Bob Lazar Says UFO was an Archaeological Finding | Joe Rogan
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: JRE Clips
Views: 10,862,603
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Joe Rogan, JRE, Joe Rogan Experience, JRE Clips, PowerfulJRE, Joe Rogan Fan Page, Joe Rogan Podcast, podcast, MMA, Joe Rogan MMA Show, UFC, comedy, comedian, stand up, funny, clip, favorite, best of
Id: WmF6RXf6U_A
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 9min 48sec (588 seconds)
Published: Thu Jun 20 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
He didn't say it was a fact. He said it as an inclination based on what he remembers being told.
But provided no further details
by the time Bob supposedly got into the Project... I'm sure they had already tried all the Ivy Big-Brains. I agree with Rogan's theory that the government at that point was looking for people who thought "outside the box".. hence this college dropout who built a rocket car
What a pimp .
Here is my problem with the idea of any UFO recovered in the course of an archaeological dig: Entropy.
The only things that last underground for hundreds or thousands of years are things engineered to do so. We don't engineer fighter planes or warships to survive underground, so if you happened to find any scraps of those machines in a hole in a thousand years, I can guarantee they will be scraps, at best, and the technology will be long obliterated. Saying you recovered a functioning alien ship that has been buried for 1,000 years is like saying you've recovered an F22 Raptor thats been buried for 1,000 years and it still works--makes ZERO sense, if anything it sounds closer to the wishful thinking of a child.
I know, I know "but its alien!" That doesn't mean it is not subject to entropy. That doesn't mean it didn't, at some point get flooded. That doesn't mean it hasn't been getting squeezed and shifted around by tectonic activity. And think about it, that's saying this vessel survived for 1,000 years (or more) with ZERO operator input or maintenance. If anything, we're discovering that the more powerful machines we build, the more delicate they are: a car requires more care than does a wooden-wheeled wagon... a nuclear power plant requires more care than a steam generator.
So we are to believe that an alien craft:
(1) can maintain itself over hundreds (or thousands) of years with zero operator input or maintenance
(2) has the energy and "intelligence" to protect itself from flooding, earthquakes, rockfalls, etc (but not enough to keep it from crashing, sending out a SAR beacon, or flying itself home)
(3) is not subject to entropy, so vital materials resisted degradation over those hundreds or thousands of years, in spite of (presumably) an uncontrolled environment (controlling the internal environment costs energy, like heating or air conditioning a home)
(4) its reactor or power source was still "hot" over all this time, with zero maintenance, and all we had to do was "turn it on" (go try to "turn on" a nuclear reactor with zero experience and report back on how that goes, lol)
(5) assuming we could turn it on, we deciphered not only the language but the math system (we use Base10 for math but most of our computers use Base8 (one bit = 8 bytes), so understanding this distinction in an alien ship would be important) and computer code (the code that runs your browser is totally separate from whats running the OS, which runs the browser, so while we might be able to recognize an alien graphical display, that might not necessarily be the data we need to understand whats really happening). Funny thing is we have languages right here on Earth we can't figure out because there is no cipher but we managed to do all this with an alien language and no cipher key.
(6) oh yeah, managed to not be crushed by the pressure of the earth over that time (even though that was not its designed purpose), AND managed to survive whatever crash put it in that hole
This is part of what makes Bob Lazar sketchy to me, because none of this occurred to him. But like Joe Rogan said, it makes for a great movie. It definitely stirs the imagination and appeals to the human want for "storytelling." That Jeremy Corbell struggled for 3 and a half minutes to describe the Wilson report is just more fuel to the fire of skepticism (not on the subject, on these two and their claims)
The Wilson memo (subject of this clip) was a memo to self supposedly written by Eric Davis regarding a conversation between him and Admiral Wilson. However, Wilson denied he ever met Davis and Davis refuses to confirm he wrote the memo.
Dead end.
Somewhere along the way I read that the disc Lazar worked on was an archaeological find unearthed in Antarctica in the early 1970's and transported to the USA.
If Project Side-Kick 'is' the reverse engineering project referenced in the Wilson Memo leak, then the projects at S4 are illegal. So no wonder they hired a very bright, but low profile scientists to open up their anti-gravity reactors.. if it blows up in their face, it's just another Groom Lake accident, and if he goes public with the story, no one will believe him.
It would be useful if Bob Lazar could return to Joe Rogan without Jeremy.
People are missing Jeremyβs main message here (understandably). Private sector is relied upon for secrecy because the government is no longer able to keep tight lips, think political leverage etc. Private sector absolutely abides by NDAβs because they would be shut down if they breached contract. I know thatβs not the title of this post or the clip, but that was my main takeaway.