The SCP Foundation: Starter Guide & Welcome Tour
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Night Mind
Views: 129,407
Rating: 4.8804293 out of 5
Keywords: scp, scp foundation, scp explained, what is scp, confinement, scp welcome, scp guide, night mind, nick nocturne, scp starter guide
Id: SFY5rSWkEjM
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 31min 43sec (1903 seconds)
Published: Sat Dec 22 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I'm fine with the SCP Wiki and The Foundation getting more non-game related attention, but even this seems to focus entirely too much on the spookyscary stuff. That's not all that it is. As for everything that Nick got wrong:
Not to mention the weird versions of the Foundation names. No one calls it "The Secure Contain Protect Foundation" or "The SCP." No one calls 173 "The Statue" (it's The Sculpture, or in Cool War headcanon, UΕcisk).
He mentions the SCP Classes, and then somehow forgets Apollyon but leaves in Esoteric?? Esoteric is not a canon SCP class. Nick literally just looked at this page - http://www.scp-wiki.net/object-classes - and copied them verbatim. Do a tiny bit of digging and you'd know that Apollyon is 100% legitimate, and part of what would be considered the "primary" canon (yes I'm aware that some people still cling to "there is no canon," but that's an argument for a different day). It doesn't matter if there are 1000 Apollyons or just one - it's enough of a legitimate class that Thaumiels are essentially described as "things that might possibly counter/work against Apollyons" in the old "box analogy."
Also...the Foundation does not actually lock things in boxes to see what happens for fuck's sake. It's an analogy. And no, Thaumiel is not what he said it was.
Thaumiel - "We can use this to help keep the other things inside their boxes." Apollyon - "Box? How the fuck would you put this in a box? Also, you call that a box?? Fuck you and fuck that box." Something along those lines.
And then there's the old "Nick inserting himself into canon" thing again. It's practically a trope at this point. "Class E - that's you guys!" etc., etc. There are people who will now think that Class E is actually what Nick said, because they come to him for information. This is what Class E actually is:
Class E is not "You guys! The fans!" Just...he always has to make it about himself.
And then...O5s are not necessarily "the highest level of Directors." The entire idea is that we don't know who the O5s are. In any way. We have zero idea, as mid-to-low level grunts viewing the SCP files. That skittish little assistant researcher at Site 9 could be an O5. Bright could be an O5. One of the SCPs could be an O5. Brad Pitt could be an O5. We have no idea. There is no distinction of a line between Directors and O5s because a link in progress from Director to O5 is not a canon-established thing in any way.
And that's about as far as I got in the video before I had to stop. All of the bad/poorly researched information combined with the annoying record scratch "[REDACTED]" stingers got to be a bit too much. It feels like Nick's going from that quality slow burn type of creepiness to "BOO! GOTCHA!" scares.
It's really disheartening. From what I saw skipping through to the end, the GoI section seemed fairly un-screw-up-able, but...honestly, for someone who's made a decent amount of videos on the site, how does he not do more than basic skimming of the main hub pages? He used to be better than this. I hope that future videos return to the level of quality that we used to get but...I just don't know any more.
This...isn't how the Foundation works. Oh god we're gonna have so many noobies making inaccurate pages now.
Fuck I thought we were finally getting passed this. The same sort of thing happened when leddit caught wind of the site and it was just starting to die down.