History of AMD CPUs As Fast As Possible

back in 1974 it was actually a little bit of corporate subterfuge that led AMD to produce its first-ever CPU the am 98 II which was essentially a clone of Intel's 8080 that AMD reverse engineered by taking a photo of Intel's processor die and studying it closely funnily enough though the two chip makers later came to an agreement that had AMD manufacturing Intel designed CPUs as a second source which was important to intel's customers at the time as they wanted to be able to buy their parts even if something went wrong at intel itself thus began a sort of strange symbiotic relationship between Intel and AMD where they both share technology with each other but competed in the marketplace at the same time indeed as part of the second source arrangement Intel licensed out the x86 architecture to AMD in 1976 which is what allows AMD to design and manufacture IBM compatible CPUs to this very day however Intel ended AMD's license to print money and stopped giving exact second source processor designs to AMD starting with its widely popular 386 so while AMD still had a license for the x86 instruction set it had to fend for itself when it came to overall cpu design so while AMD was able to clone the 386 and 486 processors for reasons of complexity and the time-consuming process of reverse engineering intel's chips they quickly realized they needed to design their own cpus in-house and thusly the k5 designed to compete with the original pentium with the clock speed of up to 133 megahertz was born in 1996 the very next year 1997 was when AMD launched the chip that allowed them to become a major player in the cpu wars the k6 with variants called the k6 2 and k6 three coming shortly thereafter these chips competed with Intel's Pentium 2 and Pentium 3 generation CPUs offering floating-point capability for better performance in games and multimedia while retaining some of the previously enjoyed compatibility with Intel designed motherboards due to Andy's aggressive pricing the k-6 series captured a huge chunk of the mainstream PC market with the k62 claiming according to some sources nearly 70% of the market for PCs under $1000 at one point in 1998 and the train kept on rolling with K 7 in 1999 better known as the Athlon featuring a double data rate frontside bus to alleviate previous bottlenecking as well as a heavily revamped floating-point unit to pull ahead of the Pentium 3 and speed in certain applications it was also depending on who you ask the first CPU to run at 1 billion cycles per second or 1 gigahertz aim D also pulled some clever marketing out of its hat with the 2001 release of the Athlon XP riding on the naming of Windows XP to imply optimal compatibility and by shifting the model names of their CPUs from a number that reflects raw frequency to the PR rating system using a term like 1900 plus to describe performance relative to an earlier Athlon chip at that clock speed or as many press and enthusiasts speculated relative to Intel over the next 2 years athletics p's revisions offered incremental improvements but didn't wow the industry though a neat side note is the Athlon MP an earlier Intel Skull trail like dual socket platform for power users but in 2003 AMD made a massive contribution to the CPU industry by rolling out the x86 64 architecture as a feature of its K a series of Athlon 64 processors beating Intel to the punch on 64-bit computing for the desktop a groundbreaking enough move that Intel ended up licensing AMD's 64-bit instruction set extension rather than setting the standard themselves a position they've never really enjoyed being in the term AMD 64 is still used to describe the instruction sets of current CPUs from both teams for this reason AMD's other huge back-to-back innovation was to bring multi-core processing to the masses with the Athlon x2 in 2005 in fact the fact that I had an argument with my writer John about whether 64-bit processing with its support for large amounts of memory or dual core technology enabling parallelization of heavy workloads was more important should illustrate just how huge AMD's back-to-back industry-changing contributions were over this short span however the solid days for AMD ended soon after due to significant pushback from Intel and business decisions that were arguably over-aggressive AMD's chairman Jerry Sanders the third famously said that real men have fabs in 1994 but AMD built so many that they eventually became an albatross around the company's neck forcing AMD to sell them just 15 years later currently AMD doesn't own any of its own fabs and is somewhat at the mercy of external forces as a result and although we don't know exactly why AMD's response to the turning tide has been to focus more on core count in subsequent performance CPUs such as the Phenom x4 and the FX series which became popular with home PC builders and on adding more powerful onboard graphics to their ap use although many users haven't seen enough practical benefit to these features to justify paying the same amount that Intel is able to charge reducing aimed ease profitability what we hope however is that the upcoming Zen architecture will see a renewed focus on single threaded performance what's important to many enthusiasts and take advantage of the smaller manufacturing processes that are finally now available at third-party chip boundaries as AMD tries to mount another challenge to its rivals in blue just three miles down the road in Santa Clara speaking of being just three miles down the road you know what's three miles down the road your local store you know what's too far away when you need to shave and you don't want to go out and buy a razor three miles Dollar Shave Club takes care of that for you just fine you get razors and other bathroom supplies shipped directly to your door for only a few bucks a month they've got the aforementioned ray they've got dr. Carver's shave butter which goes on clear so you can see what you're doing they've got their one wipe Charlies which you shouldn't be afraid to use two of if you have a particularly messy crap so those are peppermint scented butt wipes for men they've got their post shave moisturizer and they've got travel sizes as well one wipe Charlies in particular would recommend carrying some travel those when you're traveling in like overseas because man those toilets are not a thing sometimes they've got a variety of razors all the way up to the six blade executive and there's no need for vibrating handles another nonsense it's just high-quality razors and other bathroom supplies straight to your door so go to dollarshaveclub.com slash Linus if you're in the US Canada or Australia and sign up today so thanks for watching guys if you like this video do that if you disliked it well you can do the other thing if you have suggestions for future videos please leave those comments we do go through them and we do try to make them that's where this video came from and as always get subscribed follow all that good stuff and we will see you again next time

Channel: Techquickie

Views: 2,039,176

Rating: 4.9239306 out of 5

Keywords: amd, intel, x86, x86-64, 8086, 386, 486, athlon, k5, k6, k7, k8, k6-2, k6-3, phenom, fx, a-series, apu, fx-6300, fx-8350, sempron, amd64, xp, sunnyvale, cpu, processor, instruction set, radeon, ati, pga, socket, globalfoundries, fabless, a4, a6, a8, a10, advanced micro devices, athlon 64, six-core, eight-core, x64, 64-bit

Id: LKxzYFU5a_U

Length: 7min 41sec (461 seconds)

Published: Tue Dec 08 2015

Reddit Comments

[u/Kulban]

They certainly made Intel step up, stop being complacent, and give them some legit competition to get to where they are today.

I owned the first Athlon 64 they made, and I loved it.

About 6 years before that I also owned a different off-brand CPU made by Cyrix. Yeah, that sucked. But it could at least play Diablo better than my 486 could.

I'm back to Intel these days.

[u/noconsolelove]

And do you know who ushered in the golden era of CPU domination at AMD? Jim Keller! And guess who was the lead architect on the Zen architecture? Jim Keller!

Quoted from Wikipedia:

"Jim Keller is a microprocessor engineer most well known for his work at AMD and Apple. He was the lead architect of AMD K8 microarchitecture[3][4][5] (including the original Athlon 64)[3][6][7] and was involved in designing the Athlon (K7)[5] and Apple A4/A5 processors.[3][8][9][10] He was also the coauthor of the specifications for the x86-64 instruction set[8][11] and HyperTransport interconnect.[3][11][12] From 2012 to 2015, he returned to AMD to work on the AMD K12[13] and Zen microarchitectures,[14][15] particularly on the low-power/embedded versions."

*Fixed typo.

Every thing this man touches has been legendary. He lives for this. I don't think it's any coincidence that he came back to AMD when they needed him the most. Just knowing this mans history, I'm really excited about Zen. If Zen isn't a game changer, this will be the first time that Jim Keller didn't change the tide in his career. He's made a highly successful career out of doing this.

[u/[deleted]]

Yeah, it was only about 8-10 years ago that AMD started to falter. Not sure why people post stuff like this saying "TIL" and such. "Today, I learned a thing that we all just lived through hurr hurr!"

AMD was the go to "screw intel" alternative. Great performance for the price. Then . . . they started to not be.

[u/SummerMango]

Intel's lucky win was funding a new engineering and design team in Israel, who had the crazy idea of using a several generation old core design to make a mobile CPUs more efficient, only to make a cpu core so wildly overpowered, and tuned perfectly for multicore, that we were graced with intel Core 2 / Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad.

[u/Batfish_681]

My first AMD machine featured an Athlon XP 2500+ Barton Core CPU that I'd overclocked from the stock 1.83 to 2.2ghz on the stock cooler, that thing overclocked so well. While I realize my current FX-8370 isn't an i5, it's no slouch either and its 4.5ghz overclock has fueled my gameplay more than adequately. Considering that the AM3+ platform is considered by some to be dated and I still get great performance out of the chip, while I'm not on the "cutting edge of performance" like an i5 or an i7, I think it's impressive that the chip can compete as well as it can despite being older with fewer IPCs.

[u/MattDeee]

I wonder if the title was switched to "Intel CPU's currently wreck AMD cpu's" it would get downvoted?

[u/CykaLogic]

Only in desktop.

AMD was getting rekt in mobile by Core Duo/Solo. They were only winning in desktop because Intel decided to pursue clock speed(much like AMD is/was for Faildozer).

[u/Delak_]

I remember the days when people didn't mount their AMD CPU heatsinks correctly in the early 2000's: BAD THINGS WOULD HAPPEN:

[u/welsh_dragon_roar]

Oh man, I remember buying an Opteron for peanuts off ebay. The clock just kept going up.. and up.. and up..