Can I ask you about climate change, yeah and your read on that Big debate right now global warming human-made. How do you see what's actually happening here? scam I've mentioned earlier an organization called the Club of Rome Club of Rome was started in 1968 and it's part of a network of organizations in Towards the end of the 19th century early 20th century secret society was created in Britain called the round table The first head of it was Cecil Rhodes who was a Rothschild agent. That's why he went into southern Africa and pillage the the gold and diamond Resources and destroyed that that society on behalf of the Rothschilds and he was the head of the round table then went when he died another guy called Alfred Milner took over another Rothschild agent and They started this secret society started spawning satellite organizations first one they created was The Royal Institute of International Affairs in London also known as Chatham House think tanks. This is what they all watched the think tanks big time And then they created something in America, which was a an American version of that called the Council on Foreign Relations Council on Foreign Relations as to a very large extent driven American foreign policy ever since to this day then came the Bilderberg Group in 1954 Formed at the Bilderberg Hotel in it was to be Holland then in 1968 came the Club of Rome and then came the trilateral commission in 72 73. Now the Club of Rome was created specifically to use the environment as an excuse to transform society and I've been writing about this for a long time and basically You say to save the planet this has to happen and to save the planet. It's a planet. It's a globe therefore we have to have global centralization of power to center it to to control or to save the planet as the Club of Rome has been one of the big drivers of human-caused climate change or the illusion of it and then Came a United Nations Agenda called agenda Agenda 21 and That laid out a Strategy for Transforming society To meet the challenge of climate change It was everything that they wanted and then later more recently. They've Advanced that and they call it now agenda 2030 Which is a an updated version of the same thing and when you read agenda 2030 it is a Tyrannies Dream Because it dictates every area of human life including education to save the planet and this is problem reaction solution as I call it and this has been Worked towards for a long time So you create the illusion of the problem and then you offer the solutions to the problem to the problem Which is centralization of power centralized control now bringing it up to date One of the most classic Soros progressives around today is a lady in America a Congresswoman. She's recently elected called Alexandria Acacio Cortez Whose classic? nothing to do with facts just this is how it is and She's just come out now and it's got a lot of coverage in America Lord of support in the Democratic Party Called the green new deal Because she says I would say bizarrely and scientists would also say bizarrely too That we have 12 years to save the planet We had a few years to change that save the planet some years back and it long passed and we still here And what her green New Deal demands? Is exactly what I've been writing for years is the plan to transform human society into a centralized dictatorship on The justification of we have to do this to save the planet And we don't need to save the planet Humans aren't causing an aggressive form of global warming. Oh the 30 the planet that the planet Doesn't need saving I mean, it's it's natural balance Mechanisms will kick us off before it needs any help but are we gonna harm ourselves more in the meantime? No, I've just been reading See, it's also it's a psychological game So you have a major weather event in the 1950s and it's a major weather event. Oh, yeah Yeah, well that was a bit. Yeah a bit, you know extreme when it You ever won now global warming its climate change and I've just been reading a very very interesting book by an American meteorologist called Joe Bastardi Who is Since he was a little kid he was obsessed with the weather he just loves weather and weather forecasting and he's just a really kind of obsessed with it and he was observing all this and Being obsessed with the weather. He's looked at charts going back forever, you know And he's looking at all these claims about this is global warming. This is climate change. Oh nice going. Well, hold on a minute dad apt in the 1950s that happened in the 1920s and What what he does in this book is he shows the repeating cycles that cause the outcome? so in the 1920s or earlier there is a cycle where the Atlantic cools and the Pacific warms There's another cycle where the Pacific calls and the Atlantic warms and that has a knock-on effect that eventually reaches a weather outcome Now he was pointing out in this book that when this sequence happens today the outcome is that's climate change we're all gonna die and then he goes back in his book and he shows that in the 1950s the 1940s this same cycle happened and the outcome that he's now blamed on climate change Happened. I mean, you know The the planet today is nothing like as warm as it was in what they call the Medieval Warm Period When there was no Carbon dioxide emissions from technology. I mean, I mean, I mean, you know, what caused it then turbocharged handcarts. I mean, it's crazy And and the other thing is that we went from this Really warm period the Medieval Warm Period about a thousand years ago and then we came down into what they call the Little Ice Age Which is which is still portrayed today on some Christmas cards with people skating on the Thames where temperatures can became very very cold and There's a correlation between the two which I'll come to in a second and then we started coming out of the Little Ice Age into into the Present day and a lot of you know, they say this is the warmest nations since records began a lot of those records began what we're still coming out of the Little Ice Age so the comparison between then and now is is completely unsupportable and Have you noticed that Whenever they're talking about the climate and climate change and global warming They never mentioned the bloody Sun And I mention it. It's all carbon dioxide, but by by the way without carbon dioxide We'd all be dead it's what it's what gives life to the planet and Another by the way Ninety-eight percent or there abouts of greenhouse gases we're supposed to hold there eat heating or do older heating is water vapor and clouds And when you see the graph, there's water vapor and clouds. He carbon dioxide and the vast majority of this carbon Dioxide is naturally generated not human generated and it's about methane and all the ones they animals Yeah, but they're tiny. Tiny tires a big effect Dairy Dairy. They're even they're even less I mean we do gonna kill all the animals what we going to do legislate against condensation when 98% of it's caused by Water vapor. It's ridiculous. It's another scam cuz it was intense. Yeah to create control but liked it Like I was just gonna say they never talked about the Sun now It's well known that Solar activity These great emissions of power which we experience as heat coming from the Sun You can see When the Sun is in an up? Period of if you like power by the number of sunspots? Because these sunspots are massive projections from the Sun that there are bigger than the earth well bigger than the earth and they travel through on the solar wind and we get them as as heat and So when the Sun is very unactive there's very few sunspots sometimes, you know virtually none and These would have been Looked at in their cycles through this period that I'm talking about and When we reached the minimum the bottom of the Little Ice Age when it was at its coldest It's known in climate science as the maunder minimum And it's named after a guy called maunder and his wife was there as well? Who were charting sunspot activity and its relationship to? Earth temperature and they picked up a correlation and one of the correlations was that when there was virtually no sunspot activity we reached them that the the coldest point of The the maunder minimum the Little Ice Age as they call it and then sunspot activity started again And we started to climb out of this this little ice age into into present day so when you discount basically the impact of the Sun on Temperature your climate models are irrelevant Irrelevant because the the basic foundation factor of what dictates the temperature of the planet the flippin Sun Is not taken into account on anything like What it should be to get an accurate Projection of what's going to happen then you you you look at this from the point of view of prediction against experience According to Al Gore well before now they should be basically no ice in the summer at the at the North Pole funnily enough there is and And this should have happened and that should have happened. And another thing that Joe Bastardi points out in his kind of Lifelong love of of weather is that We're told that all these extreme weather events now are increasing because of climate change He's saying they're not they're not increasing There were there were more tornados and hurricanes way back than there are now and that there were More extreme weather events than we have now but if because it's a psychological game if you keep saying every time I notice what they've done now in Britain Which they've never done before started naming storms? Like they named hurricanes They've stuck which are kind of not very often So you just name a few there must be running out of names because every time there's a storm that you would call it's a bit more than You know, it's gonna be a bit rough. They give it a name, right? So it's another psychological. It's more scary, right? So we need to ignore it and well What we need to do is to research ourselves Beyond the official narrative and if we do we'll find an amazing thing that there are a Lot of scientist increasing all the time, by the way Who are saying actually? it's not happening is it it's not real is it there's many many scientists now that were on The bandwagon. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, it's happening. We're now saying well actually Actually, I'm reassessing it. I don't think it is now. I don't think this is real and All that is available if you search for it, but when you've got a situation where the BBC That's supposed to be this neutral organization. Well, yeah, you know, it's the way I tell them that Actually made a decision that the science is settled therefore We're not having people on that are saying otherwise Then what you're doing again Back to the same theme you're skewing the debate Because all people are hearing is climate change is real if they don't go searching elsewhere climate change is real. We're all gonna die you are disgustingly mercilessly Frightening young children of the devastation and the horror that they're going to face For a political agenda. That's what's happening. So you and the school. I mean my son Jamie Because he he thinks for himself When he was at school and He had an exam and part of the part of the exam was climate change He was obviously gonna put that actually there are there's evidence to say that it's actually not happening And his teacher said well, I have sympathy with that But if you say that you won't pass right, so again, wherever you look Where there's an agenda you can't win you Don't have the agenda your all you don't have the debate. So what you have now is anyone that is questioning the official narrative of So-called global warming climate change and it became climate change, by the way when the temperatures leveled out make call it global warming anymore There now climate deniers which is obviously Psychologically linking to Holocaust deniers, etc, etc and and So if you only hear one thing That's overwhelmingly gonna be the perception you have and and if you say to people well Why do you believe that? Climate change caused by humans is real. They'll say well well everybody knows that Well, they everybody knows that because that's all everyone's had ever heard when you go and do the research You find actually it's um, it's a house of cards It's just based on repetition You know go and go and research the 97% of scientists believe that global warming is caused by humans Go and research that and you'll find if you you follow it back. It's based on wind It's based on no substance whatsoever. It's a complete hoax but it's a great line all 97% of scientists agree that it's caused by by humans or well, it's 97 percent of scientists agree. It must be true You chart that number back and see where it came from. Even the Wall Street Journal trash. They're okay, but it's still parotid all the time as justification for Transforming human society destroying beautiful landscapes with with wind farms that are incredibly inefficient and so on You
Isn’t Icke the guy who thinks shape-shifting lizards rule the world?
Some of his stuff is interesting but David is probably the last guy I would trust about science.