Do I regret using the 7950X3D CPU in my rig? Let's talk about it!
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: JayzTwoCents
Views: 397,953
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: jayztwocents personal rig, jayztwocents pc, 7950x3d, custom gaming pc, custom gaming computer, gaming computer, gaming pc, personal computer, watercooled pc, watercooled computer, water cooled computer, watercooled 4090, 4090, rtx, rtx 4090, dead pc, gaming pc died, my pc died
Id: 2ch1xgUTO0U
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 21min 36sec (1296 seconds)
Published: Mon Mar 20 2023
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I'm guessing no if he's posed it as a question in the title
The biggest problem is the COMPLETELY blind insistence on using ASUS boards for everything, this applies to the copious number of people on this subreddit and all over the place.
ANYONE doing even basic level research would recognize that asus wasn't doing that great of a job, but because so many damn people just kept pushing it based on no facts or justification other than "they sell a lot and people buy it".... it kept snowballing.
While i don't expect EVERY person to be able to buy "all the boards" from all the brands, to then test them over extensively (longer than any review would bother with), validating and factoring in all the aspects of a product, anyone that spent any significant time doing extensive QC/QA would recognize that Asus even at the launch of AM4 was one of the worst choices, rather is the worst choice and they NEVER got better, every generation and even testing revisions of existing boards just showed the Asus was just firing this shit out and banking on the name alone. It's baffling how easily consumers willfully get screwed by doing it, it's mostly due to consumers being lazy and brand loyal.
In the case of jayz, he suspected/blamed the CPU, leaned heavily that way over the motherboard. Hell even linus often constantly focuses on using asus in a ton of their builds. In my thorough lab testing and then got repeatable results from others in which we share results with to validate for deployment situations (contracts or consulting for large businesses looking at purchasing systems in mass potentially), AsRock, the constantly overlooked brand, never once moved from the top spot for the entire AM4 platform lifespan thus far. Pretty much 0 reviews or anyone online with any level of influence EVER seems to use it or discuss it. Again bizarre.
A lot of the problems i find people such as Jayz or numerous others that end up having an issue are often a problem related to the boards they choose and not an inherent problem with the platform on a whole but completely glaze over the boards and bios as the factor and generally tends to broadly paint the issues as something that affects everything. Case in point the 1800x experience and how so many people broadly still believe that the ryzen 1000 launch and even many of the 2000 series had weak and problematic memory issues. I among many have been able to prove that the IMC of those chips WITHIN a month of launch were more than capable of working on boards that simply didn't exhibit the issue, I've even low tier 1000 series ryzens running 3433/3600mhz out of the box problem free even on 300 series boards still. I've also moved enough cpus from asus and gigabyte and specially a few MSI boards to asrock resulting in completely different experience.
I'm not an AsRock brand loyalist or fanatic, It's just a matter of fact that to my own shock, they provided the best solution of them all. Never ever have i recommend asrock previously because i couldn't...
Gross idc wtf Jay uses as I refuse to watch his garbage content.