Pro's guide to CQB | Doors & Thresholds
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: UF PRO
Views: 689,739
Rating: 4.9627109 out of 5
Keywords: uf pro, uf pro gear, special forces, cqb training, cqb, cqb tactics, cqb training course, itcqb, force on force, cqb room shapes, force on force training, room breaching, breaching, close combat
Id: 6EDsIP5M0xA
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 33min 13sec (1993 seconds)
Published: Sun Jul 21 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
edit so I just saw all these points brought up later in the video. The demo also includes the instructor stacking up on what he just called the "weak" side. I think better nomenclature is in order. This comment is about the nomenclature, not the underlying tactics or considerations
I'm a scrub, and this usage of "strong" and "weak" side confuses me. I would expect the strong side to be the safest and therfore better side of the door to be on once it's opened, and weak the inverse. I think the underlying considerations of where the handle is are valid, but I don't think the nomenclature quite covers the content.
Surely the safety of the side you're standing on depends on how much of the room you'll be exposed to if the door is opened? To clarify:
https://i.imgur.com/2cuVFeZ.png
1 may be able to see more of the room when the door is cracked and thus is able to "engage" the problems, but first look works both ways. The opfor needs to look only at one spot, that doorway, whereas #1 has many angles he's looking at and is exposed to at once. This seems to be a disavantage, not an advantage. Furthermore, if the handle's across the door, you're more into the frame than #2 would be to open it. This also applies to when you're eventually slicing the pie. Even if #1's not opening the door, every step exposes him to more of the room than the person on the other side, giving him more of an area to process at a time.
2 on the other hand has less angles he can be engaged from, and will have to slice less to control his (controllable) side of the room. If the door is standing open, the concealment is added to that. It seems to me #2 is in a safer place to be than #1 when the door gets cracked, even if it should open to the other side (bad building architects, lel).
This is even more pronounced in the context of working alone. Standing in #2's spot will give you the opportunity to control the speed at which you're exposed to parts of the room much more than #1, and it'll be easier to step back and be concealed from largers parts of the room of necessary.
The room at the end of the hallway is an even clearer example: https://i.imgur.com/v3Sj7kv.png, even not taking that other part of the hallway into consideration #1 will be safer when that door is opened than #2. Defined another way, #2 would have to be further away from the door to get as little exposure from the inside than #1. Another reason to pick this side would be that you have the entire right hand side cleared with the first part of the slice, and you don't need to worry about giving up ground as you slice (though this obviously applies only to cornerfed rooms where there are no dead corners on one side).
The real star of the show: https://i.imgur.com/mVqn5E9.png
great video