Starlink Teardown: DISHY DESTROYED!
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Ken Keiter
Views: 401,742
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: starlink, teardown, reverse-engineering, hardware, spacex, elon musk, dishy, satellite, electrical engineering, space, internet, ASICs, GNSS
Id: iOmdQnIlnRo
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 55min 53sec (3353 seconds)
Published: Wed Nov 25 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I hope this ends the silly debate about it containing a heater.
It's absolutely insane they can sell this for $500, Kymeta has been working on this stuff for a decade.
This is an extremely impressive piece of Electrical Engineering.
Appreciate this bold tear-down video. One respectful correction: the Starlink satellites, being deployed 60 per SpaceX launch are not cube sats.
With regard to the GPS/GNSS.
I highly doubt that IC is doing any co-processing of the signals. Its just doing its job Geo-locating. It has an ARM processor do its job.
Flash chips are very commonly paired with receivers separately for cost and size. 8 up to 64Mbit chips are used with uBlox systems. They allow Firmware upgrades and store orbital information for a fast, more accurate fix.
Since we have seen people move the dishes several kilometers and maintain service I suspect geo locking is being done at the "cell" or per satellite and not the modem. It would make the most sense since doing it at the modem would allow ground based attacks on the geo-locking. But i could be wrong and they are using encrypted comms between GNSS and the main brain.
Would really love /u/TheSignalPath taking a look at the RF side of things on this.
FYI; In last nightโs Starlink launch coverage, intrepid host Kate Tice had a ~ 20 second segment showing a map of Minnesota- and how Starlink coverage was effective/was not effective based on terrestrial location down to a couple cities. The swath of service coverage was bigger than I imagined.
Wow! What a great teardown and in depth analysis! Thanks
If they really used FR4 for the base PCB that would cut the cost by a huge amount. It should be possible despite going against conventional wisdom.
The top reflector kinda looks like it might be a Rogers variant which is molded into shape. That would be the layer where you'd want the low loss material but would likely be more expensive than the base PCB.
GPS receiver confirmed. I feel, not for the first time, that sooooomebody kinda predicted that. Can't remember who, though!