Will Civilization Collapse?

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
“I see in you all the characteristic stigma of  decay. I can prove to you that… your atheism and   your pessimism and your cynicism, your immorality,  your broken-down marriages…were characteristic   marks of the dying ages of ancient States.” Oswald Spengler, The Decline of the West   Are we living in an age of  civilizational collapse?   In this video series we are going to examine  what led past civilizations to fall, in order   to determine whether ours is in danger. “Wise men say…that whoever wishes to foresee the   future must consult the past; for human events  ever resemble those of preceding times.”   Niccolò Machiavelli, Political,  Historical, and Literary Writings   In attempting to explain why civilizations  collapse, historians and social scientists   distinguish between external and internal  causes. An external cause is a force or   phenomenon, in other words, that imposes itself on  a civilization, overwhelming its capacity to cope.   Examples include invasions from a foreign enemy  and so-called acts of god, such as epidemics or   natural disasters. Some historians claim Minoan  civilization collapsed due to a volcanic eruption,   while others propose that malaria played a  major factor in the fall of Rome. Historians   of Mesoamerican civilization allege that the  famed city of Teotihuacan fell due to invasion   by northern barbarians, while the role of Germanic  barbarians in the collapse of the Roman Empire   has been well documented and discussed. As attractive as external cause theories are,   they do not adequately explain why civilizations  collapse. All great civilizations withstand   natural disasters, persist through epidemics,  and successfully defend themselves from attack.   It is only when they lose the strength,  resilience, and adaptive capacities to deal with   external crises that they decline and fall. As external cause theories do not sufficiently   explain why civilizations fall, we need to turn  our attention to internal causes of collapse and   investigate what causes a civilization to weaken –  to rot from the inside out – and eventually reach   a point where an external crisis becomes the  proverbial straw that breaks its back.   “A great civilization is  not conquered from without   until it has destroyed itself from within.” Will Durant, The Story of Philosophy   In the 20th century, Sir John Bagot Glubb, better  known as Glubb Pasha, penned a little-known essay   titled the Fate of Empires and the Search for  Survival. In this essay he put forth the thesis   that civilizations are akin to biological  organisms in the sense that they have a   natural lifespan, and they progress through  a series of stages marked by growth, decline,   and eventually death. By tracing the progression  of these stages, we can gain greater clarity into   how, and why, civilizations destroy themselves  from within. Or as Glubb Pasha wrote:   “The experiences of the human race have  been recorded…for some four thousand years.   If we attempt to study such a period of  time in as many civilizations as possible,   we seem to discover the same patterns  constantly repeated under widely differing   conditions of climate, culture and religion…The  life-expectation of a great civilization,   it appears, commences with a violent, and  usually unforeseen, outburst of energy,   and ends in a lowering of moral standards,  cynicism, pessimism and frivolity.”   John Bagot Glubb, The Fate of  Empires and Search for Survival   According to Glubb, the first stage in  a civilization’s lifespan is the Age   of Pioneers. In this age a small yet determined  population of innovators, warriors, and explorers,   lay down the seeds of a new civilization. “Men hack their way through jungles,   climb mountains, or brave the Atlantic and  the Pacific oceans in tiny cockle-shells…Poor,   hardy, often half-starved and ill-clad, they  abound in courage, energy and initiative,   overcome every obstacle and always seem  to be in control of the situation.”   John Bagot Glubb, The Fate of  Empires and Search for Survival   After settling into their newly found, or  conquered, territory, the pioneers construct   small towns and settlements, harness the natural  resources of the region, and start to focus their   energies on manufacturing, production,  and trade. The Age of Pioneers thus ends,   and the Age of Commerce – the next stage in  a civilization’s lifespan – begins.   In the Age of Commerce, larger city centers are  constructed, public infrastructure is laid down,   and with the vast amounts of wealth created from  production and trade, the arts are lavishly funded   and monuments, palaces, museums, world wonders,  and other such cultural edifices are constructed.   In this age a civilization reaches  what Glubb called the “High Noon of   prosperity” – its peak of wealth and glory. In spite of the magnificence, in the High Noon of   Prosperity the seeds of civilizational collapse  are planted. For shortly after it reaches its   peak, the civilization transitions into the Age  of Affluence, and the immense wealth starts to   corrupt the civilization. Selfishness, greed,  and vanity uproot the virtues of dedication,   sacrifice and duty, that were the norm in past  ages. Rather than regarding money as a byproduct   of hard work and virtuous action, people seek  money for its own sake and see it as the be   all and end all – the ticket to salvation.  And so, the god of Mammon, symbolic of the   morally debasing influence of wealth, makes  his appearance on the historical scene.   “The first direction in which wealth injures  the civilization is a moral one…The object of   the young and the ambitious is no longer fame,  honour or service, but cash…The Arab moralist,   Ghazali (1058-1111), complains…[that students]  no longer attend college to acquire learning and   virtue, but to obtain those qualifications  which will enable them to grow rich.”   John Bagot Glubb, The Fate of  Empires and Search for Survival   What is more, in the Age of Affluence access  to luxuries, pleasures, and comforts abound,   and even commoners possess the wealth and  leisure to indulge in them. “A spoiled society   begins to rot from within.”, William Ophuls  explains. In adapting themselves to abundance,   the people grow incapable of enduring even mild  forms of hardship and suffering, and as the often   repeated saying goes, good times create weak men.  “Prosperity ripened the principle of decay.”,   Edward Gibbon explained in reference to Rome. The civilizational decline that occurs in the Age   of Affluence is further hastened by an  increasing preoccupation with welfare.   As there is no shortage of wealth, commoners and  rulers alike call on the State to use its monopoly   on force to take money from some citizens in  order to provide medical care, education, housing,   social insurance, and government handouts,  to others. And as Ophuls writes:   “Affluence fosters a sense of entitlement, as  well as a feeling that none should be left behind.   The upshot is a welfare state with a burgeoning  roster of clients and a growing burden of   subsidies, along with a corresponding loss of  personal responsibility and independence.”   William Ophuls, Immoderate Greatness At the peak of Rome’s affluence, for example,   between the rule of Emperor Augustus and Emperor  Claudius, nearly one in three citizens were   on the Roman dole and approximately 200 000  families received free wheat from the State.   A mere generation or so later, Rome began  its irreversible process of decline.   “It may perhaps be incorrect to picture the  welfare state as the high-water mark of human   attainment. It may merely prove to be one more  regular milestone in the life-story of an ageing   and decrepit empire.” John Bagot Glubb, The Fate   of Empires and Search for Survival With the safety net of welfare,   and with an abundance of wealth, the  population no longer needs to devote   the majority of its waking hours to  securing the necessities of life.   Many, therefore, turn their attention to  intellectual pursuits. The Age of Affluence   gives way to the Age of Intellect, and the  civilization continues its decline.   Few would deny the immense benefits that  intellectual pursuits bestow on the individual and   society at large, however, as with most things in  life, there can be too much of a good thing. And   one of the characteristics of the Age of Intellect  is that an excessively one-sided rationalistic   approach to life saturates the civilization. To  paraphrase Nietzsche, in the Age of Intellect   rationality is turned into a tyrant and reason is  viewed as the only means of discovering the truth.   As a result, the symbolic, moral, and often  irrational truths embedded in myth and   religion are discarded, and the civilization  loses the pillars upon which it was built.   Nietzsche, for example, implicated the extreme  rationality exemplified by Plato and Socrates as   a “symptom of degeneration, a tool of the Greek  dissolution.” (Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols),   and as he continued: “Without myth…every culture loses   its healthy creative natural power.” Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy   Or as the historians Will  and Ariel Durant wrote:   “Even the skeptical historian develops a  humble respect for religion, since he sees   it functioning, and seemingly indispensable, in  every land and age…The soul of a civilization   is its religion, and it dies with its faith.” Will and Ariel Durant, The Lessons of History   Along with the decline of religion  and myth, the Age of Intellect is also   characterized by the rise of highly  rational and critical intellectuals,   who thrive in dissecting and tearing down  the dominant systems of beliefs and values.   Referring to Rome’s Age of Intellect,  the historian Edward Gibbon wrote:   “A crowd of critics, of compilers, of  commentators, darkened the face of learning,   and the decline of genius was soon  followed by the corruption of taste.”   Edward Gibbon, Decline and  Fall of the Roman Empire   As these critical theories spread, traditional  moral codes give way to moral relativism,   and the faith that life has meaning  is replaced by existential nihilism.   A majority of the people come to believe that  there is no such thing as objective truth, that   nothing is inherently moral or valuable, and that  there is no meaning to the historical process,   nor to life. And as William Ophuls writes: “…thanks to the demolition job performed by the   intellectuals, the society is increasingly “value  free”—that is, it no longer believes in much of   anything or takes anything seriously. The original  élan, the moral core, and the guiding ideal of the   civilization are now a distant memory.” William Ophuls, Immoderate Greatness   Following this intellectual demolition job,  the Age of Decadence – the terminal stage in   a civilization’s lifespan – sets in. Without  an overarching guiding ideal or moral core,   there exists widespread disorientation,  confusion, and moral decay. The masses live   empty and meaningless lives from which they seek  relief by drowning themselves in base pleasures,   developing addictions, and by  adopting escapism as a way of life.   People grow increasingly incapable of  distinguishing between true and false,   good and bad, right and wrong, and so they  often choose what is life-denying and harmful.   Beauty and genius are renounced in favor of  banality, ugliness and vulgarity. Virtues are   seen as vices, and vices virtues. The process  of individuation and pursuit of greatness is   abandoned in favor of an apathetic conformity. And  as a result, mental illness becomes the norm.   “The society’s original vigor, virtue,  and morale have been entirely effaced.   Rotten to the core, the society awaits collapse,  with only the date remaining to be determined.”   William Ophuls, Immoderate Greatness Referring to the decadence that started   to infect Rome in the 1st century AD,  the Roman historian Livy explains:   “Rome was originally, when it was poor and small,  a unique example of austere virtue; then it   corrupted, it spoiled, it rotted itself by all the  vices; so, little by little, we have been brought   into the present condition in which we are able  neither to endure the evils from which we suffer,   nor the remedies we need to cure them.” Livy, Characters and Events of Roman History   Glubb Pasha echoes the conclusion of many other  historians by stating that there is no escape from   the progressive stages of a civilization’s  lifespan. Due to the laws of human nature,   each generation will modify itself in predictable  ways based on the conditions generated by previous   generations. If this is the case, we are  forced to consider what William Ophuls   calls an “unpalatable” conclusion: “…civilization is effectively   hardwired for self-destruction.” William Ophuls, Immoderate Greatness   Yet civilizations may be hardwired for  self-destruction for another reason.   For throughout history the ruling, or political  classes – through a combination of mismanagement   and corruption – have played a prominent role  in the decline and fall of civilizations.   And in the next video we will  examine this idea in more detail.   “This is the tragedy of civilization: its very  “greatness”—its panoply of wealth and power—turns   against it and brings it down.” William Ophuls, Immoderate Greatness
Info
Channel: Academy of Ideas
Views: 312,074
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: BtOgZeA8YGI
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 14min 26sec (866 seconds)
Published: Mon Sep 19 2022
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.