The Philosophy of Uncle Iroh: What does it mean to be a man? | The Last Airbender
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Hello Future Me
Views: 2,122,874
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: explained, theory, lore, analysis, how to
Id: SezGJNNZmtI
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 17min 45sec (1065 seconds)
Published: Sat Nov 30 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Only 4:17? The best story in all the episodes. The whole series is great but Iroh has always been my fav and when he starts to sing I can't help but cry at his loss and regret.
Iroh is everyone's father or a father every child deserves...
An exploration of how positive masculinity can be taught through children's media. It explores the duality between the character of Uncle Iroh; his character evolution and what it means to be a father figure, in comparison with the Fire Lord, whose lack of evolution and uncompromising adherence to the cruel ideals of his culture cause nothing but pain.
TBH I should probably actually watch The Last Airbender sometime.
ATLA is one of those shows that you could use as an example for the phrase "The Perfect Storm".
This show just had the right of everything at the right time, with the right resources and so on. It's really a great story and it teaches a lot about relationships, tolerance, empathy and understanding.
Another user posted this at almost the exact same instant as you
Funny coincidence
Kinda of topic but can we appreciate all of the amazing lessons and messages that ATLA taught? Itβs kinda funny how much I missed some of it as a kid tho lmao
Oh fuck YAS! MensLib and Avatar crossing paths! This is the best cross-over episode ever!
In all seriousness though, this show does a fantastic job of showcasing positive, healthy masculinity. As well as showing how toxic masculinity can change into a healthier kind.
Fiiiiiiiiiiine I'll start re-watching Avatar.
Jokes aside, I watched this show for the first time only a couple years ago, and it brought me to tears several times.
What I find interesting is there seems to be... shall we say.. different strands among male liberation ideology. There is the strand that is trying to seek new meaning in masculinity, and there is the strand (to which I adhere) which is post-gendered looking for a way to deconstruct the gender binary and instead let people be a spectrum of behavior. I guess I worry that any definition of masculinity will ultimately lead to policing and I'd rather people feels comfortable to define themselves as whatever works best for them instead of trying to live to ideals and compare against others in this domain.
It is a bit funny to me how Iroh is so universally beloved, despite his pretty ugly past. Definitely not to the same extent as Ozai, he was still an intense Fire Nation General at the time of the Hundred Year War, seeking the position of Fire Lord and besieging the Outer Wall, nearly the Inner Wall too. Presumably, such a siege resulted in a ton of deaths. The primary reason he stopped was because of his son's death.
Of course he would go on to regret such behavior and find forgiveness in his actions in the final few episodes of the series, but in a real world sense, would his actions result in his forgiveness? A reversal in position and a heavy interest in spirituality goes a long way in making a now peaceful figure, but would someone see it as such had they been affected by that siege at the time? Had Iroh's son not died in combat, would we get the Iroh we have now? (Which might make Iroh's son's death more tragic as a result, with Iroh perhaps knowing that his death was needed for Iroh to find some sense of peace, but nevertheless is regretful that such a conflict separated them to begin with.)
I do love Iroh, but I see his sort of peace as a complicated and bloodstained one. He is a changed man, rather than one inherently good like some circlejerks might make the likes of Keanu Reeves out to be, or Fred Rogers, or Tom Hanks, or Bob Ross, or Terry Crews... Iroh can be idolized, for sure, but that comes at the cost of brushing over his past actions in favor of his attempts at forgiveness. This might work in the context of a kids show, but in the real world, might we be as forgiving if his redemption came at the cost of potentially hundreds if not thousands of Earth Kingdom soldiers? And if he hadn't suffered the loss of his son, he may never had gone through that redemptive arc at all?
I don't know, I've been conflicted about everyone's adoration of him for a while now. I do see him as a changed person, a much better, wiser, more peaceful person, but I wouldn't go so far as to worship the dude, especially when there were characters on the show who seemed forever inclined toward "good", even if it came to results other than glory, or even when it wasn't really expected of them. They didn't need the murder of hundreds to reach that point.
That doesn't at all negate the video, but just something I don't think people really think about when it comes to Iroh. It isn't that he is forever moral or peaceful that makes him compelling, and I might even argue that some have been morally more consistent than he had been when it mattered, at the cost or preservation of human life. If we are keeping with the theme of manhood, Aang is a great example of an arc still keeping with moral consistency, despite some mistakes made out of immaturity or uncertainty. Sokka too, who does have his own setbacks to overcome or flaws to fix, but always seems pointed in the right direction regardless of glory (well, even if it were in part for glory, he keeps helping anyway.) And that's in addition to moments of insecurity, needing to admit so, and learn in order to feel more like a proper part to the team. Might those be positive examples of masculinity, with much less baggage while still remaining complex and imperfect?
tl;dr: if you are a ba sing se siege denier, none of this would matter anyway, so don't worry about it