Juno: BUSTED!
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Thunderf00t
Views: 688,001
Rating: 4.9112606 out of 5
Keywords: juno, cooling, drinks, wine, indiegogo, busted, thunderf00t, pelitier, tec, thermoelectric, cooler, drinks cooler
Id: p9i1mhNsYXQ
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 25min 38sec (1538 seconds)
Published: Sun Jan 12 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Why does every scam on this planet use a bloody peltier device
*it uses still/standing cool water to chill a can. There are devices out there that use ice water propulsion, which don't risk bacteria forming where you stick your
wine bottlescans in to."why put ur drink in a fridge and waste energy?" wait, what? if u already own a fridge, why not use it? it's only waste energy if u dont use ur fridge to cool things down...
Egh. I can't agree with the bulk of the video.
Yes, the Juno campaign is full of horrible marketing bullshit. Calling it a "reverse microwave" with an "active matrix technology" is a stretch, and saying that it is more energy efficient than just keeping the wine bottle in the fridge all the time is outright wrong. However, I see no reason to "bust" this product overall.
The product was demonstrated on CES. I see no reason to doubt the claims of all the journalists who were presented a lukewarm can of beverage, placed it in the device, seen it work, pulled out a cold can, tasted it themselves and measured how much time it took to cool it.
And the math on this device checks out as well. 0.7L of wine, from 23Β°C lukewarm room temperature to 10Β°C, that's 0.7 * 4200 * (23-10) = 38,220J. These thermo-electric elements are known to be very inefficient, and for the most part they are, but they don't perform terribly bad then the temperature difference between the cold and hot side isn't too big (see the second chart here). With a big enough heatsink, and powerful enough fan, its resonable to expect the temperature delta across the TEC to be around 30Β°C (10 on the cooling side, 40 on the heating side), so we are following the yellow line on the graph. Now, combine this with a slightly oversized cell, running at just 0.7 its maximum current (or 0.49 maximum power), will allow for a coefficient of performance above 0.5. So a 500W cell running at 250W will deliver at least 125W of cooling during extended load and significantly more (up to 250W of cooling) before the wine cools down and the heatsink heats up.
So with 125W of cooling, that 38,220J will take 38220/125 = 305 seconds = 5 minutes and 5 seconds. Exactly as much as the manufacturer claims, and exactly as much as the independent journalists confirm to have seen demonstrated. There will be some extra losses, the glass in the bottle will be an annoying isolator, but on the other hand the cooling will start off at 250W of effective power (instead of 125W), so that should make up for those losses.
And how does Thunderf00t bust this? By saying that his shitty setup from years ago wasn't able to do this? The setup that doesn't have good thermal coupling between the TEC and the liquid, and that runs on only 50W. And that is supposed to be proof that device with unspecified power (could be 200W, could be 500W!), and a good thermal transfer solution will not work?
Is this a great product? No. An ice bucket will work just as fine. But this will for sure be faster than just putting the wine bottle in the fridge, as the heat transfer between the air in the fridge and the bottle isn't that great as with the water of an ice bath or the water in the Juno device. Did Thunderf00t never put a bottle of wine in a fridge, if he claims that it will work just as fast? I'm sure everyone who as ever done that knows that this takes longer than 5 minutes, even in the freezer.
And yes their claims of being energy efficient are utterly wrong, but other than that, the product does, provably work as advertised.
And why is this video padded so hard? How does the thermal camera demo relate to the Juno? Why does he ignore the reports of journalists, and instead spends time finding and reading out loud the stupidest comments on this articles that he can find. There will always be a stupid comment somewhere on the internet, what does that prove?! I think I don't like this guy at all.
see thunder foot video * *25 minutes nope, thunder foot need to learn to edit the fuck out of his videos, it's 10m content and 15m of repetition
Juno campaign on Indiegogo
Thunferf00t talking about something that isn't Anita Sarkessien???!???
Sorry to be that guy who doesnt watch the entire video, but what is his gripe? Does it flat out not work, or is he upset because it's not actually a "reverse microwave?" I assume it's just another peltier cooler, but I always assumed that.
A lot of wine shops now have these wine chillers at the front of the store where you submerge a beverage in moving cold water, and it rapidly cools it down for you. Isn't that what this is?
I would watch this, but I don't want my Youtube feed to be crushed with videos of people complaining about "feminazis"...