I Paid 5 Designers On Fiverr To Design The SAME Logo... đ§
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Will Paterson
Views: 2,480,066
Rating: 4.854176 out of 5
Keywords: design, vlog, graphic, art, photoshop, illustrator, adobe, fiverr tutorial, fiverr challenge, fiverr logo design, fiverr logo, will paterson logo, is fiverr legit, how to design a logo, fiverr tips and tricks, fiverr tips, lets make art, make money online, minimal logo, gfx, fiverr graphic design, will patterson, will paterson logo design, fiverr gig marketing, design a logo, fiverr gigs, fiverr video
Id: U__YrDLoHRw
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 13min 53sec (833 seconds)
Published: Tue May 12 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I thought of felt that he was painting fiverr in too positive a light. A lot of those designs were--in my opinion--actually quite bad, and I think he was too soft on them because Fiverr was paying him to make this. I'll write my thoughts in more detail shortly, but I'm interested to hear what everyone else thought.
I thought he was being too positive about it and was ignoring massive problems because he had been paid by them to do this. But I donât really do logo design (I mainly do web) so I was interested to hear what others had to say about this.
For starters, his design brief wasnât very detailed and there didnât seem to be any follow up questions from the designersânothing about target audience and demographic.
Now onto the actual designs.
Designer 1:
1) It looked nice, but didnât really give off the right vibes imoâbut the design brief should have been clearer on that. To me, it looks like a generic logo for a travel companyâif you google âtravel holiday companyâ youâll see loads of very similar logos. Also not a fan of the typeface.
2) The birds were far too detailed and I donât see any connection to meditationâitâs just an abstract mark (which can sometimes work, but I donât think that this even gave off the right vibe). I also think that more thought should have been put into the typefaceâI donât think it worked well with the icon. As will mentioned, the kerning in the revised version was also poor.
3) This one was better. There were a few kinks in there which needed to be cleaned up but thatâs no biggy. I think it could work nicer if the type had similar line weight to the drawing, but Iâm not really mad at anything in this one, and with a few minor tweaks I think it could look pretty good.
Designer 2:
All of these variants used the lotus flower, which is very clichĂŠ. Even the images inside the lotus flowers look very genericâthey look like they could have been taken from any stock vector site.
I feel like it was quite low-effort in the sense that the ideas were very similarâsome of them looked more like iterations of the same design than completely separate logos.
The last one looked best in my opinion, but Iâm not convinced that it is distinct enough for a logoâif you search âmeditation appâ in the google play store, there are loads of other apps which look very similar.
Designer 3:
This guy was amazing. Presentation was on point. He even did customisations to type. He showed the reasoning behind itâthe three stones, the meditation pose he started with. Unlike all the other designers, he also specified the typeface which shows heâs thinking about more than just the logo. He showed different applications and showed it at different sizes too.
I was super impressedâI canât think of anything to criticize. It was very good.
Designer 4:
It was decent. Possibly a bit too detailed, as Will mentioned, and not a fan of the light colours on light background that it was presented on, but overall it wasnât generic and thought had been put into the application. (I can see that they made notes on animation etc. in that documnt).
Designer 5:
The mark looks very nice and the gradients add nice depth. But itâs far too detailed for a logo. Those stars would scale down horribly. Iâm also not a fan of the typefaceâit feels dated, though this was fixed after Will asked him to change it. As Will said, it also looks like a sleeping app, but that could potentially be blamed on a poor brief or them not asking enough follow up questions. Iâm also not convinced that the silhouette would be recognised as a head once scaled down, as the gradients almost disappear at small sizes and so it looses all of itâs definition.
We didnât get a good look at the other designs so I canât comment on those.
Some of them were decent at their price point. But I donât think that Will should be encouraging people to go to fiverr. Firstly, being good at the price point doesnât mean muchâthey still didnât compare to what youâd get if you paid more.
But also, unless those were all students, itâs encouraging them to work for peanuts. Fiverr devalues the work that designers do and I feel like his overwhelmingly positive reaction to it is encouraging it.
This is all my opinion, so I'd be interested to hear whether you guys agree/disagree and why! Do you agree that he painted fiverr in too positive a light? Or do you think that he was fair and balanced?