Short Treks - re:View
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: RedLetterMedia
Views: 1,352,994
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: redlettermedia, red letter media, red, letter, media, plinkett, half in the bag, mike stoklasa, jay bauman, rich evans, star trek, discovery, star trek discovery, short treks
Id: 6d4iCa6h29c
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 36min 52sec (2212 seconds)
Published: Thu Jan 03 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
What stuck most with me: 3rd Incarnation Spock looks like Let It Be Paul McCartney.
From past experience there's going to be a lot of criticism of this video, but they both make some very good points. The movement to make dark and gritty reimaginings of shows and movies hasn't been very successful. Sure, it worked for The Dark Knight because Batman leads well to that kind of atmosphere, but just look at how poorly the rest of the DC universe has been received, and how favorably viewed the Shazam trailer and the massive success of the Marvel franchise. It's clear that dark and gritty isn't what the general audience wants to see. I would also argue that it's not what Star Trek fans want to see.
I didn't hate season 1, just in case anyone reading this thinks I just want the 90's shows for nostalgia sake. I thought, for a Star Trek series, it was a strong opener. Sure, it had its issues, but I was hoping by the time the second season came around and they had dealt with the Mirror Universe stuff, we might actually see a show that was about exploration and scientific discovery. Then I read that Kurtzman had creative control over the series and basically gave up hope.
This is the guy who ruined the last two seasons of Fringe, destroyed a Spider-Man reboot, ran Sleepy Hollow into the ground, and gave us the failure that was Into Darkness. Beyond was a better movie because they finally got rid of his ass and went with a writer who knew and loved Star Trek (I'm not saying it was a perfect movie, but it was certainly light years ahead of Into Darkness). Looking at the trailers, I see his awful influences already.
And yes, I've seen people on this sub voice their hopes that this is a Beyond-like situation with the trailer -- that it's not representative of the show as a whole and is designed to make audiences think it's an action-packed sci-fi show with excellent visuals. Putting aside how manipulative and duplicitous that would be, I think the long line of failures from Kurtzman is evidence enough that trailer is probably representative of how the second season is going to go.
All I can hope is one of their spin-offs from this is going to be devoid of Bad Robot's influences.
"THE SHOW'S CALLED DISCOVERY, GO EXPLORE THAT INTERESTING PLANET, YOU FUCKS!"
"Now, I just want to die."
- Mike Stoklasa after watching Star Trek Discovery
I really like what Rich Evans said at the end of the video, and I think it bears repeating.
Thatโs fundamental for me. The argument on this sub is โitโs the best first season of Trek yet, theyโve all been bad.โ
I disagree. And unless season 2 radically changes what the show is like, Iโm out.
All I wanna know is, why does Kurtzman keep getting work.
fingers crossed those explodey angely trailers were not 100% representative of season 2...
any news how us non-Americans can watch the Short Treks yet?
My biggest complaint about Discovery is that almost every episode felt rushed... like the episodes needed 10 extra minutes to give scenes a few seconds the bake in before jumping I to the next sequence. If it's made for a streaming service, then why limit yourself to old school TV airtime standards.
"The ratings are nosediving... BRING OUT SPOCK!" -Mike Stoklasa, 9/28/17