How to Fix Major League Baseball | Baseball Bits
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Foolish Baseball
Views: 630,360
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: fix mlb, baseball dying, mlb dying, baseball decline, pitcher spin rate, three true outcomes, mlb foreign substances, minor league salaries, minor league baseball, mlb service time, mlb free agency, baseball dead, juiced ball, mlb juiced ball, mlb owners, bat flips, mike trout, fernando tatis jr., rob manfred, mlb, foolish baseball, baseball bits, how to fix mlb, how to fix baseball
Id: uh_F8WtrDCo
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 15min 9sec (909 seconds)
Published: Sat Feb 13 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Give the Orioles all the best players, problem solved
Imo, the casual fan does not notice and does not give a shit about a 15-minute increase in the length of games or a half dozen fewer balls in play per game. These are things designed to attract the "baseball is boring" crowd: people who don't and likely will never like baseball.
The primary issue facing the game is competitive balance. Baseball is a VERY regional sport. When the local team is good, it attracts interest from the casual fans who otherwise are indifferent, and makes lifelong fans of kids who are just learning about the sport.
"But look at the list of world series winners from the past few decades. Baseball is one of the MOST balanced sports."
Yeah, that just proves that the MLB playoffs are closer to a random number generator than a real reflection of team talent. The Yankees have made 24 of the last 28 post-seasons. The Dodgers have made 8 in a row. Even the best run "small market" teams like the A's and Rays haven't come close to that level of sustained success.
And speaking of those well-run teams: despite their success, attendance hasn't improved to reflect it. Now, some of that is stadium issues. But I'd posit that a good part of it is also the fact that they don't retain star talent. Fans are attached to players as much as they are attached to teams. Who is going to care when the Rays win 90 games this year when some of the most recognizable faces from the past few years are wearing different uniforms?
So how do you fix this? Revenue sharing. Subsidize low-revenue teams to go out and sign stars and to retain their hometown talent.
Set the default amount of revenue sharing lower. Include bumps for having a player with a $50M+ contract, a $100M+ contract. Subsidize the dispersion of star talent across the league, instead of having it concentrated in a few teams.
Trevor Bauer going to the Dodgers is good for him and for the Dodgers, but it does nothing for the league. The Dodgers have enough stars that adding another doesn't increase fan engagement or move the revenue needle in any meaningful way. Bauer going to a smaller market would have a much bigger impact on that teams ability to compete and to engage fans.
Another way to do this is to subsidize contracts for homegrown talent. If a player has spent 5 seasons with a single team, a contract extension with that team could be partially subsidized by revenue sharing, making it more likely for that team to be able to retain their own talent and giving players another bidding team. Imagine if 30% of Joey Vottos contract was covered through revenue sharing, the Reds might have been able to build more than 1 playoff team around him over the last decade.
Get rid of Sinclair contracts and get it on TV. I cannot watch my local team without paying at least 62$. This is not a price I would pay and I LOVE watching baseball. If it is on local TV on a sub network of ABC, CBS, NBC or FOX, then people will be initiated.
Also, get rid of the warm ups of relief pitchers on the mound. With so many pitching changes it grinds the game down. Make βem sprint in and ready to go. They can warm up enough in the bullpen.
ugh, I hate that he suggested banning the shift. someone please tell me why hitters can't just learn to hit to all fields
I've always wondered why owners don't at least look into some of these long-term investment ideas (raising minor league salary, free tickets, etc.). I find it hard to believe that all of these shrewd billionaires would clutch their pearls at the thought of spending some more money in the short term to gain in the long term (especially since that's how many made their fortune in the first place) and grow the sport, but yet that's exactly what it looks like they're doing.
I know it would never happen but I'd love to see owners comment on ideas like this. Their actions are so puzzling sometimes I've always wanted to see how they view things. Maybe it's just to preserve the "field bad, cheap team, make tiny profit" status quo.
I like Bailey but his finance section was just off.
I was with Bailey up until the finance stuff. I know its a common talking point on this sub but franchise values have absolutely NO relation to how a team can spend during any given season. Franchise valuation is just an estimate of how much it would hypothetically take to purchase all the assets of a team. Player payrolls are dictated by revenue. How much a team will spend in a given year is based upon how much they expect to make from TV deals, fan attendance, and shared revenue from the MLB on a national level. These amounts can differ greatly between teams, which is why we see such a disparity between teams like the Dodgers and Rays, due to the fact that LA is the second largest market in the country while the Tampa Bay market is extremely small. Just because an owner is a 'billionaire' (which is just a hypothetical estimate of the fair value of assets that person owns) doesn't mean they can spend like the Dodgers. Bailey completely lost me there when he immediately went to 'their franchise is worth alot'. Finances of a billion dollar industry is much more complex than that.
I'll go through this one change at a time.
THE FIELD
"Potential" stuff from The Field
THE FINANCES
THE FANS
I like foolish but this video missed the mark hard