Muhammad Ali vs Ken Norton III - Sept. 28, 1976 - Entire fight - Rounds 1 - 15
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Levi Johansen
Views: 12,953,846
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: Boxing, would championship, vs, versus, ken norton, rounds, 15, heavyweight, title fight, trilogy, rematch, KO, knockout, Yankee stadium
Id: Atzy49nQoNM
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 85min 12sec (5112 seconds)
Published: Thu Jan 31 2013
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Idk about saying it was a robbery, thereโs a whole playlist a guy has (halljbet) iirc who broke down every rounds and how Ali won on the cards fairly
I've rewatched it a few times and always scored it for Norton, don't think it's a complete highway robbery, but do think he deserved the win.
Mafia money I disagree, just judges looking at different things. Scoring is kind of subjective in the end, and people see different things too.
I had Ali edging it. If anything, I thought the second fight was ever so slightly closer. (114-114 a draw in fight 2 vs 143-142 Ali in fight 3)
Approved this one but next time, keep the title simple and put your opinion in the comments instead.
I think people watching this forget the judges are sitting at ringside, looking up and don't have perfect 360 angles and highlights to watch before scoring. Norton had a bad strategy from the perspective of someone who judges boxing fights and refs them. I think Ali had a style of fighting here that is more "judge friendly"
Ali is shooting, long clear jabs and straight rights that "seem" to be landing. Norton is throwing punches in and around Ali's guard.
Ali is doing the moving and picking the spots for the fighting = ring generalship
Ali "appears" to be landing the cleaner shots = Clean and effective shots
Ali "Appears" to be blocking much of Norton's best punches = Defense
Ali "appears" to have more effective aggression because of 1-3.
I can see easily why a judge would give the rounds to Ali despite the fight looking way closer on film.
Think of it like this, when Ali has his guard up and Norton is throwing all those shots, hooks and body shots inside the guard or over hand rights on top of the gloves and Ali's back is turned to you, you as a judge don't know if any of that is landing, you can't see it. So it looks like it is being blocked. We at home see the video from 360 angles so it looks like it could be landing or getting through. When Norton's back is turned and Ali throws those long jabs/ straights, we can see from the back Norton is getting hit.
Much of Norton's punches look like they are being blocked on the gloves by Ali, to a ringside judge. So, no I don't see a robbery, I see Ali outsmarting Norton with a more judge friendly style.
Close. Not robbery
Norton won. He out landed Ali by a considerable margin