Kyle Rittenhouse Update (I WAS WRONG)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Donut Operator
Views: 6,103,575
Rating: 4.7921681 out of 5
Keywords: donut, operator, kyle, kyle writtenhouse, kyle rittenhouse, kyle rittenhouse shooting, kenosha, kenosha protests, kenosha shooting, full video, breakdown, shooting breakdown, donut operator, jacob blake wisconsin, jacob blake, wisconsin, black lives matter, police breakdown, kenosha wisconsin, kenosha riots, police shooting, police, shooting, kenosha police, news, kenosha shooter, police brutality, police officer
Id: ts43EskooaA
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 9min 35sec (575 seconds)
Published: Fri Aug 28 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Props to the donut. Despite being a raging police apologist, he still has better journalistic integrity than any of the talking heads on tv.
What I still havenβt seen is:
1.) Definitive proof that Rittenhouse putting out the literal dumpster fire led to him being chased. I think we can all agree that while being chased, if you hear a gunshot behind you and someone right in front of you tried to grab your gun, a reasonable person would believe they were at imminent risk of death or serious bodily injury. However, if Rittenhouse assaulted or threatened to assault someone and that is what sparked the initial chase, then he cannot claim self-defense to the best of my knowledge.
2.) Does the fact that Rittenhouse was illegally in possession of a firearm prevent him from using a stand-your-ground defense in Wisconsin?
I like this because he provides a pretty good breakdown and sources..
Side note - there is a lot of EXCULPATORY INFORMATION in this criminal complaint. This will be used as a tool later on..
How much will him not calling 911 after killing the first guy fuck him over in court? I feel like that is probably the only real damning thing he did out of this.
Oh if he isn't sweet, ending the video hoping for a good discussion in youtube comments.
I think this will all fall back to the first shots. If these first shots are ruled to be in self defence then i think it will all be ruled self defence. But there is still the charge for having the rifle while under 18. More importantly im not a lawyer and this is just a guess/opinion.