Watch Live: The Final Presidential Debate

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
DECIDE ABOUT THESE CANDIDATES BEFORE THE ELECTION. >> WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS STAYS IN VEGAS EXCEPT FOR TONIGHT WHERE THEY ARE CALLING A POLITICAL FIGHT NIGHT. THE LAST TWO DEBATES ARE CALLED PERSONAL, NASTY, DARK, THEY WERE LAST CALLED DISGRACEFUL AS WELL. THE WHOLE DISCUSSION TODAY HAS BEEN WHAT WILL WE SEE TONIGHT BECAUSE A LOT HAS HAPPENED IN THE LAST TEN DAYS. >> DONALD TRUMP IS DOWN NINE POINTS IN OUR LATEST CBS NEWS POLL, NETO PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HAS MADE UP A DEFICIT THAT LARGE THIS CLOSE TO THE ELECTION. >> A STRATEGIST WILL BE WATCHING THE ELECTION TONIGHT WITH A GROUP OF VOTERS IN THE BATTLE GROUND STATE OF NEVADA AND WHAT WILL THEY HAVE TO SAY WHEN ALL THIS IS OVER ABOUT 90 MINUTES FROM NOW? >> THE NONPARTISAN DEBATE THE MARKER CONVENTION CHOSE CHRIS WALLACE TO MODERATE THE DEBATE. JOHN DICKERSON IS WITH US AND WE HEARD FROM THE DEBATE COMMISSION THAT THEY WANT THIS TO BE A SUBSTANTIVE DEBATE DRILLING DOWN ON THE ISSUES, WILL WE SEE THAT? >> THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT. DONALD TRUMP HAS ANOTHER PLAN AND HE HAS SAID HE IS NOW UNSHACKLED. WE SOLVE SINCE THE LAST DEBATE WHAT THAT MEANS. TOP ATTACKS ON HILLARY CLINTON AND THE WOMEN ACCUSING HIM. ALSO THIS CLAIMS OF RECOLLECTIONS. HE IS RAISING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE ELECTION. IT IS ALL AN ATTEMPT TO DESTABILISE AND THAT IS WHAT HE WILL TRY TO DO TONIGHT, DESTABILISE HILLARY CLINTON'S TASK TO STAY ON BALANCE. >> THIS WILL ALLOW SPECULATION ABOUT WHICH DONALD TRUMP WILL SHOW UP. MAJOR, WHAT ARE YOU EXPECTING? >> OF TRUMPET VISORS GET THEIR WAY AND THAT IS NOT ALWAYS THE CASE, HE WILL CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM A BARRAGE OF STORIES ACCUSING HIM OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT AND IN SOME CASES WORSE, AND ALSO EMBRACED THE MANTLE OF CHANGE, RESIDES -- AS A GENUINE AGENT OF CHANGE. ON ECONOMY AND SECURITY AND SPECIAL INTEREST INFLUENCE IN WASHINGTON. IF HE CAN DO THAT TRUMPET VISORS BELIEVE HE CAN REIGNITE A CAMPAIGN THAT HAS GONE THROUGH A TOUGH PATCH. >> THANK YOU AND NANCY COVERS THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN. >> HER UP FIRST TONIGHT, IF IT IS NOT BROKEN, DO NOT FIX IT. THESE HAVE BEEN THE CATALYST OF HER RISE IN THE POLLS THE LAST FEW WEEKS BECAUSE SHE HAS BEEN ABLE TO SHOW SHE CAN STAND UP TO DONALD TRUMP AND KEEP HER COOL WHEN HE SOMETIMES DOES NOT. THE ONE WILD CARD? HOW DO SHE EXPLAIN THE MISGIVINGS HER OWN AIDES HAVE EXPRESSED ABOUT HER AND THOSE E-MAILS. >> THE DEBATE IS ABOUT TO BEGIN. LET'S GO DOWN TO THE STAGE FOR THIS FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. >> FROM THE THOMAS AND MACK CENTRE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS. I AM CHRIS WALLACE OF FOX NEWS AND I WELCOME YOU TO THE THIRD AND FINAL OF THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE BETWEEN SECRETARY AND STATE -- SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON AND DONALD J TRUMP. THIS IS SPONSORED BY THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES. SIX ROUGHLY 15 MINUTE SEGMENTS WITH TWO-MINUTE ANSWERS TO THE FIRST QUESTION THEN OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE REST OF EACH SEGMENT. BOTH CAMPAIGNS HAVE AGREED TO THOSE ROLES. FOR THE RECORD, I DECIDED THE TOPICS IN THE QUESTIONS IN EACH TOPIC. NONE OF THOSE QUESTIONS HAS BEEN SHARED WITH THE COMMISSION OR THE TWO CANDIDATES. THE AUDIENCE IN THE HALL HAS PROMISED TO REMAIN SILENT, NO CHEERS, BOOS, OR ANY OTHER INTERRUPTION SO THAT WE CAN FOCUS ON WHAT THE CANDIDATES HAVE TO SAY. NO NOISE EXCEPT RIGHT NOW AS WE WELCOME THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT, SECRETARY HILLARY CLINTON AND THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR NOMINEE, MR TRUMP. >> SECRETARY CLINTON, MR. TRUMP, WELCOME. LET'S GET RIGHT TO IT. SECRETARY CLINTON, MR TRUMP, WELCOME AND LET'S GET RIGHT TO IT. THE FIRST TOPIC IS THE SUPREME COURT. YOU BOTH TALKED BRIEFLY ABOUT THE COURT IN THE LAST DEBATE BUT I WANT TO DRILL DOWN ON THIS BECAUSE THE NEXT PRESIDENT WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY HAVE AT LEAST ONE APPOINTMENT AND LIKELY OR POSSIBLY TWO OR THREE APPOINTMENTS, WHICH MEANS THAT YOU WILL IN EFFECT, DETERMINE THE BALANCE OF THE COURT FOR WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT QUARTER CENTURY. FIRST OF ALL, WHERE DO YOU WANT TO SEE THE COURT TO BE COUNTRY AND SECONDLY, WHAT IS YOUR VIEW AS HOW THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS MIKE IS IT TO THE FOUNDER, IS IT THE FOUNDER'S WORDS MEAN WHAT THEY SAY OR IS THAT A LIVING DOCUMENT THAT CHANGES ARE MEANT TO BE APPLIED IT CAME MICRO ACCORDING TO CIRCUMSTANCES? SECRETARY CLINTON YOU GO FIRST. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH CHRIS AND THANK YOU FOR HOSTING US HERE. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT IT REALLY RAISES THE CENTRAL ISSUE IN THIS ELECTION. NAMELY, WHAT KIND OF COUNTRY ARE REBORN TO BE? WHAT KIND OF OPPORTUNITIES WILL BE PROVIDE FOR OUR CITIZENS, WHAT KIND OF RIGHTS WILL AMERICANS HAVE? AND I FEEL STRONGLY THAT THE SUPREME COURT NEEDS TO STAND ON THE SIDE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, NOT ON THE SIDE OF THE POWERFUL CORPORATIONS AND THE WEALTHY. FOR ME, THAT MEANS THAT WE NEED A SUPREME COURT THAT WILL STAND UP ON BEHALF OF WOMEN'S WRITES, ON BEHALF OF THE RIGHTS OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY, THAT WILL STAND UP AND SAY NO TO CITIZEN'S UNITED, AN ORGANISATION THAT HAS UNDERMINED THE ELECTION SYSTEM IN OUR COUNTRY BECAUSE OF THE WAY IT PERMITS THE DARK, UNACCOUNTABLE MONEY TO COME INTO OUR ELECTORAL SYSTEM. I HAVE MAJOR DISAGREEMENTS WITH MY OPPONENT ABOUT THESE ISSUES AND OTHERS THAT WILL BE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT. BUT I FEEL THAT AT THIS POINT IN OUR COUNTRY'S HISTORY, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT WE NOT REVERSE MARRIAGE EQUALITY, THAT WE NOT REVERSE ROE V WADE, THAT WE STAND UP AGAINST CITIZENS UNITED, THAT WE STAND UP FOR THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE IN THE WORKPLACE, THAT WE STAND UP AND BASICALLY SAY, THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD REPRESENT ALL OF US. THAT IS HOW I SEE THE COURT AND HOW THE KIND OF PEOPLE I WOULD BE LOOKING TO NOMINATE TO THE COURT WOULD BE, IN THE GREAT TRADITION OF STANDING UP TO THE POWERFUL, STANDING UP ON BEHALF OF OUR RIGHTS AS AMERICANS, AND I LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING THAT OPPORTUNITY. I WOULD HOPE THAT THE SENATE WOULD DO ITS JOB, AND CONFIRM THE NOMINEE THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS SENT TO THEM. THAT IS THE WAY THE CONSTITUTION FUNDAMENTALLY SHOULD OPERATE. THE PRESIDENT NOMINATES AND THEN THE SENATE ADVISES AND CONSENTS OR NOT, BUT THEY GO FORWARD WITH THE PROCESS. >> SECRETARY CLINTON, THANK YOU. MR TRUMP, SAME QUESTION WHERE YOU WANT TO SEE THE COURT TO BE COUNTRY AND HOW DO YOU WANT THEM OR GROUPTHINK THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD BE INTERPRETED WHICHEVER IS FIRST OF ALL IT IS GREAT TO BE WITH YOU. THE SUPREME COURT IS WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT. OUR COUNTRY IS SO, IT IS SO IMPERATIVE THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT JUSTICES, SOMETHING HAPPENED RECENTLY WHERE JUSTICE GINSBURG MADE SOME VERY, VERY INAPPROPRIATE STATEMENTS TOWARD ME AND TOWARD A TREMENDOUS NUMBER OF PEOPLE, MANY MANY MILLIONS OF PEOPLE I REPRESENT, AND SHE WAS FORCED TO APOLOGISE AND APOLOGISED SHE DID, BUT THESE WERE STATEMENTS THAT SHOULD NEVER EVER HAVE BEEN MADE. WE NEED A SUPREME COURT THAT IN MY OPINION WILL UPHOLD THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND ALL AMENDMENTS BUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT, WHICH IS UNDER ABSOLUTE SIEGE, I BELIEVE THAT MY OPPONENT SHOULD WIN THIS RACE, WHICH I TRULY DON'T THINK WILL HAPPEN. WE WILL HAVE A SECOND AMENDMENT WHICH WILL BE A VERY, VERY SMALL REPLICA OF WHAT IT IS RIGHT NOW. BUT I FEEL IT IS ABSOLUTELY IMPORTANT THAT WE UPHOLD BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT IT IS UNDER SUCH TRAUMA. I FEEL THE JUSTICES THAT I AM GOING TO APPOINT HIM AND I HAVE NAMED 20 OF THEM, THE JUSTICES THAT I'M GOING TO APPOINT WILL BE PRO-LIFE, THEY WILL HAVE A CONSERVATIVE VIEW, THEY WILL BE PROTECTING THE SECOND AMENDMENT, THEY ARE GREAT SCHOLARS IN ALL CASES AND THEY ARE PEOPLE OF TREMENDOUS RESPECT. THEY WILL INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION THE WAY THE FOUNDERS WANTED IT INTERPRETED, AND I BELIEVE THAT IS VERY, VERY IMPORTANT. I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD HAVE THE JUSTICES APPOINTED THAT DECIDE WHAT THEY WANT TO HEAR, IT IS ALL ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION OF, AND SO IMPORTANT, THE CONSTITUTION THE WAY IT WAS MEANT TO BE. AND THOSE ARE THE PEOPLE I WILL APPOINT. >> MR TRUMP THANK YOU, WE NOW HAVE ABOUT TEN MINUTES FOR OPEN DISCUSSION, I WANT TO FOCUS ON TWO ISSUES THAT IN FACT, BY THE JUSTICES THAT YOU NAMED, COULD END UP CHANGING THE EXISTING LAW OF THE LAND. FIRST IS ONE YOU MENTION MR TRUMP WHICH IS GUNS. SECRETARY CLINTON, YOU SAID LAST YEAR AND LET ME QUOTE, THE SUPREME COURT IS WRONG ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT. NOW IN FACT IN THE 2008 CASE, THE COURT RULED THAT THERE IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, BUT IT IS A RIGHT THAT IS REASONABLY LIMITED, THOSE ARE THE WORDS OF THE JUDGE ANTHONY SCALIA WHO WROTE THE DECISION. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT? >> FIRST OF ALL I SUPPORT THE SECOND AMENDMENT, I LIVED IN ARKANSAS FOR 18 WONDERFUL YEARS, I REPRESENTED UPSTATE NEW YORK, I UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT THE TRADITION OF GUN OWNERSHIP THAT GOES BACK TO THE FOUNDING OF OUR COUNTRY. BUT I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THERE CAN BE AND MUST BE REASONABLE REGULATION. BECAUSE I SUPPORT THE SECOND AMENDMENT, DOESN'T MEAN THAT I WANT PEOPLE WHO SHOULD NOT HAVE GUNS TO BE ABLE TO THREATEN YOU, KILL YOU OR MEMBERS OF YOUR FAMILY. AND WHEN I THINK ABOUT WHAT WE NEED TO DO, WE HAVE 33,000 PEOPLE A YEAR WHO DIE FROM GUNS. I THINK WE NEED CONFERENCE OF BACKGROUND CHECKS, WE NEED TO CLOSE THE ONLINE LOOPHOLE, CLOSE THE GUN SHOW LOOPHOLE, THERE ARE OTHER MATTERS THAT I THINK ARE SENSIBLE THAT ARE THE KIND OF REFORMS THAT WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE. THAT ARE NOT IN ANY WAY CONFLICTING WITH THE SECOND AMENDMENT. YOU MENTIONED THE HOWARD PROPELLER DECISION AND WHAT I WAS SAYING THAT YOU REFERENCED WAS THAT I DISAGREED WITH THE WAY THE COURT APPLIED THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN THAT CASE. BECAUSE WHAT THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WAS TRYING TO DO WAS TO PROTECT TODDLERS FROM GUNS AND SO THEY WANTED PEOPLE WITH GUNS TO SAFELY STORE THEM. AND THE COURT DID NOT ACCEPT THAT REASONABLE REGULATION BUT THEY HAVE ACCEPTED MANY OTHERS SO I SEE NO CONFLICT BETWEEN SAVING PEOPLE'S LIVES AND DEFENDING THE SECOND AMENDMENT. >> LET ME BRING MR TRUMP IN HERE, THE BIPARTISAN OPEN DEBATE COALITION GOT BILLIONS OF VOTES ON QUESTIONS TO ASK HERE AND THIS WAS IN FACT ONE OF THE TOP QUESTIONS THAT THE GOT. HOW WILL YOU ENSURE THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS PROTECTED, YOU JUST HEARD SECRETARY CLINTON'S ANSWER, DOES SHE PERSUADE YOU THAT WHILE YOU MAY DISAGREE ON REGULATION THAT IN FACT SHE SUPPORTS A SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS? >> THE DC VERSUS HELLER DECISION WAS VERY STRONGLY, SHE WAS EXTREMELY ANGRY ABOUT IT, I WATCHED. SHE WAS VERY VERY ANGRY WHEN IT WAS UPHELD IN JUSTICE SCALIA WAS SO INVOLVED AND IT WAS A WELL-CRAFTED DECISION. BUT HILLARY WAS EXTREMELY UPSET, EXTREMELY ANGRY, AND PEOPLE THAT BELIEVE IN THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND BELIEVE IN A VERY STRONGLY WERE VERY UPSET WITH WHAT SHE HAD TO SAY. >> LET ME BRING IN SECRETARY CLINTON, WERE YOU EXTREMELY UPSET? >> WHILE I WAS UPSET BECAUSE UNFORTUNATELY DOZENS OF TODDLERS INJURE THEMSELVES, EVEN KILL PEOPLE WITH GUNS BECAUSE UNFORTUNATELY, NOT EVERYONE WHO HAS LOADED GUNS IN THEIR HOMES TAKES APPROPRIATE CAUTIONS. BUT THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT I RESPECT THE SECOND AMENDMENT, THAT I ALSO BELIEVE THERE IS AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. THAT IS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH SENSIBLE, COMMON-SENSE REGULATION, AND YOU KNOW LOOK, I UNDERSTAND THAT DONALD HAS BEEN STRONGLY SUPPORTED BY THE NRA, THE GUN LOBBY IS ON HIS SIDE, THEY ARE RUNNING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF ADS AGAINST ME AND I THAT BECAUSE WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS FOR PEOPLE TO COME TOGETHER AND SAY OF COURSE WE ARE GOING TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THE SECOND AMENDMENT, BUT WE ARE GOING TO DO IT IN A WAY THAT TRIES TO SAVE SOME OF THESE 33,000 LIVES THAT WE LOSE EVERY YEAR. >> LET ME BRING MR TRUMP BACK INTO IT BECAUSE IN FACT, YOU OPPOSE ANY LIMITS ON ASSAULT WEAPONS, ANY LIMITS ON HIGH-CAPACITY MAGAZINES, YOU SUPPORT A NATIONAL RIGHT TO CARRY LAW, WHY SO? >> LET ME JUST TELL YOU BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER IN CHICAGO, WHICH HAS THE TOUGHEST GUN LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES, PROBABLY YOU COULD SAY BY FAR, THEY HAVE MORE GUN VIOLENCE IN ANY OTHER CITY. SO WE HAVE THE TOUGHEST LAWS AND YOU HAVE TREMENDOUS GUN VIOLENCE. I AM A VERY STRONG SUPPORTER OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND I AM, I DON'T KNOW IF HILLARY WAS SAYING IT IN A SARCASTIC MANNER BUT I AM A VERY PROUD PERCENT TO HAVE THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE NRA, THE EARLIEST ENDORSEMENT THEY HAVE GIVEN TO ANYBODY WHO RAN FOR PRESIDENT SO I AM VERY HONOURED BY ALL OF THAT. WE ARE GOING TO APPOINT JUSTICES, THIS IS THE BEST WAY TO HELP THE SECOND AMENDMENT, WE ARE GOING TO APPOINT JUSTICES THAT WILL FEEL VERY STRONGLY ABOUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT, THAT WILL NOT DO DAMAGE TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT. >> WELL LET'S PICK UP ON ANOTHER ISSUE WHICH DIVIDES EU AND THE JUSTICES, WHOEVER ENDS UP WINNING THIS ELECTION APPOINTS, COULD HAVE A DRAMATIC EFFECT. THAT IS THE ISSUE OF ABORTION. MR TRUMP, YOU ARE PRO-LIFE, BUT I WANT TO ASK YOU SPECIFICALLY, DO YOU WANT THE COURT, INCLUDING THE JUSTICES THAT YOU WILL NAME, TO OVERTURN ROE V WADE WHICH INCLUDES, INCLUDE THE MICROBE IN FACT STATES THE WOMEN'S RIGHT TO ABORTION. >> I AM PRO-LIFE AND WILL BE APPOINTING PRO-LIFE JUDGES, I WOULD THINK THAT WOULD GO BACK TO THE INDIVIDUAL STATES. >> I AM ASKING YOU SPECIFICALLY. >> ESTATE UNDER -- THEY OVERTURNED I IT WILL GO BACK TO THE STATES. >> DO YOU WANT TO SEE IT OVERTURNED, YOU SAID THAT YOU WANT THE COURT TO PROTECT THE SECOND AMENDMENT, AND YOU WANT THEM TO OVERTURN ROE V WADE? >> IF WE PUT ANOTHER TWO OR THREE JUSTICES, THAT IS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN, THAT WILL HAPPEN AUTOMATICALLY IN MY OPINION, BECAUSE I'M PUTTING PRO-LIFE JUSTICES ON THE COURT, I WILL SAY THIS, IT WILL GO BACK TO THE STATES AND THE STATES WILL THEN MAKE A DETERMINATION. >> SECRETARY CLINTON. >> I STRONGLY SUPPORT ROE V WADE WHICH GUARANTEES A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A WOMAN TO MAKE THE MOST INTIMATE, A MOST DIFFICULT IN MANY CASES, DECISIONS ABOUT HER HEALTH CARE THAT ONE CAN IMAGINE. AND IN THIS CASE, IT IS NOT ONLY ABOUT ROE V WADE. IT IS ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW IN AMERICA. SO MANY STATES ARE PUTTING VERY STRINGENT REGULATIONS ON WOMEN THAT BLOCK THEM FROM EXERCISING THAT CHOICE, TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ARE DEFUNDING PLANNED PARENTHOOD, WHICH OF COURSE PROVIDES ALL KINDS OF CANCER SCREENINGS AND OTHER BENEFITS FOR WOMEN IN OUR COUNTRY. DONALD HAS SAID HE IS IN FAVOUR OF DEFUNDING PLANNED PARENTHOOD, HE EVEN SUPPORTED SHUTTING THE GOVERNMENT DOWN TO DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD. I WILL DEFEND PLANNED PARENTHOOD. I WILL DEFEND WOMEN'S RIGHTS TO MAKE THEIR OWN HEALTH CARE DECISIONS. WE HAVE COME TOO FAR TO THAT TURN BACK NOW AND INDEED HE SAID WOMEN SHOULD BE PUNISHED, THERE SHOULD BE SOME FORM OF PUNISHMENT FOR WOMEN WHO OBTAIN ABORTIONS. I COULD JUST NOT BE MORE OPPOSED TO THAT KIND OF THINKING. >> I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO RESPOND BUT I WANT TO HAVE THE SECRETARY CLINTON I WANT TO EXPLORE HOW FAR YOU BELIEVE THE RIGHT TO ABORTION GOES. YOU HAVE BEEN QUOTED AS AYING THAT THE FOETUS HAS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. YOU ALSO VOTED AGAINST A MAN ON LATE-TERM PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTIONS. WHY? >> BECAUSE ROE V WADE VERY CLEARLY SET OUT THAT THERE CAN BE REGULATIONS ON ABORTIONS, SO LONG AS THE LIFE AND THE HEALTH OF THE MOTHER ARE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. AND WHEN I VOTED AS A SENATOR, I DID NOT THINK THAT WAS THE CASE. THE KINDS OF CASES THAT FALL AT THE END OF PREGNANCY ARE OFTEN THE MOST HEARTBREAKING, PAINFUL DECISIONS FOR FAMILIES TO MAKE. I HAVE MET WITH WOMEN THAT TOWARD THE END OF THEIR PREGNANCY, THEY GET THE WORST NEWS ONE CAN GET, THAT THEIR HEALTH IS IN JEOPARDY IF THEY CONTINUE TO CARRY TO TERM. OR THAT SOMETHING TERRIBLE HAS HAPPENED OR JUST BEEN DISCOVERED ABOUT THE PREGNANCY. I DO NOT THINK THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE STEPPING IN AND MAKINGF DECISIONS. SO YOU CAN REGULATE IF YOU ARE DOING SO WITH THE LIFE AND THE HEALTH OF THE MOTHER TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. >> MR TRUMP YOUR REACTION AND PARTICULARLY ON THIS ISSUE OF LIFE TERM PARTIAL-BIRTH. >> I THINK IT IS TERRIBLE IF YOU DO WITH WHAT HILLARY IS SAYING IN THE NINTH MONTH YOU CAN TAKE THE BABY AND READ THE BABY OUT OF THE WILL OF THE MOTHER JUST PRIOR TO THE BIRTH OF THE BABY. NOW YOU CAN SAY THAT THAT IS OK AND HILLARY CAN'T SAY THAT'S OK, BUT IT IS NOT OK WITH ME. BECAUSE BASED ON WHAT SHE IS SAYING AND BASED ON WHERE SHE IS GOING AND WHERE SHE HAS BEEN, YOU CAN TAKE THE BABY AND RIPPED THE BABY OUT OF THE WOMB IN THE NINTH MONTH. ON THE FINAL DAY, AND THAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. >> WELL THAT IS NOT WHAT HAPPENS IN THESE CASES AND USING THAT KIND OF SCARE RHETORIC IS JUST TERRIBLY UNFORTUNATE. YOU SHOULD MEET WITH SOME OF THE WOMEN THAT I HAVE MET WITH. WOMEN I HAVE KNOWN OVER THE COURSE OF MY LIFE. THIS IS ONE OF THE WORST POSSIBLE CHOICES THAT ANY WOMAN AND HER FAMILY HAS TO MAKE AND I DO NOT BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE MAKING UP. I HAVE HAD THE GREAT HONOUR OF TRAVELLING ACROSS THE WORLD ON BEHALF OF OUR COUNTRY, I HAVE BEEN THE COUNTRIES WHERE GOVERNMENTS EITHER FORCED WOMEN'S TO HAVE ABORTIONS LIKE THEY USED TO DO IN CHINA OR FORCED WOMEN TO BEAR CHILDREN MIGHT BE USED TO DO IN ROMANIA. AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO BUSINESS IN THE DECISIONS THAT WOMEN MAKE WITH THEIR FAMILIES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR FAITH, WITH MEDICAL ADVICE, AND I WILL STAND UP FOR THAT RIGHT. >> ALL RIGHT BUT JUST BRIEFLY I WANT TO MOVE ON. >> HONESTLY NOBODY HAS BUSINESS DOING WHAT I JUST SAID, DOING THAT AS LATE AS ONE OR TWO OR THREE OR FOUR DAYS PRIOR TO BIRTH. NOBODY HAS THAT. >> ALL RIGHT LET'S MOVE ON TO THE SUBJECT OF IMMIGRATION AND THERE IS ALMOST NO ISSUE THAT SEPARATES THE TWO OF YOU MORE THAN THE ISSUE OF IMMIGRATION, ACTUALLY THERE ARE A LOT OF ISSUES THAT SEPARATE THE TWO OF YOU. MR TRUMP, YOU WANT TO BUILD A WALL, SECRETARY CLINTON YOU HAVE OFFERED NO SPECIFIC PLAN FOR HOW YOU WANT TO SECURE OUR SOUTHERN BORDER. MR TRUMP YOU ARE CALLING FOR MAJOR DEPORTATIONS, SECRETARY CLINTON YOU SAY THAT WITHIN YOUR FIRST 100 DAYS AS PRESIDENT YOU ARE GOING TO OFFER A PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES A PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP. THE QUESTION IS WHY ARE YOU RIGHT IN YOUR OPPONENT WRONG, MR TRUMP YOU GO FIRST IN THE SEGMENT YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. >> FIRST OF WHAT YOU WANT TO GIVE AMNESTY WHICH IS A DISASTER, VERY UNFAIR TO ALL THE PEOPLE WAITING IN LINE FOR MANY YEARS. WE NEED STRONG BORDERS. IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT WE HAVE FOUR MOTHERS OF, I MEAN THESE ARE JUST UNBELIEVABLE PEOPLE THAT I HAVE GOTTEN TO KNOW OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS WHOSE CHILDREN HAVE BEEN KILLED, BRUTALLY KILLED BY THE PEOPLE BACK INTO THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY. WE HAVE THOUSANDS OF MOTHERS AND FATHERS AND RELATIVES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY. THEY ARE COMING IN ILLEGALLY, DRUGS ARE POURING IN OVER THE BORDER, WE HAVE NO COUNTRY IF WE HAVE NO BORDER. HILLARY WANTS TO GIVE AMNESTY, SHE WANTS TO HAVE OPEN BORDERS, THE BORDER PATROL AS YOU KNOW, 16,500 PLUS ICE LAST WEEK ENDORSED ME, FIRST TIME THEY HAVE EVER ENDORSED A CANDIDATE. IT MEANS THEIR JOB IS TOUGHER, BUT THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON, THEY KNOW BETTER THAN ANYBODY. THEY WANT STRONG BORDERS, THEY FEEL WE HAVE TO HAVE STRONG BORDERS. I WAS UP IN NEW HAMPSHIRE THE OTHER DAY, THE BIGGEST COMPLAINT THEY HAVE WITH ALL THE PROBLEMS GOING ON IN THE WORLD, MANY OF THE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY HILLARY CLINTON AND BARACK OBAMA, ALL OF THEIR PROBLEMS, THEIR SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM IS CAROLYN THAT POURS ACROSS THEIR SOUTHERN BORDERS, JUST DESTROYING THEIR YOUTH, POISONING THE BLOOD OF THEIR YOUTH AND PLENTY OF OTHER PEOPLE. WE HAVE TO HAVE STRONG BORDERS. WE HAVE TO KEEP THE DRUGS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY. RIGHT NOW WE'RE GETTING THE DRUGS, THEY ARE GETTING THE CASH. WE NEED STRONG BORDERS, WE NEED ABSOLUTE, WE CANNOT GIVE AMNESTY. NOW, I WANT TO BUILD A WALL. WE NEED THE WALL AND THE BORDER PATROL, ICE, THEY'LL WANT THE WALL. WE STOP THE DRUGS WE SHORE UP THE BORDER, ONE OF MY FIRST WILL BE GOOD ALL THE DRUG LORDS, ALL THE BAD ONES, WE HAVE SOME BAD BAD PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY TO HAVE TO GO WELL. WE WOULD GET THEM OUT AND SECURE THE BORDER AND ONCE THE BORDERS SECURED AT A LATER DATE, WE WILL MAKE A DETERMINATION AS TO THE REST BUT WE HAVE SOME BAD HOMBRES HERE AND WE WOULD GET THEM OUT. >> MR TRUMP THANK YOU AND SAME QUESTION TO YOU SECRETARY CLINTON. BASICALLY, WHY ARE YOU WRITE TO MR TRUMP IS WRONG QUESTION THE AS HE WAS TALKING OTHERS THINKING ABOUT A YOUNG GIRL I WAS MEETING HERE IN LAS VEGAS KARLA, WHO WAS VERY WORRIED THAT HER PARENTS MIGHT BE DEPORTED BECAUSE SHE WAS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY AND THEY WERE NOT. THEY WORK HARD, THEY DO EVERYTHING THEY COULD TO GIVE HER A GOOD LIFE AND YOU'RE RIGHT, I DON'T WANT TO RIP FAMILIES APART. I DON'T WANT TO BE SENDING FANS AWAY FROM CHILDREN. I DON'T WANT TO SEE THE DEPORTATION FORCE THAT HAS TALKED ABOUT IN ACTION IN OUR COUNTRY. WE HAVE 11 MILLION UNDOCUMENTED PEOPLE, THEY HAVE 4 MILLION AMERICAN CITIZEN CHILDREN, 15 MILLION PEOPLE. HE SAID AS RECENTLY AS A FEW WEEKS AGO IN PHOENIX THAT EVERY UNDOCUMENTED PERSON WILL BE SUBJECT TO DEPORTATION AND THIS IS WHAT THAT MEANS. IT MEANS YOU HAVE TO HAVE A MASSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT PRESENCE WHERE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WOULD BE GOING SCHOOL TO SCHOOL, HOME TO HOME, BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS, ROUNDING UP PEOPLE WHO ARE ON ON THE MICRO UNDOCUMENTED. AND THEN WE WOULD HAVE TO PUT THEM ON TRAINS, ON BUSES, TO GET THEM OUT OF OUR COUNTRY. I THINK THAT IS AN IDEA THAT IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH WHO WE ARE AS A NATION. IT IS AN IDEA THAT WOULD RID OUR COUNTRY APART. I HAVE BEEN FOR BORDER SECURITY FOR YEARS. I VOTED FOR BORDER SECURITY IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE AND MY COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM PLAN OF COURSE INCLUDES BORDER SECURITY BUT I WANT TO PUT OUR RESOURCES WHERE I THINK THEY ARE MOST NEEDED, GETTING RID OF ANY VIOLENT PERSON, ANYBODY WHO SHOULD BE DEPORTED WE SHOULD DEPORT THEM. WHEN IT COMES TO THE WALL DONALD TALKS ABOUT WITH MEXICO, WE HAD A MEETING WITH THE MEXICAN PRESIDENT, DIDN'T EVEN RAISE IT, HE CHOKED AND THEN GONE TO A TWITTER WAR BECAUSE THE MEXICAN PRESIDENT SAID WE ARE NOT PAYING FOR THAT WALL. I THINK WE ARE BOTH A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS AND A NATION OF LAWS AND IF WE CAN ACT ACCORDINGLY, AND THAT IS WHY I AM INTRODUCING COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM WITHIN THE FIRST 100 DAYS ON PATH TO CITIZENSHIP. >> DINKY SECRETARY CLINTON, ONE OF THE FOLLOW-UP... >> I THINK I SHOULD RESPOND TO THAT. FIRST OF ALL WE HAD A VERY GOOD MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT OF MEXICO, VERY NICE MAN. WE ARE DOING VERY MUCH BETTER WITH MEXICO IN TRADE DEALS, BELIEVE ME, AFTER THE DEAL SIGNED BY HER HUSBAND IS ONE OF THE WORST DEALS SIGNED BY ANYBODY, IT IS A DISASTER. HILLARY CLINTON WANTED THE WALL, HILLARY CLINTON FOUGHT FOR THE WALL IN 2006, OR THEREABOUTS. SHE NEVER GETS ANYTHING DONE SO NATURALLY PEOPLE WHO WAS NOT BUILT. BUT HILLARY CLINTON WANTED THE WALL. WE ARE A COUNTRY... >> LET ME... NO WAIT I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM SECRETARY CLINTON. >> I VOTED FOR BORDER SECURITY AND THERE ARE... >> AND THE WALL. >> AND THERE ARE SOME PLACES WHERE THAT WAS APPROPRIATE, THAT ARE ALSO NECESSARILY GOING TO BE NEW TECHNOLOGY AND HOW BEST TO DEPLOY THAT. IT IS CLEAR WHEN YOU LOOK AT HOW DONALD HAS BEEN PROPOSING, HE STARTED HIS CAMPAIGN BASHING IMMIGRANTS, CALLING MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS RAPISTS AND CRIMINALS AND DRUG DEALERS. THAT HE HAS A VERY DIFFERENT VIEW OF WHAT WE SHOULD DO TO DEAL WITH IMMIGRANTS AND NOW, WHAT I'M ALSO ARGUING IS THAT BRINGING IN UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS OUT FROM THE SHADOWS, PUTTING THEM INTO THE FORMAL ECONOMY, WILL BE GOOD BECAUSE THEN EMPLOYERS CANNOT EXPLOIT THEM AND UNDERCUT AMERICAN'S WAGES AND DONALD KNOWS A LOT ABOUT THIS, HE USED UNDOCUMENTED LABOR TO BUILD THE TRUMP TOWER. HE UNDERPAID UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS AND WHEN THEY COMPLAINED HE BASICALLY SAID WHAT A LOT OF EMPLOYERS DO, YOU COMPLAIN I WILL GET YOU DEPORTED. I WANT TO GET EVERYBODY OUT OF THE SHADOWS, GET THE ECONOMY WORKING, AND NOT LET EMPLOYERS LIKE DONALD EXPLOIT UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS WHICH PARTS THEM BUT ALSO HURTS AMERICAN WORKERS. >> MR JOHN. >> PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS MOVED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE OUT, NOBODY KNOWS ABOUT OR TALKED ABOUT IT BUT UNDER OBAMA, MILLIONS OF PEOPLE HAVE BEEN MOVED OUT OF THIS COUNTRY, HAVE BEEN DEPORTED. SHE DOESN'T WANT TO SAY THAT THAT THAT IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND THAT IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED BIG. AS FAR AS MOVING THESE PEOPLE OUT AND WE EITHER HAVE A COUNTRY OR WE DON'T, WE ARE A COUNTRY OF LAWS, WE EITHER HAVE A BORDER OR WE DON'T. YOU CAN COME BACK IN AND BECOME A CITIZEN, BUT IT IS VERY UNFAIR. WE HAVE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE THAT DID IT THE RIGHT WAY, THEY ARE IN LINE AND WAITING, WE WILL SPEED UP THE PROCESS BIG-LEAGUE BECAUSE... THEY ARE IN LINE AND WAITING TO BECOME CITIZENS. VERY UNFAIR FOR SOMEONE TO RUN ACROSS THE BORDER WHO BECOMES A CITIZEN UNDER HER PLAN YOU HAVE OPEN BORDERS AND HAVE A DISASTER ON TRADE AND HAVE A DISASTER WITH YOUR OPEN BORDERS... WHAT SHE DOESN'T SAY IS THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS DEPORTED MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF PEOPLE JUST THE WAY IT IS. >> SECRETARY CLINTON... >> WE WILL NOT HAVE OPEN BORDERS, THAT IS A GREAT MISCHARACTERISATION. WE WILL HAVE SECURE BORDERS BUT WE WILL ALSO HAVE REFORM AND THIS USED TO BE A BIPARTISAN ISSUE, RONALD REAGAN... >> EXCUSE ME. >> AND GEORGE W BUSH SUPPORTED IT AS WELL. >> SECRETARY CLINTON I WANT TO CLEAR UP YOUR POSITION ON THIS ISSUE BECAUSE ANY SPEECH YOU GAVE TO A BRAZILIAN BANK FOR WHICH YOU WERE PAID $225,000, WE HAVE LEARNED FROM THE WIKILEAKS, THAT YOU SAID THIS AND I WANT TO QUOTE. "MY DREAM IS A HEMISPHERIC COMMON MARKET WITH OPEN TRADE AND OPEN BORDERS." SO THAT IS THE QUESTION OF JAVI THANK YOU. >> THAT IS THE QUESTION, PLEASE QUIET EVERYBODY. IS THAT YOUR DREAM, OPEN BORDERS? >> IF YOU WENT ON TO READ THE REST OF THE SENTENCE I WAS TALKING ABOUT ENERGY. WE TRADE MORE ENERGY WITH OUR NEIGHBOURS THEN WE TRADE WITH THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED AND I DO WANT US TO HAVE A ELECTRIC GRID AND ENERGY SYSTEM THAT CROSSES BORDERS, I THINK THAT WOULD BE A GREAT BENEFIT TO US, BUT YOU ARE VERY CLEARLY QUOTING FROM WIKILEAKS AND WHAT IS REALLY IMPORTANT ABOUT WIKILEAKS IS THAT THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT HAS ENGAGED IN ESPIONAGE AGAINST AMERICANS. THEY HAVE HACKED AMERICAN WEBSITES, AMERICAN ACCOUNTS, PRIVATE PEOPLE OF INSTITUTIONS, THEN THEY HAVE GIVEN THAT INFORMATION TO WIKILEAKS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUTTING IT ON THE INTERNET. THIS HAS COME FROM THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, CLEARLY FROM PUTIN HIMSELF IN AN EFFORT, AS 17 OF OUR INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES HAVE CONFIRMED, TO INFLUENCE OUR ELECTION SO I ACTUALLY THINK THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION OF THIS EVENING CHRIS, IS FINALLY, WILLED DONALD TRUMP ADMIT AND CONDEMN THAT THE RUSSIANS ARE DOING THIS? AND, MAKE IT CLEAR THAT HE WILL NOT HAVE THE HELP OF PUTIN IN THIS ELECTION, THAT HE REJECTS RUSSIAN ESPIONAGE AGAINST AMERICANS, WHICH HE ACTUALLY ENCOURAGED IN THE PAST. THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE NEED ANSWERED IN THIS IS NOT HAPPENED IN ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS BEFORE. >> THAT WAS A GREAT PIVOT OFF THE FACT THAT YOU WANT OPEN BORDERS. HOW DID WE GET... >> HOLD ON. >> THIS IS GOING TO END UP GETTING OUT OF COURT WE MET CONTROL, LET'S TRY TO KEEP IT QUIET FOR THE CANDIDATES AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. >> TO FINISH ON THE BORDERS, SHE WANTS OPEN BORDERS FOR PEOPLE TO POUR INTO OUR COUNTRY, PEOPLE COMING FROM SYRIA. SHE WANTS 550% MORE PEOPLE THAN BARACK OBAMA AND HE HAS THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE. THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHERE THEY COME FROM AND YOU SEE WE ARE GOING TO STOP RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM IN THIS COUNTRY. SHE WILL NOT EVEN MENTIONED THE WORDS AND NEITHER WILL PRESIDENT OBAMA. SO I JUST WANT TO TELL YOU, SHE WANTS OPEN BORDERS AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT PUTIN. I DO NOT KNOW PUTIN. HE SAID NICE THINGS ABOUT ME. IF WE GOT A ALONG WELL THAT'LL BE GOOD. IF RUSSIA AND THE US GOT ALONG WELL AND WENT AT PRICES THAT WOULD BE GOOD. HE HAS NO RESPECT FOR HER. HE HAS NO RESPECT FOR OUR PRESIDENT AND I WILL TELL YOU WHAT, WE ARE IN VERY SERIOUS TROUBLE BECAUSE WE HAVE A COUNTRY WITH A TREMENDOUS NUMBERS OF NUCLEAR WARHEADS, 1800 BY THE WAY, WHERE THEY EXPANDED AND WE DID NOT. 1800 NUCLEAR WARHEADS AND SHE IS PLAYING CHICKEN. FROM EVERYTHING I SEE, PUTIN HAS NO RESPECT FOR THIS PERSON. >> THAT IS BECAUSE HE WOULD RATHER HAVE A PUPPET AS PRESIDENT IN THE UNITED STATES AND IT IS PRETTY CLEAR. >> YOU ARE THE PUPPET. >> IT IS PRETTY CLEAR YOU WILL NOT ADMIT THE RUSSIANS HAVE ENGAGED IN CYBER ATTACKS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THAT YOU ENCOURAGED ESPIONAGE AGAINST OUR PEOPLE, THAT YOU ARE WILLING TO SPOUT THE PUTIN Y, SIGN UP FOR HIS WISH LIST, BREAK-UP NETO, DO WHATEVER HE WANTS TO DO AND THAT YOU CONTINUES TO GET HELP FROM THEM BECAUSE HE HAS A VERY CLEAR FAVORITE IN THIS RACE. I THINK THAT THIS IS SUCH AN UNPRECEDENTED SITUATION. WE HAVE NEVER HAD A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TRYING TO INTERFERE IN OUR ELECTION. WE HAVE 17 INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, CIVILIAN AND MILITARY WHO HAVE ALL CONCLUDED THAT THESE ESPIONAGE ATTACKS, THESE CYBER ATTACKS COME FROM THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE KREMLIN AND THEY ARE DESIGNED TO INFLUENCE OUR ELECTIONS. I FIND THAT DEEPLY DISTURBING. >> SECRETARY CLINTON. >> SHE HAS NO IDEA WHETHER IT IS RUSSIA, CHINA OR ANYBODY ELSE. >> I AM NOT QUOTING MYSELF, I'M QUOTING 17 INTELLIGENCE... >> OUR COUNTRY HAS NO IDEA. >> 70 MILITARY AND CIVILIAN AGENCIES. HE WOULD RATHER BELIEVE VLADIMIR PUTIN THAT THE MILITARY AND CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS WHO ARE SWORN TO PROTECT US -- 70 MILITARY AND CIVILIAN AGENCIES. >> SHE DOES NOT LIKE PUTIN BECAUSE HE HAS ASTHMA -- OUTSMARTED HER EVERY STEP OF THE WAY. PUTIN HAS OUTSMARTED HER IN SYRIA. >> MR TRUMP I DO GET TO ASK QUESTIONS AND I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU THIS DIRECT QUESTION. THE TOP NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIALS OF THIS COUNTRY DO BELIEVE THAT RUSSIA HAS BEEN BEHIND THE ATTACKS. EVEN IF YOU DO NOT KNOW FOR SURE WHETHER THEY ARE, DO YOU CONDEMN ANY INTERFERENCE BY RUSSIA AND THE AMERICAN ELECTION? >> BY RUSSIA OR ANYBODY ELSE. >> YOU CONDEMN THEIR INTERFERENCE? >> OF COURSE I DO. I DO NOT KNOW PUTIN. >> I'M NOT ASKING YOU THAT. >> I HAVE NEVER MET PUTIN. THIS IS NOT MY BEST FRIEND, BUT IF THE UNITED STATES GOT ALONG WITH PER SE BUT NOT BE SO BAD. PUTIN HAS OUTSMARTED HER AND OBAMA AT EVERY SINGLE STEP OF THE WAY WHETHER IT IS THE AREA, YOU NAME IT. MISSILES, TAKE A LOOK AT THE START UP A SIGN. THE RUSSIANS HAVE SAID, ACCORDING TO MANY REPORTS, I CANNOT BELIEVE THEY ALLOWED US TO DO THIS. THEY CREATE WARHEADS AND WE CANNOT. THE RUSSIANS CANNOT BELIEVE IT. SHE HAS BEEN OUTSMARTED BY PUTIN AND ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS LOOK OF THE MIDDLE EAST, THEY HAVE TAKEN OVER. WE HAVE SPENT $6 TRILLION AND THEY HAVE TAKEN OVER THE MIDDLE EAST. SHE HAS BEEN OUTSMARTED AND ALL PLAYED WORSE THAN ANYBODY I HAVE EVER SEEN IN ANY GOVERNMENT WHATSOEVER. >> WE ARE A LONG WAY AWAY FROM IMMIGRATION BUT I WILL LET YOU FINISH THIS TOPIC YOU HAVE ABOUT 45 SECONDS. >> AND SHE ALWAYS WILL BE. >> I FIND IT IRONIC HE IS RAISING NUCLEAR WEAPONS. THIS IS A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN VERY CAVALIER, EVEN CASUAL ABOUT THE USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS. HE HAS ADVOCATED MORE COUNTRIES GETTING THEM, JAPAN, KOREA, EVEN SAUDI ARABIA. HE SAID IF WE HAVE THEM WHY DON'T WE USE THEM? WHICH I THINK IS TERRIFYING. BUT HERE'S THE DEAL. THE BOTTOM LINE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS IS THAT WHEN THE PRESIDENT GIVES THE ORDER IT MUST BE FOLLOWED. THERE IS ABOUT FOUR MINUTES BETWEEN THE ORDER BEING GIVEN AND THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR LAUNCHING NUCLEAR WEAPONS TO DO SO. AND THAT IS WHY TEN PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD THAT AWESOME RESPONSIBILITY HAVE COME OUT AND IN AN UNPRECEDENTED WAY SAID THEY WOULD NOT TRUST DONALD TRUMP WITH THE NUCLEAR CODES OR TO HAVE HIS FINGER ON THE NUCLEAR BUTTON. >> I HAVE 200 GENERALS AND ADMIRALS, 21 ENDORSING ME. 21 CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENTS. AS FAR AS JAPAN AND OTHER COUNTRIES, WE ARE BEING RIPPED OFF BY EVERYBODY. WE ARE DEFENDING OTHER COUNTRIES, SPENDING A FORTUNE DOING SO. THEY HAVE THE BARGAIN OF THE CENTURY. ALL I SAID IS WE HAVE TO RENEGOTIATE THESE AGREEMENTS BECAUSE OUR COUNTRY CANNOT AFFORD TO DEFEND SAUDI ARABIA, JAPAN, GERMANY, SOUTH KOREA AND MANY OTHER PLACES. WE CANNOT CONTINUE... SHE TOOK THAT AS SAYING NUCLEAR WEAPONS. LOOK, SHE HAS BEEN PROVEN TO BE A LIAR ON SO MANY DIFFERENT WAYS, THIS IS JUST ANOTHER LIE. >> I'M QUOTING YOU. >> THERE IS NO GLOW, YOU WILL NOT FIND A QUOTE FOR ME. >> RE: NUCLEAR COMPETITION IN ASIA YOU SAID GO AHEAD, ENJOY YOURSELVES FOLKS. SETTING UP AND DEFEND YOURSELVES. >> THE UNITED STATES HAS KEPT THE PEACE THROUGH OUR ALLIANCES. DONALD WANTS TO TEAR UP OUR ALLIANCES. I THINK IT MAKES THE WORLD SAFER AND FRANKLY IT MAKES THE UNITED STATES SAFER. I WOULD WORK WITH OUR ALLIES IN ASIA, AND EUROPE, IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND ELSEWHERE. THAT IS THE ONLY WAY WE ARE GOING TO... >> WE WILL MOVE ONTO THE TOPIC. WHICH IS THE ECONOMY AND I HOPE WE HANDLE THAT AS WELL AS WE DID IMMIGRATION. YOU ALSO HAVE VERY DIFFERENT IDEAS ABOUT HOW TO GET THE ECONOMY GROWING FASTER. SECRETARY CLINTON, IN YOUR PLAN, GOVERNMENT PLAYS A BIG ROLE. YOU SEE MORE GOVERNMENT SPENDING, MORE ENTITLEMENTS, MORE TAX CREDITS, MORE TAX PENALTIES. MR TRUMP YOU WANT TO GET GOVERNMENT OUT WITH LOWER TAXES AND LESS REGULATION. WE WILL DRILL DOWN INTO THIS A LITTLE BIT MORE BUT IN THIS OVERVIEW PLEASE EXPLAIN TO BE WHY YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR PLAN WILL CREATE MORE JOBS AND GROWTH FOR THIS COUNTRY AND YOU OPPONENT‘S PLAN WILL NOT. IN THIS ROUND, YOU GO FIRST SECRETARY CLINTON. >> I THINK IN THE MIDDLE-CLASS BRIBES AMERICA THRIVES SO MY PLAN IS BASED ON GROWING THE ECONOMY, GIVING MIDDLE-CLASS FAMILIES MORE OPPORTUNITIES. I WANT US TO HAVE THE BIGGEST JOBS PROGRAM SINCE WORLD WAR II. JOBS AND INFRASTRUCTURE AND ADVANCED MANUFACTURING. I THINK WE CAN COMPETE WITH HIGH WAGE COUNTRIES AND I BELIEVE WE SHOULD. NEW JOBS IN CLEAN ENERGY, NOT ONLY TO FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE WHICH HAS EXTERIOR PROBLEM -- SERIOUS PROBLEM BUT TO CREATE NEW OPPORTUNITIES IN A NEW BUSINESSES. I WANT US TO DO MORE TO HELP SMALL BUSINESSES WHERE TWO THIRDS OF THE NEW JOBS WILL COME FROM. I WANT US TO RAISE THE NATIONAL MINIMUM WAGE BECAUSE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN POVERTY SHOULD NOT STILL BE IN POVERTY IF THEY WORK FULL-TIME AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE WOMEN GET EQUAL PAY FOR THE WORK WE DO. I FEEL STRONGLY THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE AN EDUCATION SYSTEM THAT STARTS WITH PRESCHOOL AND GOES THROUGH COLLEGE. THAT IS WHY I WANT MORE TECHNICAL EDUCATION IN HIGH SCHOOLS AND IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES, REAL APPRENTICESHIPS TO PREPARE YOUNG PEOPLE FOR THE JOBS OF THE FUTURE. I WANT TO MAKE COLLEGE DEBT-FREE AND FOR FAMILIES MAKING LESS THAN $125,000 YOU WILL NOT GET A TUITION BILL FROM A PUBLIC COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY IS THE PLAN THAT I WORKED ON WITH BERNIE SANDERS IS ENACTED. WE WILL WORK HARD TO MAKE SURE THAT IT IS BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO GO WHERE THE MONEY IS. MOST OF THE GAINS IN THE LAST YEAR SINCE THE GREAT RECESSION HAVE GONE TO THE VERY TOP. SO WE ARE GOING TO HAVE THE WEALTHY PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE CORPORATIONS MAKE A CONTRIBUTION GREATER THAN THEY ARE NOW TO OUR COUNTRY. THAT IS A PLAN THAT HAS BEEN ANALYZED BY INDEPENDENT EXPERTS WHICH SAID THAT IT COULD PRODUCE 10 MILLION NEW JOBS. BY CONTRAST, DONALD‘S PLAN HAS BEEN ANALYZED TO CONCLUDE IT MIGHT LOSE THAN A HALF-MILLION JOBS, WHITE? BECAUSE THIS WHOLE PLAN IS TO CUT TAXES TO GET THE BIGGEST TAX BREAKS EVER TO THE WEALTHY AND TO CORPORATIONS. ADDING TRILLION DOLLARS TO OUR DEBT AND CAUSING THE KIND OF -- TRILLION DOLLARS AND KIND OF SILLY BECAUSE YOU'RE THE KIND OF DISLOCATION WE HAVE SEEN BEFORE BECAUSE IT WILL BE TRICKLE-DOWN ECONOMICS ON STEROIDS SO I THINK THE PLAN I HAVE WILL ANGRY SKATER OPPORTUNITIES AND THE PLAN HE HAS WILL COST US JOBS AND POSSIBLY LEAD TO ONE OF THE GREAT RECESSION. >> THANK YOU, MR TRUMP WHY WILL YOU ARE PLANNING TO CREATE MORE JOBS AND GROWTH? >> IN HER PLAN IS GOING TO RAISE TAXES AND EVEN DOUBLE YOUR TAXES. HER TAX PLAN IS A DISASTER AND SHE CAN SAY ALL SHE WANTS ABOUT COLLEGE TUITION. I AM A BIG PROPONENT, WE WILL DO A LOT OF THINGS FOR COLLEGE TUITION BUT THE REST OF THE PUBLIC WILL PAY FOR IT. WE WILL HAVE A MASSIVE MASSIVE TAX INCREASE UNDER HILLARY CLINTON‘S PLAN. I WOULD LIKE TO START UP WHERE WE LEFT BECAUSE WHEN I SAID JAPAN AND GERMANY, AND I AM NOT TO SINGLE THEM OUT, SOUTH KOREA, THESE ARE VERY RICH POWERFUL COUNTRIES. SAUDI ARABIA. NOTHING BUT MONEY. WE PROTECT SAUDI ARABIA WHY ARE THEY NOT PAYING? SHE IMMEDIATELY WHEN SHE HEARD THIS I QUESTIONED AND I QUESTIONED NATO, WHY ARE THEY QUESTIONED OR PAYING BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT PAYING. SINCE I DID THIS A YEAR AGO, ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY ARE PAYING. I HAVE BEEN GIVEN A LOT OF CREDIT FOR IT. ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY ARE STARTING TO PAY UP. THEY HAVE TO PAY UP, WE ARE PROTECTING PEOPLE THEY HAS TO PAY UP. I'M A BIG FAN OF NATO BUT THEY HAVE TO PAY UP. SHE CAME OUT AND SAID WE LOVE OUR ALLIES AND THINK THEY ARE GREAT. IT IS AWFULLY HARD TO GET THEM TO PAY UP WHEN YOU HAVE SOMEONE SAYING WE BEEN HOW GREAT THEY ARE. WE HAVE TO TELL JAPAN AND VERY NICELY, GERMANY AND ALL OF THESE COUNTRIES, SOUTH KOREA, WE HAVE TO SAY YOU HAVE TO HELP US OUT. WE HAVE, DURING HIS REGIME, DURING PRESIDENT OBAMA‘S REGIME, WE HAVE DOUBLED OUR NATIONAL DEBT. WE ARE UP TO $20 TRILLION, SO MY PLAN, WE WILL RENEGOTIATE TRADE DEAL, WE WILL HAVE MORE FREE TRADE THAN WE HAVE NOW, WE HAVE HORRIBLE DEALS. OUR JOBS ARE BEING TAKEN OUT BY THE DEAL HER HUSBAND SIGNED, NAFTA, OUR JOBS ARE BEING SUCKED OUT OF OUR ECONOMY. YOU LOOK AT ALL THE PLACES I LEFT, YOU GO TO PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO, FLORIDA, ANY OF THEM, YOU GO UPSTATE NEW YORK, OUR JOBS HAVE FLED TO MEXICO AND OTHER PLACES. WE'RE BRINGING THEM BACK. I WILL RENEGOTIATE NAFTA AND I CANNOT MAKE A GREAT DEAL THEN WE WILL TERMINATE NAFTA AND CREATE NEW DEALS. WE WILL HAVE TRADE, WE WILL TERMINATE IT, WE WILL MAKE A GREAT TRADE DEAL AND IF WE CANNOT WE WILL DO IT AND GO A SEPARATE WAY BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN A DISASTER. WE ARE GOING TO CUT TAXES MASSIVELY, WE WILL CUT BUSINESS TAXES MASSIVELY. THEY WILL START HIRING PEOPLE. WE WILL BRING THE $2.5 TRILLION THAT IS OFFSHORE BACK INTO THE COUNTRY. WE ARE GOING TO START THE ENGINE ROLLING AGAIN BECAUSE RIGHT NOW OUR COUNTRY IS DYING AT 1% GDP. >> LET ME TRANSLATE THAT IF I CAN'T, CHRIS, BECAUSE >> YOU CANNOT. >> THE FACT IS HE IS GOING TO ADVOCATE FOR THE LARGEST TAX CUTS WE HAVE EVER SEEN. THREE TIMES MORE THAN THE TAX CUTS UNDER THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION. I HAVE SAID, REPEATEDLY THROUGHOUT THIS CAMPAIGN, I WILL NOT RAISE TAXES ON ANYONE MAKING $250,000 OR LESS. I ALSO WILL NOT ADD A PENNY TO THE DEBT. I HAVE COSTED OUT WHAT I AM GOING TO DO. HE WILL, THROUGH HIS MASSIVE TAX CUTS, ADDED $20 TRILLION TO THE DEATH. HE MENTIONED THE DEBT. WE KNOW HOW TO GET CONTROL OF THE DEAD. WHEN MY HUSBAND WAS PRESIDENT WE WENT FROM A $300 BILLION DEFICIT TO A $200 BILLION SURPLUS AND WE ARE ACTUALLY ON THE TOP TO ELIMINATING THE NATIONAL DEBT. WHEN PRESIDENT OBAMA CAME INTO OFFICE HE INHERITED THE WORST ECONOMIC DISASTER SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND HAVE CUT THE DEFICIT BY TWO THIRDS. SO, YES, ONE OF THE WAYS YOU GO AFTER THE DEBT, ONE OF THE LEAVE YOU TO CREATE JOBS IS BY INVESTING IN PEOPLE. SO I DO HAVE INVESTMENTS, INVESTMENTS IN NEW JOBS, INVESTMENTS IN EDUCATION, SKILL TRAINING AND THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEOPLE TO GET AHEAD AND STAY AHEAD. THAT IS THE KIND OF APPROACH THAT WILL WORK. CUTTING TAXES ON THE WEALTHY, WE HAVE TRIED BAD. IT HAS NOT WORKED THE WAY THAT IT HAS BEEN PROMISED. >> I WANT TO PURSUE YOUR PLAN BECAUSE IN MANY WAYS IT IS SIMILAR TO THE OBAMA STIMULUS PLAN IN 2009 WHICH HAS LED TO THE SLOWEST GDP GROWTH SINCE 1949. >> CORRECT. >> THANK YOU, SIR. YOU TOLD ME IN JULY WHEN WE SPOKE THAT THE PROBLEM IS THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA DID NOT GET TO DO ENOUGH IN WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO DO WITH HIS STIMULUS. IS YOUR PLAN BASICALLY EVEN MORE OF THE OBAMA STIMULUS? >> IT IS A COMBINATION, CHRIS. LET ME SAY THAT WHEN YOU INHERITED THE LEVEL OF ECONOMIC CATASTROPHE THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA INHERITED, IT WAS A REAL TOUCH AND GO SITUATION. I WAS IN THE SENATE BEFORE I BECAME SECRETARY OF STATE. I HAVE NEVER SEEN PEOPLE AS PHYSICALLY DISTRAUGHT AS THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION TEAM WAS BECAUSE OF WHAT WAS HAPPENING TO THE ECONOMY. I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT THE STEPS THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA TOOK SAVED THE ECONOMY. HE DOES NOT GET THE CREDIT HE DESERVES FOR TAKING SOME VERY HARD POSITIONS. BUT IT WAS A TERRIBLE RECESSION, SO NOW WE HAVE DUG OURSELVES OUT OF IT, WE ARE STANDING BUT WE ARE NOT YET RUNNING. WHAT I AM PROPOSING IS THAT WE INVEST FROM THE MIDDLE OUT IN THE GROUND UP. NOT THE TOP DOWN, THAT IS NOT GOING TO WORK. THAT IS WHY WHAT I HAVE PUT FORWARD DOES NOT ADD A PENNY TO THE DEBT, BUT IT IS THE KIND OF APPROACH THAT WILL ENABLE MORE PEOPLE TO TAKE THOSE NEW JOBS, HIGHER PAYING JOBS. WE'RE BEGINNING TO SEE SOME INCREASE IN INCOMES, AND WE CERTAINLY HAVE HAD A LONG STRING OF INCREASING JOBS. WE HAVE TO DO MORE TO GET THE WHOLE ECONOMY MOVING AND THAT IS WHAT I BELIEVE I WILL BE ABLE TO DO. >> MR TRUMP, EVEN CONSERVATIVE ECONOMISTS WHO HAVE LOOKED AT YOUR PLAN SAY THAT THE NUMBERS DO NOT ADD UP. THAT YOUR IDEA AND YOU HAVE TALKED ABOUT 25 MILLION JOBS CREATED, 4% GROWTH. >> OVER A 10-YEAR PERIOD. >> IS UNREALISTIC. AND THEY SAY YOU TALK A LOT ABOUT GROWING THE ENERGY INDUSTRY. THEY SAY WITH OIL PRICES AS LOW AS THEY ARE RIGHT NOW THAT IS UNREALISTIC AS WELL. YOUR RESPONSE? >> I JUST LEFT SOME HIGH REPRESENTATIVE OF INDIA. THEY ARE GROWING AT 8%. CHINA IS GROWING AT 7% AND AFTER THAT TO THEM IS A CATASTROPHICALLY LOW NUMBER. WE ARE GROWING, OUR LAST REPORT CAME OUT AND IT IS AROUND 1% LEVEL AND I THINK IT IS GOING. LAST WEEK AS YOU KNOW THEY CAME OUT WITH AN ANEMIC JOBS REPORT, A TERRIBLE JOBS REPORT. IN FACT I SAID IS THAT THE LAST JOBS REPORT BEFORE THE ELECTION BECAUSE IF IT DID IF I SHOULD WIN EASILY. IT WAS SO BAD. THE REPORT WAS SO BAD. OUR COUNTRY IS STAGNANT, WE HAVE LOST OUR JOBS, WE HAVE LOST OUR BUSINESSES. WE ARE NOT MAKING THINGS ANY MORE ON A RELATIVELY SPEAKING. OUR PRODUCT IS POURING IN FROM CHINA, POURING IN FROM VIETNAM, POURING IN FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD. I HAVE VISITED SO MANY COMMUNITIES, THIS HAS BEEN SUCH AN INCREDIBLE EDUCATION FOR ME, CHRIS. I HAVE GOT TO KNOW SO MANY, I'VE DEVELOPED SO MANY FRIENDS OVER THE LAST YEAR AND THEY CRY WHEN THEY SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING. I PASSED FACTORIES THAT WERE THRIVING, 20-25 YEARS AGO AND BECAUSE OF THE BILL HER HUSBAND SIGNED AND SHE BLESSED 100%, IT IS JUST HORRIBLE WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THESE PEOPLE IN THESE COMMUNITIES. SHE CAN SAY THAT HER HAS DID WELL, BUT BOY DID THEY SUFFER AS AN ADVOCATE IN BECAUSE IT DID NOT REALLY TAKE HIM VERY MUCH BUT HE KICKED IN AFTER THEY LEFT. BOY DID THEY SUFFER. THAT IS ONE OF THE WORST THING THAT HAS EVER BEEN SIGNED BY OUR COUNTRY. NOW SHE WANTS TO SIGN TRANSPACIFIC PARTNERSHIP. SHE LIED WHEN SHE SAID SHE DID NOT CALL IT THE GOLD STANDARD IN ONE OF THE DEBATES. SHE TOTALLY LIED. SHE DID CALL IT THAT AND THEY ACTUALLY FACT CHECK AND THEY SAID I WAS RIGHT. >> I WANT TO GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO BRIEFLY SPEAK TO THAT THAN I WANT TO GIVE IT TO SOMETHING THAT IS OBAMACARE BUT GO AHEAD, BRIEFLY. >> FIRST, LET ME SAY NUMBER ONE WHEN I SAW THE FINAL AGREEMENT FOR TPP- I WAS AGAINST IT, IT DID NOT MEET MY TEST. I HAVE OF THE SAME TEST, DOES IT CREATE JOBS, RAISE INCOMES AND FURTHER OUR NATIONAL SECURITY. I AM AGAINST IT NOW, I WILL BE AGAINST IT AFTER THE ELECTION AND WHEN I AM PRESIDENT. THERE IS ONLY ONE OF US ON THIS STAGE THAT HAS SHIPPED JOBS TO MEXICO, THAT IS DONALD TRUMP, 12 COUNTRIES INCLUDING MUST GO BUT HE MENTIONED CHINA. ONE OF THE PROBLEMS WE HAVE LOOKED CHINA IS THE ILLEGAL DUMPING OF STEEL AND ALUMINUM INTO OUR MARKETS. I HAVE FOUGHT AGAINST THAT AS A SENATOR I HAVE SET UP AGAINST IT AS SECRETARY OF STATE. DONALD HAS CHINESE STEEL AND ALUMINUM. IN FACT THE TRUMP HOTEL IN LAS VEGAS WAS MADE WITH CHINESE STEEL SO HE GOES AROUND WITH CROCODILE TEARS ABOUT HOW TERRIBLE IT IS BUT HE HAS GIVEN JOBS TO CHINESE STEEL WORKERS AND NON-AMERICAN STEELWORKERS. THAT IS THE KIND OF THING THAT IS JUST NOT GOING TO WORK. WE'RE GOING TO PULL THE COUNTRY TOGETHER, HAVE TRADE AGREEMENTS WE ENFORCE, THAT IS WHY I'M GOING TO HAVE A TRADE PROSECUTOR FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY AND WE ARE GOING TO ENFORCE THOSE AGREEMENTS AND WE ARE GOING TO LOOK FOR BUSINESS IS TO HELP US BY BUYING AMERICAN PRODUCTS. >> I ASKED A SIMPLE QUESTION, SHE HAS BEEN DOING THIS FOR 30 YEARS. WHY THE HELL DID YOU DO IT OVER THE LAST 15-20 YEARS? -- WHY THE HELL DIDN'T YOU DO IT. YOU ARE VERY MUCH INVOLVED IN EVERY ASPECT OF THIS COUNTRY. AND YOU DO HAVE EXPERIENCE, I SAY THE ONE THING YOU HAVE OVER ME HIS EXPERIENCE BUT IT IS BAD EXPERIENCE BECAUSE WHAT YOU HAVE DONE HAS TURNED OUT BADLY. FOR 30 YEARS YOU HAVE BEEN IN A POSITION TO HELP AND IF YOU SAY I USED A SKILL OR SOMETHING ELSE, THAT WOULD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO DO THAT -- MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO DO THAT. I WOULD NOT MIND. THE PROBLEM IS YOU TALK BUT DON'T GET ANYTHING DONE, HILLARY. YOU DO NOT. JUST LIKE WHEN YOU RAN THE STATE DEPARTMENT. $6 BILLION WAS MISSING. HOW DO YOU MISS $6 BILLION? HE RUN THE STATE DEPARTMENT. $6 BILLION WAS EITHER STOLEN, THEY DON'T KNOW. $6 BILLION IS GONE. IF YOU BECOME PRESIDENT, THIS COUNTRY IS GOING TO BE IN SOME MASS, BELIEVE ME. >> FIRST OF ALL, WHAT HE JUST SAID ABOUT THE STATE DEPARTMENT IS NOT ONLY UNTRUE IT HAS BEEN DEBUNKED NUMEROUS TIMES. I THINK IT IS REALLY AN IMPORTANT ISSUE HE RAISED THE 30 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE. LET ME TALK BRIEFLY ABOUT THAT. BACK IN THE 1970S I WORKED FOR THE CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND AND I WAS TAKING ON DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AFRICAN-AMERICAN KIDS IN SCHOOLS. HE WAS GETTING SUED BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FOR RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN HIS APARTMENT BUILDINGS. IN THE 1980S, I WAS WORKING TO REFORM THE SCHOOLS IN ARKANSAS. HE WAS BORROWING $14 MILLION FROM HIS FATHER TO START HIS BUSINESSES. IN THE 1990S I WENT TO BEIJING AND I SAID WOMEN'S RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS. HE INSULTED A FORMER MISS UNIVERSE, ALICIA MACHADO AND CALLED HER AN EATING MACHINE. ON THE DAY WHEN I WAS IN THE SITUATION ROOM MONITORING THE RAID THAT BROUGHT OSAMA BIN LADEN TO JUSTICE HE WAS HOSTING THE CELEBRITY APPRENTICE. I AM HAPPY TO COMPARE MY 30 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE, WHAT I HAVE DONE FOR THIS COUNTRY TRYING TO HELP IN EVERY WAY THAT I COULD ESPECIALLY KIDS AND FAMILIES GET AHEAD AND STAY AHEAD WITH YOUR 30 YEARS AND I WILL LET THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MAKE THAT DECISION. CITI I THINK I DID A MUCH BETTER JOB. I BUILT A MASSIVE COMPANY, GREAT COMPANY, SOME OF THE GREATEST ASSETS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD WORTH MANY BILLIONS OF DOLLARS. I STARTED WITH A $1 BILLION LOAN, I AGREE WITH THAT, WHEN MILLION-DOLLAR LOAN BUT I BUILT A PHENOMENAL COMPANY AND IF WE COULD RUN OUR COUNTRY THE WAY I RUN MY COMPANY WE WOULD HAVE A COUNTRY THAT YOU WOULD BE SO PROUD OF YOU WOULD EVEN BE PROUD OF IT AND FRANKLY WHEN YOU LOOK AT HER REAL RECORD WILL STOP TAKE A LOOK AT SYRIA. TAKE A LOOK OF THE MIGRATION. TAKE A LOOK AT LIBYA. TAKE A LOOK AT IRAQ. SHE GAVE US BY THIS BECAUSE HER AND OBAMA CREATED THIS HUGE VACUUM AND A SMALL GROUP CAME OUT OF THAT HUGE VACUUM BECAUSE WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN IN IRAQ BUT ONCE WE WERE THERE WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER GOT OUT THE WAY THEY WANTED TO GET OUT. SHE GAVE ADVICE IS AS SURE AS YOU ARE SITTING THERE AND WHAT HAPPENED IS NOW ISIS IS IN 32 COUNTRIES AND NOW I LISTEN TO HOW SHE'S GOING TO GET RID OF ISIS. SHE WILL GET RID OF NOBODY. >> WE WILL GET TOO FOREIGN HOTSPOTS IN A FEW MOMENTS BUT THE NEXT SEGMENT IS FITNESS TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. MR TRUMP, AT THE LAST DEBATE YOU SAID YOU ARE TALKED ABOUT GRABBIN WOMEN WAS JUST THAT, TALK AND THAT HE WOULD NEVER ACTUALLY DO IT AND SINCE THEN AS WE ALL KNOW NINE WOMEN HAVE COME FORWARD AND SAID THAT YOU EITHER GROPED THEM, OR KISSED THEM WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT. WHY WOULD SO MANY DIFFERENT WOMEN FROM SO MANY DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES OVER SO MANY DIFFERENT YEARS, WHY WOULD THEY ALL IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS MAKE UP THAT YOU DID THIS. SINCE THIS IS A QUESTION FOR BOTH OF YOU, SECRETARY CLINTON, MR TRUMP SAYS WHAT YOUR HUSBAND DID AND THAT YOU DEFENDED WAS EVEN WORSE. MR TRUMP, YOU GO FIRST. >> FIRST OF ALL THOSE STORIES HAVE BEEN LARGELY DEBUNKED. I DON'T KNOW THOSE PEOPLE. I HAVE A FEELING HOW THEY CAME, I BELIEVE IT WAS HER CAMPAIGN THAT DID IT, JUST LIKE IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT CAME OUT TODAY ON CLIP WHERE I WAS WONDERING WHAT HAPPENED WITH MY RALLY IN CHICAGO AND OTHER RALLIES WHERE WE HAD SUCH VIOLENCE. SHE IS THE ONE AND OBAMA THAT CAUSED THE VIOLENCE. THEY HIRED PEOPLE, THEY PAY THEM $1500 AND THEY ARE ON TAPE SAYING BE VIOLENT, CAUSE STATES, DO BAD THINGS. THAT'S CAUSE FIGHTS. I WOULD SAY THOSE STORIES ARE ALL FALSE. I DID NOT EVEN APOLOGIZE TO MY WIFE IS SITTING RIGHT HERE BECAUSE I DID NOT DO ANYTHING. I DID NOT KNOW ANY OF THESE WOMEN. I DID NOT SEE THESE WOMEN. THE LIMIT, THE WOMAN ON THE PLANE, I THINK THEY WANT EITHER FAINT OR HER CAMPAIGN DID AND I THINK IT'S HER CAMPAIGN -- I THINK THEY WANT EITHER FAME. WHAT I THOUGHT, WHAT THEY DID, WHICH IS A CRIMINAL ACT BY THE WAY WERE THEY ARE TELLING PEOPLE TO GO OUT AND START THIS FIGHT AND VIOLENCE, I WILL TELL YOU WHAT, IN PARTICULAR IN CHICAGO, PEOPLE WERE HURT AND PEOPLE COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED IN THAT RIGHT. THAT WAS NOW ON TAPE STARTED BY HER. I BELIEVE, CHRIS, THAT SHE GOT THESE PEOPLE TO STEP FORWARD. IF IT WAS NOT THEY GET THERE TEN MINUTES OF FAME, BUT THEY WERE ALL TOTALLY, IT WAS ALL FICTION, IT WAS WIDE AND IT WAS FICTION. SECRETARY CLINTON. >> AT THE LAST DEBATE, WE HEARD DONALD TALKING ABOUT WHAT HE DID TO WOMEN AND AFTER THAT, A NUMBER OF WOMEN HAVE COME FORWARD SAYING THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HE DID TO THEM. WHAT WAS HIS RESPONSE? HE HELD A NUMBER OF BIG RALLIES WHERE HE SAID THAT HE COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE DONE THOSE THINGS. TO THOSE WOMEN BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT ATTRACTIVE ENOUGH FOR THEM TO BE ASSAULTED. >> I DID NOT SAY THAT. >> IN FACT, HE WENT ON. >> IT IS HER TWO-MINUTE. >> I DID NOT SAY THAT. >> HE WENT ON TO SAY LOOK AT HER, I DON'T THINK SO. ABOUT ANOTHER WOMAN. HE SAID THAT WOULD NOT BE MY FIRST CHOICE. HE ATTACKED THE WOMAN REPORTER WRITING THE STORY, CALLED HER DISGUSTING AS HE HAS CALLED A NUMBER OF WOMEN DURING THIS CAMPAIGN. DONALD THINKS BELITTLING WOMEN MAKES THEM BIGGER. HE GOES AFTER THEIR DIGNITY, THEIR SELF-WORTH, AND I DON'T THINK THERE IS A WOMAN ANYWHERE WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT THAT FEELS LIKE. SO WE NOW KNOW WHAT DONALD THINKS AND WHAT HE SAYS AND HOW HE ACTS TOWARD WOMEN, THAT IS WHO DONALD IS. I THINK IT IS REALLY UP TO ALL OF US TO DEMONSTRATE WHO WE ARE AND WHO OUR COUNTRY IS AND TO STAND UP AND BE VERY CLEAR ABOUT WHAT WE EXPECT FROM OUR NEXT PRESIDENT. HOW WE WANT TO BRING OUR COUNTRY TOGETHER, WHERE WE DO NOT WANT TO HAVE THE KIND OF DATING OF PEOPLE, ONE AGAINST THE OTHER. WHEREIN SAID WE CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSITY, WE LIFT PEOPLE UP AND WE MAKE -- WHERE INSTEAD WE CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSITY. AND WE MAKE OUR COUNTRY EVEN GREATER. AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE AMERICA IS GOOD, AND IT REALLY IS UP TO US TO MAKE THAT TRUE NOW AND IN THE FUTURE IN PARTICULARLY FOR OUR CHILDREN AND OUR GRANDCHILDREN TO LEAD BY GRANDCHILDREN. >> NOBODY HAS MORE RESPECT FOR WOMEN THAN I DO. LAUGHTER >> FRANKLY THOSE STORIES HAVE BEEN LARGELY DEBUNKED AND I REALLY WANT TO JUST TALK ABOUT SOMETHING SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT. SHE MENTIONS THIS, WHICH IS ALL FICTION, ALL FICTION LIES. PROBABLY OR POSSIBLY STARTED BY HER AND HER VERY SLEAZY CAMPAIGN, BUT I WILL TELL YOU WHAT IS NOT FICTIONALIZED ARE HER E-MAILS WHERE SHE DESTROYED 33 THOSE E-MAILS CRIMINALLY, CRIMINALLY. AFTER GETTING A SUBPOENA FROM THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS. -- 33,000 E-MAILS. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE FBI? I DON'T KNOW. WE HAVE A GREAT 4-STAR GENERAL TODAY, YOU READ IT IN ALL OF THE PAPERS, WHO WILL POTENTIALLY SERVE FIVE YEARS IN JAIL FOR LYING TO BE AT THE EYE. ONE LINE. SHE HAS LIED -- LYING TO BSDI. SHE HAS LIED HUNDREDS OF TIMES TO THE PEOPLE, CONGRESS AND THE FBI. YOU WILL PROBABLY GO TO JAIL. THIS IS THE 4-STAR GENERAL -- HE WILL PROBABLY GO TO JAIL. AND SHE GETS AWAY WITH IT AND CAN RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES. THAT IS REALLY WHAT YOU SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT, NOT FICTION WHERE SOMEBODY WANTS FAME WERE WHERE THEY COME OUT OF HER CRICKET CAMPAIGN. >> SECRETARY CLINTON. >> -- CROOKED CAMPAIGN. >> EVERY TIME DONALD IS PUSHED ON SOMETHING WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY UNCOMFORTABLE LIKE WHAT THESE WOMEN ARE SAYING, HE IMMEDIATELY GOES TO DENYING RESPONSIBILITY AND IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT WOMEN. HE NEVER APOLOGIZES OR SAYS HE'S SORRY FOR ANYTHING, SO WE KNOW WHAT HE HAS SAID AND WHAT HE HAS DONE TO WOMEN, BUT HE ALSO WENT AFTER A DISABLED REPORTER, MOCKED AND MIMICKED HIM ON NATIONAL TELEVISION. >> WRONG. >> HE WENT AFTER MR AND MRS. KLEIN, THE PARENTS OF A YOUNG MAN WHO DIED SERVING OUR COUNTRY. A GOLD STAR FAMILY BECAUSE OF THEIR RELIGION -- MR AND MRS. KHAN. HE WENT AFTER JOHN MCCAIN, A PRISONER OF WAR AND THAT HE PREFERS PEOPLE WERE NOT CAPTURED. -- HE PREFERS PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT CAPTURED. HE WENT AFTER A FEDERAL JUDGE BORN AND A DEED TO LEAD INDIANA BUT WHO YOU SAY CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO TRY THE FRAUD AND RACKETEERING CASE AGAINST JOB UNIVERSITY BECAUSE HIS PARENTS ARE MEXICAN. IT IS NOT ONE THING, THIS IS A PATTERN. A PATTERN OF DEVICES DIVISIVENESS OF THAT DARK AND DANGEROUS MISSION OF OUR COUNTRY WHERE HE INCITES VIOLENCE, WHERE HE APPLAUDS PEOPLE WHO ARE PUSHING AND PULLING AND PUNCHING AT HIS RALLIES. THAT IS NOT WHO AMERICA IS AND I HOPE THAT AS WE MOVE IN THE LAST WEEKS OF THIS CAMPAIGN MORE AND MORE PEOPLE WILL UNDERSTAND WHAT IS AT STAKE IN THIS ELECTION. IT REALLY DOES COME DOWN TO WHAT KIND OF COUNTRY WE ARE GOING TO HAVE. >> SO SAD WHEN SHE TALKS ABOUT VIOLENCE AT MY RALLIES AND SHE CAUSED THE VIOLENCE. IT IS ON TAPE. THE OTHER THINGS ARE FALSE, BUT HONESTLY I WOULD LOVE TO TALK ABOUT GETTING RID OF ISIS AND I LOVE TO TALK ABOUT OTHER THINGS. BUT THOSE OTHER CHARGES AS SHE KNOWS OUR FAULT. >> IN THIS OP-ED ABOUT FITNESS TO BE PRESIDENT THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DEVELOPMENTS OVER THE LAST TEN DAYS SINCE THE LAST DEBATE. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT THEM. THESE ARE QUESTIONS THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE. SECRETARY CLINTON, DURING YOUR 2009 SENATE CONFIRMATION HEARING YOU PROMISED TO AVOID EVEN THE APPEARANCE OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH YOUR DEALING WITH THE GLENN FOUNDATION WHILE YOU WERE SECRETARY OF STATE BUT E-MAILS SHOW THAT DONORS GOT SPECIAL ACCESS TO YOU -- CLINTON FOUNDATION. THOSE SEEKING GRANTS FOR HAITI RELIEF WERE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY FROM NONDONORS AND SOME OF THOSE DONORS GOT GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, TAXPAYER MONEY. CAN YOU REALLY SAY THAT YOU KEPT YOUR PLEDGE TO THE SENATE COMMITTEE AND WHY ISN'T WHAT HAPPENED AND WHAT WENT ON BETWEEN YOU AND THE GLENN FOUNDATION, WHY ISN'T THAT WHAT MR TOWN CALLED PAY TO PLAY? >> EVERYTHING I DID AS SECRETARY OF STATE WAS IN FURTHER UP THE MICRO FURTHERANCE OF OUR COUNTRY BUT MIGHT INTEREST. I THINK THAT HAS BEEN PROVEN BUT I AM HAPPY, IN FACT I'M THRILLED TO TOP OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION BECAUSE IT IS A WORL RENOWNED CHARITY AND I AM SO PROUD OF THE WORK THAT IT DOES. I COULD TALK FOR THE REST OF THE DEBATE, I KNOW IT'LL HAVE THE TIME TO DO THAT BUT JUST BRIEFLY, THE CLINTON FOUNDATION MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR 11 MILLION PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD WITH HIV-AIDS TO GET TREATMENT AND THAT IS ABOUT HALF THE PEOPLE RUN THE WORLD GETTING TREATMENT IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE AMERICAN... HEALTH ASSOCIATION. WE HAVE MADE ENVIRONMENTS IN SCHOOLS HEALTHY. >> RESPECTFULLY, THIS IS AN OPEN DISCUSSION OF JAVI IT IS AN OPEN DISCUSSION. >> PAID TO PLAY, DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT. >> THERE IS NO EVIDENCE... >> HAS BEEN VERY WELL STUDIED. >> THERE HAS BEEN VERY GOOD WORK IN THE HIRING. >> IT IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, SAUDI ARABIA GETTING $25 MILLION, QATAR, ALL OF THESE COUNTRIES, YOU TALK ABOUT WOMEN AND WOMEN'S WRITES, SO THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT... THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT KILL WOMEN AND TREAT WOMEN HORRIBLY AND YET YOU TAKE THEIR MONEY. SO I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU RIGHT NOW, WHY DON'T YOU GIVE BACK THE MONEY THAT YOU HAVE TAKEN FROM CERTAIN COUNTRIES THAT TREAT CERTAIN GROUPS OF PEOPLE SO HORRIBLY? WHY DON'T YOU GIVE BACK THE MONEY? I THINK IT WOULD BE A GREAT GESTURE BECAUSE SHE TAKES THE TERMINUS AMOUNT OF MONEY AND YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE PEOPLE OF HAITI, I WAS IN LITTLE HAITI THE OTHER DAY, AND I WANT TO TELL YOU THEY HATE THE CLINTONS BECAUSE WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN HAITI WITH THE CLINTON FOUNDATION IS A DISGRACE. AND YOU KNOW IT AND THEY KNOW IT, AND EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT. >> SECRETARY CLINTON. >> VERY QUICKLY, WE AT THE CLINTON FOUNDATION SPENT 90%, 90% OF ALL THE MONEY THAT IS DONATED ON PERHAPS OF PROGRAMMES -- ON BEHALF OF OF PEOPLE... WE HAVE THE HIGHEST RATING FROM WATCHDOGS THAT FOLLOW FOUNDATIONS AND I WOULD BE HAPPY TO COMPARE WHAT WE DO WITH THE TRUMP FOUNDATION WHICH FOUND THE MARKER TOOK MONEY FROM OTHER PEOPLE AND DID A 6-FOOT PORTRAIT OF DONALD. WHO DOES THAT? IT WAS ASTONISHING. WHEN IT COMES TO HAITI, HAITI IS THE POOREST COUNTRY IN OUR HEMISPHERE, THE EARTHQUAKE AND HURRICANES, IT HAS DEVASTATED HAITI. BILL AND I HAVE BEEN INVOLVED TO TRY TO HELP HAITI FOR MANY YEARS. THE CLINTON FOUNDATION RAISED $30 MILLION TO HELP HAITI AFTER THE CATASTROPHIC EARTHQUAKE AND ALL OF THE TERRIBLE PROBLEMS THAT PEOPLE THERE HAD. WE HAVE DONE THINGS TO HELP SMALL BUSINESSES, AGRICULTURE AND SO MUCH ELSE. AND WE WOULD KEEP WORKING TO HELP HAITI BECAUSE IT IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE AMERICAN... >> THEY DON'T WANT YOUR HELP ANY MORE. >> I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION ONE THING. TRUMP FOUNDATION, SMALL FOUNDATION, PEOPLE CONTRIBUTE, I CONTRIBUTE, THE MONEY GOES 100%, 100% GOES TO DIFFERENT CHARITIES INCLUDING A LOT OF MILITARY PEOPLE. I DON'T BUY BOATS OR PLANES, WHAT HAPPENED... >> WAS IN SOME OF THE MONEY USED TO SETTLE YOUR LAWSUIT CERTAIN QUESTION THE IT WAS USED TO PUT UP THE AMERICAN FLAG, WE FOUGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO PUT UP THE AMERICAN FLAG. >> THERE WAS A PENALTY IMPOSED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY... >> THERE WAS, AND BY THE WAY... >> IS THE MONEY WENT TO FISHER HOUSE WHERE THEY BUILD HOUSES WITH MONEY YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT, WHAT TO FISHER HOUSE WHERE THEY BUILD HOUSES FOR DISABLED VETERANS. >> I WANT TO GET IN... >> THERE IS NO WAY WE CAN SEE THAT IS TRUE BECAUSE HE HAS NOT RELEASED HIS TAX RETURNS, FIRST CANDIDATE TO EVER FOR PRESIDENT IN THE LAST 40 PLUS YEARS WHO HAS NOT RELEASED HIS TAX RETURNS SO EVERYTHING HE SAYS ABOUT CHARITY OR ANYTHING ELSE CANNOT PROVE IT. WE CAN LOOK AT OUR TAX RETURNS, IT IS ALL OUT THERE, BUT WHAT IS REALLY TROUBLING IS THAT WE LEARNED IN THE LAST DEBATE HE HAS NOT PAID A PENNY IN FEDERAL INCOME TAX. WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IMMIGRANTS A FEW MOMENTS AGO CHRIS, HALF OF ALL IMMIGRANTS, UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS IN OUR COUNTRY ACTUALLY PAY FEDERAL INCOME TAX, SO WE HAVE UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS IN AMERICA WHO ARE PAYING MORE FEDERAL INCOME TAX BEEN A BILLIONAIRE. I FIND THAT... >> LET ME JUST TELL YOU FOR A SECOND, WE ARE ENTITLED BECAUSE OF THE LAWS PEOPLE LIKE HER PAST TO TAKE MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF DEPRECIATION AND WE DO IT. ALL OF HER DONORS, JUST ABOUT ALL OF THEM, I KNOW TOOK ABOUT HUNDREDS OF HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, GEORGE SOROS, OTHERS. LET ME EXPLAIN. MOST OF HER DONORS STRUCTURED MR TRUMP. >> AND MOST OF THEM DO THE SAME. >> YOU KNOW HILLARY WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE IS YOU SHOULD HAVE CHANGED THE LAW WHEN YOU WERE IN A -- WHEN YOU WERE A SENATOR BECAUSE THOSE SPECIAL INTERESTS ARE DOING THE SAME THINGS I DO ACCEPT EVEN MORE SO. YOU HAD TO CHANGE THE LAW BUT YOU WON'T CHANGE THE LAW BECAUSE YOU TAKEN SO MUCH MONEY, I MEAN I SAT IN MY APARTMENT TODAY ON A VERY BEAUTIFUL HOTEL DOWN THE STREET... BUT I WILL TELL YOU I SAT THERE WATCHING AD AFTER AD, ALL PAID FOR BY YOUR FRIENDS ON WALL STREET, THAT GAVE SO MUCH MONEY BECAUSE THEY KNOW YOU ARE GOING TO PROTECT THEM AND FRANKLY, YOU SHOULD HAVE CHANGED THE LAW. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT I DID YOU SHOULDN'T CHANGE THE LAW? >> I WANT TO YOU ABOUT ONE MORE QUESTION ON THIS TOPIC. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED AT RALLIES RECENTLY THAT THIS ELECTION IS RIGGED AND HILLARY CLINTON IS IN THE PROCESS OF TRYING TO STEAL IT FROM YOU. YOUR RUNNING MATE MIKE PENCE PLEDGED ON SUNDAY THAT YOU AND HIM, HIS WORDS, "WILL ABSOLUTELY ACCEPT THE RESULTS OF THIS ELECTION" ELECTION". TOD DAUGHTER IF I BESTED THE SAME THING. I WANT TO ASK YOU HERE ON THE STAGE TONIGHT, DO YOU MAKE THE SAME COMMITMENT THAT YOU WILL ABSOLUTELY COME ASSERT, THAT YOU WILL ABSOLUTELY ACCEPT THE RESULT OF THE SELECTION QUESTION I WILL LOOK AT AT THE TIME. I AM NOT LOOKING AT ANYTHING NOW. I AM NOT LOOKING A THING NOW. WHAT I'VE SEEN IS SO BAD. FOR SOME OF THE MEDIA IS SO DISHONEST SO CORRUPT AND THE PYLON IS SO AMAZING THAT THE NEW YORK TIMES ACTUALLY WROTE AN ARTICLE ABOUT IT, THEY DON'T EVEN CARE. THAT THEY POISON THE MINDS OF THE VOTERS BUT UNFORTUNATELY FOR THEM, I THINK THE VOTERS ARE SEEING THROUGH IT. I THINK THEY WILL SEEK DIRECT, WE'LL FIND OUT ON NOVEMBER EIGHT BUT WE EITHER IT. EXCUSE ME, IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR VOTER ROLLS, YOU WILL SEE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE THAT ARE REGISTERED, MILLIONS, THE COMING FOR ME, THIS IS COMING FROM OTHER PLACES, MILLIONS OF PEOPLE THAT ARE REGISTERED TO VOTE THAT SHOULD NOT BE REGISTERED TO VOTE. SO, LET ME JUST TO GIVE YOU ONE OTHER THING SO I CAN TALK ABOUT THE CORRUPT MEDIA, I TALK ABOUT THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE, TELL YOU ONE OTHER THING. SHE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO RUN. SHE IS GUILTY OF VERY, VERY SERIOUS CRIME. SHE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO RUN. AND JUST IN THAT RESPECT, I SAY, IT IS RIGGED TO CAUSE SHE SHOULD NEVER... CHRIS, SHE SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY BASED ON WHAT SHE DID WITH E-MAILS AND SO MANY OTHER THINGS. >> BUT SIR THERE IS A TRADITION IN THIS COUNTRY IN FACT ONE OF THE PRIDES OF THIS COUNTRY IS APS WILL TRANSITION OF POWER AND THAT NO MATTER HOW HARD FOUGHT A CAMPAIGN IS, THAT AT THE END OF THE CAMPAIGN, THAT THE LOSER CONCEDES TO THE WINNER, NOT SAYING THAT YOU ARE NECESSARILY GOING TO BE THE LOSER OR THE WINNER, BUT THAT THE LOSER CONCEDES TO THE WINNER AND THAT THE COUNTRY COMES TOGETHER IN PART FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY, ARE YOU SAYING YOU ARE NOT PREPARED NOW TO DO THAT QUESTION ME WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT I WILL TELL YOU THAT THE TIME, I WILL KEEP YOU IN SUSPENSE THAT SHOULD BE CHRIS LET ME RESPOND TO THAT BECAUSE THAT IS HORRIFYING. EVERY TIME DONALD THINKS THINGS ARE NOT GOING IN HIS DIRECTION HE CLAIMS WHATEVER IT IS IS RIGGED AGAINST THEM. THE FBI CONDUCTED A YEAR-LONG INVESTIGATION INTO MY E-MAILS, THEY CONCLUDED THERE WAS NO CASE. HE SAID THE FBI WAS RIGGED. HE LOST THE IOWA CAUCUS, THE WISCONSIN PRIMARY, HE SAID THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY WAS RIGGED AGAINST THEM. AND THEN TRUMP UNIVERSITY GETS SUED FOR FRAUD AND RACKETEERING, HE CLAIMS THE COURT SYSTEM AND THE FEDERAL JUDGE IS RIGGED AGAINST HIM. THERE WAS EVEN A TIME WHERE HE DID NOT GET AN EMMY FOR HIS TV PROGRAMME THREE YEARS IN A ROW AND HE STARTED TWEETING THAT THE EMMYS WERE RIGGED. >> SHOULD'VE GOTTEN THAT. >> THIS IS A MINDSET. THIS IS HOW DONALD THINKS. IT IS FUNNY BUT IT IS ALSO REALLY TROUBLING. >> OK. >> THAT IS NOT THE WAY OUR DEMOCRACY WORKS. WE HAVE BEEN AROUND FOR 240 YEARS, WE HAVE HAD PLENTY OF ELECTIONS AND WE ACCEPTED THE OUTCOMES WHEN WE MAY NOT HAVE A LIKED THEM -- LIKE THEM AND THAT IS WHAT WE EXPECT FOR ANYONE STANDING ON THE DEBATE STAGE DURING A GENERAL ELECTION. PRESIDENT OBAMA SAID THE OTHER DAY, WHEN YOU ARE WHINING. >> HOLD ON FOLKS... >> IT JUST SHOWS YOU ARE NOT UP TO DOING THE JOB AND LET'S, LET'S BE CLEAR ABOUT WHAT HE IS SAYING AND WHAT THAT MEANS. HE HAS DENIGRATED, HE IS TALKING DOWN OUR DEMOCRACY AND I FOR 1AM APPALLED THAT SOMEBODY WHO IS THE NOMINEE OF ONE OF OUR TWO MAJOR PARTIES WOULD TAKE THAT KIND OF POSITION. >> I THINK WHAT THE FBI DID AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DID, INCLUDING MEETING WITH HER HUSBAND, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, IN THE BACK OF AN AEROPLANE ON THE TARMAC, IN ARIZONA... I THINK IT IS DISGRACEFUL I THINK IT IS A DISGRACE. WE HAVE NEVER HAD A SITUATION... HOLD ON FOLKS. >> THIS DOES NOT DO ANY GOOD FOR ANYONE, BUT PLEASE CONTINUE THE DEBATES AND MOVE ONTO THE SUBJECT OF FOREIGN HOTSPOTS. THE IRAQI OFFENSIVE TO TAKE BACK MOSUL HAS BEGUN. IF THEY ARE SUCCESSFUL IN PUSHING ICE IS OUT OF THAT CITY AND OUT OF ALL OF IRAQ, THE QUESTION THEN BECOMES WHAT HAPPENED THE DAY AFTER AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WHICHEVER OF YOU IN THE BEST PRESIDENT WILL HAVE TO CONFRONT. WILL YOU PUT US TROOPS INTO THAT VACUM TO MAKE SURE THAT ISIS DOES NOT COME BACK OR IS REPLACED BY SOMETHING EVEN WORSE? SECRETARY CLINTON YOU GO FIRST IN THE SEGMENT YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES. >> WELL I AM ENCOURAGED THAT THERE IS AN EFFORT LED BY THE IRAQI ARMY, SUPPORTED BY KURDISH FORCES, ALSO GIVEN THE HELP AND ADVICE FROM THE NUMBER OF SPECIAL FORCES AND OTHER AMERICANS ON THE GROUND, BUT I WILL NOT SUPPORT PUTTING AMERICAN SOLDIERS INTO IRAQ AS AN OCCUPYING FORCE. I DON'T THINK THAT IS IN OUR INTERESTS AND I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD BE SMART TO DO, IN FACT CHRIS, I THINK THAT WOULD BE A BIG RED FLAG WAVING FOR ISIS TO RECONSTITUTE ITSELF. THE GOAL HERE IS TO TAKE BACK MOSUL. IT WILL BE A HARD FIGHT, I HAVE NO ILLUSIONS ABOUT THAT, AND THEN CONTINUED TO PRESS INTO SYRIA AND BEGIN TO TAKE BACK AND MOVE ON RACK UP WHICH IS THE ISIS HEADQUARTERS. -- I BELIEVE IN THE HARD WORK WE HAVE DONE AND I BELIEVE WE WILL SEE A REALLY SUCCESSFUL MILITARY OPERATION. BUT WE KNOW WE HAVE LOTS OF WORK TO DO, SYRIA WILL REMAIN A HOTBED OF TERRORISM AS LONG AS THE CIVIL WAR AIDED AND ABETTED BY THE IRANIANS AND RUSSIANS CONTINUE. SO I HAVE SAID LOOK, WE NEED TO KEEP OUR EYE ON ISIS. THAT IS WHY I WANT TO HAVE AN INTELLIGENT SURGE THAT PROTECTS US HERE AT HOME WHILE WE HAVE TO GO OUT THEM FROM THE AIR, ON THE GROUND, ONLINE. WHY WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE HERE AT HOME WE DON'T LET TERRORISTS BY WEAPONS IF YOU'RE TOO DANGEROUS TO FLY, YOU ARE TO YOUR DOCTOR TOO DANGEROUS TO BUY A GUN. I AM GOING TO CONTINUE TO PUSH FOR A NO-FLY ZONE AND SAFE HAVENS WITHIN SYRIA. NOT ONLY TO HELP PROTECT THE SYRIANS AND PREVENT THE CONSTANT OUTFLOW OF REFUGEES, BUT TO FRANKLY GAIN SOME LEVERAGE ON BOTH THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE RUSSIANS SO THAT PERHAPS WE CAN HAVE THE KIND OF SERIOUS GO STATIONS NECESSARY TO BRING THE CONFLICT TO AN END AND GO FORWARD ON A POLITICAL TRACT. >> MR TRUMP SAME QUESTION, IF WE ARE ABLE TO PUSH ISIS OUT OF MOSUL AND OUT OF IRAQ, WILL YOU BE WILLING TO PUT US TROOPS IN THERE TO PREVENT THEIR RETURN OR SOMETHING ELSE QUESTION ME LET ME TELL YOU, MOSUL IS SO SAD. WE HAD MOSUL. BUT WHEN SHE LEFT, WHEN SHE TOOK EVERYBODY OUT WE LOST MOSUL. NOW FIGHTING AGAIN TO GET MOSUL. THE THING WITH MOSUL AND WHAT THEY WANTED TO DO IS THEY WANTED TO GET THE LEADERS OF ISIS WHO THEY FELT WERE IN MOSUL. ABOUT THREE MONTHS AGO I STARTED READING THAT THEY WANTED TO GET THE LEADERS AND THEY ARE GOING TO ATTACK MOSUL. WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE ELEMENT OF SURPRISE? OK? WE ANNOUNCE WE ARE GOING AFTER MOSUL, I HAVE BEEN READING ABOUT GOING AFTER MOSUL OR HOW LONG IS THAT HILLARY? THREE MONTHS? THESE PEOPLE LEFT. THEY LEFT. THE ELEMENT OF SURPRISE, DOUG DOUGLAS MACARTHUR -- DOUGLAS MACARTHUR. THE STUPIDITY OF OUR COUNTRY, SO NOW WE ARE FIGHTING FOR MOSUL THAT WE HAD, ALL SHE HAD TO DO WAS STAY THERE AND NOW WE'RE GOING IN AGAIN. BUT YOU KNOW WHO THE BIG WINNER IN MOSUL IS AFTER WE EVENTUALLY GET IT AND THE ONLY REASON THEY DID IT IS BECAUSE SHE IS RUNNING FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT. THEY WANT TO LOOK TOUGH. THEY WANT TO LOOK GOOD. SHE VIOLATED THE RED LINE IN THE SAND AND MADE SO MANY MISTAKES. MADE ALL MISTAKES, THAT IS WHY WE HAVE THE GREAT MIGRATION, BUT SHE WANTED TO LOOK GOOD FOR THE ELECTION SO THEY ARE GOING IN BUT WHO IS GOING TO GET MOSUL REALLY? WE WILL TAKE MOSUL EVENTUALLY, BY THE WAY IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING, MUCH TOUGHER THAN THEY THOUGHT. MUCH TOUGHER AND MUCH MORE DANGEROUS, MORE DEATHS THAN THEY THOUGHT. BUT THE LEADERS THEY WANT TO GET ARE ALL GONE BECAUSE THEY ARE SMART. THEY SAY WHAT WE NEED THIS FOR? SO MOSUL IS GOING TO BE A WONDERFUL THING AND I RAN SHOULD WRITE AS A LETTER OF THANK YOU, JUST REALLY STUPID, THE STUPIDEST DEAL OF ALL TIME, A DEAL THAT IS GOING TO GIVE IRAN SO MUCH NUCLEAR WEAPONS, IRAN SHOULD WRITE US YET ANOTHER LETTER SAYING THANK YOU VERY MUCH BECAUSE IT RAN AS I SAID MANY YEARS AGO, IRAN IS TAKING OVER IRAQ. SUNDAY MAY HAVE WANTED TO DO FOREVER AND WE HAVE MADE IT EASY FOR THEM. WE WILL NOT TAKE -- WE WILL TAKE MOSUL AND YOU KNOW WHO'S GOING TO BE THE BENEFICIARY? IRAN, THEY ARE OUTSMARTING, LOOK YOU ARE NOT THERE, YOU MIGHT BE INVOLVED IN THAT DECISION, BUT YOU WERE THERE WHEN YOU TOOK EVERYBODY OUT OF MOSUL AND OUT OF IRAQ. YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN IRAQ, BUT YOU DID VOTED -- VOTE FOR IT. BUT ONCE HE WERE IN IRAQ, YOU SHOULD HAVE NEVER LEFT THE WAY... >> YOUR TWO MINUTES ARE UP. >> THE BIG BOY IS GOING TO BE IRAN. >> WELL, YOU KNOW, ONCE AGAIN DONALD IS IMPLYING THAT HE DID NOT SUPPORT THE INVASION OF IRAQ, I SAID IT WAS MISTAKE AND SAID THAT YEARS AGO, HE HAS CONSISTENTLY DENIED WHAT IS. >> WRONG. >> CLEAR FACT THAT BEFORE THE INVASION HE SUPPORTED IT. I JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO GO GOOGLE IT, GOOGLED "DONALD TRUMP IRAQ" AND YOU WILL SEE THE DOZENS OF SOURCES WHICH VERIFIED HE WAS FOR THE INVASION OF IRAQ. >> WRONG. >> AND YOU CAN HEAR THE AUDIO OF HIM SAYING THAT. WHY DOES THAT MATTER? IT MATTERS BECAUSE HE HAS NOT TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT THAT POSITION. I GUESS HE BELIEVES IT MAKES HIM LOOK BETTER NOW TO CONTRAST WITH ME BECAUSE I DID VOTE FOR IT. BUT WHAT IS REALLY IMPORTANT HERE IS TO UNDERSTAND ALL THE INTERPLAY, MOSUL IS A SUNNI CITY. MOSUL IS ON THE BORDER OF SYRIA AND YES WE DO NEED TO GO AFTER BAGHDAD HE AND JUST LIKE WE WENT AFTER BIN LADEN. WHILE YOU WERE DOING CELEBRITY APPRENTICE AND WE BROUGHT HIM TO JUSTICE. WE NEED TO GO AFTER THE LEADERSHIP BUT WE NEED TO GET RID OF THEM, GET RID OF THEIR FIGHTERS, THEIR ESTIMATED SEVERAL THOUSAND FIGHTERS IN MOSUL, THEY HAVE BEEN DIGGING UNDERGROUND AND PREPARED TO DEFEND, IT IS GOING TO BE TOUGH FIGHTING BUT I THINK WE CAN TAKE BACK MOSUL AND MOVE ON TO SYRIA AND TAKE BACK RAQQA. THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE TO DO. I AM JUST AMAZED THAT HE SEEMS TO THINK THAT THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT AND OUR ALLIES AND EVERYBODY ELSE LAUNCHED THE ATTACK ON MOSUL TO HELP ME IN THIS ELECTION BUT THAT IS HOW DONALD THINKS YOU KNOW? HE ALWAYS IS LOOKING FOR SOMETHING... HE HAS ALL THE. >> IRAN IS TAKING OVER IRAQ. >> SECRETARY CLINTON HAS HER TIME. >> WE WOULD HAVE GAINED MORE GROUND... >> SECRETARY CLINTON IT IS AN OPEN DISCUSSION. >> WOULD HAVE GAINED... >> UNFIT AND HE PROVES IT EVERY TIME. >> WERE THE ONE THAT IS UNFIT. YOU KNOW WIKILEAKS ACTUALLY JUST CAME OUT, JOHN PODESTA SAID SOME HORRIBLE THINGS ABOUT YOU AND BOY WAS HE RIGHT. HE SAID SOME BEAUTIES. YOU KNOW BERNIE SANDERS HUH YOU SAID YOU HAD BAD JUDGEMENT, YOU DO. IF YOU THINK THAT GOING INTO MOSUL AFTER WE LET THE WORLD KNOW WE'RE GOING IN AND ALL THE PEOPLE WE REALLY WANT TO, THE LEADERS, THEY ARE ALL GONE, IF YOU THINK THAT WAS GOOD, THEN YOU DO. JOHN PODESTA SAID YOU HAVE TERRIBLE INSTINCTS, BERNIE SANDERS SAID YOU HAVE BAD JUDGEMENT. I AGREE WITH BOTH. >> WELL YOU SHOULD ASK BERNIE SANDERS WHO HE IS SUPPORTING FOR PRESIDENT AND HE HAS SAID... >> WHICH WAS A MISTAKE. >> HE HAS SAID WHEN CAMPAIGNING AROUND THE COUNTRY THAT YOU ARE THE MOST DANGEROUS PERSON TO RUN FOR PRESENT IN THE MODERN HISTORY OF AMERICA. I THINK HE IS RIGHT. >> LET'S TURN TO ALEPPO. MR TRUMP IN THE LAST DEBATE YOU WERE BOTH ASKED ABOUT THE SITUATION IN THE SYRIAN CITY OF ALEPPO AND I WANT TO FOLLOW UP ON THAT BECAUSE YOU SAID SEVERAL THINGS IN THAT DEBATE WHICH WERE NOT TRUE, SIR. YOU SAID THAT ALEPPO HAS BASICALLY FALLEN AND IN FACT THERE ARE... >> IT IS A CATASTROPHE. >> IT IS A CATASTROPHE... >> HAVE YOU SEEN A? HAVE YOU SEEN IT? HAVE YOU SEEN WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO ALEPPO? >> CAN I FINISH MY QUESTION QUESTIONING IT HASN'T GONE, TAKE A A LOOK AT IT. >> THERE ARE 11 MILLION PEOPLE STILL LIVING THERE AND BEING SLAUGHTERED. >> AND THEY ARE BEING SLAUGHTERED BECAUSE OF BAD DECISIONS. >> IF I MAY JUST FINISHED HERE. AND YOU ALSO SAID THAT SYRIA AND RUSSIA ARE BUSY FIGHTING ISIS, IN FACT THEY HAVE BEEN THE ONES BOMBING AND SHELLING EASTERN ALEPPO AND THEY JUST ANNOUNCED A HUMANITARIAN PAUSE AND EFFECT, ADMITTING THAT HAVE BEEN BOMBING AND SHELLING ALEPPO. WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLEAR THAT A? >> ALEPPO IS A DISASTER. IT IS A HUMANITARIAN NIGHTMARE, BUT IT HAS FALLEN FROM ANY STANDPOINT. YOU NEED A SIGNED DOCUMENT? TAKE A LOOK AT ALEPPO. IT IS SO SAD WHEN YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENED. A LOT OF THIS IS BECAUSE OF HILLARY CLINTON. WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS BY FIGHTING ASSAD, WHO TURNED OUT TO BE A LOT TOUGHER THAN SHE THOUGHT, NOW SHE WILL SAY OH HE LOVES ASSAD. HE IS AS MUCH TOUGHER AND MUCH SMARTER THAN HER AND OBAMA. TWO YEARS AGO OR THREE YEARS AGO EVERYONE THOUGHT HE WAS GONE, HE ALIGNED WITH RUSSIA AND NOW ALSO ALIGNED WITH IRAN WHO WE MAY VERY POWERFUL. EAT WE GAVE THEM $150 BILLION BACK, WE GIVE THEM 1.7 BILLION IN CASH, I MEAN CASH, BUNDLES OF CASH AS BIG AS THIS STAGE. WE GAVE THEM ONE BILLION. HE HAS ALIGNED WITH RUSSIA AND WITH IRAN? THE DON'T WANT ICES BUT THEY HAVE OTHER THINGS BECAUSE WE ARE BACKING, WE ARE BACKING REBELS. WE DON'T KNOW WHO THE REBELS ARE. WE ARE GIVING THEM LOTS OF MONEY, LOTS OF EVERYTHING. WE DON'T KNOW WHO THE REBELS ARE. AND WHEN AND IF, IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE YOU HAVE RUSSIA AND IRAN NOW, IF THEY EVER DID OVERTHROW ASSAD, THEY MAY END UP AS BAD AS ASSAD IS. HE IS A BAD GUY BUT YOU MAY END UP WITH WORSE THAN ASSAD. IF SHE DID NOTHING, WE WOULD BE IN MUCH BETTER SHAPE AND THIS IS WHAT HAS CAUSED THE GREAT MIGRATION WHERE SHE IS TAKING IN TENS OF THOUSANDS OF TEARY AND REFUGEES, WHO PROBABLY IN MANY CASES, NOT PROBABLY, WHO ARE DEFINITELY IN MANY CASES ICES ALIGNED AND WE NOW HAVE THEM IN OUR COUNTRY AND WAY TOO YOU SEE, THIS WILL BE THE GREAT SHORT-TERM HORSE, WAIT TO YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENS IN THE COMING YEARS. -- GREAT TROJAN HORSE. THINGS A LOT FOR DOING A GREAT JOB. >> SECRETARY CLINTON YOU HAVE TALKED ABOUT IN THE LAST DEBATE AND AGAIN TODAY THAT YOU WOULD IMPOSE A NO-FLY ZONE TO TRY AND PROTECT THE PEOPLE OF ALEPPO AND STOP THE KILLING THERE. PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS REFUSED TO DO THAT BECAUSE HE FEARS IT WILL DRAW US CLOSER OR DEEPER INTO THE CONFLICT AND GENERAL JOSEPH DUNN FORD, THE CHIEF OF STAFF SAYS YOU WOULD IMPOSE A NO-FLY ZONE AND CHANCES ARE YOU'LL GET INTO A WAR. HIS WORDS, WITH SYRIA AND RUSSIA. SO THE QUESTION I HAVE IS IF YOU IMPOSE A NO-FLY ZONE, FIRST HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THEIR CONCERNS, SECONDLY, IF YOU IMPOSE A NO-FLY ZONE AND A RUSSIAN PLANE VIOLATES THAT, DOES PRESIDENT CLINTON SHOOT THAT PLANE DOWN? >> CHRIS, FIRST OF ALL. I THINK A NO-FLY ZONE COULD SAVE LIVES AND HASTENED THE END OF THE CONFLICT. I AM WELL AWARE OF THE REALLY LEGITIMATE CONCERNS THAT YOU HAVE EXPRESSED FROM BOTH THE PRESIDENT AND THE GENERAL. THIS WOULD NOT BE DONE JUST ON THE FIRST DAY, THIS WOULD TAKE A LOT OF NEGOTIATION AND WOULD TAKE MAKING IT CLEAR TO THE RUSSIANS AND SYRIANS THAT OUR PURPOSE HERE WAS TO PROVIDE SAFE ZONES ON THE GROUND. WE HAVE HAD MILLIONS OF PEOPLE LEAVE SYRIA AND THOSE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE INSIDE SYRIA WHO HAVE BEEN DISLOCATED, I THINK WE COULD STRIKE A DEAL AND MAKE IT VERY CLEAR TO THE RUSSIANS AND SYRIANS THAT THIS WAS SOMETHING WE BELIEVE WAS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE ON THE GROUND IN SYRIA, IT WOULD HELP US WITH OUR FIGHT AGAINST ICES BUT I WANT TO RESPOND TO WHAT DONALD TRUMP SAID ABOUT REFUGEES, HE HAS MADE THESE CLAIMS REPEATEDLY. I AM NOT GOING TO LET ANYONE INTO THIS COUNTRY WHO IS NOT VETTED, WHO WE DO NOT HAVE CONFIDENCE IN, BUT I AM NOT GOING TO SLAM THE DOOR ON WOMEN AND CHILDREN. THAT PICTURE OF THAT LITTLE FOUR-YEAR OLD BOY IN ALEPPO WITH THE BLOOD COMING DOWN HIS FACE WHILE HE SOUGHT THE MICROSECOND AND AMBULANCE IS HAUNTING SO WE ARE GOING TO DO VERY CAREFUL AND THOROUGH VETTING. THAT DOES NOT SOLVE OUR INTERNAL CHALLENGES WITH ICES AND OUR NEED TO STOP RADICALISATION. TO WORK WITH AN AMERICAN MUSLIM COMMUNITIES WHO ARE ON THE FRONT LINES TO IDENTIFY AND PREVENT ATTACKS. IN FACT, THE KILLER OF THE DOZENS OF PEOPLE AT THE NIGHTCLUB IN ORLANDO, THE PULSE NIGHTCLUB, WAS BORN IN QUEENS. THE SAME PLACE, BORN. SO LET'S BE CLEAR ABOUT WHAT THE THREAT IS AND HOW WE ARE BEST GOING TO BE ABLE TO MEET IT AND YES, SOME OF THAT THREAT EMANATES FROM OVER IN SYRIA AND IRAQ AND WE HAVE TO KEEP FIGHTING AND I WILL DEFEAT ISIS AND SOME OF IT IS, WE HAVE TWO OF OUR GAME AND BE MUCH SMARTER HERE. >> I WANT TO GET INTO OUR FINAL SEGMENT. >> I JUST HAVE TO COME IS SO RIDICULOUS. SHE WILL DEFEAT ICES. WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER LET ICES HAPPEN IN THE FIRST WAS IN RIGHT IN 32 COUNTRIES. WAIT ONE SECOND. THEY HAD A CEASE-FIRE THREE WEEKS AGO. A CEASE-FIRE, UNITED STATES, RUSSIA, SYRIA. IN DEMAGOGUE AND DURING THE CEASE-FIRE THEY TOOK OVER SWATCHES OF LAND AND THEY SAY WE DON'T WANT THIS CEASE-FIRE ANYMORE. WE ARE SO OUTPLAYED ON MISSILES, ON CEASE-FIRES, THEY ARE OUTPLAYED, SHE WASN'T THERE AND GENDER THING TO DO WITH IT, BUT OUR COUNTRY IS SO OUTPLAYED BY AND ASSAD AND EITHER WAY, BY IRAN. NOBODY CAN BELIEVE HOW STUPID OUR LEADERSHIP IS. >> MR TRUMP, SECRETARY CLINTON, NO WE NEED TO MOVE ON TO OUR FINAL SEGMENT AND THAT IS THE NATIONAL DEBT WHICH HAS NOT BEEN UNTIL TONIGHT. OUR NATIONAL DEBT AS A SHARE OF OUR ECONOMY, OUR GDP IS NOW 77%, THAT IS THE HIGHEST SINCE JUST AFTER WORLD WAR II. BUT A NONPARTISAN COMMITTEE FOR A RESPONSIBLE AND RURAL BUDGETS AS SAIDY JANKO DO AND UNDO YOUR PLAN, DEBT WOULD RISE TO 86% OF GDP OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS, MR, NEW YORK PLAN, THEY SAY IT WOULD RISE TO 105% OF GDP OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS. QUESTION IS, WHY ARE BOTH OF YOU IGNORING THIS PROBLEM? MR TRUMP YOU GO FIRST. >> I SAY THEY ARE WRONG BECAUSE I'M GOING TO CREATE TREMENDOUS JOBS. WE NEED GDP FROM REALLY 1% WHICH IS WHAT IT IS NOW, SHE WOULD BRIENNE GLASS 20, WE ARE BRINGING IT FROM 1% UP TO 4% AND I ACTUALLY THINK WE CAN GO HIGHER THAN 4%. I THINK WE CAN GO TO FIVE OR 6%. AND IF WE DO, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BOTHER ASKING THE QUESTION BECAUSE WE HAVE THE TREMENDOUS MACHINE WE HAVE, WE WOULD HAVE CREATED A TREMENDOUS MACHINE ONCE AGAIN. TO DO THAT WE ARE TAKING BACK JOBS, NOT GOING TO LET OUR COUNTRIES BE RATED BY OTHER COUNTRIES WHERE WE LOSE ALL OF OUR JOBS, WE MAKE OUR PRODUCT. ANYMORE, IT IS SAD. BUT I'M GOING TO CREATE THE KIND OF COUNTRY AND THAT WE WERE FROM THE STANDPOINT OF INDUSTRY. WE USED TO BE THERE, WE HAVE GIVEN IT UP. WE HAVE BECOME VERY SLOPPY, WE HAVE PEOPLE WHO ARE POLITICAL HACKS. MAKING THE BIGGEST DEALS, BIGGER THAN COMPANIES THESE BIG COMPANIES, THESE TRADE DEALS ARE FAR BIGGER THAN THESE COMPANIES AND YET WE DON'T USE OUR GREAT LEADERS, MANY OF WHOM, MANY OF WHOM BACKED HILLARY I MUST SAY. WE DON'T USE THOSE PEOPLE, THOSE OF THE PEOPLE, WE'RE THE GREATEST NEGOTIATORS IN THE WORLD, WITH THE GREATEST BUSINESSPEOPLE IN THE WORLD AND WE HAVE TO USE THEM TO NEGOTIATE OUR TRADE DEALS. WE USE POLITICAL HACKS. WE USE PEOPLE THAT GET THE POSITION BECAUSE THEY MADE A CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION AND THEY ARE DEALING WITH CHINA AND PEOPLE VERY MUCH SMARTER THAN THEY ARE. SO WE HAVE TO USE OUR GREAT PEOPLE. BUT THAT BEING SAID, WE WILL CREATE AN ECONOMIC MACHINE THE LIKES OF WHICH WE HAVE NOT SEEN IN MANY DECADES AND PEOPLE, CHRIS, AGAIN WILL GO BACK TO WORK AND THEY WILL MAKE A LOT OF MONEY AND THEY WILL HAVE COMPANIES THAT WILL GROW AND EXPAND AND START FROM NEW. >> SECRETARY CLINTON. >> FIRST WHEN I SEE AND HEAR DONALD TALK LIKE THAT AND KNOW THAT HIS SLOGAN IS MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN I WONDER WHEN HE THOUGHT AMERICA WAS GREAT. AND BEFORE HE RUSHES AND SAYS BEFORE YOU AND PRESIDENT OBAMA WERE THERE, I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT TO RECOGNISE THAT HE HAS BEEN CRITICISING OUR GOVERNMENT FOR DECADES. BACK IN 1987, HE TOOK OUT A $100,000 AD IN THE NEW YORK TIMES DURING THE TIME WHEN PRESIDENT REAGAN WAS PRESIDENT, AND BASICALLY SAID EXACTLY WHAT HE JUST SAID NOW. THAT WE WERE THE LAUGHING STOCK OF THE WORLD, HE WAS CRITICISING PRESIDENT REAGAN. THIS IS THE WAY DONALD THINKS ABOUT HIMSELF, PUTS HIMSELF INTO THE MIDDLE AND SAYS YOU KNOW, I ALONE CAN FIX IT AS HE SAID ON THE CONVENTION STAGE. BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE DEAD WHICH IS THE ISSUE YOU ASKED ABOUT CHRIS, I PAID FOR EVERYTHING I AM PROPOSING. I DO NOT ADD A PENNY TO THE NATIONAL DEBT. I TAKE THAT VERY SERIOUSLY BECAUSE I DO THINK IT IS ONE OF THE ISSUES WE HAVE TO COME TO GRIPS WITH. SO WHEN I TALK ABOUT HOW WE ARE GOING TO PAY FOR EDUCATION, HOW WE WHAT INVEST IN INFRASTRUCTURE, HOW WE WILL GET THE COST OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS DOWN AND A LOT OF THE OTHER ISSUES PEOPLE TALK TO ME ABOUT ALL THE TIME, I HAVE MADE IT VERY CLEAR, WE ARE GOING WHERE THE MONEY IS. WE ARE GOING TO ASK THE WEALTHY AND CORPORATIONS TO PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE AND THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT THAT WILL SLOW DOWN OR DIMINISH OUR GROWTH, IN FACT I THINK JUST THE OPPOSITE. WE WILL HAVE WHAT ECONOMISTS CALL MIDDLE OUTGROWTH. WE HAVE TO GET BACK TO REBUILDING THE MIDDLE CLASS, THE FAMILIES OF AMERICA, THAT IS WHERE GROWTH WILL COME FROM. THAT IS WHY I WANT TO INVEST IN YOU, I WANT TO INVEST IN YOUR FAMILY AND I THINK THAT IS THE SMARTEST WAY TO GROW THE ECONOMY, TO MAKE THE ECONOMY FAIRER, AND WE HAVE A BIG DISAGREEMENT ABOUT THIS. MAYBE BECAUSE OF OUR EXPERIENCES YOU KNOW, HE STARTED OFF WITH HIS DAD IS A MILLIONAIRE... MY DAD IS A SMALL BUSINESSMAN. >> WE HAVE HEARD THIS BEFORE. >> I THINK IT IS A DIFFERENCE THAT AFFECTS THE WAY WE SEE THE WORLD AND WHAT WE WANT TO DO THE ECONOMY. >> >> I DID DISAGREE WITH RONALD REAGAN VERY STRONGLY ON TRADE. WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH TOUGHER ON TRADE EVEN THEN. I HAVE BEEN RATING FOR THE -- WAITING FOR YEARS AND BRIGHTLY NOW WE'RE GOING TO DO IT RIGHT. >> THE LAST AREA I WANT TO GET INTO WITH YOU IN THIS DEBATE IS THE FACT THAT THE BIGGEST DRIVER OF OUR DEBT IS ENTITLEMENT WHICH IS AT 60% OF ALL FEDERAL SPENDING. THE COMMITTEE FOR FEDERAL SPOTS RESPONSIBLE BUDGET HAS LOOKED AT BOTH OF HER PLANS AND SAYS NEITHER OF YOU HAS A SERIOUS PLAN THAT WILL SOLVE THE FACT THAT MEDICARE IS GOING TO RUN OUT OF MONEY IN THE 20 20S, SOCIAL SECURITY WILL RUN OUT IN THE 20 30S AND AT THAT TIME, RECIPIENTS ARE GOING TO TAKE HUGE CUTS ON THEIR BENEFITS. IN EFFECT, THE FINAL QUESTION I WANT TO ASK IN THIS REGARD IS, LET ME START WITH YOU, MR TRUMP, WITH PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP MAKE A DEAL TO SAVE MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY THAT INCLUDED BOTH TAX INCREASES AND BENEFIT CUTS IN EFFECT A GRAND BARGAIN ON ENTITLEMENTS? >> I AM CUTTING TAXES. WE WILL GROW THE ECONOMY AT A RECORD RATE. >> THAT WILL NOT HELP WITH ENTITLEMENT. >> IT WILL TOTALLY HELP YOU. ONE THING WE HAVE TO DO IS REPEAL AND REPLACE THE DISASTER KNOWN AS OBAMACARE. IT IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY, DESTROYING OUR BUSINESSES, OUR SMALL BUSINESS AND BIG BUSINESSES. WE HAVE TO REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMACARE. YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE KIND OF NUMBERS THAT WILL COST US IN THE YEAR 17, IT IS A DISASTER. IF WE DO NOT REPEAL AND REPLACE. IT WILL PROBABLY DIE OF ITS OWN WEIGHT, BUT OBAMACARE HAS TO GO. THE PREMIUMS ARE GOING UP, 60-70- 80%. NEXT YEAR THEY WILL GO UP OVER 100% AND I AM REALLY GLAD THAT THE PREMIUMS HAVE STARTED, AT LEAST THE PEOPLE SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING BECAUSE SHE WANTS TO KEEP OBAMACARE AND MAKE IT EVEN WORSE AND IT CANNOT GET ANY WORSE. BAD HEALTH CARE AT THE MOST EXPENSIVE PRICE. WE HAVE TO REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMACARE. >> SECRETARY CLINTON, SAME QUESTION, BECAUSE AT THIS POINT, SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE WILL RUN OUT, THE TRUST FUNDS WILL RUN OUT OF MONEY. WILL YOU AS PRESIDENT CONSIDER A GRAND BARGAIN, A DEAL THAT INCLUDES BOTH TAX INCREASES AND BENEFIT CUTS TO TRY TO SAVE BOTH PROGRAMS? >> WELL, CHRIS, I AM ON RECORD AS SAYING THAT WE NEED TO PUT MORE MONEY INTO SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND. THAT IS PART OF MY COMMITMENT TO RAISE TAXES ON THE WEALTHY. MY SOCIAL SECURITY PAYROLL CONTRIBUTION WILL GO UP AS WILL DONALD‘S ASSUMING HE CANNOT FIGURE HOW TO GET OUT OF IT. WHAT WE WANT TO DO... >> SUCH A NASTY WOMAN. >> WE WILL DO THAT BY MAKING SURE WE HAVE SUFFICIENT RESOURCES AND THAT WILL COME FROM EITHER RAISING THE CAP AND WERE FINDING OTHER WAYS TO GET MORE MONEY INTO IT. I WILL NOT CUT BENEFITS. I WANT TO ENHANCE BENEFITS FOR LOW INCOME WORKERS AND FOR WOMEN WHO HAVE BEEN DISADVANTAGED BY THE CURRENT SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM. BUT WHAT DONALD IS PROPOSING WITH THESE MASSIVE TAX CUTS WILL RESULT IN A $20 TRILLION OF ADDITIONAL NATIONAL DEBT. THAT WILL HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES FOR SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE. I WILL SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT THAT HE WANTS TO REPEAL. THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT EXTENDED THE SOLVENCY OF THE MEDICARE TRUST FUND. IF HE REVEALS IT OUR MEDICARE PROBLEM GETS WORSE. WHAT WE KNEW TO DO IS >> YOUR HUSBAND DISAGREES WITH ME. >> WE NEED TO COVER LONG-TERM HEALTH CARE DRIVERS. WE HAVE TO GET COSTS DOWN, INCREASE VALUE, EMPHASIZE WELLNESS, I HAVE A PLAN FOR DOING THAT AND IT THINK WE WILL BE ABLE TO GET ENTITLEMENT SPENDING UNDER CONTROL WITH MORE RESOURCES AND SMARTER DECISIONS. >> THIS IS THE FINAL TIME TO BOTH OF YOUR DELIGHT THAT YOU WILL BE ON THE STAGE TOGETHER IN THIS CAMPAIGN. I WOULD LIKE TO END IT ON A POSITIVE NOTE THAT YOU HAVE NOT AGREED TO LOOKING STATEMENTS BUT IT SEEMS TO BE IN A FUNNY WAY THAT WILL MAKE IT MORE NTERESTING BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN PREPARE CLOSING STATEMENTS. A MINUTE, HERE IS THE FINAL QUESTION IN THE FINAL DEBATE TO TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHY THEY SHOULD ELECT YOU TO BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT. THIS IS ANOTHER NEW MINI SEGMENT, SECRETARY CLINTON IN HIS RETURN TO GO FIRST. >> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY TO EVERYONE WATCHING TONIGHT THAT I AM REACHING OUT TO ALL AMERICANS. DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS AND INDEPENDENTS BECAUSE WE NEED EVERYBODY TO HELP MAKE OUR COUNTRY WHAT IT SHOULD BE. TO GROW THE ECONOMY, TO MAKE IT FAIRER, TO MAKE IT WORK FOR EVERYONE. WE NEED YOUR TALENTS, YOUR SKILLS, YOUR COMMITMENT, YOUR ENERGY, YOUR AMBITION. I HAVE BEEN PRIVILEGED TO SEE THE PRESIDENCY OF CLOSE AND I KNOW THE AWESOME RESPONSIBILITY OF PROTECTING OUR COUNTRY AND THE INCREDIBLE OPPORTUNITY OF WORKING TO TRY TO MAKE LIFE BETTER FOR ALL OF YOU. I HAVE MADE THE CAUSE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES REALLY MY LIFE‘S WORK. THAT IS WHAT MY MISSION WILL BE IN THE PRESIDENCY. I WILL STAND UP FOR FAMILIES AGAINST POWERFUL INTERESTS, AGAINST CORPORATIONS. I WILL DO EVERYTHING THAT I CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE GOOD JOBS WITH RISING INCOMES, THAT YOUR KIDS HAVE GOOD EDUCATIONS FROM PRESCHOOL THROUGH COLLEGE. I HOPE YOU'LL GIVE ME A CHANCE TO SERVE AS YOUR PRESIDENT. >> SECRETARY CLINTON, THANK YOU. MR TRUMP. >> SHE IS RAISING THE MONEY FROM THE PEOPLE SHE WANTS TO CONTROL IT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY. WHEN I STARTED THIS CAMPAIGN, I STARTED A VERY STRONGLY IT IS CALLED MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. WE ARE GOING TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT. WE HAVE A DEPLETED MILITARY, THAT HAS TO BE HELPED AND FIXED. WE HAVE THE GREATEST PEOPLE ON EARTH IN OUR MILITARY. WE DO NOT TAKE CARE OF OUR VETERANS, WE TAKE CARE OF ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS BETTER THAN WE TAKE CARE OF OUR VETS. THAT CANNOT HAPPEN. OUR POLICEMEN AND WOMEN ARE DISRESPECTED. WE NEED LAW AND ORDER BUT WE NEED JUSTICE ALSO. OUR INNER CITIES ARE A DISASTER. YOU GET SHOT WALKING TO THE STORE, THEY HAVE NO EDUCATION, NO JOBS. I WILL DO MORE FOR AVERAGE AMERICANS AND LATINOS THAN SHE COULD EVER DO IN TEN LIFETIMES. ALL SHE HAS DONE IS TALK TO THE AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND LATINOS BUT TO GET THE BOLD AND THAT MAY COME BACK AND SAY WE WILL SEE YOU IN FOUR YEARS. WE'RE GOING TO MAKE AMERICA STRONG AGAIN AND WE ARE GOING TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN AND IT HAS TO START NOW. WE CANNOT TAKE FOUR MORE YEARS OF BARACK OBAMA AND THAT IS WHAT YOU GET WHEN YOU GET HER. >> THANK YOU BOTH. SECRETARY CLINTON, HOLD ON JUST A MOMENT, FOLKS. SECRETARY CLINTON, MR TRUMP I WANT TO THANK YOU BOTH FOR PRTICIPATING IN ALL THREE OF THESE DEBATES. THAT BRINGS TO AN END THIS YEAR DEBATE FOSTERED BY THE COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES. WE WANT TO TAKE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS AND ITS STUDENTS FOR HAVING US. NOW THE DECISION IS UP TO YOU. WHILE MILLIONS HAVE ALREADY VOTED ELECTION DAY NOVEMBER EIGHT IS JUST 20 DAYS AWAY. ONE THING EVERYONE HERE CAN AGREE ON, WE HOPE YOU WILL GO VOTE. IT IS ONE OF THE HONOR AND OBLIGATIONS OF LIVING IN THIS GREAT COUNTRY. THANK YOU AND GOOD NIGHT. APPLAUSE >> AND WE HAVE WITNESSED ONE OF THE MOST SUBSTANTIVE I THINK DEBATES TO DATE, THIS THIRD AND FINAL DEBATE WHERE THERE WAS TALK ABOUT WHO IS A PUPPET FOR PUTIN. >> THEY'RE SHAKING HANDS WITH CHRIS WALLACE BUT WILL THEY SHAKE HANDS WITH EACH OTHER? WHEN THEY FIRST CAME OUT THEY WALKED TO THEIR PODIUM AND DID NOT INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER. IT DOES NOT LOOK LIKE HE WAS SHAKY AND AT THE END OF THIS ONE EITHER. >> JOHN DICKERSON, I THINK ONE OF THE PIVOTAL MOMENT INTO MY‘S DEBATE WITH A QUESTION ABOUT WHETHER DONALD TRUMP WOULD ACCEPT THE RESULTS. >> COMING AFTER HIS DAUGHTER THIS MORNING THAT HER FATHER WOULD ACCEPT RESULTS. >> AND MIKE PENCE ON SUNDAY SAID WE WILL. >> THERE IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ACCEPTING THE RESULTS AND NO LONGER SAYING THAT THE ELECTION IS RIGGED, BECAUSE WHAT IS HAPPENING WHEN YOU SAY THE ELECTION IS RIGHT IF YOU ARE IN AND CITING YOUR SUPPORTERS TO WATCH OUT FOR ANYWHERE IT MIGHT BE RIGHT AND IT IS INTIMIDATING TO THOSE WHO ARE WORRIED ABOUT BEING WATCHED AT THE POLLING PLACE BECAUSE THEY WILL THE PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO THINK THE VOTE IS BEING RIGGED. THE ESSENTIAL QUESTION FOR HIS CANDIDACY HAS ALWAYS BEEN HE IS A CHANGE CANDIDATE AND HE IS DISRUPTING AND THAT IS FANTASTIC BECAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO WANT THE SYSTEM TO GET A PUNCH IN THE NOSE AND HE IS PUNCHING THE SYSTEM IN THE NOSE. JAMES CAN GO TOO FAR. AND WHEN YOU QUESTION SOMETHING THAT IS THE PILLAR OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, THE PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER -- CHANGE CAN GO TOO FAR, AND YOU DO IT PERHAPS FOR YOUR OWN AND, THAT IS GOING PAST A PUNCH IN THE SYSTEM IN THE NOSE. THAT IS PUNCHING THE ACTUAL UNDERGIRDING OF THE SYSTEM AND KICKING HIS LEGS OUT FROM UNDER IT AND THAT IS WHAT WORD WORRIES PEOPLE ABOUT THIS TALK. THE ELECTION WITH NO REAL PROOF THERE IS A LEGITIMACY THERE MAY BE SHENANIGANS BUT THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN THE ACTUAL VOTE BEING ILLEGITIMATE. THAT IS WHAT WORRIES PEOPLE. >> HILLARY CLINTON TURNED IT INTO A CHARACTER ISSUE. SHE SAID THIS IS HORRIFYING AND SHE SAID EVERY TIME YOU THINK THINGS ARE NOT GOING IN HIS DIRECTION HE CLAIMS WHATEVER IT IS IS RIGGED AGAINST THEM AND MENTIONED AND NOT GETTING AN EMMY FOR HIS TV PROGRAM CELEBRITY APPRENTICE. >> AT WHICH POINT HE SAID I SHOULD HAVE ONE FOR THAT. >> THAT IS HER LARGER CHARACTER CLAIM WHICH IS THAT THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT THE SPECIFIC ELECTION, THIS IS A HABIT OF MIND FOR HIM SO SHE'S TRYING TO RAISE QUESTIONS AND SHE DENIED THAT AUTHOR WITH HIS ATTACK ON THE WOMEN ACCUSERS, SAYING THAT THIS IS A BROADER HABIT OF HIS. HE IS AGAIN THE CHANGE CANDIDATE BUT AS DID THIS TO STATE THAT HE -- AS JEB BUSH USES THAT HE USED TO CALL THEM THAT HAVE CANDIDATE. CHANGE AND CHAOS IS THE QUESTION BETWEEN THE TWO. >> HE HAD A VERY STRONG REACTION WHEN HE SAID THAT HE SAID HE WOULD NOT EAT THAT I WILL LET YOU KNOW. >> SHE SAID IT IS DENIGRATING AND TAKING DOWN OUR DEMOCRACY AND I LIKE ALSO NOR AS YOU POINTED OUT SHE USED THE WORD THIS IS WORTH BUYING. THERE WAS AN AUDIBLE GASP IN THE ROOM WHEN HE MADE THAT COMMENT. >> LET'S TURN TO THE ISSUE OF RUSSIA. IT APPEARED TO ME THAT HILLARY MANY TIMES THROUGHOUT THIS DEBATE CAME READY WITH CANNED LINES OR PUNCHES SHE WANTED TO LAND HOWEVER YOU MAY SEE IT IN ONE OF THEM WAS ON TOPIC OF RUSSIA AND SHE SAID THAT IT'S BECAUSE HE WOULD RATHER HAVE A PUPPET AS THE PRESIDENT, SUGGESTING THAT DONALD TRUMP IS VLADIMIR PUTIN BATH PUPPET. >> THERE WAS NAME CALLING AND HE SAID NO YOU ARE THE PUPPET. THE CENTRAL QUESTION HERE IS WHETHER DONALD TRUMP TAKE ON BOARD THE EVALUATION OF US INTELLIGENCE. THE FOLKS WHO HAVE BEEN BREATHING HIM AS WELL AND WHETHER HE BELIEVES THAT RUSSIA IS INVOLVED -- THE FOLKS THAT HAVE BEEN BREATHING HIM AS WELL. -- BRIEFING. HE WAS RELUCTANT TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT RUSSIA. >> THAT IS CONFUSING. >> HILLARY CLINTON‘S WHAT WAS THAT THERE ARE 17 DIFFERENT INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES THAT HAVE BLAMED RUSSIA. >> NOT AT ALL, HE WAS BASICALLY SAYING WE CAN HAVE A GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH RUSSIA AND HER ARGUMENT AGAIN IS THAT THERE ARE SOME STRANGE REASON HE IS SUCH A RUSSIA SUPPORTER. OF COURSE HE PUSHED IT BACK ON HERE AND THAT PUTIN PLAYED HER AND THAT SHE WAS INEFFECTIVE AS SECRETARY OF STATE IN DEALING WITH RUSSIA. >> HE ALSO MADE IT CLEAR, THAT I DON'T KNOW VLADIMIR PUTIN, I HAVE NEVER MET VLADIMIR PUTIN, HE IS NOT MY BEST FRIEND AND HE SAYS BUT IF RUSSIA AND THE UNITED STATES GETS A LOT AND CAN TAKE OUT ICE IS WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT? >> WE SHOULD ALSO ADDED YOUR THAT MARCO RUBIO, RUNNING IN A TIGHT RACE IN FLORIDA SAID THAT NOBODY SHOULD BE TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE WIKI WE TAX, THAT THIS IS IN FACT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF SOMETHING THE RUSSIANS ARE TRYING TO DO TO DO ESTATE -- DESTABILIZE THE GOVERNMENT. KNOWLEDGE OF A STICKING POINT TO GOOD ADVANTAGE OF WHAT IS IN THIS BECAUSE THEY GIVE YOU A WINDOW INTO THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN. >> LET'S SEE WHAT SOME OF THE VOTERS THOUGHT ABOUT THIS. REPUBLICAN POLLS ARE IS WITH A GROUP OF VOTERS WHO ALL WATCHED THE DEBATE AND FRANK HAS THE REACTION. WHAT ARE THEY SAYING? >> I WANT TO FOLLOW-UP ON WHAT YOU GUYS TALKED ABOUT. HOW MANY OF YOU HAD A PROBLEM WITH DONALD TRUMP SAYING HE WOULD NOT AFFIRM THE ELECTION RESULTS. YOUR HANDS. OUR GROUP WAS ARGUING OVER IT. WHAT IS THE ISSUE? >> I THINK BECAUSE OUR COUNTRY IS BUILT ON A FAIR ELECTION AND WHEN THE RESULTS COME IN, YES, THERE CAN BE EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD SOMETIMES BUT WE HAVE TO TRUST IT IS WORKING THE WAY IT SHOULD AND THE RESULTS STAND. >> WHY DID WHAT HE SAID BOTHER YOU? >> IT INSPIRES A DISCONNECTION FROM A LOT OF THE POPULATION FROM THE POLITICAL PROCESS. >> MORE PARTISAN STATE, IT WILL MAKE THE DIVIDE EVEN WORSE. JOHN KASICH TODAY SAID THAT BELIEVING THAT IS THE SAME THING AS BELIEVING WE DID NOT LAND ON THE MOON. >> THE AMERICAN WAY IS WHOEVER WINS IS THE WINNER, THE LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT. YOU DO NOT LEGITIMIZE THE WINNER, YOU DON'T LEGITIMIZE THE PRESIDENT. WE HAVE TO STAND UNITED WITH OUR PRESIDENT. >> DID THAT ACTUALLY AFFECT HOW YOU EVALUATE HIS PERFORMANCE TODAY YES OR NO? >> YES. >> WHY? >> BECAUSE ONCE AGAIN HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND OUR PROCESS. HE SAID TODAY 44 TIMES THAT WE HAVE HAD THIS CLEAN ADJUSTMENT TO THE NEW PRESIDENT. >> IT OUR PROCESS IS BROKEN WHY WOULD YOU JUST ACCEPT IT PLAINLY? I'M NOT SAYING HE SHOULD ACCEPT THE RESULTS, BUT TO PROMISE AHEAD OF TIME, TO SAY NO MATTER WHAT THE RESULTS ARE I WILL BE OK WITH IT, WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN, I DON'T THINK ANYONE WOULD DO THAT ABOUT ANYTHING THAT WAS SERIOUS. >> SO YOUR GROUP OF 26 UNCOMMITTED VOTERS WHEN HE WALKED IN HERE, NINE HAVE YOU LEANED TOWARD DONALD TRUMP, AIDED YOU LEANED TOWARD CLINTON AND NINE OF YOU ARE TRULY UNDECIDED. DID IT MOVE ANY OF YOU TODAY -- EIGHT OF YOU LEANED TOWARD CLINTON. DID ANY OF YOU MOVE YOUR VOTE TODAY? >> I WENT FROM DONALD TRUMP TO CLINTON BECAUSE CLINTON PROVED TO BE MORE OF AN ADULT. DONALD TRUMP IS MORE OF THE SPOILED CHILD, CLINTON WAS MORE OF THE ADULT. SHE WENT TOE DETAIL, HEAD TO HEAD. SHE DID JUST AS WELL BUT I THINK SHE DID BETTER THAN DONALD TRUMP. WHO ELSE MOVED? >> HOW DID YOU MOVE? >> I WENT MORE TOWARD HILLARY, I THOUGHT SHE WAS SOLID AND HELD HER OWN. SHE WAS PRESIDENTIAL AND DONALD TRUMP WHILE I THINK HE DID PRETTY GOOD IN THE DEBATE ALL IN ALL, HE JUST DOES NOT HAVE A. >> HOW DID YOU MOVE? >> I'M MORE DECISIVE TOWARD DONALD TRUMP. >> WHY? >> IT SEEMS HE REALLY HAS THE ISSUES. AND HE IS RIGHT SHE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE, OBAMA, THEY HAVE BEEN THERE LONG ENOUGH AND NOT ENOUGH HAS GOTTEN BETTER OVER THAT PERIOD OF TIME. IN ESSENCE, HE'S SAYING YOU DID NOT DO ANYTHING SO I WILL GIVE A GUY A SHOT THAT WILL DO SOMETHING. >> ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE CANDIDATES NOW? >> NOT 100%. >> NO. >> WHAT THE HECK DO YOU WANT? >> THE TRUTH. >> YOU DON'T THINK YOU GOT THE TRUE TODAY? >> NOT RUN HILLARY, THAT IS FOR SURE. SHE LIED ABOUT THE CLINTON FOUNDATION. IN HAITI, SHE BROUGHT UP HAITI IN THE DEBATE TONIGHT. THERE WAS AN EARTHQUAKE IN 2010, THEY RAISE A LOT OF MONEY FOR THAT BUT DID HAITI GET ANY HELP OR THAT? NO. >> ARE AND YET YOU NOT GOING TO VOTE BECAUSE YOU ARE REGULAR VOTERS? ARE ANY OF YOU NOT GOING TO BUG? >> SO YOU ARE ALL GOING TO PARTICIPATE ARE ANY STILL UNDECIDED? OH COME ON, WHAT DO YOU WANT? >> I KNOW I'M NOT GOING TO GET BAT. >> I REALLY WANT TO KNOW MORE. I FEEL LIKE. >> YOU ARE NOT GETTING MORE DEBATES. >> THEY'RE JUST NOT GIVING ME WHAT I WANT, I WANT SOMEONE ELSE AND I WILL NOT GET IT. >> YOU'LL HAVE ABOUT TWO OR 3% THAT WILL NOT MAKE UP THEIR MINDS AND SOME ARE RIGHT HERE AMONG VEGAS NEVADA. THESE VOTERS STILL MATTER, I HAS TO WONDER DEBATE AND IN EVEN NUMBERS THAT CLINTON VERSUS TRUMP. IT IS ALL OVER AND STILL SOME PEOPLE HAVE NOT MADE UP THEIR MINDS. BACK TO YOU. >> FRANK, VERY INTERESTING TO HEAR FROM VOTERS. WE HAVE A LOT MORE AHEAD. WE WILL HEAR FROM NANCY, MAJOR GARRETT AND WE WILL HEAR FROM BOB SCHAFFER. CBS NEWS COVERAGE OF THE FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE OF 2016 WILL CONTINUE IN A MOMENT. >> I WANT TO BUILD A WALL, THE BORDER PATROL, EYES, THEY ALL WANT THE WALL. WE HAVE SOME BAD HOMBRES HERE AND WE WILL GET THEM OUT. >> WHEN IT COMES TO THE WALL HE TALKS ABOUT BUILDING, HE WENT TO MEXICO, HAD A MEETING WITH THE MEXICAN PRESIDENT AND DID NOT EVEN RAISE THAT, HE JOKED. -- HE CHOKED. IN THE >> ONE OF THE BIGGEST REACTIONS IN THE ROOM TONIGHT WAS WHEN BILL CLINTON SAID NO ONE HAS MORE RESPECT FOR WOMEN THAN I DO. BACK ON A BIG REACTION IN THE ROOM THIS EVENING. HILLARY CLINTON HAD PLENTY TO SAY IN RESPONSE TO THAT. BUT THE BOARD IS IT THERE. SHE COVERS THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN. >> CLINTON AIDES THAT I HAVE BEEN PICKING TO SAID THERE WERE TWO KEY MOMENTS IN THIS DEBATE FROM THEIR PERSPECTIVE. THE FIRST WAS WHEN DONALD TRUMP REFUSED TO SAY WHETHER HE WOULD ACCEPT THE OUTCOME OF THE SELECTION AND THE SECOND WAS WHEN HE INEXPLICABLY REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE CONSENSUS OF THE US INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY THAT RUSSIA IS BEHIND THESE RECENT HACKING. THEY SAY TAKEN TOGETHER THESE TWO MOMENTS SHOW THAT HE IS UNFIT TO BE PRESIDENT AND THAT HE PUTS HIMSELF IN FRONT OF THE COUNTRY. BEYOND THAT, THEY SAY THAT BEAUTY FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE LEAGUE PERSPECTIVE IS THAT REPUBLICANS WILL CONDEMN HIM FOR BOTH OF THOSE COMMENTS TOMORROW AND IN FACT IT HAS ALREADY BEGUN. A SENATOR FROM ARIZONA, A RED STATE WHICH IS SUDDENLY A CONTESTED STATE IN THIS RACE, JUST TWEETED THAT REAL DONALD TRUMP SAYING THAT HE MIGHT NOT ACCEPT THE ELECTION RESULT IS BEYOND THE PALE. THE TOUGHET MOMENT FOR HILLARY CLINTON IN THIS CAMPAIGN, REPUBLICANS WILL SAY, WAS IN THE DEBATE TONIGHT WHEN SHE WAS ASKED ABOUT THE CLINTON FOUNDATION, WHETHER DONORS THAT SPECIAL ACCESS TO OUR STATE DEPARTMENT, SOMETHING THAT HAS PRETTY CLEARLY BEEN DEMONSTRATED TO BE THE CASE. SHE VERY QUICKLY SAID THAT THERE IS NO PROOF OF THAT AND PIVOTED TO TALKING ABOUT ALL THE GREAT THINGS THAT THE CLINTON FOUNDATION DOES AND REPUBLICANS SAY IT LOOKED LIKE SHE WAS DUCKING THE QUESTION. >> NANCY THERE. MAJOR GARRETT. YOU HAVE BEEN COVERING THE TRUNK CAMPAIGN, WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNED TONIGHT? >> THE TRUCK CAMPAIGN HAS ALREADY BEGUN TO MARSHAL A DEFENSE ABOUT HIS GROWING CONSENSUS THAT HE WOULD NOT ACCEPT THE ELECTION WHICH IS WHAT HE SAID, BUT THEY ARE PUSHING BACK TO SAY HE ONLY MEANT SIGHT UNSEEN, THAT HE IS LEAVING OPEN THE OPTION OF REVIEWING THE RESULTS AND THE UNDERLYING EFFICACY OF THE ELECTION HIMSELF, NOT SAYING HE WOULD NOT ACCEPT A NOTE TO LEAD A RESULT I WAS VALID. THAT IS THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN PUSHED BACK AND THEY KNOW BECAUSE THIS HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF TREMENDOUS CONVERSATION WHERE TO PLACE THEM ON THIS QUESTION AND WHAT THEY SAY IS TRUMP HAS MOVED FROM WHERE HE WAS A FEW DAYS AGO SAYING THE ENTIRE THING IS BEING RAKED TO THINK AT LEAST EVALUATE IT WHEN I SEE IT. FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN‘S INTERNAL PERSPECTIVE THAT HIS MOVEMENT AND A POSITIVE DIRECTION. IT MAY NOT BE VIEWED THAT WAY BY OTHER REPUBLICANS OR THE PUBLIC AT LARGE BUT INTERNALLY WITHIN THE TRUMP WORLD THEY SAY HE IS MOVING IN A PLACE THAT IS DEFENSIBLE AND IN-LINE WITH THE PRESIDENTIAL HISTORY. >> MAJOR GARRETT, THANK YOU. BOB SCHIEFFER, THE TERM CAMPAIGN MAY BE TRYING TO LITIGATE ALL THEY TO BUT I THOUGHT TRUMP IS PRETTY CLEAR. HE SAID I WILL KEEP THE SUSPENSE UP ABOUT WHETHER I WILL ACCEPT THE RESULT. >> THIS IS A VERY UNUSUAL THING. IT RAISES THE QUESTION, WHAT WILL HE DO IF HE DOES NOT ACCEPT THE RESULTS? I ASSUME HE IS TALKING ABOUT FILING A LAWSUIT OR SOMETHING, SURELY HE IS NOT THINKING ABOUT TRYING TO STAGE A COUP, BUT WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT HERE? THIS IS NOT THE WAY WE DO IT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY THAT YOU CAN'T SAY IT. IT IS DANGEROUS TO BE TALKING THAT WAY, BECAUSE IT THREATENS AND RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT THE VERY FOUNDATIONS OF WHAT THIS NATION IS ABOUT. WE HAVE A PEACEFUL TRANSFERS OF POWER IN THIS COUNTRY AND TO SOMEHOW SUGGEST THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO IT THAT WAY, WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT? >> HOW DO YOU TAKE THIS THEN HIS CAMPAIGN IS PUTTING OUT NOW BECAUSE BACK TO YOUR POINT NORA A IT SEEMED HE WAS MAKING A VERY CLEAR STATEMENT AND ALREADY THEY'RE PUTTING ANOTHER SPIN ON IT. >> WELL, YOU HAVE TO SAY SOMETHING BECAUSE. >> THIS GOES TO TEMPERAMENT WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN A BIG QUESTION. DOES THE WHEN THINGS ARE NOT GOING HIS WAY WHAT IT DOES HAVE A? OUT AS HE RESPOND AND THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE BIG QUESTION AND THIS GOES RIGHT TO THAT QUESTION. AND IT RAISES THOSE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED ABOUT HIS CANDIDACY ALL ALONG. >> WE WILL TALK ABOUT SUPREME COURT QUESTIONS AS WELL BUT QUICKLY ON THE TOPIC OF WOMEN BECAUSE CHRIS WALLACE WHO DID AN EXCELLENT JOB TONIGHT THAT THESE NINE WOMEN THAT HAVE COME UP AND SAID YOU BROKE THEM, HOW COULD ALL OF THEM IN HIS WORDS BE MAKING UP THIS STORY? >> HE BLAMED HILLARY CLINTON BRINGING THEM OUT. HILLARY CLINTON PIVOTED, DO NOT ANSWER AGAIN. SHE DID NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION WHICH WAS ABOUT HER HUSBAND, SHE DUCKED THAT AS MUCH AS SHE DID THE QUESTION ABOUT THE CLINTON FOUNDATION. BUT SHE DID THIS TWICE WHERE SHE TOOK AN INDIVIDUAL INCIDENT AND SAID THIS IS A PATTERN OF HIS. HE WENT AFTER A DISABLED REPORTER, HE WENT AFTER A JUDGE FOR HIS MEXICAN HERITAGE AND THAT THIS IS A PATTERN AGAIN CHANNELING BACK TO THAT TEMPERAMENT POINT. >> SHOULD HE BLAMED -- HE BLAMED THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN BUT ALSO SET ALL OF THOSE WOMEN HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED WHICH IS NOT THE CASE. >> AND ALSO BY THE WAY HE DID NOT TALK ABOUT -- HE SAID HE DID NOT TALK ABOUT THEIR APPEARANCE WHICH HE DID. >> I THINK ONE OF THE STRONGER WIND SHE HAD CLEARLY PREPARED WHAT TOOK DELETE MATT FORD TONIGHT WAS DONALD THINKS BELITTLING WOMEN MAKE THEM BIGGER -- I THINK ONE OF THE POINTS SHE CLEARLY PREPARED FOR TONIGHT WAS THAT DONALD THINKS BELITTLING WOMEN MAKES THEM BIGGER. >> WE WILL CONTINUE RIGHT AFTER THESE MESSAGES. >> HI EVERYONE I AM ELAINE QUIJANO LIFE FROM THE SPIN ROOM FROM THE THIRD AND FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE HERE AT THE UNI
Info
Channel: CBS News
Views: 5,012,338
Rating: 4.3350906 out of 5
Keywords:
Id: ye0Xblp_Nb0
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 117min 42sec (7062 seconds)
Published: Wed Oct 19 2016
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.