The Spring Paradox

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
- Look at this arrangement of springs and rope. These two springs are joined together by this short bit of blue rope and there's a weight on the bottom. There's also a red rope and a green rope. The red and green ropes are slack. They're not taking any of the weight. So the question is what will happen when I cut the blue rope? I mean, look, you could think about the forces and energy and try to work out if the weight will go up or down. Or you could just consider the fact that I'm making a video about it. So it's probably the counter-intuitive answer. Like, this blue rope is in tension. So when I cut it, I will release that tension. So surely the weight will go down. Let's see what happens. This video is sponsored by Fasthosts. Viewers in the UK have a chance to win the ultimate work from home bundle worth 5,000 pounds, if you can answer my techy test question. The link is in the description. More about that at the end of the video. (weight thumps) Isn't that crazy? The weight goes up. Why does it do that? Well, when you add a weight to a spring, the spring extends. And of course, if the spring were twice as long, it would extend twice as far like this. But actually if you consider the initial setup before the blue rope was cut, that's exactly what we have. The blue and green ropes are slack. They're not doing anything. They might as well not be there. And so we have a spring that is twice as long, plus this little bit. So these two springs together will extend twice as far as one spring would on its own. You could say that these springs are in series, but what would happen if you put the springs in parallel? Okay, so start again with a mass on a single spring and then add a second spring like this. Now the weight is shared between the two springs. This spring takes half the weight. This spring takes half the weight. If you half the weight on a spring, it should extend half as far. And look, that's what we see. Actually, it's not exactly what we see because my springs aren't ideal springs. They don't follow Hooke's Law. But anyway what's interesting is springs in parallel is what we have after the blue rope is cut. Look, two springs in parallel. It's just that they've both got this extension rope on them as well. So the reason the weight moves up when you cut the blue rope is because you're switching from two springs in series to two springs in parallel. But then I was like, "Hold on, hold on. If I were to slowly extend the blue rope, instead of cutting it, surely the weight would go down." Like my brain wasn't happy, still. So look, here's the set up here. I can slowly release the blue rope and watch what happens as I do that. Actually the weight does go down. But it only goes down until the red and green ropes become taut. And then as I release more and more of the blue rope, the weight goes up again. It's at that point when the red and green ropes become taut, that you begin to transition from one regime to the other, from springs in series to springs in parallel. What's really cool is that this arrangement of springs and rope is actually an analogy for a traffic-based paradox called Braess's Paradox. Imagine we've got two towns, A and B, with a network of roads between them. The red and green roads here are really wide and quite long. The silver roads are really narrow and quite short. The blue road is really wide and really short. The red, green and blue roads are so wide, they never get congested. It doesn't matter how many cars you put on those roads, it always takes 11 minutes to travel down the green road and 11 minutes to travel down the red road and one minute to travel down the blue road. The silver roads are so narrow, the travel time depends on how many cars are on the roads, because they get congested. For simplicity, let's say that the silver roads take one minute to travel down for every 100 cars that are on those roads. Let's imagine there are 800 cars trying to get from A to B and they all take this route. So it's eight minutes here, one minute here and eight minutes here. That's 17 minutes in total. But is that what drivers would actually do? Would they all take this same route? Or would some drivers switch to a different route? Well, a driver could switch to this route or this route. But both those routes take 19 minutes, which is more than 17 minutes. So no individual driver would take that route. What we have is an equilibrium. All drivers taking this same route is an equilibrium because it doesn't make sense for any individual driver to change route. How does this relate to the springs and ropes? Well, the weight is like the number of cars on the road and how far down the weight goes is like the travel time. The green, blue, and red roads are like the green, blue and red ropes. It doesn't matter how much weight you put on them. They don't get any longer. Just like it doesn't matter how many cars you put on those roads, the travel time doesn't go up on those roads. The silver roads are like the springs. The more weight you balance to the springs, the lower the weight goes. Just like the more cars you add to the silver roads, the longer the travel time gets on those roads. In this setup, the green and red ropes are slack. They're not being used in the same way that the green and red roads aren't being used. So what happens when you cut the blue road? Well, there are now two possible routes between A and B. And assuming that drivers can have up-to-date information on congestion, maybe because they've got Google Maps or whatever, then a new equilibrium will be reached, where half the cars take one route and half the cars take the other route. That means there are now 400 cars on each of those silver roads. So the total travel time for any one car is now four plus 11 equals 15 minutes. And that's less than the 17 minutes we had before the blue road was cut. And that's Braess's Paradox. By removing a short fast road from a network, you might actually decrease travel time. It's almost like a multi-player version of the prisoner's dilemma. And this isn't just an academic curiosity. It's happened in real life. We know that in Seoul and Stuttgart it's happened where the removal of a road has actually caused travel times to go down without the number of cars on the road going down. But surely if you added the blue road back in at this point, drivers would choose to continue using the better, faster outer routes. But with everyone using those outer routes, look how attractive the blue route is. Four minutes plus one minute plus four minutes equals nine minutes, compared to the 15 minutes of the outer routes. So it makes sense for any one individual driver to defect to the blue route. And unfortunately, every driver that defect makes the blue route a little bit worse, but it also makes the outer routes a little bit worse as well. In fact, the blue route is always preferable. So all drivers will switch to the blue route and it will be worse. You know, if all the drivers could agree to not use the blue road as if it wasn't there, then we could keep it for people who want to go from here to here. Wouldn't that be nice? Unfortunately, humans don't form hive minds, so it can't happen. Except maybe one day, we will solve the problem with a hive mind. Like if self-driving cars take over the majority of driving and these self-driving cars can act cooperatively, then maybe one day we can experience this utopia of optimization. It's never going to happen, is it? Like even if all the car companies could agree to write software that acts cooperatively with each other, there's always going to be a human in the car, ready to override the software and say, "Do you know what? Take me the fastest route this time." Anyway, thanks to George Maveron Nicholas for the idea for this video. I appreciate it. This video is sponsored by web hosting company, Fasthosts. If you want to get your website up and running really quickly, take a look at their drag-and-drop templates. They're really intuitive to use and they work on desktop and mobile out of the box. So you don't need to worry about responsive web design and stuff like that. Though if you do want to get your hands dirty, you can put your own code in there as well. I know what you guys are like. You can get two months absolutely free and there's a 30-day money-back guarantee, so you can try it out no strings attached. If you want to do it your own way, check out their secure web hosting with unlimited bandwidth, so your website's not going to go down if you get a spike in traffic. You get a free domain name and SSL certificate for the first year and hosting plans start from just one pound a month. Viewers in the UK have a chance to win the ultimate work from home bundle worth 5,000 pounds, if you can answer my techy test question which is, "What is the default port for HTTPS?" The link to enter is in the description. So check out Fasthosts today. I hope you enjoyed this video. If you did, don't forget to hit subscribe and the algorithm thinks you'll enjoy this video next. (bright music)
Info
Channel: Steve Mould
Views: 8,661,518
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: Cg73j3QYRJc
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 9min 30sec (570 seconds)
Published: Thu Jul 29 2021
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.