Game Theory: FNAF, The SECRET Afton (FNAF Security Breach)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The Game Theorists
Views: 8,326,627
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: FNAF, Five Nights at Freddys, fnaf security breach, Security Breach, fnaf security breach explained, fnaf security breach ending, fnaf security breach endings, fnaf security breach theory, fnaf security breach lore, security breach theory, fnaf security breach ending explained, fnaf gregory, gregory, glamrock freddy, vanny, springtrap, Markiplier fnaf, markiplier fnaf security breach, matpat fnaf, game theory fnaf, game theory, fnaf theory, game theorists, matpat, fnaf sb
Id: WH_ugKNCKlQ
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 20min 44sec (1244 seconds)
Published: Tue Jan 18 2022
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
as much as i dont like the idea of most of these theories, he has a lot of good evidence
I really want to hate this video, but the only real thing I can actually call bullscheisse is that Michael talks in gray text. Everything else, while it is a coincidence, is plausible and fun to toy around with. I do think that itโs too many coincidences to say conclusively, and I do think all three Afton kids have passed on, but this is justโฆ fun.
I think Afton is manipulating and or controlling Vanessa to act more (and in a way become) like Elizabeth so William can tell her what to do better, not Elizabeth being Vanessa it just makes more sense.
And I am just saying it if Gregory is a robot BV, he doesnโt have BVโs soul. Even if you disagree with him being in Golden Freddy we know at the very least that he was in the survival logbook.
Edit: also I think the charging station is just a gameplay mechanic. And the tidbit on Gregoryโs vision when Vanny appears is also probably a game mechanic because if freddy has the same effect when she is near and canโt see her, why can Gregory see her with the same effect? And the ending with the new eyes freddy got, it probably means the static is gone because how can he tackle Vanny with all of that static.
I think this is a good theory, with one exception- I don't think these are CC's and Elizabeth's souls. It's more like the novel Charlie, which is made clear in the books to be a separate entity.
Despite Matpat's evidence, I still hate the idea of Glamrock Freddy, Gregory and Vanessa being the 3 Afton children, whether it's literally or metaphorically. Because I just want them to be their own standalone characters rather than forced connections to the Aftons, a family this series really should've moved on from by now.
Mat said this is the end for the Afton children... I'm sure the series and theorists will find another dumb reason to keep them around, which I think is the reason why people hate the Gergory is a robot theory, and no I don't care if it happened in the Fourth Closet, it was stupid back then and it's still stupid today.
You know, Iโd bet money on Matpat actually having an idea in his head on how the Elizabeth and Vanessa connection works, but just refusing to bring it up due to the backlash of the GregBot theory. Better to just leave the seed of an idea and then go โI donโt know how, but it feels like there could be something thereโ.
Anyways, I thought this video was fine. Canโt wait for the loads of unnecessary threads whining and making fun of it just because itโs about a theory they donโt personally like.
I really like how he handles all the criticism in such a light hearted way, even making jokes like he is in a losing battle. He and his team puts a lot of effort in those videos, so it must be at least a little disheartening when people criticize him so much on twitter, but it's part of the job.
Btw now that he addressed his gregory bot theory in this video, no one is talking about the actual new theory of the video. haha
Vanessa's comments about liking flowers and hating dark basements are definitely worth looking into. These tapes are clearly important for the lore, and Scott/Steel Wool wouldn't add random lines that don't mean anything to it, especially considering how few lines Vanessa has in the tapes.
I feel like thematically this all works and I never really got the pushback on the robo greg thing on the apperances angle of all things...
Is it literally the case however? I dunno. There is evidence for it yes. I know the illusion disc comes up as a reason for the crt scanlines but it also makes... no sense? Why would you make an illusion disk that has the effect of... making someones sight act like a broken CRT monitor of all things???