Was She LYING About The Whole Thing?! Body Language Analyst Reacts to Woman on Plane, Tiffany Gomas.

gotten a bit of an altercation it spiraled out of control it was not my best moment can I ask again what did you see you know the reason why I probably haven't come out yet cuz it's like so cringe um what's going on everyone welcome to the behavioral Arts my name is Spidey and I use my degree in sociology and psychology my certifications in criminal interrogation and Body Language analysis and over 10 years experience as an award-winning Mentalist to teach people behavioral analysis and practical psychology on stages and television shows all over the world Tiffany Gomez otherwise known as the plane lady is back in the news so of course a couple of months ago Tiffany went viral because of an outburst that she had on a flight and that video went insanely viral it was viewed hundreds of millions of times from people all over the world and it made news everywhere and at the time we covered that moment that video then for a while nobody knew who this woman was then she did a couple of interviews an apology video we analyzed those as well on the channel then nothing for a couple of months and now she's back in the news she did a couple of interviews with Inside Edition couple of podcasts and she's finally answering the question what did she see on that flight but what do her body language facial expressions and word choice reveal and more importantly why did the answer she gave on this podcast and this interview directly contradict each other now the focus of this analysis will be the interview she did on a podcast called pardon my take I will leave a link in the description to the full interview the reason I'm using this one is because we get the longest unedited answers and we're going to see a lot of really interesting behaviors that are going to give us a lot of Clues as to what she's thinking and feeling and what really happened on that day so without further Ado let's Dive Right In what did you see you really start off with that well it's a hard question you start off with a hard question and then it's like everything's going to get easy off that yeah we can start off and then we'll jump to Big cat's question first question sup yeah sup sup all right so I'll start it easier then no we can get to that all right so how crazy crazy has your life been in the last like few months um I don't even know how to explain it honestly there's like no Playbook to going viral right like I'm just a normal person is contrary to what people think promise you I'm a pretty normal person and after this all went viral um yeah my life did change like I chilled for a little bit and people didn't think that cuz like TMZ and all the things but no I did like I didn't come out of my house for like over fours weeks okay I know you guys want to talk about that massive Dodge of the first question and we're going to talk about that but before we do there's a really interesting expression of emotion that I want to start with so as she says I don't even know how to explain it we see a very distinct gesture we see her head kick back as her eyes open up wide and as they open up wide if you look at the part right under here under the eyebrows you could see that muscle right there lift as well like this now the eyebrow doesn't actually lift much it moves a little bit and we'll talk about why that is in a moment but we see a lift here and the eyes open up wide so if I were to list the universal emotions on the screen right now these are the emotions that research has shown everywhere in the world are expressed more or less the same way there's a very high recognizability rate pretty much everywhere in the world and I were to ask you which of these emotions do you think is consistent with that eyes open eyebrows up and even quite commonly with that head kicking back which one would you say is the most consistent with that if you said surprise you'd be correct but if you said fear you wouldn't be wrong either both these emotions have the eyes open with the eyebrows raised and both can happen with us backing up from whatever the source is but there's a slight difference between the two in fact there are three slight differences between the two one is the mouth with surprise the mouth drops open we gasp often with fear it tends to draw back a little bit more like that so more of this this motion but if we look at the eyes there are two differences as well the first is with surprise the eyebrows go straight up like this everything opens up because we're trying to take in as much information as we can to know how to react with fear they do go up but they're drawn together so look surprise fear surprise fear the second one is the bottom eyelid with surprise it's neutral eyes open wide up with fear there's tension in the bottom eyelid this is fear this is surprise so in her case when she's says I don't even know how to explain it it's the eyes opening up no tension down here and if we look at the muscles under the eyebrows over here they're just going Boop like this they're not being drawn together in any way this is surprise her reaction to this entire event has been surprising she's taken a back by it which is why we even see the head kick back as those eyes open up she didn't expect this she know how to deal with it she's still shocked by everything that's going on and this is something we want to look for because every now and then she will have this kind of moment moment with things where we know that there's this genuine surprise towards whatever she's talking about at that moment now admittedly the eyebrows are not going as high up as they should with surprise which is why I pointed out that we're seeing the muscles down here go up but it's almost like although it's doing this the eyebrows are barely budging and we're seeing nothing up here and I think most of you have guessed the reason for that is because certain cosmetic procedures that could very well be happening in this case I think you know which one specifically limit movement of the face especially this area but it's fascinating how we're seeing those muscles still move but we're just not seeing the eyebrows lift or any wrinkling up here which is what those procedures are for okay now back to the beginning so the guy asks her what did you see on that plane and she says you really start off with that right away so that's a massive massive non-answer in fact she's answering a question with a question which is one of the most classic ways we Dodge questions in interrogations and interviews this this is something we look out for and she's completely dodging it there she's just saying oh well we're just going to jump right into it and it's interesting because well yeah that's all we want to know that's all we wanted to know for months from you is what the heck did you see on that plane what else do you think you're here for what else do you think people want to know from you that's it now I think she knows that she knows that that's all people really want and I've been saying this for a while even in other analysis videos that she was being super dodgy with it to extent because this is all she has it's her only bargaining chip the long longer she can keep this mystery up the longer she remains relevant the moment she gives that answer people move on to the next thing so then they ask her you know how was your life after that event what was life like and we see something that we're going to see a lot in this interview so I'm not going to Baseline her as part of this video because there's a lot to cover I baselined her separately so I'll talk about some of the stuff that I saw and one of them is when there's an answer that she doesn't immediately know how to answer we very often see this um that we we saw there then this pause and then she starts with some what we call fluff just these useless little lines that delay the answer so in this case she goes I don't even know how to explain it we see that pause so these are all little things that we do to buy ourselves time to think of an answer speaking of things she does quite often she's going to go on to do something twice in that answer that she does very often in this interview and I can even tell you exactly why she does this in his best-selling book six- minute x-ray interrogation expert and really good friend of mine Chase Hughes talks about a principle known as correcting the record which is this urge that we have to set things straight when something is incorrect it's almost impossible to fight this urge to say actually and set the record straight she's going to do this a lot in this interview and in that answer alone she does it twice first she says I'm just a normal person contrary to what people think then she says I chilled for a little bit people don't think that because of TMZ and all those things and she's going to do this again and again in this interview and I could tell you why she's going to do this a lot in the interview it's because she's someone who's not in the public eye who suddenly went insanely viral and went and looked at those videos and saw tons of comments thousands even Millions saying a lot of the same things and she got very frustrated that she can't actually respond to that person so I have a lot of experience with that specific sensation because as someone who's done a lot of magic and mentalism on television and have a lot of close friends who have done the same when those a or they go online sometimes we get a ton of comments along the same lines with a very incorrect guess as to how we did it there's this urge to gather everyone who commented that and say no no look I'll start with my hands empty or in the case of mentalism this isn't a plant I don't know them it's a randomly selected audience member but you can't you can't do that so on this podcast that's what's happening it's her having this bottled up urge to just address all these comments and here she has a platform she's on this podcast so without them even asking her she's volunteering all these things where it's like no this didn't happen no that was wrong and we're seeing her priorities there to correct that record on things that are incorrect we're also going to notice times where she doesn't do that certain things that she doesn't correct and it's interesting to see that difference one last thing that we see here that we're going to see again later in the interview is when she talks about TMZ that you know people didn't think that because of TMZ and things like that we see an eye block followed by an eye flatter and for a moment that smile disappears so she talks with a smile for a lot of this podcast but in that moment as she says people didn't think that because of TMZ and things like that we see an ey block which is when we blink but for an extended period of time so the eyes stay closed for a little bit then we see a flutter and that smile is gone so ey blocking usually is when we're trying to keep a thought in or trying to keep a thought out the research on eye blocking shows that it happens when we're trying to keep a thought in or trying to keep a thought out and This is highly Universal and ey fluttering is something that happens so this is like when it's not an increased blink rate where we're blinking more it's a quick succession like this and this happens when we're processing something but eye fluttering also happens in pre- aggression when we're feeling a little aggressive towards something it might happen because we're trying to process emotion rather than thought so in that moment when she's talking about the TMZ thing and we see all these gestures it has a tone of just being annoyed if you look at that it just really feels like this thing that she doesn't want to deal with ey block we have a flutter cuz she's processing emotion the smile is gone I think she's just annoyed with the perception that people had on her based on the TMZ thing and we're going to see this cluster this eye block and flutter a lot when she talks about public opinion giving me the indication that she's quite annoyed with a lot of the narratives that are out there obviously I leave the airport finally um which I did not get arrested I know everyone thinks I did don't know how I didn't but I did not get arrested and um I had already left when they like came out with some citation or something so I didn't refuse to sign anything like I just was gone you left yeah yeah so I'm like in the Uber calling my mom I'm like this is bad I just knew what a fool I acted like I just knew like I knew I was going viral and you know how social media is like I'm not dumb to to realize what's going to happen so that was like a later flight by the time I got home I am like literally like a crazy person not literally but searching like American Airlines American Airlines on Tik Tok like I'm like I know it's going to come out okay that clip is going to be really really quick because there isn't much I want to talk about there but you need the context of what she said there for the next clip because there is some stuff happening between the two that is for me just it's hurting my brain so really quickly in the beginning again we have that correcting the record I wasn't arrested I left before they showed me any paperwork so again we're correcting This Record but really pay attention to what she said happened next she got in the Uber and called her mom so from the way she's talking about it it certainly sounds like she's alone but definitely she's not with her mom so she's in the Uber then she goes home she said she goes home and she's saying how paranoid she was thinking that this was going to go viral she knew it was going to go viral and she's on her phone just constantly checking because she knows what's about to happen keep all that in mind because now we're going to move on and look at her next answer and compare that to what she just said and I'm going to have a lot of questions about that but before we get to that do me a huge favor hit that subscribe button turn those notifications on for more behavioral analysis and practical psychology content and to regular viewers who want to encourage the channel I will leave a link in the description where you could learn more about memberships and how you can join and I got on another flight at 6:00 a.m. on Southwest successful flight successful flight um wearing the same outfit yep wait did you put your hair down at least the next time no I can't like my hair is wet like the reason why I slick it back like that people think that's like oh she's trying to get not no like that's my lazy fit like on airplane my hair's wet like I tie it in a bun like it's long as hell it takes 30 minutes to blow dry it like I ain't trying to do that every day right so um yeah we get there and we're going on a cruise so you like drop off your bags like immediately so I can't even change so the only person that knows what's going on is my mom we have like my grandparents my siblings everybody's there on a family cruise oh yeah but I'm the only one on like I'm on a separate flight right right um I'm meeting them there so yeah I like can't even like get a new shirt out of my bag I'm like Mom do you have a hat like do you have a beach hat like sunglasses anything I am so confused there are things about this that I'm convinced I must be misunderstanding to the point where where I must not speak the English language because what she's saying doesn't make sense let's dive into why I'm saying that first of all she says that she took another flight at 6:00 a.m. so I don't know the exact timeline of the flight where the footage was taken but the easy assumption is that she's talking about the next morning unless that was a really really early morning flight which I don't think it was at all so I think it was the day before so she's probably talking about the next day 6:00 a.m. regardless doesn't matter the host asks um in the same clothes and we see something that we see quite commonly with her where the tongue goes up and touches the top lip like this and this is something we see often with women who are wearing lipstick or lip gloss because it's the tongue's impulse to go and do a lick lip but when you have lipstick or gloss you don't want to mess it all up so it's a very minimal lip lck it also has an element of what we call hushing or mouth blocking so whenever we don't want to say say something or we say something we shouldn't have said we might bring something in front of the mouth like this we might compress the lips some we bring an object up like this and every now and then you might see someone use the tongue like this as a hushing gesture So within this context he says so you wearing the same thing and we instantly see this yeah that was that was pretty silly of me to wear the same thing so it's some sort of like she knows how silly it looks that she would have worn the same thing the very next day when she's the one who said she knew how viral this video was going to be then she even kind of crumbles in shame so I think this is all just kind of a silly me and kind of feeling silly about that whole decision then someone comments about her hair and she goes into this whole thing about the hair she even jumps on it her voice gets higher she jumps on this whole hair thing because I think she's come up with an excuse that she thinks is convincing for the hair like of course I'm going to tie it up my hair is wet I don't want to let it down but she can't really explain the clothes thing so that's why she kind of immediately leaves that and jumps on the hair thing but I'm still left wondering at that point why she would wear the same clothes okay fine maybe your hair it's wet I don't really know she seems happy with that answer so let's give her that one but you haven't answered the clothes thing why would you go back wearing the exact same thing if according to what you said you were super terrified on your phone checking to see knowing it's going to go viral why would you go back wearing the exact same thing then she says a series of things that I found were so bizarre she says that you know because they have to drop off their bags I can't even change but what are you talking about you said you went home I don't understand this I really like and I tried really hard guys to understand what the heck she means by I can't even change you said you went home you talked about you said you said you were in The Uber and you said you went home so unless she means she went home then she went back to the airport and at that point realized she had to change and couldn't do it I don't I get what she's saying so maybe she's saying that but if that's what she's saying that's super unclear like I would have expected her say something like you know I got to the airport that's when I realized people are looking at me and now I can't even change but there's none of that so I have no clue what she means by I can't change when she said she went home then to add to my epic confusion she says my grandparents my siblings everybody's there and the host says you know on a family cruise you're going to a family cruise and she goes yeah but they you know we were going separately she says I'm meeting them there so she starts by saying they're there but then she goes no no they're not there they're there I'm I'm and then she says I'm the only one I'm on a separate flight so now it's they're already there I'm going to meet them there I'm on a separate flight not we I'm on a separate flight then she talks about how she was asking her mom for a hat or something so it's so confusing to me cuz she's starting with grandparents and siblings are there but no they're not there there they're there I'm meeting them there so why did you even bring that up in the first place if they're not even there then it's I'm the only one uh I'm on a separate flight then her mom's there so you're not the only one your mom's there with you cuz you're asking her for a hat and once again why are you asking her for a hat like desperately like you have some sort of a hat or something when you went home and you could have changed at home so to me it doesn't make any sense it's almost like she's trying to reflect that she didn't want the attention she was super paranoid about the attention but doesn't actually have a good explanation as to why she didn't change when she was home if she knew she knew she said it herself that this video was going to go viral cuz then when the when the apology video came out everybody was like oh it's a different person are you a CIA plant is this a big op oh my God yeah I'm a fed I'm CIA I'm I mean the conspiracy theories are really good not and they I mean they're really entertaining to listen to but no you were saying when it happened like these everyone that thinks that this is a different person like have you ever been with a girl yeah women have like aund different looks that they can get into okay so now they address a comment that was circulating for a while that that's not her when she did the apology video there were quite a few comments of people saying not her not the same girl and uh she's asked about this and the first thing you'll notice is a mocking tone towards that comment we do get a direct denial here after she talks about the theories and she goes but no which is a lot more than I could say for some other answers that we're going to see soon that get really really dodgy but that one got a direct denial after that she kind of Chuckles a little bit and anyone who's really forcefully trying to look like wants this to be a lie might go that that smile after she says no it's duping the light which is a small smile that we sometimes see in Liars that's associated to the excitement of getting away with a lie but that could just as easily be a smile of like laughing at that theory because she is being quite condescending ing throughout this entire piece and that's a big problem that I have with duping delight hundreds of things can make us smile so I'm not a big fan of you know every time somebody Smiles oh duping the light duping the light duping the light it's usually much more subtle than that that's just flat out laughing so we get a direct denial notice what happens when she says really entertaining when she says that the theories are really entertaining we see that cluster of irritation we see the eye block with the flutter as that smile which is quite consistent in the sensor goes away for a moment then immediately comes back that is pretty much the definition of passive aggressive cuz she's saying that you know they were really entertaining and we almost sense the sarcasm in the way that she's saying that but then that little flutter with the eye block kind of gives it away that she's feeling irritated towards these rumors and then she gets quite condescending in saying have you ever been with a girl not have you seen a girl do you know women it's questioning the virility or the masculinity or the charm of anyone who would say something like that like have you ever even been with a girl so it's getting quite condescending towards the men I guess who are making that comment now I don't want to spend too much time talking about the theory of this not being the same woman because we already talked about in a previous video but really quickly it's not enough it's not enough to say oh they don't look the same therefore that's definitely not the same woman because again you have to explain how that would happen and that's the thing that blew my mind the most of all the comments that think it's not her 99% is just that one line nope not the same girl not the same woman that's not her oh my God that's not even her that's it there's no further reasoning there's no critical thinking there's no trying to develop that argument because the moment you do you have too many questions to answer for example she has family right she has she said grandparents siblings her mom that she's rather close with wouldn't they notice wouldn't they be like wait a second that's not that's not Tiffany that's some agent some crisis actor that came in that's not her so what did they do did they silence or replace everyone she's ever met and then everyone they've ever met as well it sounds like a really expensive project for some woman who had an outburst on a plane and once again it's a very difficult argument to make that random commenters on social media would know if it's her or not more than her own family and friends so I'm not saying it's for sure the same woman because I rarely speak in absolutes and I don't know her what I'm saying is I haven't seen a well-presented and well-reasoned argument for it not being the same woman just these onliners from commenters who don't really get how critical thinking Works wait so okay can I ask again what you saw you know the reason why I probably haven't come out yet cuz it's like so cringe um I did not see anything what I mean I think yall knew that okay I we honestly had no idea yeah you said you did no I did not the media you said this mother is not real I said that mother is not real these like apologies yeah so I gotten a bit of an altercation it spiraled out of control it was not my best moment everyone has bad moments on planes yeah but mine you know 450 million plus people have seen it y like it's that many Jes a lot of people exactly so what you're saying is that clip that we all saw that mother is not real is not like you thinking that someone is an alien it was just the tail end of an argument it was an expression of speech okay MH so just like you had an argument with some guy on the plane and then as you're leaving you're like that mother is not real yeah okay Buckle in this is going to be a wild one so before we jump into this response I need to give the LIE detection disclaimer really really quickly for those of you who are new to the channel so there isn't a single Behavior or series of behaviors whether it's verbal or non-verbal that can allow anyone on this planet to know with certainty when someone's lying that behavior doesn't exist there are a lot of studies that that show oh a bunch of people did this when they were lying or did that when they were lying but then other studies contradict that the reason for that is that we all do different things when we're lying and no two humans are the same so there isn't a universal tell for deception there are however Universal tells for stress or for an increased cognitive load when we're really thinking about something which happens in deception so the way lie detection works is that we look for a cluster of behaviors both verbal and non-verbal numerous behaviors happening at the same same time that would indicate either more stress an increased cognitive load or signs that someone is fabricating something rather than actually trying to recall what happened but even if we see a cluster it doesn't mean for sure someone's lying it's just an increased probability of deception so an interrogation or an interview it just means we want to ask more questions about that topic it never means the person's lying for sure that being said there is a clusterfest in this answer so she's asked what did you see you know tell us what you saw finally what did you see on the plane and she goes you know the reason I probably haven't come out yet cuz it's like so cringe so first of all again here we have fluff fluff is pretty much anything that's put in front of an answer to buy us time to get to the answer now I call it fluff I'm not the only one who calls it fluff but other behavioral analysts some pair it with hesitation some pair it with non-answer statements but the bottom line is it's words that are not answering the question there's a whole bunch here you know the reason I probably haven't said anything yet cuz it's so cringe so all this all this preface to the answer in that fluff we have something called an exclusion qualifier so she says probably the reason I probably haven't come out yet and exclusion qualifiers are a clever way to kind of remove the answer from the answer so imagine if you ask me um what what I did last week after work and I say um you know after I left work I probably went home that's different than saying after I left work I went home would that probably gives me a bit of wiggle room there I probably went home so here she's saying the reason I probably haven't come out yet what do you mean the reason you probably haven't come out yet shouldn't you know the exact reason you haven't come out yet so probability lowers the confidence of the answer after the fluff we see a gesture that falls under two categories as her hand comes up like this and touches the tip of her nose the first category This falls into is face touching so there's research that shows that when we're stressed and dis deceptive the blood flow in our face changes and they've seen in scans that more blood goes to the nose when we're being deceptive and the nose actually grows a little bit calling this the Pinocchio effect and so often we see this kind of nose touching or around the nose within clusters of deception and what a great example as to why we need a cluster because of course there's a million reasons you could scratch your nose if I see someone answer something and scratched your face it's not enough it means nothing but within a cluster of all these other things it's just just adding a little bit to that cluster the gesture also falls under mouth blocking so very often we say something we're not supposed to say or even thinking of something that we don't want to say we do things to block the mouth in children it's very obvious that kind of thing but as we get a little bit older we become quite a little bit better at it and with withheld opinions or something we're holding in we kind of see this kind of thing then we get a non-c contraction as she says I did not see anything not didn't and she's someone who's not using ractions that often it happens a few times but she speaks casually didn't couldn't wouldn't but here we get I did not see anything and it really jumped out at me because she's not often using those non-c contractions and again non-c contraction is something that sometimes people just talk that way by the way it's important to consider Baseline should have said that in disclaimer if you know someone who constantly touches their face or you know someone who constantly uses probably or exclusion qualifiers it's meaningless we're looking for these clusters of behaviors that differ from the way a person normally behaves so if someone often says I did not I could not I would not it wouldn't matter but in her case it really stood out the reason a non-c contraction contributes to a cluster of deception is because we often say that Liars are trying to sell whereas truth tellers are just trying to tell so a truth teller isn't concerned as to how their story is going to come off they just tell you what happened because they know it's the truth they don't have to sell it but people who are making something up very often really feel they need to sell it so they want to make sure every everything is clear and that did not makes it very clear then after the I did not see anything again we see what we see that tongue come up and touch the top lip which could be a lip lick or it could simply be that mouth blocking that we sometimes see people do with their tongue like this again as a way to hold something in then they ask her again a little bit about what she said on the flight to try to elaborate and she goes no I did not again a non-c contraction no I did not say that and she clarifi I said I said that MF was not real I didn't say these so here she's getting overly specific which does contribute to a cluster when we really zero in or focus on a specific part of the question here she's going I didn't say these or anything like that I said that well it doesn't make a difference whether you said these or him or or those or or this doesn't matter you said something MF is not real so focusing on a very unimportant element of the question so we certainly have enough here to constitute a cluster of deception now what does that mean in interview or interrogation does it mean I immediately am convinced this person's being deceptive absolutely not it just tells me I need to ask more questions about this and really dig in to this specific answer there are other reasons we could see a cluster of deception one of the main ones is the fear of not being believed so the research has shown that when we're scared that we're not going to be believed we behave very similarly to someone who's being deceptive which makes a lot of sense because if we're scared we're not going to be believed we want to sell our story more and remember Liars sell so it's very possible she knows she went viral she knows a lot of people have a lot of theories on what she saw it's very possible that she knows people aren't going to buy this she dragged this on for so long it's hard to now say I saw nothing so that could be the only reason we're seeing these behaviors another possibility is that she knows how ridiculous it is how long this went and how viral it went over nothing so the guilt could be Associated to how silly this whole thing is rather than a deception so yes behaviorally that's a cluster of deception but we have to critically think as to why else we might be seeing these behaviors happening at the same time could be deception could be the fear of not being believed or could be the guilt of knowing how long something so silly has dragged on few other things in that clip one of them is when she says 400 million plus have seen this now in this interview numerous times says how ashamed she is and how she did don't want to go viral but at that point let me let me play this for you I'm going to put it on mute I'm going to play it for you and I'm going to ask you a multiple choice question so look at this clip right here and tell me if In that clip you are seeing a either shame or B Pride what are you seeing in this clip well the research would tell us that we are seeing Pride because pride is a universal emotion that's expressed more or less the same way everywhere in the world world and chin up like this exposing that chin is associated to that when we're ashamed of something we close inwards like this we're a little more defensive we make ourselves smaller to not be noticed if I saw that on mutant I had no idea what she was talking about I would tell you whatever she's talking about she's proud of it so yeah I'm not necessarily buying that she didn't want the attention or the virality also take into consideration she's giving that number you know 450 million plus people have seen it like she's giving this massive number it's not a lot more people that I'm comfortable with or you know a lot of people side it she's giving that number like a point of Pride so for someone who's saying she didn't want that virality you know she wasn't this is quite this is this is a lot of Pride finally when they ask her you know so what was it why were you saying this MF is not real she says it was an expression of speech she means figure of speech or expression but not expression of speech but regard that's not what's important what's important is no it's not saying this person is not real is not a figure of speech it's it's literal words she's not saying this guy's not for real she's not saying this guy's a phony she's not saying uh this guy's not being real this guy's not a real one she's saying this MF is not real that's not a figure of speech that I'm aware of and I think she knows very well that that's not a figure of speech and the reason I think that is because she doesn't seem confused that people don't understand what she meant by that right let me give you an example let's say I use a popular figure of speech in saying I'm so hungry I could eat a horse right that's a pretty common figure of speech and let's say the response to that is millions of people and you talking to me go what are you talking about why did you say that you want to eat a horse you're actually going to go eat a horse my response to that would be like no guys what are you talking about it's a figure of speech I'm so hungry I could eat a horse I'm not going to eat a literal horse but you guys you guys don't know the figure of speech like I'll would be confused that you guys don't know that there's no part of her going yeah guys come on that MF is not real it's a figure of speech you guys never heard that she knows she knows it's not a figure of speech she's just kind of throwing that out there like yeah no it's just it's just fig it's just an expression of speech and then when the host at the end tries to explain it and says you know you had an argument and on the way out you're like that MF is not real look at her agreement it's like this muffled yeah with the vocal fry really unconfident so there's a lot to this that feels really dodgy and unconvincing with low confidence answers and uh yeah a lot going on with this answer that that I'm not very convinced with so Daily Mail was like the first to like take it and run with it and they're like she saw a not real person and I'm like they are making me look bash yeah and given I did like I I did look absolutely crazy um but no I just was in my feels needed to get off that I was highly distressed um not a good look it was not a good situation yeah so was it so was it armrest guy smell bad I actually in the aisle seat and I like gave up my aisle seat so gave up I was in the middle seat and it was just there was just a really bad energy and I don't want to get into like all the details of that just as you know there's it's ongoing and this is probably not the smartest to get into that but um yeah I I feel like you're Vindicated now because it really was everyone thought like oh she saw something she saw something she's crazy she's on druged that's just an expression not real it' be way cooler if I did yeah yeah first and foremost she talks about the Daily Mail and how they made her look bad and as she says bad by the way notice we see that cluster of surprise again where the eyes open up the head kicks back a little bit and again we see the muscles here move up a little and we see the eyebrows this time move just a little bit upwards but it's meant to look like this but it doesn't it looks like a muffled version of that but the point is she's saying that the Daily Mail said she's crazy and she goes on to say you know but no I didn't I didn't say anything and reiterates that but why didn't you say it back then when that came out when the daily mail came out and said that and you're bringing it up like you know it's kind of surprising to you that they would say something like that why didn't you come out back then and put an end to it why Dr I get out for this long and now for the first time say you didn't see anything now you might say that oh well because there was maybe an ongoing investigation or legal something like that but you don't have to go into details you don't have to all you could have said was come out and say guys listen that's not it I didn't hallucinate something I didn't see something I didn't see anything I was having an emotional moment you could give the bare minimum but if you had a problem with that narrative why didn't you just put an end to it the other clue that we have here as to what she may or may not have seen on the plane is that she's saying that the daily mail ran with this and said she saw a not real person and they painted me out to be bad like I'm crazy for seeing a not real person so this is subtle but there's a clue here as what's happening in her mind the only explanation to seeing something that's not real is that she's crazy she's not even entertaining the possibility that seeing something not real could be an alien a ghost a a a reptilian a shape shifter a spirit and all these other things no part of her is entertaining the idea that her having seen something could be legit she is directly equating without a second's thought this isn't even thought out she's just saying it that the only reason she would have seen something that's not real is that she's crazy and this goes back to something I said in the first video so many theories came out of people saying oh she must have seen insert whatever from Aliens to shape shifters to to Demons to spirits and I said it down and I'll say it again now I'm not saying these things don't exist but a woman screaming on a plane is not evidence of any of those things especially when she comes out and goes well they said I saw something so they thought that I was crazy when she comes out and says something like that it makes anyone who felt that her Outburst was evidence of whatever they want to believe in look ridiculous because even within the community of people who believe she saw something for sure cuz she's freaking out they disagree on what it is she saw whether it was a reptilian an alien or a spirit so again I have a lot of problems with arguing from a conclusion in other words you have a conclusion you're only looking for things that support that conclusion and confirmation bias and I think anybody who looking at this as evidence that she saw something specific like it's for sure uh a reptilian and nothing else that's not it that's not how evidence works again not saying it's impossible but it's not for sure evidence of that anyways then she goes on to say that there was really bad energy uh and I don't want to go into details because it's ongoing so a lot of ambiguity there what's ongoing is there is there a trial is there a case are you being sued what's ongoing so very dodgy there by the way I'm not sure anything is ongoing and she goes there was this really bad energy and and and then goes on to say that she just basically had to get out of there that explains nothing like that doesn't bad energy what does that mean bad energy bad energy might explain why you would go I don't want to sit here while you would leave it doesn't explain why you had this hysterical outburst and went on to say even off the plane there's footage of her saying don't let that flight take off she thought that the other passengers were in danger and we're going to talk about that a little bit later but saying that there was bad energy there but you know just you should have left doesn't really add up because it doesn't explain why you were that worked up over it and why you were saying that there's a danger here for everyone on this flight so a lot of her answers aren't really adding up then at the end something interesting happens where the host says she saw something she's crazy she was on drugs so he mentions the drugs he brings up the idea that she may have been on drugs because it really was everyone thought like go she saw something she saw something she's crazy she's on drugs did and notice how she doesn't address that at all she keeps talking now this might be okay if she wasn't the type of person who consistently throughout this interview was correcting the record even when she wasn't asked so many times we saw it earlier she brought up things to correct them to say people said this people said that this is wrong that's wrong but even when he brought up the drugs she's not coming out and saying oh by the way a lot of people are saying I was on drugs that's not true I didn't take anything nothing like that so it's not a huge deal but I just find it interesting that for someone who keeps correcting things even without being asked she didn't correct that now on Inside Edition in her interview she was straight up asked if she was on something take a look what do you want to say to the people out there who are like okay this girl was drunk this girl was on something I had an altercation and I felt very strongly that I needed to get off the plane so I don't know know if that's one smooth take it could very well be a cut because after the question it zooms in on her but that's the answer they chose to publish and there's no denial there's no no I wasn't on any of those things in fact it's a non-answer he's asking what do you want to say to people that you were on substances and she goes I had an altercation it's not no no I wasn't on anything it's that I had an altercation it's not a correction it's just I had an altercation now again there might be an edit there but I'm sure if there was more of an answer to that a denial or something it would have been in there there but it's not so when it comes to substances and I don't know what substances there's a wide range of substances I think the fact that she's not correcting that you know whether it's coming up or not the fact that on Inside Edition she seems to have been asked specifically that and it doesn't seem like there was a direct denial of that specific element I think there might be the possibility that there may have been couple of drinks at the bar in the lounge I don't really know I'm just saying I'm not getting a confident Den of X or Y substance coming into play your worst Moment Like exists as like the internet's focus of who you are as a person yeah so people like think I've like been trying to like I've been trying to dodge it honestly like I you know what I put out the apology video cuz obviously I am really sorry to everybody on the plane like that I disrupted a lot of people and that's I travel a lot and that's just really not my character um it was just a wild situation that I was in and I needed you know I did need to get off um I just wish I would have done it peacefully okay I'm sorry she says I've been trying to dodge it sorry no you haven't you really haven't you're on a podcast you're on a podcast saying you've been trying to dodge the attention from this event months later you're on a podcast this is one of many you did an interview with Inside Edition you did an interview with TMZ so you're not trying to dodge it I'm sorry that was like I don't even need a cluster of deception that's just not true but again here she's saying there was altercation I should have stepped off but we're not I'm not really getting why she felt that the rest of the passengers were in danger fine you had an altercation you had to step off fine why was everyone else in danger so luckily on inside addition she was flat out asked that question yes why did you think the people were in danger on the flight just due to the altercation um I don't want to go into too much detail um for legal reasons talk about a non-answer statement what your altercation with someone convince you that everyone one else on that flight was in danger it seems like the only way to connect those two is that she felt due to this altercation with someone that that person was a threat to that plane that that person was a massive danger to that plane which is which would kind of explain why she would storm off like that hysterically yelling about that person and getting the heck off the plane warning everyone else that they're in danger that must be what this is and again she's saying for legal purposes what legal purposes is she being sued by someone so again tons of dodginess around this but to me there's a big gap between I had an altercation with bad energy to yelling hysteric that everyone else is in danger but what's so crazy is everyone thinks like I'm this marketing genius which is highly entertaining but um I actually do real estate Investments like P that's like my primary source of income right now okay legit I I literally don't I've done marketing my whole career um promotional in e-commerce but primarily now just real estate now here she's saying that people think she's a marketing genius which is highly entertaining then she goes on to say that that's incorrect because she's actually in real estate investment so when I heard that I was like okay so we were wrong you're not in marketing got it but then she says that she's only in real estate investment at the moment right now and says that she's been in marketing her entire life so she debated the first thing then she debated her own debate she like argued her own argument because yeah it's a good counterargument to say no no I work in real estate okay so you're not in marketing but then she goes but I've worked in marketing my entire life Promotional and e-commerce so okay then we were right to think that you work in marketing so in saying that we were crazy to think that you're a marketing genius then you go on to say that you have been in marketing your entire life all you're telling us is that you're not a genius because you have effectively worked in marketing your entire career those are her words so all you're correcting us on is that you're not a genius but you're still in marketing but here's my much bigger problem with that statement she's making a point of saying that she's not in marketing right that and that right now all she does is real estate but on Inside Edition they literally said this despite the worldwide attention she's received Gomez says she's focusing on her Marketing in real estate Ventures that is a direct quote of her words she said she's working on her marketing so only two things are possible the first is that the reporter at Inside Edition is really bad at his job because he's quoting someone that he talked to and he's misquoting her and the second possibility is that she lied somewhere because on the podcast she's saying she doesn't work in marketing to the point where it's like it's really entertaining that people think that but I don't work in marketing and here she is on inside aition saying she's working on her marketing both those things cannot be true so either she lied on one of them or the Inside Edition reporter is really bad at his job do you have to now go like in Disguise on a plane or have you ever with people and you wear the the old outfit and you step on it no so what was funny is everyone thought I wore the same exact outfit like when TMZ did their thing no I was not in the same exact outfit actually I had a brown tank top on my wardrobe is basically black and brown guys aren't good with details no no but what they didn't see is I had some big old baggy cargo pants on yeah I have some tight jeans and I sure as hell went shown my mid drift oh man that one that one just struck a nerve with me it's it's such a deflection because like oh oh oh the the pants were different I'm Sor the pants were different I'm so sorry the pants were different she knows she knows that she was wearing something so similar fine one was brown one was black in my video when I covered it I even said that it's very very similar not exactly the same garments but that's not the point the point people were making was that you went back to an airport looking very much similar to dissect that specificity of saying no no but the pants the pants were cargo pants so obviously I was entirely different completely sidesteps the point that people were trying to make and the point that people were trying to make is that you were something very similar in order to be recognized and it worked she had the interview with TMZ dressed like that where people said oh look she's dressed very similar and she talks about the TMZ interview by the way in this podcast and she says this did TMD just find you like were you expecting them or were you just like why the are these people I think they like they chill out at the like airport like it's not I mean it's LAX like yeah and that wasn't my first flight I'm not 100% convinced with that one again I can't say anything with certainty but for someone who really likes to correct the record and say people are saying this you know people are saying this people are saying that people were saying that the TMZ interview was very much orchestrated and she never said she didn't even deny it there when he said like were you expecting them or you know when he said were you expecting them or were you like why are these people here she doesn't answer that she doesn't talk at all about whether she was expecting him or not she says I think they just hang out at LAX a very low confidence answer there's no no no no I the guy came up to me you know none of that she's not addressing it at all I talked about the whole TMZ thing in the last video I'll leave a link in the description I've worked with TMZ before so I had some theories there is a possibility that it was orchestrated they were tipped off maybe by someone she knows maybe not not really sure but the point is this if you're alleging with low confidence that TMZ was just hanging out at the airport and they recognized you then what you were wearing was extremely similar to what you were wearing in the original video so again one of two things that she said has to be incorrect either TMZ didn't just recognize you while they were hanging out at the airport somebody had to tell them that you're who you say you are or you did look almost identical regardless of whether your pants were the same or not you did look pretty much exactly the same and that's why TMZ would have recognized you so again when we really critically think about her answers there are contradictions within the things she's saying so look here's the bottom line I think it's the same that it's always been for me with minor adjustments at first I really wasn't sure what she experienced but the more we progressed with this the more I saw someone who had an event kind of overreacted and then tried to ride that wave as long as she can I don't believe that she's trying to lay low she's taking podcasts she's on Inside Edition that is not consistent with someone who's trying to lay low um we're seeing signs that she's dragging out the information she took so long holding out to that information as to what she saw I think when it comes to what she saw we're getting some dodginess uh when she's being asked about why she reacted the way she did we're getting some dodgess we talked a lot about why we might be seeing these types of answers earlier but at the end of the day I think that's all it is I think she had an altercation I think the nature of that altercation did not Merit her reaction which is why she's being dodgy about it I think she went viral I think parts of her enjoyed that so she held on to that information as long as she can to drag this out now The Jig Is up she has to give an answer at some point so I think she's coming out and going I really didn't see anything could there be more to what she saw that she's concealing it's possible I wouldn't think it's crazy to think that but I think overall a lot more adds up for me to believe that there was an altercation she overreacted dragged it on for way too long and now I think she kind of knows that this went on a little too long but she's kind of enjoying a little bit of the attention and I think that's why we're seeing a lot of what we're seeing just a big overreaction but let me know in the comments what you think and more importantly let me know did your opinion change at all throughout this journey did you think one thing and then with more evidence kind of change what you thought or are you on the same page that you were personally from the very beginning let me know in the comments and I will see you on the next one

Channel: The Behavioral Arts

Views: 509,895

Keywords:

Id: Ln5iPjwN6yE

Length: 50min 56sec (3056 seconds)

Published: Sat Nov 18 2023