Ben Shapiro Talks About His 'Criminal Case' Against Barack Obama

the people versus Barack Obama that's the name of an explosive new book by commentator and best-selling author Ben Shapiro as the Obama administration acted like a criminal cabal as Shapiro alleges and if so is criminal prosecution of a sitting president the answer in lieu of impeachment Ben Shapiro is here to make the case on this edition of politicking ticking I'm Larry King he's editor in chief of Breitbart news and a New York Times bestselling author his latest book the People vs Barack Obama the criminal case against the Obama administration is out right now and Ben Shapiro's my guest joining us here in studio thanks Ben for coming thanks for having me all right yeah he's two years into his second term you're not going to impeach him are you bringing criminal to proposing criminal charges against the administration or specific who well I mean they're they're certain specific players within the administration Lois Lerner at the IRS the Attorney General for one who it would be subject to criminal charges the problem is of course that the Department of Justice is the only body that is that is capable of bringing criminal charges this point under federal law but actually make the case for in in the People vs Barack Obama's I make the case that the RICO Act the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 which allows for civil charges to be brought people can file civil suits that that be broadened to allow people to sue members of the executive branch so the people themselves essentially would become the guardians of the criminal law because sorry but I just don't trust any executive branch to to prosecute its own guys are you bringing this right to the president self if we could sure I mean the question of sovereign immunity would he do hands on that's criminal well see this is the problem this is why you have to use the RICO Act so no president is ever going to have to do things unless you're Richard Nixon presumably no print in their tapes is going to have to do things that are that are particularly hands on the government has run much more like a mafia s Corgan ization in which you have somebody at the top who makes you know a basic demand that certain things be done and then somebody the low-level says okay well you know I want to up my career why don't I do this right this is Henry the second with Thomas Becket right well no one riddle me rid of this meddlesome priest and then somebody goes in rhythm of meddlesome priests it it is odd that all of the scandals all of the criminal activity in the Obama administration has already mid to the benefit of President Obama could we make this case against any presidents iran-contra against Reagan weapons of mass destruction against Bush every administration has had people under them who have lied or done things we can indict Washington well I'm not sure we can indict Washington but I think that certainly I'm sure something it's done Washington is relatively clean but it but if you look at you know George W Bush or if you looked at Bill Clinton or if you looked at Ronald Reagan sure I mean the answer would be that you could and people should be wary I mean this is this is sort of the case that I'm making is that we've become so comfortable with the executive branch of the government abusing its citizens and violating our rights and violating what they're structured to do under the law that we've just become used to it and if we start treating them as criminals maybe they'll think twice before they act so criminally in the future or what makes it we had tapes and there was a possibility of in diving him you remember that all right we did impeach but he would have had to be in this is the problem under American law man and right because the way that it works is that under American law Barack Obama could literally strangle somebody on camera today and he would have to be in be impeached and then he would have to be tried in the Senate and convicted and only then could you actually bring a criminal indictment against the president because you can't bring a criminal indictment against sitting president so your point of the book is to make a statement rather than to bring a case right you don't expect cases to be filed I would be shocked if there were cases to be filed there'd have to be actual alterations to law which I suggest that would make such things possible let's break some down what's the crime in Benghazi the crime in Benghazi that there are two crimes in Benghazi the first is probably the violation of the arms Export Control Act the shipping of guns into Libya in the first place right that is actually illegal under the arms Export Control Act any time the President of the United States or anybody in the executive branch if I were to ship weapons into Libya to a terrorist group I'd be prosecuted the President of the United States has the ability to waive the arms Export Control Act in order to ship weapons or money to terrorist groups he didn't do that in the arms Export Control Act he didn't do that in Libya and he shipped the weapons in anyway and with regard to Benghazi the the solid information is that the annex in Benghazi the CIA annex in Benghazi was actually a weapons ground who's being used as a as a shipping point for weapons into Turkey and then into Syria that's number one in terms of Hillary Clinton's culpability in Benghazi and voluntary manslaughter be a pretty easy charge to bring involuntary manslaughter requires three basic elements the first element is that someone's killed the second is that something reckless resulted in the death and the third is that somebody should have known that it was reckless that could have been that could have resulted in death in this case you have Chris Stevens and you have the entire staff in Benghazi repeatedly letting the State Department know over and over and over we need security anybody who the newspapers knew they needed security in Benghazi it was not provided that's the real crime and then of course there are there issues of obstruction of justice afterward in which witnesses in Benghazi were talked to by the State Department and basically were leveraged not to speak openly I if this is not just political we could make a case on 9/11 against Condoleezza Rice who got a warning from the FBI and shelved it well the morning from Condoleezza Rice on before 9/11 was certainly less specific than please provide security in Benghazi at this particular embassy right well the question is going to be um third element if you were to track Condoleezza Rice for example the third element would be was something reckless done that they should have known about right that I'm not sure that the same case exists with 9/11 there's certainly plenty that we could talk about 9/11 but I don't think the same case exists for involuntary manslaughter in Benghazi as with 9/11 with the largest shipper of arms this administration ever Israel mm-hmm any of that a crime that is not a crime because there's no terrorist groups in Israel that are being supplied with the weapons we are currently however providing four hundred million dollars in funding to unity government that includes Hamas right which is a State Department terrorist group I mean just this week the President of the United States did nothing is Hamas kidnapped three people including an American citizen and the State Department continues to say that we will continue funding that that unity government which is in and of itself of crime that's crime if I were to ship our ship weapons Tomas that's 15 years in prison the IRS scandal what was the crime the crime the IRS scandal was violation of IRS law anybody who leverages IRS officials in order to politically target anybody that that's a crime under IRS law that comes with penalties obviously that happened with regard to the IRS itself which was according to its own statements violating the law and in targeting particular political groups and like any other scandal this one became phony according to the president shortly after he said this is the most important thing ever and he was going to get to the bottom of it within weeks it had become phony it was no big deal and now it's old news of course will be back with the always outspoken ben shapiro don't go away are you a right-winger making a statement against the left-wing administration or are you a lawyer making a criminal charge that you would be making here against George Bush or Ronald Reagan or any of the other previous presidents except Washington about I mean I think that there's no question I'm a conservative and I'm open about that I mean anybody who's watched my career would be hard-pressed to call me anything but but by the same token the case that I'm making is really one against executive overreach because we have a choice as a country here and the choice of the country is pretty simple the executive branch has grown so much there are 2 million people who work for the executive branch all the branches of government are now armed I mean literally every branch of the of the executive branch every regulatory agency has its own SWAT team because of that we have to make a choice is someone ever going to be held accountable in the executive branch or are they not and so we have really we have to decide do we want an executive branch this large number one and number two if we do want an executive branch this large how exactly are we going to be helping them accountable no matter who's running the show because the truth is that half the stuff that I invite President Obama for in this in this case against Obama is is impeachable or indictable under under bush I mean what was done with regard to the NSA obviously started under george w bush and was double down under under president obama snowden would be a chief witness for you everyone right sure what about the obstruction of justice against the this administration how how is it obstructed justice well you know they've done that multiple ways I mean then that that the obstruction of justice charge basically applies to not only jury tampering but witness tampering trying to stop federal officials or state officials from engaging in in the execution of the law one of the easiest ways to cite that would be for example the president's immigration policy you know simply saying we're not going to prosecute anybody between the ages of 16 and 30 who's in the country illegally that's not a prosecutorial discretion issue that's a blanket statement it's a blanket political statement that the president is not empowered to make under the Constitution if in fact I were to say if I were to go to the I NS or are now ice and I were to stop them from deporting anybody I'd be carted off to prison if the President of the United States gives that order then he's championed as a champion of the people so this is a fact a blanket statement again the structure of government well against the current we're not a democracy right or not at this point I mean what we have is an executive tyranny essentially the president can do whatever he wants I mean what he's present anywhere I said if any and this is something I think that the left and right should unite on honest to god because when it was bush then I think the media did a much better job of covering bush than they have covering Obama mainly because they're motivated against bush just in the same way that I've probably done a better job of covering President Obama that in covering President Bush hopefully we can all I think at this point learned that all presidents should be covered with a certain fair level of skepticism but the executive branch itself no matter who runs it you grip this much power to any one body of government and you've got a problem and I think we should avoid being Arthur Schlessinger who when it was in Richard Nixon was writing the imperial presidency and then when it was jimmy carter was talking about how the the executive didn't have enough authority i think we should recognize at this point the executive has plenty of authority and no matter who is in charge we are all going to feel the brunt of that and there's no answer ability why on the right is there so much hostility on seriously action toward this president because he's the most extreme president we've ever had most extreme liberals think he's too conservative paul krugman did an article today in the new york times saying easy easy great well he's entitled his yeah they certainly a spec ruling could say ben shapiro no I'm sure he does but but he made a case of the help factors kicking in more insurance companies on board more you said people wouldn't sign up they're signing up but I'm getting at the core of it why such a still is it racist absolutely not absolutely not why in the world who do why in the world would it be racist well what exactly is racist about calling out his policies there's nothing what it's done was such an for example there's a part of the right some in the Tea Party that make him think that he's sitting there deliberately acting against the United States like haha I'm opposed to my own country that's idiotic well I think that he has interests that are opposed to certain aspects of America sure just said just like anybody nation are you say any president no I know I think that he's different in this way I think that his ideology motivates him to to scale back on America's role in the world by the way I say I think the same thing about Hillary Clinton I think there are plenty of people on the Left who feel that America has had much too muscular role in the world and would like to see America cut down to size and whittled down to size and they would like to see it as one member of the family of Nations as opposed to the leading member on the world stage so in that way President Obama is significantly more extremely than Bill Clinton when Obama made this statement we have the biggest hammer and every problem isn't a nail I have a you agree with that I don't think I don't think there's I don't think there's any Allen there's anybody on earth who would suggest that every problem is a nail this is what President Obama is so great at he's a terrific politician what he's really and truly great at is creating false dichotomies and then saying well my way is the middle way there's no there's there's nobody in the world who thinks that we should use the military to solve every problem on earth just like I don't think there's anybody in the world who believes that we should never use the military President Obama likes to create these kind of straw men and then he has a field day burning them but it seems there's some good example John McCain wish I liked a lot one day he says never never send a troop again to Iraq then the trouble happens in Iraq why don't we send troops in other words your complaints don't have solutions well no matter what he does he can't do anything right I don't remember anybody on the right suggesting the presidents of the United States had done the right thing by precipitously withdrawing troops from Iraq I really don't remember anybody on the right saying that maybe there were I don't remember that in 2011 as we were pulling troops out of Iraq virtually everybody on the right was unanimously saying that we are now pulling out of a winning situation and that is going to leave a lien only saying there were weapons of mass destruction man and they were all wrong well that was also had members left I mean though it's those Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton basing their information giving to them by the right and be given that's not true give based on information giving them by Bill Clinton Bill Clinton's giving the exact same information when he was bombing Iraq in the late nineties exact same information when Obama does things like so more arms to Israel than any other presidents combined why did you applaud him because he's not the one who's making that you know he's not the Congress passed the bill and he's executive he sees sold more than anybody he he just just he's also see he's also given more aid to the Palestinian authorities also given more aid to various countries around the region he's confronted is openly developing nuclear weapons and that deal is going to result in them going nuclear he's basically now talking about handing over Iraq to Iran he has turned syria into a hot mess some Republican senators said yesterday we should talk to Iran well those Republican senators are wrong too he's the president he makes foreign policy is there anything you like about him President Obama I think it's a beautiful speaker I think is a beautiful speaker the book is the People vs Barack Obama and I knew Ben when he was 12 years old he was a great violinist and when we come back we'll take out we'll get the latest rumor right and how involved the United States should be and what's happening there let's talk about the growing humanitarian crisis on America's southern border stay tuned welcome back to politicking the best-selling author and editor larger breitbart.com is Ben Shapiro he remains with us and by the way he's also the author of the new book the People vs Barack Obama which is out right now joining us now is Richard Fowler political commentator host of the online news program the Richard Fowler show Richard you've heard what Ben has had to say on the on the legal questions here your response to his critique of the whole Obama administration thanks Larry I appreciate being here and I'm good to see you you know Blair I got to tell you I think this this criticism of the president is a little far-reaching for me because I think if you're going to criticize President Obama the question I have is where were they when george w bush was having ridiculous government overreach and that's fair i think that's totally fair i think they did but now is the time when why don't we all get together and figure out okay how do we prevent this in the future because we can all do this routine you know why why are people who didn't back george w bush back then when president when bush was going into afghanistan backing president obama's plans for a troop surge in afghanistan now turns out there's two sides to the political debate i'm what i'm calling for at this point whether we're wrong then or wrong now let's get together and figure out exactly how we fix the problem of executive overreach bush was overreaching so is obama say that in the book yeah I absolutely do well I've been listen I hear that if we're gonna come together I think that what needs to happen is that folks on the right that you know run part of the city and run half the United States Congress should we're going to come together to deal with government overreach and we haven't seen that yet Republicans have set on their hands on most issues besides having multiple and multiple which trial hearings or Kabuki theater like I like to call it you know I'd rather see them say let's find a way to solve immigration so the president doesn't have to actor let's find a way to reform our tax code so the president doesn't have to act or let's find a way to fix to get more money funding to our embassy so the present doesn't have to act oh well it seems to be happening hear me Oh Larry is a dural ection of duty when it comes to the right Almond so now they're playing the blame game when they really haven't put forward any solutions well Richard when it comes to the solutions I think the bigger problem here is not the question of particular issues honestly I think the question is the one that you've stated which is you're using the into action as a threat why don't why does in Congress do XO the president doesn't have to do it why doesn't Congress do why so the president doesn't have to do it the problem is the president has not given the power to do these things when the president goes ahead and does it wait a minute now yeah I think the President does have the power to stop deportations and I think like what we saw just a couple of days right on pilot Reza Michael has the power to the president also has the power to make sure that federal contractors don't fire LGBTQ folks these are all parts of the present executive power being the he's the administer of the executive branch I'm not sure what what it what is administrative about ignoring basic facts of American law such as that it is a crime to cross the border illegally and believe me I'm somebody who actually is for immigration reform but this is not a question of whether immigration reform is a good idea or a bad one it's do you really want to give the president this this ability because Richard if you really want to give the president this much power then you can't be surprised if the president turns around you healed we elect somebody on the other side he turns races okay let's deport everyone you want given this much discretion I don't wait wait no wait a second let's be very clear cuz I think you're mixing apples and oranges here and let's be very clear about the private this president's deported any more individuals than any other president in history that's not true but what that is that is not he's changed that deportations change the statistics that statistics used to be measured that if you came to the border and you were rejected that did not count as a deportation he's now been changed that notations and glides naturally and what he what he has done now the folks who are being deported are those individuals who came to the country at no fault of their own who pledged allegiance to our flag they go to our schools and they want to pursue the American dream sometimes individuals serve in our military and the president has the power to instruct his secretaries to do whatever he chooses to see fit for them to do and there we go that's a combination of federal law he can he can instructed secretaries to do whatever he sees fit to do and this is the problem on every issue of there can be some day it is not a violation of federal law let me interrupt guys I'm not wearing a blue okay well but there is a very pressing issue going on now in Iraq what are your thoughts on it Richard listen I think this is the president loses any on any situation here and I think people like our friend there from Breitbart will attack this president no matter what he does the truth of the matter is is this we shouldn't have gotten the war in Iraq to begin with and now it is time for the people of Iraq and the government of Iraq to finally stand up and deal with their own mess and I think we're going to provide support as a country that support can only come after Iraq figures out exactly what it's going to do well okay here there are really three separate questions when it comes to a rock should we've gotten in should we've gotten out and what do we do now right and the first two questions are actually sort of irrelevant to the third meaning I can actually second I hear the our coalition too got it in the first place certainly getting out looks like a mistake now that there's massive chaotic situation over there in terms of the third solution doing nothing and saying that oh well throwing up our hands well I guess what happens there happens there that's a pre 9/11 mentality that suggests that whatever happens there is a regional problem and we'll never have any blowback what should you do what we should do is we should put military advisers on the ground particularly in Kurdistan where we help out some of the folks who actually want to defend the country and look if we actually care about the status of the country the last thing we should be doing is helping the Iranians invade the southern half of the country and then helping the Sunnis invade the northern half of the country this is exactly what the Left wanted with regard to ROK way back in the middle of last decade they wanted this to turn into the invasion Vietnam was a war that was one and cut funding and pull down military is also a war that was one until we cut funding and pulled out good Richard Larry that's utterly utterly utterly completely not true right and if you listen to the folks like John McCain who always believes we should arm the rebels which is his solution to everything and putting our men and women in harm's way once again to solve a quagmire every situation that we've created let's be very clear about this it was created under george w bush this president has brought our men our men and women back home in the safety of america and now we've got to figure out a solution and to be honest with you this government the Iraqi government has got to stand up this can not always be America's nightmare the Iraqi government has to stand up and say we're going to take control what this president what the president of Iraq needs to do is reach out to the Sunnis Richard the Shias make concessions and find a way to run his government we do it here in America they do it in India they do it in Pakistan they do it all across the world people come together different factions come together and rule a country equally and this president the president rock hasn't been able to do that and we have one held accountable for his action before we put our men and women back was it our problem it was it's our problem because to a certain ones we invaded them well yeah yes because we invaded them but also beyond that because once we're there and you make promises to people who are now being mowed down in the streets by the way if you feel no more obligation about that but you feel a moral obligation about two hundred and seventy girls get kidnapped by Boko Haram in Nigeria then I question where exactly your moral feelings live because the fact is tens of thousands of people are going to get killed there possibly certainly hundreds of thousands have already been moved into exile essentially you want to send advisers I certainly want to set off I do want their advisers airstrikes on Isis air strike say we cannot work an airstrike Qaddafi's forces in Libya in a country we have nothing to do with but we won't air strike Isis don't go away the debate continues with Ben and Richard right after this what's wrong with that Richard why not ash listened I think I would like for him to define what military advisors mean one because we've already trained the Iraqi military and it's not our fault the Iraqi military is surrendering as fast as possible right that's not our issue that's not a problem now where I do agree with him is I think that's idle I have no problem I think this president is no problem with some sort of drone warfare sending some drones over there to strike Isis but with that being said we need a solution where all the parties are at the table and unfortunately that could only happen when the Iraqi government stands up here well that also happens actually and was happening when the American military was there I mean if you read the pieces in The New Yorker by the great reporter who's actually on the left he was talking in specific detail about the fact that when the US military was there they were speaking every day every day with it with Maliki and they were telling you want the u.s. military to be there is the question if the migos military there is for is there for decades we can look how long do you want arm ends and one do you want our men and women to be put in harm's way let me ask you this how many American men and women were you willing to let die for no reason now because now that now the country is gone right so you got 4,500 American men and women who died there and their blood is worth nothing because the country is gone and veterans are saying this no no no no wait a minute well first of all we should have been there in the first place an i well you can argue that but the bottom line is once a war was won white israel more american blood do you want to shed for a seat a cot for a conflict that is not not our conflict a government that is literally irresponsible you would do do you think the American public will not support troops on the ground you know I think I think at this point you're probably right the American public will not go around by a wide margin because this is a this has become a country that has now slipped into a pre 9/11 mentality which is why we are now going to surrender Afghanistan back to the Taliban and Iraq to a combined force of al-qaida / Isis in the north and Iran in the in the South by some other political things your reaction to the the defeat of mister kantor is it's very interesting I think that it has a couple of ramifications it once again shows kind of the the difference between the establishment Republican Party and the grassroots that election really had nothing to do with the Tea Party the Tea Party didn't spend any money in it and the Tea Party really didn't do much in that race that was much more about Cantor not being in his district a lot and being a little bit out of touch as far as the immigration issue I think it's right thing for Democrats because now you're going to see President Obama do what he's wanted to do all along he's going to claim he has no partners on the Republican side of the aisle on immigration reform and then he's going to move toward executive action he's going to threaten the American people if they don't elect Democrats who are allies in sort of the for November he's gonna he's gonna steal 11 if the feed will help Democrats absolutely I'll help them what do you think Richard well I don't know immigration reform was a threat but hey who's a who who's asking the questions here but Larry listen I think we're I do agree is I think the reason why you can't you lost his raise is because once again we all know the truth of the line that all politics are local and Eric Cantor just didn't play the local ground game this guy he he outspent this guy on ads also other stuff but when it came to talking to people of his district he just didn't get it done now but what I think this does say for the broader Republican Party on immigration and and on other issues on raising the minimum wage is that what you're going to find is a more divided government in Washington if Eric Cantor who is as conservative as conservative can be who sort of tipped his foot into water on immigration reform can lose his seat then all Republicans feel as though they're vulnerable they're going to go all the way to the right and we're going to have a dysfunctional government because Republicans refuse to come to the table and work with this president why can't we have the immigration reform and the reason we George Bush led the parade I mean listen I'd be fine with immigration reform I think most Americans actually agree on immigration reform on migrants on this exactly on this basic count right you can't have this at a very basic level you can't have a welfare state with open borders right because people come across the border and take advantage of the welfare state so what you have to do first is you have to secure the border and then you figure out what to do with the people here whether that means pathway to citizenship or whether that means just a legal residency and I think that pretty much everybody agrees on that the problem is that the president has been so lacks on border security that people don't trust his enforcement of border security so this has been the sticking point wait a second here now first I don't think that border security and a pathway to citizenship are mutually exclusive those two things can happen simultaneously at the same time that is the compromise that is the place of compromising Democrats and Republican Larry they can happen at the same time we can build a fence we can build a wall we can build electric fence if that's what they want but at the same time we need to provide a pathway to citizenship for those 11 lunes are in the shadows the Republican Party's problem is is they cannot pathway through citizenship out of the United States House of Representatives whether they like it or not whether we beefed up the border or not whether we put as Marine Team six on the border they would still not be able to pass a pathway to citizenship that's simply not true if you secured the border people that leave some type of votes I promise you I know the Republican Party pretty well and if you if you were to secure the border then you would be able to pass a pathway to citizenship you would attend those happen me why why are those two things mutually expire they connected because if we're dealing with immigration we're dealing with immigration is in total issue they're not separate issues of course they're separate issues because the fact is that it was not okay final about your right winding our border and have immigration control so so so you're right let's assume you're right and we'll completely will completely connect them okay but the way we'll connect them is we won't but we won't have any border security amnesty for everybody is there a problem or no that's not what we'll see you there but this is this is this story this is exactly where they go to Larry every time we have is where we go to one wheel just Wayne why they have to be kinetise not what wait a second wait a second that is not what's in the Senate bill in the Senate bill which is the democratic solution which is been endorsed by the president and all the Democrats in the United States Senate that bill strengthens our border it increases border security and at the same time provides a very very very long pathway to citizenship it takes almost ten years it is completely and totally bipartisan yet still Republicans in the house won't even bring the bill to the floor for a vote Richard I tell you I dare Larry that they don't agree with the pathway to citizenship I have a vote honestly I have one question in all of this seriously just one question why not just secure the border and then put a pathway to citizenship why can't those happen at the same time why don't you answer my question instead of asking me back why I just explained you why they can't here's why they can't happen at the same time as you secure the border the border remains somewhat open people cross the border because they feel that if they get in before the deadline if they get in before the border is secure then they are somehow included the pathway to citizenship of course I've read the bill and not only if I read the bill I've been watching what's happening on the board with tens of thousands of children go crossing the borders anticipation we can see wait cuz we have money things there's no law right now but you know that's you know we're all right talked about we talked about their logins crossing the border illegally we in the Senate bill we talked about who qualifies for a pathway to citizenship and those deadlines do not do not apply to those in whose across the border and how are you going to magically determine everything do they have a magical light in the mail right they haven't read the bill I've read the bill Richard can you explain to me when you have a vertical when you determine when you determine who has crossed the border when I was unaware that everybody who crosses the border has heeled our codes like when they came across you know what I'm gonna do I'm gonna read the bill and have you both back thanks Ben thanks professor I look forward to having you both back soon Ben's book the People vs Barack Obama the criminal case against the Obama administration is available now and you can catch Richard Fowler at Fowler show.com for my viewers out there I want to hear from you join the conversation on my Facebook page and share your thoughts on Twitter by tweeting at Kingston as over this week's politician Oh

Channel: Larry King

Views: 1,152,638

Rating: 4.8211055 out of 5

Keywords: ben shapiro, barack obama, shapiro, ben shapiro interview, ben shapiro barack obama, ben shapiro obama, ben shapiro obama clinton, ben shaprio, ben shapiro breitbart, ben shapiro vs bill maher, ben shapiro liberal, ben shapiro politics, ben shapiro live debate, obama, ben shapiro piers morgan, ben shapiro (author), ben shapiro israel, ben shapiro jason collins, ben shapiro conservative, ben shapiro protest

Id: QzmHiuE4288

Length: 29min 2sec (1742 seconds)

Published: Mon Jun 23 2014

Reddit Comments

[u/mmillington]

I agree, there is a criminal case.

...against that manlet beard.

[u/PotatoOfRage69]

someone NEEDS to YTPify this