Legend of Korra's 'Beginnings' | An Overdue Critique
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Hello Future Me
Views: 694,572
Rating: 4.8672376 out of 5
Keywords: explained, theory, lore, analysis, how to, legend of korra, the last airbender, avatar, korra, season 2, critique, criticism, review, bending, elements, southern water tribe, magic system, mystery, to
Id: G1_SDy1nlbM
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 34min 7sec (2047 seconds)
Published: Thu Feb 06 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I generally like this channel, but I'll have to just say "I disagree" on this take on Beginnings.
I don't think "the human heart in conflict with itself" is diminished at all by Raava as the Avatar Spirit. Wan never comes across as "godlike" to me. The channel lists the consequences that previous Avatars made from poor actions such as Kyoshi creating the Dai Li, but the episode by no means presents Wan as perfect. In the final shot, we see him lamenting that he couldn't keep peace between people as he dies... he hardly seems like an unconflicted person. And Korra's decision to keep the portals open was very much: "What if Wan was wrong?" or at least, "What if Wan's decision 10,000 years ago isn't the best thing for the present day?"
The point about Korra having access to Raava doesn't really strike me as true, either. She provides some innate goodness of the Avatar spirit, but I don't think a great primordial spirit Raava will have all the answers to how Korra can best handle democracy in the Earth Kingdom. This just isn't how Raava functions either, she's mostly there to represent Korra being content with herself and moving past her own uncertainties.
In terms of how Beginnings relates to the rest of Book 2: I don't really like early Book 2 much myself, which is why it works for me as sitting the audience down and telling us what the real enemy is, and how it starts to pick up the pacing. It doesn't rectify a lot of the earlier clumsiness, but really gets the ball rolling as it were.
I would also say that Wan's arc is a pretty good thematic parallel to Korra, as the first Avatar of the "reset cycle." Korra, like Wan, is set to square one and has to navigate the world on her own. She becomes spiritually enlightened and is more in touch with Raava than all recent Avatars but at the cost of losing her past lives, and is on her own as she forges a new destiny. And to me that ultimately leads to some of the best moments of the "human heart in conflict with itself."
Some other points I'd disagree on, like how I don't think that blue and orange morality really is upended in the broader picture (the spirits refused to fight against Kuvira in Book 4 and I think Raava and Vaatu are "exceptions" as great cosmic spirits), and how I don't think this took away mystery - there's 10,000 years of potential interactions we can see with Kyoshi and Yangchen's interactions with spirits, or even the mystery of what the world like before Wan, before Vaatu broke into the material world. If anything, knowing some but not all details provides even more scope for theories, etc.
All due respect to Hello Future Me, though -- do love his channel, I just definitely land on a completely other side on this.
Hey I was just coming to see if anyone had posted already.
Now, what I was going to say about it: I've always been a supporter of Legend of Korra. Was it as good as ATLA? Of course not. Was it wholly necessary? No. But it did do a lot to look at the more grey morality and it matured with Avatar's audience.
Season 2 always stood out to me as being the weakest of them but I could never place why. This video really puts it into words. It had such a strong set up for a great moral conflict and societal analysis, but throws it away on a contrived "good vs evil in universal forces" with frikken laser beams. LoK as a whole indeed would have been stronger without the second half of this season, though I recognize a LOT would have needed to be rewritten to not be so dependent on the results of S2. What with Vaatu being instrumental in Korra losing her connection to her past lives, and as addressed in the video, the universal "balance" forcing people to become airbenders (which he provides a good solution for). But of course, the series capitalizes on the struggle of people having power thrust upon them and the conflicts/issues that can arise out of that, so making said change may have completely changed the following seasons...
I'm surprised this didn't get the clout/discussion it deserves on the sub, unless I missed another thread with this video. I absolutely agree with everything, and I couldn't put together why when I first watched S2. I could gather bits and pieces but Tim really puts everything into perspective. Some people like the episodes on their own at the very least, but I'm vehemently against them and what they did to Avatar lore tbh. But hey, the effects were decent 🤷
I definitely see Hello Future Me's broad point about the deviation from what he terms orange and blue morality. I think its the biggest obvious narrative flaw in LOK, but I think more due lot's of sloppiness than a decision to fully frame Raava and Vaatu as 'good' and 'evil'.
A cosmic 'good' and 'evil' clearly does not fit the themes that were developed in ATLA, or the rest of LOK for that matter. It's what I think makes Book 2 so jarring for most people.
That said, I think there are elements of 'blue/orange' morality in the raava/vaatu dynamic. Vaatu mentions that he is responsible for the spirit and physical worlds being in contact with one another to begin with for example.
Wan's failure to prevent conflict until his death all the way up to the conflicts that lead to Vaatu's escape I think are the writer's trying to say that merely attempting to lock 'chaos' away and keeping the spirit and physical worlds as separate from each other as possible was a flawed and wrong-headed. In other words, the human fusing with the order/light spirit and locking up the chaos/dark spirit isn't an unquestionable 'good'. It's a band-aid applied onto the initial fuck-up Wan made. Korra ends the season actively taking up the decision to re-fuse with Raava and fix her mistakes releasing Vaatu as well. In contrast to Wan, she leaves the worlds joined and doesn't lock Vaatu away again, showing some blue/orange morality in not walking back Vaatu's action. Pure order (the separate worlds as they've been for 10,00 years) isn't unquestionably better than chaos (the drastic change in re-uniting the worlds fully). In fact, a positive effect of chaos is shown the next season though the awakening of airbending in people.
However in 'pacifying'? 'purifying'? Vaatu it leaves the theme of both order and chaos being important really muddled. He wasn't just locked back away and he hasn't been destroyed once and for all either, but he was still 'defeated'. That just doesn't jive with order and chaos being both forces that must balance each other out.
Really, Hello Future Me's suggestion that Korra *also* fuse with Vaatu would've been a much better choice along if there was also some re-writing a good bit of dialog to more heavily emphasize that both chaos and order being necessary (with a clear and concrete example of order/stasis being bad) and really de-emphasizing the 'good' and 'evil' connotations/framing.
This is some great critique with a fix.
Netflix, if it gets to Korra, should do this.