A Computer Co-Wrote this Sketch
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: CollegeHumor
Views: 2,201,271
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Collegehumor, CH originals, comedy, sketch comedy, internet, humor, funny, sketch, weird, botnik, technology, the singularity, robots, jar jar binks, failed pitches, special effects, trippy, computers, alternate reality, trapped, mike trapp, zach dunn, grant oโbrien, siobhan thompson, raphael chestang, rekha shankar, katie marovitch, ally beardsley, hardly working
Id: BjngNWP9C5s
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 5min 35sec (335 seconds)
Published: Mon Jan 14 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
This actually made me laugh to tears. Easily my favorite CH sketch.
This is actually the best college humor sketch I've ever seen.
This is a really good sketch
This one really is good, although the story seems planned out enough that I'm guessing the bot had at least a little bit of human help (hence the "co-wrote" in the title).
The line "Empty me, damn you! I'm trash!" seems super meaningful for some reason. I also love Trapp's grin at the end. "Aren't I a shitty bitch?" He's so proud of himself.
Oh, and I'm totally using "This is flooding my thought engine".
THIS IS MOST EXCELLENT WRITING. MOST VERY HUMANLIKE IN EXECUTION.
Man this felt like a particularly bad fever dream. I loved it.
There is no way this was written by a computer. I'm confused why I haven't found any comments disagreeing. If it was powered by machine learning, as implied, then it doesn't make sense how well it all fits together. When they're in the computer, they all talk about how they're in a computer: "I'm a program", "sneezing data", a computer doesn't know that these are related to them being in a computer. It also matches the CollegeHumor format too well. I think that if a computer was involved, it was very minimal. Previous similar ideas have met criticisms for saying they were written by a computer, like the Harry Potter one, and I think this is far less believable. I definitely think it's funny, but it's definitely misleading in how it was created.