The Hyperloop: BUSTED!
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Thunderf00t
Views: 1,920,913
Rating: 3.9824748 out of 5
Keywords: hyperloop, busted, fail, death, kill, vacuum, failure, you, hyperloopone, one, thunderf00t, phil mason, science, physics, engineering, pump, tube, glass, shatter, break, boom, pressure, depressurisation, gas, ball, bearing, fired, gun, space, hyper, loop, elon, musk, scam, transport, la, sf, los angles, san fransico, california, liberal, green, energy, cheap, travel, train, plane, billionaire, dumb, stupid, 30 mins, air, worlds, largest, lhc, scandal, nuke, nuclear, test, mythbusters
Id: RNFesa01llk
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 28min 39sec (1719 seconds)
Published: Sun Jul 24 2016
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
When he began discussing expansion and seals, he seems to want to compare it to massive structures, and focus on overall changes and demands, but the numbers at an individual cylinder doesn't reflect that. Now I don't know the latest designs out there, but welding the whole thing together feels like a strawman, it just wouldn't make sense to do that for a number of reasons, but that's what he's using for big numbers that fail.
Also, there was criticism of his previous video on how catastrophic failure would occur because it wasn't comparable to a full scale tube and pod. He makes no mention of possible safeguards in airlocks or other emergency systems, instead using the scary idea of a wall of air shooting down the tube with the pods unable to escape. See his other video, he relies there on dramatics to make his fallacy seem a problem.
He seems to not understand the purpose begin the turbine in front of the original design, saying that it would have to run at huge speeds to take in enough molecules from the partial vacuum. But that's not meant to drive the pod, but to move remaining air past the pod.
His argument on security is based on his arguments that a single accident can kill everyone in the whole tube or destroy/shut down the whole thing. Again, no mention of possible systems to minimize or prevent that.
I don't mind bringing up problems with the whole concept, that's one reason why it was put out there. But his videos are slanted to his opinion of it being not viable and don't offer any solutions or alternatives to them. Plus the hyperbole is a bit much because of this superiority take on things. The title and his opening words both suggest that anyone working on the hyperloop concept is trying to pull one over on everyone else.
It's not a discussion on specifics, it's a few strawmen and preconceived notions based on the basic original design which was meant as a starting point, not a final product.
Damn it.
1st 5 minutes and most of the video are random comparisons to make it sound harder than it is. His thing with the plexiglass is particularly dumb, when in reality building an airplane has the exact same challenges. His bullshit with air going the speed of sound doesn't happen when planes lose integrity. Then he makes engines that already exist sound like they don't, and shows a clip from battlebots to prove this. GOOFY.
Heat expansion is an issue, but he hasn't done his research enough. First, the air in the tube is gonna be basically climate controlled since air will be pumped out constantly. That limits expansion straight off. Second the expansion he's talking about happens once every 6 months, so a huge complicated system is fine to account for it. Third the tube floats on the pylons, and can potentially move into a slightly less straight shape to reduce the expansion. Fourth there are tons of ways to control heat expansion, like accordian tube with a liner inside.
He makes such a huge deal of vaccuum systems being hard to seal when it is nearly irrelephant. Moving seals are incredibly simple in low vacuums. Polymer(O-ring) seals can handle the pressure easily, are incredibly cheap, and their leakage is super easy to compensate for with a small pump. I think he was a lab tech or something, but I doubt he knows much about it.
His second big point is that if someone blows the tube up, everyone in the tube will die. Whether or not that's true its irrelevant. The hyperloop is not a better target than a stadium.
His third point is that hyperloop will probably not be cheaper than rail. That's probably true. The land acquisition cost is predicated on highway land travel. Then he goes and compares the numbers to the worst numbers in the world, America and the Japanese maglev. Actual Japanese rail costs about the same as hyperloop's estimation. The numbers are not insane, and while personally I think they are probably off by at least 2x from what's possible, its definitely not 10x. American rail is essentially corporations gutting taxpayers, and the Japanese maglev has hundreds of miles of coils in the rail. It's far more complicated than a hyperloop.
He closes with a snarky comment about putting solar panels on top of anything. Hyperloop has a top, train tracks do not.
OK just a few thoughts:
Wouldn't the pods travelling away from the rupture point be okay as long as they are moving as they are travelling at or above the speed of sound and the air wall couldn't catch up to them? When they get to the station is a whole different issue, but there are ways to add valves and control mechanisms to stop/slow the air before they get to the station, especially if the pods are traveling faster than the wall of air. however, the pods coming at the wall of air are probably going to be toast, and there may be no practical way around that.
Couldn't you solve the temperature differential and the need for vacuum tubes by putting the whole tube in a temperature controlled underground system, thereby eliminating the expansion and sun baking problem? It could also prevent against outside attacks, as any trespassing onto the space above the hyperloop could be monitored.
As for the turbine approach, wouldn't using a maglev system inside the tube solve that?
I'm not saying that the project is necessarily realistic and its goals are achievable, but with some thought, it may become a bit more plausible, if it is even that possible at the moment.
Oh, hyperloop might be hard to make... we better give up right away.
When so called expert scientists tell you something is possible, they're probably right.
If other so called experts tell you its most definitely impossible. .. they're probably wrong .
Anyone remember when mass produced electric cars were never going to happen? Or how about the well known fact that heavier than air flying machines would never work? Or maybe you recall when any train travelling faster than 90mph would rip it's passengers apart?
Other videos in this thread: Watch Playlist ▶
I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch.
Info | Get it on Chrome / Firefox
I tried posting this here but you beat me to it! I've posted it on the Elon Musk subreddit also. The SpaceX page doesn't deem it as relevant.