How to Win Games and Manipulate People (SHUX'19)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Shut Up & Sit Down
Views: 49,716
Rating: 4.7768364 out of 5
Keywords: Shut Up and Sit Down, SUSD, SU&SD, Board Game Review, Review, Board Games, Board Gaming, Boardgame, Board Game, Gaming, Tabletop, Fun Games, Quintin Smith, Matt Lees, Psychology, Alan Gerding, How to Persuade People, Manipulation, Psy, Psych, Persuasion, Win Games, How to Win, Social Psychology, Werewolf, Mafia, Twilight Imperium, Mind Games
Id: JMtxii4s9ss
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 47min 0sec (2820 seconds)
Published: Fri Oct 25 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Damn, what happened here?
This was a really interesting watch, as it reminds me of a similar talk at PAX a couple of years ago and they said a lot of the same things. Made me realize that I was already manipulating my friends in games, so I try now to be cognizant of when I do it and not to overdo it.
That said, the rhyming one is one of my favourites that they pointed out because a recent example stands out to me. With my group we've been playing a bunch of Love Letter recently and I've managed to get people on board of mostly using their Barons against our friend Aaron, because I just started saying "It's the Aaron Baron play" every time it happened.
Well, I got the 'ask stupid questions' part down pat.
Presentations like this often fail to convince the audience that these techniques exploit features of cognition that everybody shares, including you, yes, you. You will believe something more strongly if you've put it into writing. You will be less likely to be persuaded by an argument if you have previously refuted a weaker form of the argument. You will be more likely to believe what someone says if they're like you.
They try to explain this, but it's not something that's really amenable to explanation.
For instance, there many forms of unconscious bias that have been demonstrated to be practically universal. But when you confront someone with all of the experimental evidence that's been used to demonstrate this, if you demonstrate, say, that confirmation bias is a thing that affects literally everyone, that person will think: wow, other people really have interesting failure modes.
The only way to get the universality of these failure modes across to a person, unfortunately, is to make the person fail. Unconscious-bias training is really only effective if you put a person into a position where their unconscious bias leads them to make a bad decision, and you can demonstrate to them that they just did that thing that everyone does. Nobody believes that the "everybody" in "everybody does this" applies to them until you make them prove it to themselves.
Nothing gets the point of this presentation across like falling to one of these techniques and then being shown, after the fact, that you fell for it. Also, even that is really hard to do. People don't want to believe that they fell for something,
I'm not good at trading/negotiation games, lets see if this will help. I have shied away from those type of game because I'm not good at them.
By Dale Carnegie
What is going on with this post and all this drama lol?
Great info. Too bad now everyone else knows too though.