Minister Louis Farrakhan handles the Donahue audience!
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Britt Hart
Views: 4,070,727
Rating: 4.7744045 out of 5
Keywords: Racism (Quotation Subject), race in america, Louis Farrakhan (Politician), Politics (TV Genre), The Phil Donahue Show (TV Program), African American (Ethnicity), White People (Ethnicity), 1990, diaspora, slavery, segregation
Id: Epjb-A6vOhQ
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 14min 43sec (883 seconds)
Published: Fri Jan 09 2015
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.
In general, be courteous to others. Attack ideas, not users. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, and other incivility violations can result in a permanent ban.
If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I think a lot of the tension during these types of discussions arise from the difficulty of understanding eachothers experiences. If you are a man, have you ever tried to talk about men's right to a female feminist? If so, you may have experienced a very defensive response from the feminist. The whole discourse falls apart as it jumps from whataboutism, comparing suffering, abstract to detail, absolute statements to individual opinions.
You can see this in the BLM discussion. Many instantly react with "All lives matter!" (I did back in 2014), because the assumption and the straw man pictured is white people don't suffer at all, and they only care about black people. Then certain events happen, and the BLM movement use it as an example of the suffering and unjust they are fighting, but people start talking about general issues of crimes in black community, gang violence, looting and etc., Eventually their discourse is removed from the event, and the references BLM movement is referring to, and they talk about whataboutism, comparing suffering, abstract to detail, absolute statements to individual opinions.
Anyway, to have a proper discussion you need a different host then this guy, who just want the drama to explode, and some more sober, specific conversation, with someone who can hold the conversation to the scope and participants who don't base their opinion on emotions.