Guantánamo: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: LastWeekTonight
Views: 10,566,230
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: last week tonight with john oliver, john oliver, last week tonight, guantanamo bay
Id: KEbFtMgGhPY
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 20min 41sec (1241 seconds)
Published: Sun Oct 09 2016
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
That retired Colonel spoke some truth. Too bad most people in power apparently have less than 1% of the courage and integrity needed for the job they do.
Guantanamo always seemed like a plausible deniability thing to me. Like, you know the US is holding/detaining people without trial, probably in a bunch of different areas, but as long as we designate this one extrajudicial location as "the legally gray area", we can pretend we're not holding whomever in underground bunkers in New Hampshire or whatever.
That Maximum Security brand toiletries are also used in Wisconsin State Prisons. The toothpaste has no flavor but foams up incredibly well.
He missed an opportunity to say, 'Voldemort could soon be in charge of Guantanamo'
Fuck Billy Bush.
Oh, and some good news: John Oliver found Chechnya leader Kadyrov's missing cat shown at the end of this week's episode.
This episode just makes me sad. We don't even have a Guantanamo-esque jail here in my country yet everyone's just being "tried" by other people even if they are innocent.
According to the most recent report, released Sept. 2016, 693 detainees had been released. Of that group, 208 had been confirmed (122) or suspected (86) of returning to jihadist activity upon their release. (https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/FINAL%20-%20GTMO%20Unclass%20CDA%20Response%20-%20September%202016.pdf) These are not just low-level individuals as Oliver claims. The U.S. government—under George W. Bush and Barack Obama—has released dozens of veteran jihadists whose terror résumés include senior positions in al Qaeda and like-minded groups. And of course Obama had himself transferred five senior Taliban officials to Qatar in order to secure the release of Bowe Bergdahl.
I'm surprised by the lack of any empirical evidence to substantiate Oliver's argument. Anyone even casually familiar with jihadist propaganda knows that Guantánamo is infrequently mentioned and is not part of any significant recruiting theme. Ayman al Zawahiri, the head of al Qaeda, has released five messages since early August. He didn't mention Guantánamo once.
Obama has also claimed has claimed that Guantánamo "was an explicit rationale for the formation of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula," or AQAP.
At no point in time did AQAP's leaders, some of whom were once held at Guantánamo, say that the facility was the reason they launched their organization. If anything, AQAP's history shows the dangers of releasing known al Qaeda operatives from Guantánamo. One current AQAP leader is Ibrahim al Qosi, who was transferred in 2012. Qosi was a trusted associate of Osama bin Laden before he was captured. JTF-GTMO's assessment of Qosi described him as "an admitted al Qaeda operative and one of Usama bin Laden's (UBL) most trusted associates and veteran bodyguard."
In fact, in May, AQAP's Inspire magazine directly rebuked Obama on his claim that the facility is a key recruitment tool, arguing that al Qaeda talks about many issues and Guantánamo wasn't nearly at the top of their list. Inspire cited the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as well as other issues, as far more important from a recruiting standpoint and chastised Obama for being pro-Israeli.
The fifteenth issue of the Islamic State's Dabiq magazine, released earlier this year, carried an article aptly titled "Why We Hate You & Why We Fight You." For starters: "We hate you, first and foremost, because you are disbelievers; you reject the oneness of Allah—whether you realize it or not—by making partners for Him in worship, you blaspheme against Him, claiming that He has a son, you fabricate lies against His prophets and messengers, and you indulge in all manner of devilish practices." Dabiq's editors listed many other reasons, including our "secularism and nationalism," our "perverted liberal values," and our "Christianity and atheism." They did include a generic mention of the imprisonment and "torture" of Muslims around the world, but only after listing Obama's drones and many other reasons, and even then there was nothing—not a word—about Guantánamo.
There hasn't been a single attack that was rationalized or justified on the basis of Guantánamo. If there has please point me to it.
President Obama created two different entities to evaluate Guantánamo detainees and the risks they present to the United States. Both bodies—first Obama's task force and later the Periodic Review Board—were conceived to further the president's oft-expressed objective of closing the detention facility. As the end of Obama's presidency draws near, and the urgency of closing Guantánamo increases, Obama's PRB is finding ways to transfer many of the same detainees that Obama's own task force previously said were too dangerous to transfer.
The PRB's web page describes the body as "a discretionary, administrative interagency process" that was established "to review whether continued detention of particular individuals held at Guantánamo remains necessary to protect against a continuing significant threat to the security of the United States."
To date, according to a review of government filings conducted by The Weekly Standard, the PRB has issued a ruling in 52 cases. Thirty-three detainees have been approved for transfer by the PRB. The PRB determined that continued detention of 19 Guantánamo detainees "remains necessary" to protect the "security of the United States." This means that the PRB has approved Guantánamo detainees for transfer in nearly two-thirds of the cases it has heard.
This is a stunning success rate for these particular detainees. To put it in perspective, keep in mind that Obama's own Guantánamo Review Task Force previously assessed all 52 of these detainees and determined that none of them—not one of them—should be transferred or released. Twenty-eight of the 33 detainees approved for transfer by the PRB had been deemed "too dangerous to transfer but not feasible for prosecution" by Obama's task force. The remaining five approved for transfer by the PRB were referred for prosecution by Obama's task force. But instead of being prosecuted, they have either already been transferred or will be.
To add some additional perspective, keep in mind that Obama's task force decided that nearly two-thirds of the 240 detainees remaining at Guantánamo as of January 2009 could be transferred. The task force made it clear that the detainees approved for transfer were not deemed innocent. Nor were they considered non-threats. Instead, Obama's task force concluded that the security risks they posed could be adequately mitigated. In many of these cases, Obama's task force decided to transfer detainees who had been deemed "high" risks by the military and intelligence professionals at JTF-GTMO. That is, Obama's task force was willing to accept the dangers these detainees' presented to further the president's desire to close Guantánamo.
Regardless, even Obama's task force drew the line at transferring the detainees who have been evaluated by the PRB. But roughly two out of every three of them have won transfer under the PRB process.
Simply put: The Obama administration is transferring many of the detainees the administration itself previously deemed to be the worst of the worst—including at least five members of the Karachi Six and the man long suspected of recruiting some of the 9/11 hijackers.
I cannot disagree more with this video, despite agreeing with much of his other videos. I simply will not accept criticism's about human rights abuses from countries who treat their civilians like we treat terrorist. We should not be willing to free dangerous terrorists and endanger the American people and our diplomatic partners in order to gain moral clarity.
I hope to get some responses.
anyone have a mirror for us non-us folk
Obama should have had someone rush a bill through the house forbidding the transfer of any US funds to Cuba. The GOP would have voted for it (without reading it, of course) and this would have resulted in the rent being defaulted and the land being handed back.