Cuphead: The Fake Outrage
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Shaun
Views: 625,412
Rating: 4.7750826 out of 5
Keywords: cuphead, shaun jen
Id: _-P9_oUV9Gw
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 30min 48sec (1848 seconds)
Published: Fri Nov 24 2017
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Honestly, you see this getting called out on reddit sometimes. the odd comment: "You know I feel like it's just like four or five people being retarded online and there are way more people getting outraged over it and making a big deal out of nothing" sometimes pops up and gives me that bad taste in my mouth. Whenever I see massive outrage threads there's always that little voice in the back of my mind, telling me to go and look at the source myself. I always feel guilty when I catch myself not looking at the actual article, and I see way too many people falling for the same thing.
The games "news" community runs on outrage....just like the normal "news". Anger spreads more online.....so it is an easily and often used tool for people to get higher profile.
Everyone eats it up, love listening to others angry and yelling into a camera.
I'm glad that he says these racist caricatures and their relation to Cuphead's sources are "worthy of a conversation" while stating clearly that saying so isn't an attack on Cuphead. I just wish there were a forum where these conversations could take place. Most discussions on video game forums get shut down by people who aren't even interested in discussing the topic.
I think this is a really important video. The gaming community tends to start a wild fire over the smallest spark. I understand why people are uneasy with an idea like EAs micro transactions catching on. But if everyone doesn't like it then it WON'T catch on. The only reason it has, is because people keep buying it. Finally we're seeing people realizing they don't have to buy Battlefront just because it exists. Why did we need to set the gaming world on fire to get people to realize this?
Edit: My point being: why is information in the gaming community only exchanged in outrage?
I didn't even notice this fake outrage over the game, and I spend too much of my time online. I usually see more of this shit than I'd like...
All I saw was people feeling mislead by the cute look of the game, but cute-looking games being fiendishy difficult has been a thing in gaming for about as long as people have managed to communicate a cute look via the available graphics tech.
It makes this video kind of feel like it's a cog in the very same machine it is criticizing. I suppose it might be a damned if you do, damned if you don't type of scenario.
Frankly this video points to a problem with so much of the gaming community. People absolutely love drama, and people always want an 'other' to scapegoat.
Of course the "SJWS ARE RUINING GAMES" crowd is the worst at this, but pretty much all areas of the gaming community are at fault here. We love a good outrage, especially if it can be put on some 'other' (SJWs, game journalists, Nintendo Fans, Redditors, and many more), and that won't stop until we stop giving deliberate attempts at controversy views. That goes for the Sargon of Akkads, Ian Miles Cheongs, but also your Jim Sterlings who created multiple videos decrying 'Nintendo fans' because of an apparent DDOS on his site that he provided no proof of. Even the cases of people going to a Subreddit, posting terrible 'criticisms' of a game, then going "x fans don't want you having an opinion!!!" when they inevitably get downvoted serve to extend this problem.
Gaming discourse is, generally, quite terrible and, to be honest, I have no idea how we could possibly fix it.
"I feel like a lot of gamers are so threatened by journalism that simply asks questions or sparks debate because they'd rather be totally passive and uncritical consumers of a predictable and unchanging product."
Ding ding ding. This is it pretty much, could've just said this and stopped.
Fanboys cannot be argued with, you cannot have a discussion with them, unless it's complete praise.
Have you ever watched, lets say, CoD and Battlefield fanboys "debate" which game is better?" "No!" the BF fanboy will say "Our game is far superior, it's a game for mature gamers, not like that kiddy CoD trash!" "LOL ! " the CoD fanboy would reply, "You're just an elitist neckbeard virgin in your mom's basement!"
Do you see what's going on here? These people invest a lot of their self worth into their favorite games.
For you CoD or BF (or any other game) might just be a game you play for fun and laughs for a bit and then move on with your life - for them, it's part of their persona, and when you try to discuss anything that could EVEN BE PERCEIVED as negative about "their" game, in their mind, you're not just criticizing the game, you're criticizing them as a person.
Immaturity. Immaturity and stupidity, and apparently the natural conclusion of consumerist culture - where people identify themselves with these products to such an extent that they get extremely defensive at anything other than constant praise.
Companies love this by the way, they love the legions of unpaid PR agents that defend their games and their actions to the hilt and they absolutely encourage it.
Why wouldn't they? I would. If I owned a popular franchise and there was a """rival""" franchise, I'd have my marketing trump up that """rivalry""" as much as possible, get all the man-children to ""debate"" each other. Then I can do whatever I want. Day 1 DLC? Yep. Microtransactions in full priced games? Of course. Lootboxes? Absolutely.
Those that would reasonably criticize my actions would be branded by my fanboys as "haters" or fanboys of "the other game" and would swiftly be silenced. Meanwhile, the other game is doing the same thing, and I can join their CEO for a golf game and laugh about our "rivalry" and all the morons buying into it. It's great, really.
[removed]
I think it a very solid video that illustrates how every community has a group of people looking to be outraged and offended.
Although I feel when it came to Dean's video there was a loss of nuance. Lot of the outrage centered around the video had less to do with the video itself but instead how venturebeat decided to react to the criticism.
It sort of feels like it was intentionally left out because it didn't fit in with what the video was trying to say.