Ghostbusters (1984) - re:View
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: RedLetterMedia
Views: 1,759,347
Rating: 4.8857832 out of 5
Keywords: Red Letter media, ghostbusters, 1984, re:view, Rich Evans, redlettermedia, red, letter, media, half in the bag, plinkett, best of the worst, mike stoklasa, rich evans, ivan reitman, bill murray, dan aykroyd
Id: 8PS7CgXHxps
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 33min 18sec (1998 seconds)
Published: Tue Jul 12 2016
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I feel like the answer to the question near the end is somewhere in between. "Well, that's what I heard!" is clearly ADR. The sound quality is markedly different from everything else going on at that time in the scene. However, you can see that Murray is clearly trying to jump up to toss in some comment. My guess is that his comment got buried under the sound of the ensuing argument and they just had him record the same line again later to make it clearer.
So after they said Gremlins was also from 84 i wanted to see what else came out that year and holy shit, what a year! Not only Ghostbusters and Gremlins but also;
Berverly Hills Cop
Terminator
A Nightmare on Elm Street
The Karate Kid
Amadeus
Police Academy
Children of the Corn
Why does it feel that nobody ever analyzes the social commentary of ghostbusters. At its core, the story of ghostbusters is that 3 university professors who in spite of their intelligence, underestimate how easy it would be to take on a blue collar job and start their own business. They take the chance and start their own company which is a commonplace profession (pestcontrol/exterminators) and enhance it using the skills they learned over the years.
Ghostbusters is about glorifying blue collar workers. Showing that even the mundane of jobs can be satisfing, entertaining, and can bring glory.
Ghostbusters is Mike Rowe's wet dream.
Does Men in Black follow the formula?
visit us at /r/redlettermedia for more of this and nasty pizza rolls
I enjoyed this re:view because it's nice to hear a good take on Ghostbusters from a non fanboy perspective. Much like Mike and Rich I always found the first film a pretty surprising accidental hit that could have fucked up in any other direction. In a perfect world it would be it's own standalone thing but damn if all the ghostbusters stuff isn't super marketable. I think in one RLM video Mike said he no longer finds Darth Vader scary because pop culture has ruined him. I feel the same about Ghostbusters' charm. There's no life there for me outside of the original and the sequel and cartoons and toys just feel like products with no real soul to them. So to me a cynical reboot is just the latest dumb thing. I'm not going to the reboot to recapture that magic, it's been dead since Ghostbusters II. I'm going to hopefully have a good comedy that will be strung along by a multi-million dollar branding empire, like The Lego Movie. If it succeeds in that I'll be happy and I'm glad Mike seems to be going into this film without an agenda.
>Judd Apatow Busters
If a modern director HAD to direct a GB reboot i'd pick Adam McKay
I want that Juicy Shaq Meat.
Who were the three pricks they were making fun of in the beginning?