LAND. >> Emily: THINK YOU SO MUCH I’M EMILY COMPAGNO.
MY COHOST KAYLEIGH McENANY , THANK YOU. , THANK YOU. PETER ANALYZE, SPEAKING FURTHER INTO WHO IS A MEMBER -- COCHAIRED BY ONE OF THE TOP ATTORNEYS OF THE FIGHTING CAMPAIGN, AS WELL AS A YALE LAW SCHOOL PROFESSOR. OTHER MEMBERS INCLUDE THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY, ANTHONY HARVARD LAW SCHOOL PROFESSOR. YOUR THOUGHTS. >> Sandra: MOSTLY, ACADEMICS, TALKING ABOUT THREE DOZEN PEOPLE LED BY BOB BAUER. NOBODY EXPECTS THIS WILL BE A CHANGE OVERNIGHT. NONETHELESS, IT COULD BE A BIG CHANGE IF THAT WAS DECIDED BY THIS GROUP. I WANT TO PUT A FOCUS ON SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BREYER. THEY SPOKE OUT IN A SPEECH, I BELIEVE IT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, ON TUESDAY. SPOKE OUT CLEARLY AGAINST COURT EXPANSION. WARNED THAT IT MAY MAKE THE COURT MORE POLITICAL AND UNDERLING TRUST IN THE CONSTITUTION. "STRUCTURAL ALTERCATION MOTIVATED BY THE PERCEPTION OF POLITICAL INFLUENCE CAN ONLY FEED THAT LATTER PERCEPTION, FURTHER ERODING THAT TRUST." AS HE SAYS THAT, THERE ARE LIBERALS AGGRESSIVELY LOBBYING BREYER, 82 YEARS OLD, TO RETIRE. BIDEN COULD POSSIBLY REPLACE HIM IN THIS KEY MOMENT OF HISTORY FOR THE SUPREME COURT IN THIS COUNTRY. >> Emily: AGAINST AFFECT TRAVEL CALLS FOR BREYER TO RESIGN, AGAINST THIS MORNING THAT THIS IS A POLITICAL MOVE THAT COULD TRUST IN THE INSTITUTION, TO THINK THAT CHANGE IS LIKELY HERE? IT IS TO ANALYZE, BUT CLEARLY, BY FORMING THIS COMMISSION, THAT’S STATING A MESSAGE AS WELL WELL. >> IT’S ABSOLUTELY STATING A MESSAGE. JOE BIDEN WAS ASKED TIME AFTER
TIME AFTER TIME ON THE CAMPAIGN TIME AFTER TIME ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL -- IT TOOK HIM MONTHS, A WAY TO APPEASE THE FAR LEFT. LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE. WHEN THEY LEFT DOESN’T GET THEIR WAY, THEIR ANSWERS TO CHANGE THE INSTITUTION. WE’VE HAD 9 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES SINCE 1869, AND NOW WE ARE TALKING ABOUT COURT PACKING. THE FILIBUSTER HAS BEEN USED SINCE THE 1800s, AND NOW WE ARE TALKING ABOUT GETTING RID OF IT. THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE IN OUR CONSTITUTION, THEY CALLED TO GET RID OF THAT. WHAT IS THE SET UP TO? POWER! UNILATERAL, ONE PARTY RULE, PACK THE COURT, GET RID OF THE FILIBUSTER, AND THAT IS WHAT THE LEFT IS AFTER. I WOULD REFER THEM TO JOE BIDEN’S OWN WORDS, SAYING IT WAS A BONEHEADED IDEA, SAYING THAT 9 IS THE NUMBER IT SHOULD BE. ANY TRUE HISTORIAN OR ACADEMIC, LOOKING BACK TO FDR, WHO WHEN HE TRIED TO DO THIS, HIS OWN PARTY CALLED HIM OUT AND SAID IT WOULD SHATTER THE REPUBLIC. IF THIS IS A BAD IDEA. I’M NOT SURPRISED TO SEE IT WITH TODAY’S MODERN LEFT. >> Emily: UNPACKING THE PRESIDENT’S PAST COMMENTS, WE KNOW THAT HE HAS SAID "YOU WILL KNOW MY OPINION AFTER THE ELECTION." AS KAYLEIGH POINTED OUT, HE SAID IT WAS A BAD IDEA, AND NOW HE IS A TOPPING EIGHT-POINT STOMACH TOP POINT CHAIR TO HIS CAMPAIGN. >> Dave: LISTEN, KAYLEIGH IS CRYSTAL CLEAR CORRECT. THE DEMOCRATS ARE HERE TO DESTROY EVERY POLITICAL NORM WE’VE HAD IN THIS COUNTRY FOR 250 YEARS. THE FACT THAT BIDEN IS FLIPPING ON THESE SHOULDN’T SURPRISE ANYBODY. KAMALA HARRIS WAS STILL RUNNING, AND WAS ASKED ABOUT AN EXACT DEFECTION ON GUNS. SHE SAID "JOE, CAN’T WE SAY YES WE CAN"? BIDEN SAID IT HAD TO BE CONSTITUTIONAL. WE ALL KNOW WHAT HAPPENED YESTERDAY, SO CAN SURPRISE US THEY WANT TO PACK THE COURTS. THIS IS JUST A POWER GRAB. THE LEFT SEES A GREAT MOMENT HERE. THEY HAVE A VERY WEAK 78 EURO PRESIDENT WHO ISN’T THE ONE IN CHARGE. THEY ARE GOING FOR EVERYTHING, PUTTING ALL THEIR CHIPS ON THE TABLE. I WILL GIVE A BETTER ANALOGY. THEY ARE GOING TO FLIP THE TABLE OVER. [LAUGHTER] THEY WILL EITHER DO EVERYTHING BY EXECUTIVE ACTION OR THEY WILL PACK THE COURTS, OR THEY WILL GET RID OF THE FILIBUSTER. I CAN’T IMAGINE WHAT ELSE, BUT EVERY NORM WE THINK WE HAD, JUST THE FACT THAT WE ARE HAVING THIS CONVERSATION ABOUT WHETHER WE SHOULD BE PACKING THE COURTS, IF BIDEN WOULD HAVE BEEN HONEST A FEW MONTHS AGO, MAYBE HE WOULDN’T BE PRESIDENT, BUT HE KNEW, OR AT LEAST THE POWERS THAT BE NEW, THAT ONCE YOU HAVE HIM IN YOU CAN PRETTY MUCH DO ANYTHING. >> Emily: IT’S ARGUABLE THAT MUCH OF THIS ORGANIZATION IS ABOUT CATERING TO THE LEFT. FOR THOSE THAT ARE EXPECTING QUICK ACTION, THEY MIGHT BE DISAPPOINTED. DO YOU THINK THIS IS THE EXTENT OF THE ACTION THEN, IS THIS APPEASING THE FAR LEFT CRIES TO ACTUALLY PACK THE COURT? WHAT DO YOU THINK WILL HAPPEN FROM THIS COMMISSION? >> I THINK THIS IS A SYMBOLIC GESTURE FOR THE LEFT INWARD TO GET THEM TO CALM DOWN A LITTLE. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM IN THE DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR THESE IDEOLOGIES. THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM IS SO OUTDATED AT THIS POINT. THIS GOES TO SHOW YOU HOW HIGH THE STAKES REALLY ARE WHEN IT IS US OR THEM. EVERYTHING IS ZERO SUM. CONGRESS IS IS IRRELEVANT. EVERYTHING IS DONE, TO DAVE’S POINT, BY EXECUTIVE ORDER OR THROUGH THE COURT SYSTEM, THAT MEANS CONGRESS CAN DO WHAT THEY ARE DOING, WHICH IS, ESSENTIALLY, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. THAT’S NOT A GOOD LOOK FOR THEM EITHER. I’M EXCITED IN THE NEXT NEXT 10 YEARS, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE TREE 2 SHIFTS
IN PARTY IN THE WHITE HOUSE DOWN LIKE WE WILL WHITE HOUSE DOWN LIKE WE WILL HAVE ONE OR TWO GO THE WHITE HOUSE. WHEN I AM AN OLD LADY, IT WILL LOOK LIKE A GOSPEL CHOIR, THE SUPREME COURT. [LAUGHTER] I’M LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT, I LOVE A GOSPEL BRANCH. >> Emily: KAYLEIGH, PART OF THE IMPACT AND SUCCESS OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WAS THE AMOUNT OF JUDGES HE APPOINTED TO. CAN HE SPEAK TO THAT FROM YOUR PURVIEW WITHIN THE ADMINISTRATION, AND THE IMPACT MOVING FORWARD? >> Kayleigh: THAT’S I THINK THE CRUX OF WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. PRESIDENT TRUMP GOT THREE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, FILLED A HISTORIC NUMBER OF VACANCIES IN A SMALL AMOUNT OF TIME THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY, AND THE LEFT CAN’T TAKE THAT. THERE WAS AN ARTICLE LAST WEEK LAMENTING THE FAR RIGHT TURN, RELIGIOUS TURN BECOME OF THE COURT, WHICH IS PREPOSTEROUS. THE COURT IS INVULNERABLE TO PEOPLE’S RELIGIOUS -- THE SISTERS OF THE CORE, THEY PROTECT OUR FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, WHICH
ACCORDING TO JOE BIDEN, ARE NO ACCORDING TO JOE BIDEN, ARE NO LONGER ABSOLUTE TO THE COURT. ONE OF THEM, EVEN FAR LEFT JUSTICES ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE SHOULDN’T CHANGE ITS MAKEUP. YOU SEE ONE INSTITUTION THAT PEOPLE STILL HAVE FAITH IN AS A PROTECTOR OF OUR RIGHTS, I WOULD JUST SAY, THIS IS WHY THOSE TWO RACES IN GEORGIA ARE STILL IMPORTANT, WHY 2022 IS STILL IMPORTANT. NEED A SENATE THAT IS NOT WILLING TO OVERTURN OUR INSTITUTIONS FULL SALE. >> Sandra: >> IT’S ONE THING FOR ADMINISTRATION TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE COURT. IF YOU HAVE A CLEAR ANSWER. THERE IS A COMMISSION. YOU HAVE A QUESTION OF WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO DO TO FIX THE MESS OF THE SOUTHERN BORDER. THERE IS NO CLEAR PLAN FOR THAT. LOOK AT THE OPTICS. WE DON’T EVEN HAVE A SCHEDULE FOR BIDEN OR KAMALA HARRIS, THE POINT PERSON AT THE BORDER COMING TO VISIT THE BORDER, BUT YOU HAVE A CLEAR EXPLANATION FOR HOW THEY PLAN TO CHANGE THIS
