Men's Rights vs Feminism: Is Toxic Masculinity Real? | Middle Ground
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Jubilee
Views: 9,699,126
Rating: 4.8083596 out of 5
Keywords: jubilee, jubilee media, jubilee project, live deeper, blind devotion, love language, middle ground, spectrum, men's rights vs feminists, feminism vs men's rights, what is the men's rights movement, mgtow, toxic masculinity, gender roles, gender equality, gender pay gap, gender bias, family court system, is sexism real?, what do feminists believe?, men's rights activists, traditional gender roles, feminist movement
Id: hOUGNGWmN0k
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 24min 2sec (1442 seconds)
Published: Sun Dec 01 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Should've had better representation. Those three men were deliberately brought in as stereotypes of the mens rights movement perpetuated by feminism.
This channels videos are so biased
I literally remember one of the guys asked her a question and she randomly started crying about her sexual assault and he just sat there, so lost at to what was happening
It's funny when I see an MRA giving excellent points then the feminist just goes for that little example and be like "so we're like children? We don't need your protection." xD made me laugh
Pretty one sided video, a big part of it was failure on the men’s part to challenge the women with counter questions that point out the vast inequalities under the law and on social media.
One thing I noticed a lot, the feminists were a lot more defensive and weren’t as open to hearing the opinions of the men’s rights activists. The men used facts, statistics, and personal experiences, while the women used common clichés and opinions based off of that of the ideal of feminism, instead of developing their own ideas and beliefs. One of the women came across as passive aggressive, attempting to subtly insult the men. The common theme among the women, is they say one thing and do another. They say they want to be more understanding about the other side, yet they act closed off, like their ideology is set and nothing will change that or break through that barrier. I will acknowledge, the women had some very good points, and them men, some not-so-good points. But it seems to me like the women wanted to silence the men and cut them off as they were trying to say their peace. As this is all happening, you don’t see the men interrupt them once, they don’t step up and say ‘hey, I’m talking, may I say what I need to say?’. They’re silent, they let the women talk, and once they’re done, they attempt to voice their beliefs, but instead of returning that kindness, the women build up their barrier, become defensive, interrupt and insult the men as they’re talking. Double standards have a huge presence throughout this video, and it’s noticeable.
It’s ironic I’ve heard feminists accuse mras of gaslighting when feminists are the ones who say misandry doesn’t exist, I’ve never once heard a mra say misogyny doesn’t exist.
I like the part where one of the women says she didn't bring a list while the other guy is stating facts
Honestly I think the only way this maybe could have been a fair “debate” was if the mra had a woman on their side. I find in discussions like this women only consider another women’s perspective... and that’s even a stretch.