Normal & Crosswind Approach & Landing - Lesson 1
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: ERAU SpecialVFR
Views: 767,641
Rating: 4.9344997 out of 5
Keywords:
Id: DxbcyBjFiSg
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 36sec (936 seconds)
Published: Thu Aug 24 2017
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I'm a firm believer in pitch for airspeed and power for altitude/descent rate. It simplifies the approach tremendously when you can get set up & configured (flaps/gear/trim) and just make slight power adjustments to control your approach path. Your airspeed won't vary, just your descent rate.
Power for energy in, pitch to choose what to do with it.
https://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182148-1.html
Student Pilot here - I have seen instructional videos like the one above that seem to advocate pitch for altitude and throttle for speed, but I have seen others that teach to use pitch for speed and throttle for altitude during landing. For example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlLwxj8fxlY
Which is the best method to focus on as a student?
thanks
Pitch for airspeed and power for altitude. On approach you're already really slow, usually around 1.3 Vso. That's not really a great time to be pitching up and trading what little airspeed you have for altitude.
Instead, hold a constant airspeed by holding a constant pitch, and if you're below the glideslope, you increase your power which slows your descent. You probably won't climb, but your descent rate will decrease and the glideslope will meet you. If you're too high, don't dive for the glideslope! That extra airspeed won't do you any good once you float past your aimpoint. Instead, continue holding a constant airspeed with pitch, and decrease your power. Your descent rate will increase and you'll meet the glideslope.
EDIT: In reality you're doing a mix of both, both power and pitch are relatively interchangable, and a mix of both will lead to smoother approaches. However while you're still learning, just pitch for airspeed and use power to maintain glideslope.
It's both :/
But if you have to pick one it't pitch for airspeed, throttle for descent.
Has anybody mentioned energy? It's all energy, man.
High and fast, chop power. Low and slow, add power. High and slow, pitch down. Low and fast, pitch up.
Pitch for airspeed and power for glidepath works incredibly well in light piston aircraft. As such i'm not vocally against teaching it in that context. It's just also important to know that it stops working the moment you fly things with more inertia, like a heavy turboprop or jet. When you also factor in the spool time in those type of aircraft, then it no longer becomes valid, at which point it becomes more a "pitch for glidepath, power for energy". That said as many have pointed out the relationship between the two still exists and is still useful. I know I pitched up slightly in the jet, so I expect my airspeed to eventually decay, therefore I add a touch of power to avoid that from happening. But it is a proactive measure, if you wait to actually see the change before you do something about it (which you can do in a piston single), it's going to be too late and you'll be all over the place.