UFO Hunters: Aliens Spotted at Chicago Airport (S2, E11) | Full Episode | History

at airports all over the world hey  did you see a flying desk out by c-17   something is happening pilots on  the ground reporting a ufo sighting airlines and government agencies deny it   certainly there was a cover-up  but tower audio exposes the truth why are ufos penetrating  our most vulnerable airspace   there could be something serious happening at  o'hare airport what could make an 8 000 foot   long hole in a cloud some sort of object that  was radiating heat be invisible to radar the faa   chose to say it doesn't exist and even the  naked eye there are things that we may not   be able to see but they may actually be there  this is case number 47206 aliens at the airport november 7th 2006 4 15 pm chicago  o'hare international airport is busy   there are approximately 100 departures and 100  arrivals every hour but one object seems to have   eluded the virtual web of radar and air traffic  control that envelops the congested air space   according to eyewitness testimony hovering  between 1000 and 1900 feet above gate c17   of the united airlines terminal is a dark gray  disc shaped object estimated to be anywhere from 6   to 30 feet in diameter the alleged ufo is reported  by as many as a dozen united and o'hare employees   including ground personnel taxi  mechanics managers and pilots air traffic control is made aware of the ufo  but claims it does not see the object on radar   or from their tower then at approximately  4 34 p.m the alleged object shoots into   the sky at incredible speed blasting  a hole through the dense cloud cover to this day united airlines and the faa say  nothing unusual happened on november 7th   you're struck by the fact that on that afternoon  a lot was going on that never made it out into   the public and everybody there is  looking to sweep it under the rug   you've got the entire air  traffic control system at chicago   all involved in what appears to be to use their  own words a ufo sighting descriptions that we're   hearing from these united mechanics are that  this is clearly a solid craft whatever it is on the ground in chicago pat usgert will uncover  the details behind the sighting and how the story   first broke we have to consider the possibility  that there really was something hovering over   this airport dr ted akworth will fly a mission  to see how a flying disc or anything else could   evade radar over one of the busiest airports  in the world i don't know of any way for any   conventional aircraft to get into that airspace  without actually being detected and bill burns   will examine the safety implications of this event  sometimes people get so nervous about something   that literally they become dismissive there could  be something serious happening at o'hare airport january 1st 2007 after two months of research  journalist john hilkovich of the chicago tribune   publishes an article exposing  the sighting at o'hare airport   you're a pulitzer prize-winning journalist  how did you end up breaking this major ufo   story well yeah it's a completely unusual for  me to be working in this area but actually   peter davenport of the national ufo reporting  center called me in early november of 2006   shortly after this alleged sighting at o'hare  we were able to rule out very quickly that this   was not a hoax of any type these are all aviation  professionals ranging from pilots to ramp workers   to united airlines managers who believe they  saw something above the airspace at o'hare   and were very concerned both from a potential  safety and potential security standpoint john's research reveals that at some point after  4 pm a united ramp worker at gate c17 looks up   and reports seeing a dark gray disc which is later  estimated to be approximately 22 feet in diameter   hovering between 1 000 and 1900 feet above the  gate he tells the two mechanics inside the plane   a united airlines manager hears  the account over his company radio   walks outside of his office and he too  supposedly sees the disc shaped object   finally two pilots parked at a gate also report  seeing the ufo after approximately 15 minutes the   disc accelerates up through the dense clouds and  leaves behind a whole distinctly showing blue sky   up above but because the object does not appear  on radar and cannot be seen from the control   tower the faa refuses to investigate so at first  tried to laugh it off and then just followed up   with well uh you know our theory and emphasizing  theory was this this was some kind of weather   phenomenon but there was no investigation of any  type despite the witnesses years of experience   the faa proposes that the ufo is nothing more  than a trick of light on the low cloud cover why would the faa choose to ignore credible  witnesses like this it's in the faa's   regulations that they do not identify  reports of ufos and it specifically says   that if a member of the public or anyone else sees  what they think is a unidentified aerial phenomena   that they should either contact the national ufo  reporting center or contact local authorities now   united airlines they are not a government entity  they're a private company how do they react   initially united told me they had  no knowledge of this sighting at all   and nothing in their logbooks no documentation  whatsoever but then proof surfaces   after numerous freedom of information act requests  the actual tower communications are released   clearly airport employees report seeing something  these are the actual communications between   united airlines employees and air traffic control  this is the first time they are being broadcast do you see anything above united's concourse  they actually believe it or not they called   us and said there's a somebody observed a  flying disc about a thousand feet above the uh   charlie 17. you see anything over there oh we to hilkovic united employees claim they  are forbidden by the airline from speaking   about the incident he follows up on these  claims and speaks with a united spokeswoman   during a phone conversation she tells him  quote my concern is that my employees are   coming forward and talking to you which we  have not authorized and will not authorize   none of the employees were willing to have  their names used in the newspaper because of   the possible repercussions the investigations  attempt to get interviews with united employees   are also met with a short but polite response  quote thank you for the invitation for which we   are going to have to decline bottom line were the  faa and united airlines complicit in a cover-up   certainly there was a cover-up uh whether  they communicated behind the scenes uh to   come up with this story i can't say but they both  denied any knowledge of the existence of these   reports there's radio evidence to show  that they knew about it on november 7th these taped conversations from november 7th  between the control tower and united employees   revealed the entire story initially tower  officials sound skeptical as the first reports are relayed oh my initial impression from listening to the tower  audio was that it must be very strange for them to   actually be faced with the possibility that they  have a ufo over their airport but as reports from   the ground continue to be received the tone  of the tower officials changes from skeptical   to concerned some of our pilots on the ground  were reporting a ufo sighting at a thousand feet   from the sea side of the airport did you guys hear  anything about it you know what the ramp called me   i want to say about 10-15 minutes ago we have not  seen anything up here okay but we will surely keep   an eye out that's for sure we're listening to the  incident the real voices of real people from the   tower talking to united employees who say they  saw something over their heads and it was a ufo while the tower grapples with unconfirmed reports  several eyewitnesses finally stepped forward   somebody observed charlie 17. you see anything  over there uh we thought a half hour ago   who saw it whole bunch of us over at the  uh charlie county court really yeah who's this now area pilots are warned somebody reported  a ufo or a flying disc above charlie time course   nobody can see it but use caution you could  use alpha northport use caution for the ufo   the o'hare incident is not the  first ufo sighting near an airport   1978 at mccarran international airport in las  vegas both pedestrians and a pilot see a disc   shaped ufo with glowing white lights and 1997  over jfk airport in new york a swiss air 747   barely misses a glowing white cylindrical  object traveling at a high rate of speed one organization that did do a thorough  investigation of the november 7th sighting   is narcap the national aviation  reporting center on anomalous phenomena   as an organization narcap deals exclusively  with pilots and air traffic controllers   who report uaps or unidentified aerial phenomena bill meets with narcap executive director ted  rowe why did you get involved in the chicago   o'hare case the chicago o'hare case involved an  unidentified aerial phenomena that intruded into   class b restricted airspace over the sea terminal  at o'hare and very clearly represented an aviation   safety hazard class b airspace extends to 10  thousand feet above america's busiest airports   these areas are thoroughly monitored by air  traffic control and all aircraft must obtain   clearance before entering unidentified  aircraft pose a significant problem   there is no contingency in place for  pilots air controllers or radar operators   when it comes to dealing with unidentifieds you're  saying that uaps represent a threat to air traffic   safety especially in the case of o'hare narcap  investigators write an exhaustive 155-page report   on the incident they conclude quote an official  government inquiry should be carried out had this   phenomenon moved into lanes of oncoming air  traffic could have resulted in catastrophe how could an object make its way undetected  through one of the most monitored and   controlled airspaces in the world ted is  about to take a flight into o'hare to see   just how secure this airspace is could some  sort of craft penetrate chicago hair airspace   while a video reveals how close  these encounters can really become illinois has been a magnet for  reported ufo activity in recent years   previous investigations have examined the mass  sighting of a huge triangular formation of lights   over the nearby suburb of tinley park in 2004  and the intense pursuit of another triangular   craft in southern illinois by five different  police departments in 2000 now the ufo sightings   have come to the state's largest city and  one of the busiest airports in the world the strange objects seen at o'hare allegedly  hovered over gate c-17 in the united concourse   for about 15 minutes before reportedly  rising rapidly into the cloud cover   leaving a round hole in its wake but how could this object have entered this  highly controlled area in the first place   the skies above chicago o'hare are some  of the most closely monitored in the world   ted is about to stage a flight to see how even  a small plane must go through intense scrutiny   in approaching this airport the purpose  of the flight is really to put to the test   whether or not some sort of craft  could penetrate chicago o'hare airspace   without going through these various levels  of air traffic control and radar coverage   controlled airspace around the world is organized  as imaginary cylinders that fit around airports   the cylinders get narrower as aircraft descend  to lower altitudes and make their approach   if mapped out they look like an upside down  wedding cake at each successive layer of the   wedding cake the degree of communication with  the control tower and the demands on the pilot   increase scott schweider a local flight instructor  will help ted navigate his way into o'hare now getting in there isn't going to be easy right  like i have to move a lot of a lot of traffic for   us it'll be busy ted is flying out of chicago  executive airport about 10 miles north of o'hare three four takeoff here we  go all right ready to go after receiving clearance  from chicago executive's tower   ted ascends to 3000 feet at the bottom of  the third tier as he nears o'hare he is   contacted by chicago approach control before  descending to 2000 feet and the second layer in this layer he is being constantly watched by  tower personnel and by radar he receives two more   contacts before reaching the lowest tier where he  is finally handed off to chicago o'hare's tower   somewhere around maybe five or ten nautical miles  we switch over to the tower control change to   one two six point nine now monitor that  frequency it's a very smooth handoff to the   air traffic controllers and they see us on the  radar they see our altitude and identification   now that he has descended through each  controlled layer ted is cleared to land we've cleared the runway which means we finish our  roll out and turn to the left or the right to get   onto a taxiway but even here ted is tracked  and given instructions by another controller   hitting zero seven zero ground control is in the  control tower and they have a visual view of the   all the ground area of the airport and they're  managing the the ground based traffic with such a   complicated system including multiple air traffic  controllers restricted zones and ground control   how could any object navigate over this airport  without being tracked by numerous officials   i don't think there's any way that a  conventional aircraft could get into   chicago or really any fully controlled  airspace without being detected with no ground workers or  pilots willing to go on record   other corroborating witnesses are  key to confirming the o'hare sighting   and sam moronto director of the  illinois mutual ufo network has one what we really want is an eyewitness who's  totally independent of the faa and united   airlines well pat i think we have the witness  sam's witness claims to have been in a car   driving to o'hare when she  notices something in the sky   she was coming down mannheim road where  she had noticed the object over gate c17   and went off into the international area parked  as soon as possible got out with her and her   friend and observe the object for some length of  time with groups of people in and about the area the witness known only as ms jh comes forward  after hilkovich's article in the tribune   she requests anonymity but consents  to a tape phone interview with sam   and for her protection her voice has been altered  at the point when i first saw it it was straight   ahead of me slightly to the left and just sitting  there didn't in any way look like a plane um it   seemed very much to absorb and take  on the colors of its surroundings from her description i'm gathering that this  thing would have been very difficult to see   this description of a ufo appearing  to blend with the atmosphere   is similar to another aerial  sighting reported over paris in 1994 an air france captain also sees a disc that  he claims dematerializes in front of his eyes   is this a second account of a ufo that is able  to utilize a new form of stealth technology   but the object over chicago's appearance  is not its only unconventional capability the reactions are so strong to squeal to screech  because you're thinking what could do that it was very obviously not plowed it was very  obviously a solid object it didn't change shape   in any way uh it obviously wasn't a balloon that  was subject to the wind it didn't move with the   wind this wasn't some you know lights that look  a little unusual at night or anything like that   this was just a very blatant daytime sighting  this was explained away as a weather phenomenon   that was the official faa explanation but she says  this is not a cloud it was not drifting with the   with the breeze it's not a balloon you know this  she says this is a very solid structured craft   without a doubt this woman saw  the exact same thing that the   united personnel saw she was essentially  describing a strange disc shaped craft that   flew off and punched a hole through the  clouds i believe they saw the same thing with witnesses requesting anonymity  the investigation turns to an actual   air traffic controller in  the o'hare tower that day charlie 17. and he is speaking  out for the very first time   on television united airlines  employs some type of strange object having heard the tower tapes first hand  pat and bill meet with craig berzik   an air traffic controller with 22 years  experience 18 of those years at o'hare craig   is handling ground control on november 7th 2006  he is speaking about this on television for the   first time on the tapes it is craig who asks if  the other planes see the ufo reported over c-17 yeah look out your window do you see anything  above the united concourse they actually   believe it or not they called us and said  there's a somebody observed a flying disk how did this incident start for you your  supervisor usually takes the phone call   which he did and he put the phone down  and just kind of yelled out to everybody   that united airlines was on the phone and they  were saying that some of their employees were   claiming that they saw some type of strange  object hovering above the united terminal   and so he basically asked everybody does anybody  see anything did anybody see anything before do   we have any helicopters hovering around  that sort of thing and the answer was no   even though he does not see anything over the  gate craig asks other planes about the alleged ufo   17. you see anything over there i had a  regional jet which was parked in a holding   area on the opposite side of united's terminal  so i went out to that pilot and informed him that   somebody had called and were claiming they saw  something did you see anything and his response   was no we don't see anything and we did not see  anything he had been there for about 20 minutes but then craig's communication  with the regional jet   is broken into by a united taxi mechanic  who is moving the plane back to the terminal whole bunch of us over the uh charlie  concourse really yeah who's this so what happens when you get these two conflicting  reports how do you try to resolve them in your own   mind had we saw something up there like they did  then obviously would have been much different but   really we didn't see anything there were no fewer  than 15 people up in the tower cab at that time   controllers supervisors traffic management people  you know we we work in a building that's designed   to see aircraft i mean that's what our job is our  job description is safety we have a clear view of   360 degrees and the only blind spot i would  say would be directly above the control tower   yet according to the narcap report on the o'hare  incident there is a flaw in the tower design based on narcaps calculations an  air traffic controller standing next   to the console and facing gate c17  would have a vertical view of about   30 degrees arc before his vision would be  blocked by the outsize overhanging roof   and upper window frame he could only see  a maximum of 1800 feet above ground level the narcap report says that since this  object was estimated to be at 1900 feet   you would not have seen it from the tower how  to react to that that's not true the control   tower is united's terminal lies directly in  front of the control tower and opposite of   the terminals are two of the main runways and  if it was hovering over united's terminal we   would have saw it i'm just curious if you had  seen something what would you have done we'll   stop departures we'll stop arrivals we'll put  airplanes in a hold we just didn't see anything   there was nothing there to investigate  and there was no impact on the operation   in craig's opinion the sighting  is caused by a weather phenomenon i'm not saying they didn't see anything but what  they saw was likely some kind of reflection that   was positional in nature it was kind of dusk we  had wet pavement the entire day you have airplanes   all over hundreds of airplanes with flashing  lights and united's terminal is all glass there's   a lot of reflection i understand that craig  verzick believes that nothing went on but i also   had the chance to talk with john hilkovich who was  there on the ground talking to the eyewitnesses   these were very credible eyewitnesses these  were experienced people they all gave accounts   of of something that was a clearly defined  object i don't know how to reconcile the two but one final detail of the o'hare  incident may prove to be the most   telling according to the witnesses the  ufo ascended quickly punching a hole   in the cloud covering through  which they could see blue sky it's not the first time witnesses  to alleged ufo sightings   have reported seeing strange holes punched  in the clouds in newfoundland in 1947   in warwickshire england in 1977 and as  recently as 2002 in ventura california ted meets with meteorologist william puckett  one of the authors of the narcap report on the   chicago ufo the witnesses who reported seeing  this phenomenon up in the cloud formation   were they looking directly overhead  or way out horizontally to the side   my understanding is that they were looking  straight up and right after the object had   made its split-second ascent they saw  this hole in the cloud i saw a blue sky   do you know from the meteorological history  where the cloud tops were that day we were   able to determine that the tops of the clouds  were 10 000 feet if the ufo enters the cloud   cover at 1900 feet and then blasts through them  to 10 000 feet the hole is about 8 000 feet long   so what you're saying is we've got this  cylindrical hole that's basically 8 000 feet tall   what kind of energy would it take to convert  that into clear air that amount of operation   in one or two seconds time is an astronomical  amount of energy by some estimates as much as   100 megawatts of power is needed to generate  enough heat for creating a hole this large   in comparison the engines of a 747   pushing their nearly 400 000 pound aircraft fast  enough to break the speed of sound would use only   about 60 megawatts roughly half the energy of  whatever punch through the clouds over chicago   there really only a couple of ways you could  introduce heat into a cloud column like that   one would be some sort of object  that was radiating heat as it climbed the other will be something much more  lightning fast an electromagnetic impulse   that would heat the air column itself and that's  the only possibility i can think of that would   be plausible because the descriptions again say  that it happens so quickly between the object's   ability to evade radar its ability to blend into  the atmosphere and its ability to punch an 8 000   foot hole through dense cloud cover the craft  clearly displays extraordinary characteristics but the o'hare incident is not the only account of   an advanced ufo penetrating  supposedly secure airspace authenticated video shows a fiery  object buzzing an airliner in japan   and the crew apparently sees nothing can these  ufos allegedly seen over airports become invisible   is it possible for something to appear on video  but not be seen with the naked eye well sure an alleged ufo over chicago o'hare has  raised concerns about airport security   but another case could prove even more unsettling october 23 2004 about 30 miles to the east  of itami international airport in osaka japan   mr kiyoshi amania is videotaping airplanes  when he spots something he can't quite comprehend his tape has never been released to the public  it has never been broadcast on television   a fiery glowing object appears to be on a  collision course with an approaching airliner   the light seems to pass dangerously close to  the wing the camera tracks the object as its   shape transforms at first it appears as a solid  hot bloom then a second heat source materializes finally after three minutes the object  begins to fade and then vanishes although the object is clearly  seen in the camera's viewfinder   when the cameraman looks for himself he sees  nothing the object is invisible to the naked eye narcap director ted rowe and investigator bill  puckett have brought this to the attention of   the ufo hunters investigation into airport  incursions it's a very compelling video for   the mere fact that we have an object coming close  to an aircraft it appeared that the aircraft did   not see the object well this video is important  we suspect that it demonstrates that there are   categories of unidentified aerial phenomena  that can't be seen visually with the naked eye   but this isn't the first time video has  captured something that appears to be invisible a previous investigation looked at footage from  the volusia county florida sheriff's office   that shows a dumbbell shaped  object on infrared video the object was also over an airport and  it was also invisible to the naked eye what kind of technology is capable of  rendering a flying object invisible   and why is the camera able to see what we cannot  pat meets with ted and dr peter morse from the   physics department of santa monica college to  find out i'm looking for scientific answers is   it possible for something to appear on video but  not be seen with the naked eye well sure i mean   visible light's part of the electromagnetic  spectrum and we just see a little piece of it   but there's also other parts of the  electromagnetic spectrum gamma rays   x-rays radio waves and infrared so you know our  eyes don't see some parts of the spectrum maybe   it was part of the spectrum we couldn't see if  you're using a video camera like this this is not   a perfect match to the human eye so it actually  captures information on either side of what we see   with our eye ted believes one explanation why the  object over japan might be visible to the camera   but not the camera operator is because it  could have been emitting infrared light the human eye can only see a small part of the  electromagnetic spectrum infrared light is just   beyond this range but some video cameras are  more sensitive and can see more than the eye   is capable of including infrared light this is our  infrared flashlight it has a light source in here   that only emits infrared so you won't be able  to see with the naked eye so if you look down   here i'm shining this flashlight right onto the  plastic so this is on right now absolutely i don't   see anything look at the camera okay right i can  clearly hold it i can see that it's all flashlight infrared is used in many different technologies  the military uses infrared lasers to guide   heat-seeking missiles towards and away from  targets and nasa uses it to transmit information   across thousands of miles of space what this  suggests is that if the object in the japanese   video is emitting infrared light it could be  capable of projecting a form of communication   or a form of weaponry and either could be  a significant hazard near an airport there   are things that we may not be able to see but  they may actually be there meaning that there's   a definite connection between this jl-1521 video  footage and the objects seen over chicago o'hare how are objects infiltrating secure  airspace without being seen digital analysis   of the osaka video may finally provide an answer  to the mystery surrounding these airport sightings   the speed would be beyond  any aircraft that we have numerous employees at chicago's o'hare  international airport claimed to see a   disc shaped object but control tower officials and  radar see nothing a luminous orb is caught on tape   over japan and seems to fly dangerously close to  a jetliner but it can't be seen with the naked eye are these alleged ufos displaying advanced   capabilities that prevent them  from being seen or detected ted has called on image analyst terence  massen to try and identify the unknown object   i notice it goes really close to the  wing that plane cannot be more than   a thousand feet away i mean it's very  close if we can determine whether or   not the object is on this side of the aircraft  it means it's less than a thousand feet away   terrence isolates sharpens and zooms in  as tightly as possible on the wingtip   but the image is inconclusive to my eye  i would guess that it was behind the wing   what do you think to me it looks like  the object between the aircraft and us   is closer we're definitely the limit of  the information available in the image not knowing the object's relative location  to the plane means calculating the speed of   the object will help give additional clues  the first thing i'll do is stabilize around   that large aircraft that's in the foreground of  the frame and that way we can isolate that object   and judge the relative speed of our orb that's  flying through frame the stabilized image makes   the airplane appear frozen in space the object's  actual flight path and movement past the airplane   can now be accurately measured it  looks like in about one second of video   it's traveling what appears to be about  two lengths of wing tip to wing tip right   it's doing about 350 to 400 feet per second  right which gets us to uh 500 miles per hour ted estimates that if the object is  at the same distance as the airplane   it is moving roughly 500 miles per hour   if it is closer it travels a shorter distance  in the same amount of time meaning it is slower   but if it is in the distance it could be  traveling faster than anything built by humans so we have a contradiction here if it were near to  us and within a reasonable speed we should be able   to see the structure now if it's very far away  from us we wouldn't be able to see the structure   which we can't but the math tells us that the  speed would be beyond any aircraft that we have terence is also able to prove that the  object is moving away from the camera   clearly it's it's disappearing in the distance um  it's being affected by the atmospheric distortion   the haze it's uh it's fading off you see that you  know the color saturation goes down that's all   consistent with an object moving away in distance  this rules out military jets or helicopters   because they would be closer and identifiable  earlier in the video and another characteristic   also eliminates anything conventional when the  object should supposedly be extremely close to us   it looks like a single orc when it's in a midfield  it does look like two distinct point sources of   light very close together and then as it fades  away they merge into one point why would it go   from being a single orb when it's the closest  and what's in the midfield it would be a double   and then further away it's back to a single  again that's not really consistent we still   don't know what this is and i'm not sure we'll  ever be able to get a conclusive decision on this   in both chicago and japan the identity  of these objects remains elusive   one evades radar and supposedly uses more power  than a 747 to blow through 8 000 feet of cloud   cover while another remains invisible and could  be traveling at speeds beyond any known aircraft   if technology like this cannot be identified in  sensitive airspace what are the repercussions bill meets with former british ministry of  defense official nick pope who was responsible   for investigating and researching ufos for the  british government it doesn't matter what ufos are   it doesn't matter whether you're a  skeptic or a believer if you've got   something unidentified operating in the controlled  restricted airspace then it's an air safety issue alarmed by the faa's refusal to investigate the  incident at o'hare pope writes an op-ed piece in   the new york times entitled unidentified flying  threats in july 2008 a healthy skepticism about   extraterrestrial space travelers leads people to  disregard ufo sightings without a moment's thought   but in the united states this translates into  over dependence on radar data and indifference   to all kinds of unidentified aircraft whatever  these objects are because they're in commercial   air space we have to take something seriously  if we're not interested in something and unless   it behaves like a conventional aircraft it makes  us vulnerable both to terrorism and to espionage a commercial airliner on final approach to  land it's probably one of the most dangerous   phases of flight and get you know the potential  of some sort of interference hitting an aircraft   at that phase of flight is actually an extreme  danger if pilots and ground crew whose job it   is to protect the safety of the aircraft if they  say they see something their testimony should be   taken as rock solid this may actually be working  against us by keeping this this ufo phenomenon   a secret uh pilots themselves are in a danger of  not knowing what to do when they encounter a ufo   the faa or or the government or someone needs  to really put in place some kind of protocol as the ufo phenomenon continues to be denied  technological capabilities seem to be escalating   and with no official policy or investigation   into these events can we really  consider our skies to be safe you

Channel: HISTORY

Views: 1,180,018

Rating: 4.7629857 out of 5

Keywords: history, history channel, history shows, history channel shows, ufo hunters, history ufo hunters, ufo hunters show, ufo hunters full episodes, ufo hunters clips, full episodes, UFO Hunters s2 e11, UFO Hunters se2, UFO Hunters season 2 episode 11, UFO Hunters history, UFO Hunters se2 ep11, UFO Hunters s02, UFO Hunters 2X11, UFO clips, nightmare, ufo, ufo sighting, ufo videos, alien sightings, ufo hunters history channel, extra terrestrials, extraterrestrials, UFO Madness

Id: 0PSTkEN5n_A

Length: 43min 50sec (2630 seconds)

Published: Mon Jan 11 2021