The Impeachable Mr. Trump - SOME MORE NEWS

[Music] hey everybody real quick the senior advisor to the president who's a white nationalist but that's not what we're gonna talk about even though that's all anyone should be talking about here's some more news we got a bum pres y'all a real caldron of cold diarrhea in president form and now a bunch of people just sat around in a big fancy room talking to other people to determine if we can perhaps not have him as the president anymore because we've got a bad one folks a super duper fart noggin of a POTUS he is and you know what before we get jabbering about laws and junk allow me to be the first to say that I do very much wish we could undo the 2016 election the thing that Republicans are accusing Democrats of doing with this impeachment I sincerely wish that one fifth of the country didn't get duped into voting for a sort of rich racist steak peddler with absolutely no experience or even respect for our military who very clearly had only his own personal gain in mind he wasn't even in the best home alone I wish that the candidate who actually got the most votes was the person who won even though that candidate wasn't very good either but less bad I would totes undo the election like with the like with a time machine or whatever that butterfly effect film did if only to maybe prevent a bunch of kids getting separated from their parents and throwing cages and then lost and the number lost keeps getting revealed to be higher or the senior adviser to the president to become not a white nationalist I think it's in the best interest of this country to not have the president we have despite whether or not he did something illegal luckily it sure seems like he has done many illegal things and should be impeached for those things but since our government is designed like a cascading clown show there is a whole cluster of people whose job it is to pretend like that isn't true and obstruct the process as much as possible and they're sweaty diarrhea has leaked down to regular folk who happened to be like-minded politically as if their entire ideology is hinged on whether or not an obvious grifter did obviously bad things and hey the holidays are coming Thanksgiving and Hanukkah and New Year's and I think there's one more in there too and that means you all get to go home sit at a table or table like object and try to debate with your relatives about basic reality reality that is being denied by a whole lot of people who sure don't want to admit that their president did some crimes obvious crimes because he thinks he can act like the same greasy business Fink he always was while also holding the highest office in the world he's very bad at this so I thought I'd help you all out a little bit not only by going through the evidence of the impeachment inquiry but calling out all the blatant diarrhea being slopped around to distract from the actual facts of the impeachment inquiry no better place to start than the Constitution can I get a constitution please get it out here let's get it we're not you didn't you didn't get the original Constitution for me to roll out here and examine okay let's uh look at this copy on the screen okay zoom in on article two section four right there where some honky scribbled that the president vice president and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction of treason bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors that's going to be our standard for impeachment now you might be wondering hey there sex buns just what exactly is high crimes and misdemeanors some kind of fancy movie made by a pervert to which I would say yes but also totally not relevant for what we need to talk about because the word I'd actually like to focus on written right there in the Constitution I so desperately want to own is bribery and just because people are going to act like obtuse idiots here is a legal definition of that word which specifically says demonstrating a quid pro quo relationship in which the recipient directly alters behavior in exchange for the gift quid pro quo being Latin for the phrase something for something I give you a thing you want and in exchange you give me a thing I want in legal code dumb s 201 it is described as when a public official or person selected to be a public official directly or indirectly corruptly demands seeks receives accepts or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in the performance of any official act and just because people are gonna continue to act like up to cydia --tz-- that's why we're talking about a personal quid pro quo because the president absolutely can on an official level withhold aid in exchange for a country doing a thing like when jimmy carter withheld aid from Chile El Salvador Nicaragua and Uganda for human rights abuses what they can't do is use the office to bribe other countries for their personal gain that's what we're very clearly talking about the accusation that Donald Trump ordered aid to be withheld from Ukraine unless they announced an unwarranted investigation into one of his political rivals for his personal gain in the next election that's the goalposts being clearly set not just by myself but by the GOP and conservatives are you open-minded if more comes out that you could support impeachment sure I mean I mean show me something that that that is a crime if you could show me that you know Trump actually was engaging a quid pro quo outside the phone call that would be very disturbing not that we need their approval but that's the now commonly agreed on standard even though it doesn't really have to be and the president is doing all kinds of other crimes we could also be investigating if there was evidence of a quid pro quo outside of trumps phone call to the Ukrainian president which did have evidence of a quid pro quo but whatever we'll get to that later if there's evidence of that well then that's very disturbing to quote a very smart boy no quid pro whoa no impeachment no moving goal posts are we all clear a personal quid pro quo as in bribery is constitutionally described as an impeachable offense not the only impeachable offense but the one that these impeachment inquiries are mostly about also just to get out of the way all that Biden burr isma'u cranes stuff what the president claims to have been looking for was investigated a bunch and they found no evidence of corruption specific to the vice president and his son the pervasive and long-standing problem of corruption in Ukraine included exposure to a situation involving the energy company BER yzma the primary concern of the US government since 2014 was burr Isthmus owner McCullough's Liszewski whose frozen assets abroad we had attempted to recover on Ukraine's behalf in early 2015 I raised questions with the deputy prosecutor general about why the investigation of mr. Liszewski had been terminated based on our belief that prosecutors had accepted bribes to close the case later I became aware that hunter Biden was on the board of berezne I soon after that in a briefing call with the national security staff of the office of the vice president in February of 2015 I raised my concern that hunter Biden's status as a board member could create the perception of a conflict of interests let me be clear however I did not witness any effort by any US official to shield burr asthma from scrutiny in fact I and other US officials consistently advocated reinstituting a scuttled investigation of Liszewski bur Isthmus founder as well as holding the corrupt prosecutors who closed the case to account now don't get this news dude wrong alright burr yzma is corrupt as nor am i saying that Biden's son should be involved in international business and in fact am i right this second saying they shouldn't be this goes for all politicians no sons nor should their sons-in-law or daughters be doing that sort of stuff it's a bad thing all around and perhaps the president should look into all the other instances of sons or daughters or sons in law you know having business dealings overseas maybe he should maybe maybe he should do that you know if he's so concerned about this kind of corruption as he claims but this isn't about those things but rather whether or not Trump had a good reason to specifically go after Biden use proper channels to do that and if he used federal aid to bribe a country into specifically going after his political rival so let's get to those enquiries except all the [ __ ] up let's not because the GOP has also questioned the legitimacy of the inquiries themselves for reasons that I'm sure of very serious reasons that we now have to address there was the demand for a house vote something that wasn't necessary to begin the inquiry but whatever they did won anyway so let's move on then Trump claimed that the inquiry was constitutionally invalid because they denied him the ability to cross-examine witnesses or call witnesses but that's not true as neither the Constitution nor house rules require that and in the past presidential rebuttals came at the end of the process he does however get the right to cross-examine and rebuttal witnesses once this gets to the Senate this is probably stuff that the president and his Tonys should know right like like law stuff it should be weird if we like to the president who didn't know these kinds of things and then we get to Matt Gaetz guy with a face and US Representative for Florida now I'm not going to give Gates that much attention because it's clearly what he wants but I simply must talk about the time when he and a group of House Republicans valiantly stormed into the impeachment inquiry quite stupidly and while breaching security to protest the idea that they weren't allowed in the room that it was a shadowy and secret process designed to keep Republicans away which is weird because of that group of sit and Republicans claiming they weren't allowed in the inquiry 13 of them were allowed in the inquiry the Foreign Affairs Committee holding the inquiry has 103 members that are split evenly between Republicans and Democrats something the House Republicans absolutely should know which means that 13 of them chose not to attend the inquiry in order to pretend like they weren't invited to the inquiry which they were absolutely invited to in other words they just lied they lied to your face to pretend like the impeachment inquiry was corrupt in order to later discredit the results also one of the people that was there was Steve King speaking of white nationalism for earlier he was there I thought the GOP was like no no no no no these the white nationalists we don't want anyone doing it but he was there anyway I don't know that's kind of weird anyway Trump not only had knowledge of the sit-in but supported it before it happened and that's it's a little pathetic and obvious and something a guilty person would do and maybe illegal and Gates is being used like some kind of instrument to carry out the president's wishes like like a tool sure is weird how even though they are claiming the president is totally innocent the GOP is putting all kinds of intimidation and obstruction tactics on the inquiry demanding the media revealed the whistleblowers name and trying to force him or her to appear in public and not just give written answers even though Trump 100% will only give written answers and threatening to give up dirt on witnesses strange how the totally not guilty president is doing everything he can to scare away the people testifying about him but despite all of this the impeachment inquiry has continued because it's a completely legal and historically normal process with witnesses who are extremely credible mainly concerned about Ukraine and very serious even though some of them wear bowties that look like a wacky scrotum that's George Kent a Harvard grad who can speak Ukrainian Russian and Thai and also joined the State Department in 1992 he's considered an expert on the corruption in Ukraine he was a senior anti-corruption coordinator in the State Department's European Bureau and even has the bowtie in his official State Department biography another person giving testimony is ambassador Bill Taylor a career diplomat who has served both Republican and Democratic administrations he graduated from West Point served in the infantry for six years and fought in the Vietnam War he was nominated to be Ukraine's ambassador by George W Bush in 2006 before getting hired as deputy assistant to the President and Senior Director for Europe and Russia fiona hill was an intelligence officer for George W Bush and Obama these aren't liberal nut jobs they aren't never Trump errs as Trump would call them and in fact one of the key witnesses is ambassador Gordon Sunland who was a longtime GOP donor who was appointed by Trump after he donated a million dollars to Trump's inaugural committee so it's uh it's kind of interesting that the moment he flipped during this inquiry our president would say this let me just say I hardly know the gentleman so that's a weird like something a bad crime president would say you know they are so credible that conservatives are having problems finding ways to make them uncredible like this is probably the most damning headline Fox could come up with about Murray ivanovitch who served the US Foreign Service in 1986 and has been an ambassador since the Bush administration but the president said she's bad news when Lieutenant Colonel Alexander as Vinh Minh came forward the media was quick to point out that he is an extremely respected soldier and scholar who fled to ukrainian age 3 and went to harvard became a decorated officer in the United States Army and then an expert on Ukraine for the White House's National Security Council he's like everything the GOP fantasizes about when they think of immigrants assimilating to America gee I wonder what detail Fox News focused on here we have a u.s. national security official who is advising Ukraine while working inside the White House apparently against the president's interest and usually they spoke in English isn't that kind of an interesting angle on this story I find that astounding and and you know some people might call that espionage yes some might call a Ukrainian immigrant spending his life loyally working for the US government with a spotless record espionage that's some being people who are liars and all heck maybe even xenophobic ones so yeah they got nothing and for this reason the main focus has been on the whistleblower despite that the whistleblower has now been joined by a bunch of credible people backing them up only chairmanship knows who the whistleblower is we don't we will never get the chance we will never get the chance to see The Whistleblower raise his right hand swear to tell the truth and nothing but that chance more importantly the American people won't get that chance this anonymous so-called whistleblower with no first-hand knowledge whose bias against the president who worked with Joe Biden who was the reason we're all sitting here today we'll never get a chance to question that individual yeah how beard that lefty communists whistleblower with bias against the president that we know literally nothing about how do how dare that it doesn't matter how many other people you get to confirm the president's crimes because that one whistleblower and their bias that we assume they have hey quick sidenote so that clip you might have noticed has a Daily Caller logo on the top and I wanted to use that specific video because it's a part of the daily callers 15 minute long recap video that completely cuts out nearly all of the actual testimony and focuses only on the parts where the GOP kind of sounds good like the Daily Caller a site that calls itself news that Facebook calls news has a recap of the impeachment inquiry that cuts out nearly all of the actual inquiry the article that came with it is no joke 250 words long that's their coverage by someone calling themselves a reporter so great work Daily Caller founder Tasker Khorasan but can you blame them like if you were a partisan propaganda organization pretending to be the news and had to cover a story that was largely damning for your side you kind of just have to pretend it's not happening and much more on that later but for the moment let's actually stop and look at what has been said by these witnesses no more teasing all right let's get fully fisted by the truth and as implied by the fisting well it's gonna be a lot to take in no doubt more and more revelations will show up along in the future but also like the fisting well a little goes a long way and so we already have a pretty damning timeline so far so let's do it fist away on April 21st of alotta mere zalenski was elected president of Ukraine and according to EU Ambassador Gordon Stalin's testimony he and several others later met with President Trump to discuss Ukraine this was on May 23rd and included special envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker Rick Perry and Senator Ron Johnson this is also backed up by Kurt Volkers testimony all on the transcript and I can't in good conscience mention Rick Perry without checking in on what the president thinks of Rick Perry Rick Perry watch him he's a comer during that meeting with the comer and other people and according to both Sandlin and Volcker Trump showed very little actual interest in Ukraine and instructed them to talk to Rudy Giuliani a person who and this is true is not a government employee nor an expert on Ukraine nor a person with experience being an ambassador or a diplomat but rather the president's personal lawyer who during the same time was taking trips to Ukraine specifically to investigate hunter Biden for political reasons to quote Giuliani at the time of his trip I'm asking them to do an investigation that they're doing already and that other people are telling them to stop and I'm going to give them reasons why they shouldn't stop it because that information will be very very helpful to my client give them reasons and now according to multiple witnesses it turns out the president was referring u.s. ambassadors and envoys to Giuliani a non government official specifically tasked with going after his political rival to consult on Ukraine the same Giuliani who hired left harness and Igor Froman to go to Ukraine and find Ukrainians who were willing to make you claims against the Biden's for his client the president only for those two guys to get caught trying to leave the country after violating campaign finance laws connected to their time in Ukraine a place Giuliani told them to go to Giuliani the president's lawyer who once said I don't do anything that involves my client without speaking to my client none of this is hearsay I'm just saying things that happened hey look at this picture of the president standing next to those crime guys I just mentioned so what were those crime guys up to anyway well it turns out they were making hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal campaign donations while disguising where the money was coming from in order to specifically push the firing of ambassador marie le ivanovitch a woman that the president has and still continues to smear on twitter so what did you Voinovich to do wrong well back in march marie gave a speech before the Ukraine crisis media center where she called out Ukraine for backsliding on corruption and before this had made a lot of enemies in the country due to her criticism and it turns out that left partisan Igor Froman those crime guys who worked for the president's lawyer well a lot of their associates didn't like her and so the crime guys were making donations to US officials in the hope they would push her out and they got their wish after donating to congressman Pete sessions on May 9th part us posted a photo of himself in sessions office the same day that greasy Pete wrote a letter to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo cleaning that Jovanovic had made disparaging remarks against Trump meanwhile Ukraine's then top prosecutor yuriy lutsenko floated a conspiracy theory the Jovanovic had secretly helped the clinton campaign this is based on literally nothing and it was since recanted by Lutz n Co himself didn't matter because Trump great brain had been successfully tricked into the conspiracy theory as he has wanted to do and began to attack ivanovitch it didn't help that many of the people who didn't like her in Ukraine also happened to be the same people that Giuliani was tapping for dirt on Biden and this is all according to testimonies and indictments so while you may have seen a lot of people wonder why Ivanovich has been involved this is mostly the reason she was collateral damage heraus ting a sort of side deal made between Giuliani and the people in Ukraine he was working with to find Biden stuff for the president of course these people apparently had a problem with the Ivanovitch an extremely serious ambassador who was focused on corruption I wonder if I wonder what type of people would have a problem with that anywho according to Jovanovic is testimony she was called at 1:00 a.m. and told to get on the first plane out of Ukraine and back to Washington due to concerns for her security her dismissal then caused Michael McKinley a 30 year ambassador and then senior advisor to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to quit setting a continuous effort by Trump and Giuliani to sideline in silence career diplomats working on Ukraine wowie that's a lot of sketchy-ass stuff I just said huh but focus Kody all right we're looking for bribery not the other clearly impeachable crimes the key part so far is when the president told us ambassadors to work with his personal crime lawyer on Ukraine next up is July 10th when according to testimony by senior director for Europe and Russia on the National Security Council Fiona Hill there was a White House meeting with the then National Security Advisor John Bolton and two Ukrainian officials who were trying to get a meeting between President Trump and Ukrainian president zalenski in that meeting Ambassador Gordon Sandlin the guy who is very much team Trump and also a wealthy hotel owner who maybe shouldn't be involved in the government let it be known that he had an agreement with chief of staff Mick Mulvaney that if the Ukrainians agreed to investigate hunter Biden they could get a meeting with the president according to he'll everyone in the room got real uncomfortable because Sandlin hadn't at all discussed this officially and was basically just throwing it out there so bolton stops the meeting and they call it a day then at a follow-up meeting Sandlin does it again and this time he'll halts the meeting again and ask the ukrainian officials to leave the room and according to her testimony she then tried to explain to Sandlin why he couldn't keep doing that specifically telling him that they couldn't make any commitments without going through the proper procedures to which sodom then brought up Giuliani as his defense you know the the president's personal lawyer who I'm pretty sure shouldn't at all be involved in matters of diplomacy as he wasn't even named as a special envoy later she and Lieutenant Colonel Alexander s bin Minh decide to report the sketchy as a meeting to John a Eisenberg the chief legal advisor to the National Security Council and before they do it Bolton asks hill to quote go and tell Eisenberg that I am not part of whatever drug deal Sandlin and Mulvaney are cooking up on this so here we see a clash where the acting White House chief of staff teamed with an ambassador with close support of Trump to set up unofficial and weird meetings under the condition that Ukraine go forward with these investigations and members of the National Security Council were getting very uncomfortable with that then came the time the Trump withheld aid from Ukraine according to testimony by Laura Cooper a top Pentagon official overseeing Ukraine this happened near the end of July you know what else happened near the end of July the date July 25th which is also when Trump made that phone call to president zalenski according to the transcripts that aren't actually verbatim transcripts according to the transcript itself that Trump is insisting we all read the Ukrainian president brings up his desire to buy more javelins from the US for defense purposes to which Trump responds I would like you to do us a favor though before bringing up an investigation into CrowdStrike an entirely different tangent that I guess we need to talk about right now CrowdStrike is the cybersecurity technology company the DNC hired to analyze their email hack five months before the 2016 election the one that linked Russia to our elections a thing they totally messed with CrowdStrike is the one who figured out that Russian agents had broken into the DNC's Network and stole him emails the evidence of which was later used by Muller to indict 12 members of Russia's military as laid out in his report that includes at least ten other impeachable instances of obstruction of justice but anyway for that reason there's been a conspiracy theory that CrowdStrike a company that has also worked with the GOP when they had hacking issues withheld knowledge that it was actually Ukraine that hacked the DNC and blamed it on Russia something that has zero evidence behind it and would be a pretty random thing for a nonpartisan company to decide to do this was being pushed by Roger stone a man known for lying and for having a back tattoo commemorating his friendship with another crime president who was just found guilty of witness tampering and aligned to Congress stone if you forgot was an advisor to Trump's 2016 presidential campaign who was caught establishing a back-channel with those Russian hackers and WikiLeaks to dig up dirt on Trump's election rival which sure seems like a thing that keeps on happening ha and it just so happens that Muller's testimony was a day before Trump called zalenski which is why in the transcript the president wants us to read Trump specifically asks Ukraine to look into it because he wants quote that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Muller this is the transcript the president wanted us to read and involves the Ukraine president bringing up purchasing weapons from the US before the president responds with I would like you to do us a favor though as inconditional to purchasing weapons and that favor is for him to investigate a private company responsible for the investigations against him they wanted us to read this including the other part where Trump says the other thing there's a lot of talk about Biden's son and so on during the same time it became very clear to everyone that there was a quid pro quo between Trump and zalenski the court Ambassador Bill Taylor during his testimony that was my clear understanding security assistance money would not come until the president committed to pursue the investigation Taylor would later text Sunland and say I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign on August 9th we also have a text exchange provided by former US special envoy kurt volker between himself and Sandlin arranging a White House meeting and statement from the Ukrainian president where Salah remarks POTUS really wants the deliverable and they begin drafting a statement for the event then three days later we got the first whistleblower complaint about the July 25th call which begins to make its way through Congress and seemingly causes Trump's advisors to try to convince him to release the aid which he still doesn't do he is now withholding the aid despite people begging him to do it the situation at this point was getting so alarming that the senior State Department official in charge of Ukraine George Kent wrote up a memo specifically addressing it expressing concerns that there were people like Giuliani pushing occasion with Ukraine and not going through any formal policy process while doing it the implication there is that trump was basically undermining the official channels working a different deal that was under the table through his personal lawyer who he had directed his ambassadors to work with then on September 1st is when according to testimony we get a very explicit mention of a quid pro quo as William Taylor recalled that during an event in Warsaw commemorating World War two zalinsky flat-out asked vice president Mike Pence about security cooperation pence deflected and said he'd talked to Trump about it Taylor testified that he then spoke to national security council adviser Tim Morrison about this and Morrison told him as Sodom told one of zelinsky's top aides that quote security assistance money would not come until President zalenski committed to pursue the BIR yzma investigation burr is mo being the company hunter Biden worked for while that sounds like a game of telephone or secondhand information both Tim Morrison and Sandlin would then corroborate this with their testimonies as well according to Saleh on himself he explicitly told solinsky's people the Ukraine wasn't going to get aid unless he investigated Biden meanwhile 13 Ukrainian soldiers would die during this span of withheld aid fun fact having no choice in the matter szalinski then prepared to go on CNN to talk to Fareed Zakaria and announce publicly that he was going to investigate Biden like Trump wanted but before he could do that the story broke about the whistleblower causing the White House to release the aide and because they released the money zalinsky quickly cancelled the CNN appearance and that I was in in Kiev on September 12th and 13th and I met with him which often happens though they want to you know suss you out and make sure that they could they feel comfortable and we had a very nice conversation no inkling of any of this and then we sort of had a date set they they'd essentially committed to it and I think the Washington Post breaks the story about the whistleblowing and the whole thing you know suddenly radio silence from their sy aide was released right that was when the a was released and and then the I think the aid was released the post story breaks the Trump administration I think I have this right the the the you know the story breaks I think it was the post the aide is quickly released and then the interview is essentially canceled so the way I look at it was you know the aide is released so that's the end of the kwid and then the interview is canceled that's the end of the quo did you catch all of that zelinsky's aid was told that he wasn't going to get the money unless he announced an investigation into Biden despite there being no reason for that investigation beyond the fact that Biden was Trump's political rival and zalanski was so clearly only doing that for the aide that when it was finally released he cancelled the announcement because he didn't actually care about investigating Biden he was doing something to get something and then once he got his something cancelled the something he was supposed to give in order to get to something and everything I just told you is from these inquiries corroborated by various advisers and ambassadors with varying loyalty to Trump and for some many years of bipartisan service none of this is from the mysterious whistleblower and it all very clearly points to Trump trying to set up a bribe which is definitely grounds for impeachment under the Constitution there's no wiggle room there the idea that Ukraine didn't know about the quid pro quo not that it would legally matter is not true and everything I described here is just the thing that happened according to these very credible witnesses and backed up with text messages also probably to save some time but here's the [ __ ] White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney just saying there was a quid pro quo that was those were the driving factors that he also mentioned to me and past the the the the the corruption related to the DNC server absolutely no question about that but that's it and that's why we held up the money now there was a report so the demand for an investigate into the Democrats was part of the reason that he it was on the to withhold funding to 14 we look back to what happened in 2016 certainly was was part of the thing that he was worried about in corruption with that nation and that is absolutely a broken yep could it maybe luck with that Cody but whatever there it is that could pro quo that Lindsey Graham was talking about shall we now check in with him to hear his thoughts no doubt it's some kind of grand revelation that he's been led astray by the president right no okay so all those transcripts I just cited about how there was totally quid pro quo Lindsey isn't gonna read them to his credit that's a pretty easy way to avoid taking responsibility by just not doing his job I honestly didn't realize that was an option but I guess it is like that's seriously how the GOP is handling this by just ignoring it or in Trump's case claiming he's not going to watch the hearing and then tweeting about that hearing he's not watching it's just it's it's just it's just it's just very transparent remember Ben Shapiro is no quid pro quo no impeachment no moving goal post tweets before the hearing yeah you remember that the whole thing where he wasn't gonna move any goal posts let's let's check in with that the White House should stop saying there was no quid pro quo there was a quid pro quo the question is whether it was a corrupt quid pro quo as I've been saying for weeks okay Ben so so there was a quid pro quo as you have been saying for weeks and I guess we'll just have to trust you there because if how truthful you are and there's no possible way to look into the past and see what you've said special Ben we could probably just end the video here but then we get to miss the fun part because as I believe I've explained there is a lot of very damning and undeniable witness evidence from extremely credible sources pointing to an impeachable offense and normal people should at this point be able to recognize that but folks like Ben and the GOP keep on pushing those goal posts and trying to explain it sure sure sure there was a quid pro quo but not a corrupt one and in fact these things happen all the time and that was the legality of the issue clearly you just described is a quid pro quo it is funding will not flow unless the investigation into the into the democratic server happen as well we do we do that all the time with foreign policy and I have news for everybody get over it there's going to be political influence in foreign policy yeah get over it bro investigating corruption is so 2018 also buy these shirts these official shirts from Trump his branded argument about how quid pro quos are no big deal a thing he also definitely didn't do according to him see that's the real fun part because while they are still trying to discredit the idea that there even was a quid pro quo they're also simultaneously pushing the idea that it would have been totally normal if it happened like saying ain't a man I didn't in the dressing room this JCPenney but if I did that wouldn't be the end of the world you know like people places all the time why not a dressing room it's the same size of a bathroom it happens all the time and now we have to backtrack all over again because at the start of this I pointed out that there are quid pro quos the government legally engages in with other governments which was never the accusation here this is an accusation about a personal quid pro quo and so by trying to point that out as a defense of Trump is a way to purposefully bog down the conversation especially when as clearly stated in the evidence these ambassadors and diplomats were working with Trump's personal lawyer and were specifically worried about how they weren't dealing with Ukraine through proper channels and procedures saying yeah but but the u.s. makes deals all the time is missing the entire point of what the accusations are it's being purposefully stupid or just regular stupid but probably purposefully stupid and again they are doing this all while trying to also claim it never happened here's US representative Jim Jordan grilling William Taylor and claiming that since szalinski didn't denounce the investigation into Biden that means there was no quid pro quo my clear understanding was they weren't gonna get the money until presidents Lizzie committed to pursue the investigations now with all due respect ambassador Yorkshire understanding was obviously wrong because it didn't happen president Solinsky didn't announce he was going to investigate charisma or the Biden's he didn't do a press conference and say I'm gonna investigate the Biden's we're gonna investigate burr yzma he didn't tweet about it and you just told the ranking member he didn't do the see an interview and announced he's gonna investigate charisma or the Biden's okay so despite all the evidence and the fact that zalenski was absolutely going to announce the investigation into Biden before the money was released after public scrutiny that's going to be Jim Jordans stupid opinion on the situation and he's totally entitled of that now here he is speaking after the same damn hearing Ukraine's one as Ernst and Young said one of the three most corrupt countries on the planet President Trump in our administration or his administration was checking him out and guess what after president after vice president pence visited with mr. szalinski after senators bipartisan senators Johnson and Murphy visited with presidents Lenski six days later the aide is released because they all became convinced this is a guy worth sending the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people to okay so it was it was it was all a test of corruption he was like he's like an undercover cop buying drugs to bust the dealer so so here's a question then if szalinski didn't announce they were looking into Biden like you Jim Jordan said didn't happen during the hearing then how did they pass this corruption test you are now saying did happen what did the Lenski do to convince Trump famous anti-corruption President that he was on the level because the only thing zalenski was asked to investigate was Biden which Solinsky didn't do because he got the aid so did this never happen or did it actually happen and was part of a corruption test which is it jord which lie do you want to tell all because you can't tell both lies you just can't little buddy all right guys you can because you did so this is where we're at there's a ton of damning evidence showing that the president United States instructed various ambassadors and officials to work with his personal lawyer to make a deal with another country exchanging aid for a personal favor and because it's so clear the GOP is going to spend the inquiry ranting and tap-dancing conspiracies and just flat-out lying and confusing the subject they have no other option you know decides acting in the interest of the people and not themselves and don't get me wrong here Democrats possibly the lesser of two evils are also using this inquiry to preach and make big dumb speeches and use these very serious witnesses to grandstand it's a lot of filling time sprinkled with extremely important information hidden in hours of insufferable bullet my colleagues a couple of my colleagues referenced the conversation the hot and light conversation between President Obama and President Medvedev that was in 2012 there's a suggestion that he was saying he was going to go easy on Russia over the invasion of Ukraine but that evasion took place two years after that conversation you had every reason to believe that President Obama was referring to going easy on Russia for an evasion that hadn't happened yet do you mr. Morelle I have no Taj of what was then it was more or less the rhetorical question hey maybe don't ask the very serious ambassador rhetorical questions to dunk on the Republicans sheffy dude isn't made of time this is a test of the legislative branch as a whole who is facing an executive branch that is very clearly corrupt it's everything the Constitution talked about in terms of removing a president from office Trump who believes in very little could have just as likely grifted his way into the Democratic Party like it really shouldn't be about party lines at least specifically when it comes to his crimes which are very numerous and obvious this really shouldn't be hard and yet it is because the system we designed here is broken all of it from the branches of our government to the terrible media coverage cleaning that the inquiry are boring and dull and lacked pizzazz no pizzazz did you not see the [ __ ] bowtie but the true heroes of the dipped parade are of course conservative media who are going to give us endless months of this you tuned in you're either sound asleep or you can't follow he said she said she said he said he said it's a bunch of Gossip Girls it's not it's not a want to stop the impeachment again it might just as easily have been Democrats but Republicans and conservatives are on the slab here they are most responsible for this mess and so they are the ones being put to the test and they're just failing this Ted of that test like you know I'm being super detailed and explaining the definition of stuff and whipping out the Constitution or at least trying to I'm not doing that to be a condescending chuckle dick I'm doing it because I actually have to okay here's the problem yeah of course Nancy it's in the Constitution we can read okay President may be impeached for bribery treason or hike on crimes and misdemeanors but even assuming the Democrats trained in ridiculous interpretation of the facts and I do not assume them but just for the sake of their argument attempted bribery isn't in the Constitution this is where we are at and just in case your uncle whips out that gem on Thanksgiving or on what's the other one starts with an X well in case of that here I'm just gonna once again show you this link to the legal definition of bribery that specifies that seeking an exchange of value is also bribery do I have to play The Simpsons clip victim of a crime I didn't even commit this is just so embarrassing and we still haven't hit the bottom this life on earth is bribery you say I want something from you you give something to me that's how the world works everywhere ah yeah the President couldn't have done bribery cuz of how like when you think about it man like everything is bribery on like a philosophical level their grotesque desperate and a lying about what's happening the only play they have left is to fundamentally change the rules of reality and we probably shouldn't forget that you know like like if in the future we get to decide which party gets to be in charge we should remember the specific people who when faced with the trial of integrity put their partisan and personal interests over the people they are supposed to be serving we should remember the television and social media hacks who claimed to be warriors on logic but bend over backwards to not change their minds they shouldn't be allowed to influence this country because they are hurting us it's just a suggestion also PS there's a white nationalist in charge of our immigration policies right now so maybe there mate maybe there shouldn't be just a little old PMS [Music] something to consider you know hey everybody here's a generic thank you and ending leave comments and like and subscribe to the YouTube channel patreon.com slash some more news is where you can support us even more news is the name of a podcast somewhere news is the name of the show you just watched YouTube is the website they you've seen it on like and subscribe yeah

Channel: Some More News

Views: 555,911

Rating: 4.9068346 out of 5

Keywords: Donald Trump, mr. Trump, Impeach, impeachable, impeachement, Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, Holidays, Thanksgiving, Joe Biden, Ukraine, quid pro quo, ben shapiro, democrats, republicans, hunter biden, nancy pelosi, adam schiff

Id: h4119gK6q9s

Length: 45min 42sec (2742 seconds)

Published: Wed Nov 20 2019

Reddit Comments

[u/mosenpai]

Those clips of people either denying Trump's crimes or saying the crimes he did shouldn't bother anyone makes me wonder what kind of mindset they have in order to not be absolutely disgusted by the bullshit they have to spout.

[u/tuckernuts]

"Rick Perry, watch him, he's a cummer" absolutely never fails to bring tears to my eyes

[u/ThisGuyLikesMovies]

The streams of point dodging bullshit from those media clips infuriate me to no end!

[u/justsomeguyx123]

You are all forgetting the real important question...

What about her emails?

[u/abravernewworld]

Cody is the best.

[u/RockinOneThreeTwo]

I cannot believe the people of America aren't more irate about this.. like nuclear-level irate. World is beyond fucked that people aren't grasping for revolution after shit like this.