Kyle's vaccine complication
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Dr. John Campbell
Views: 1,775,667
Rating: 4.8856215 out of 5
Keywords: physiology, nursing, NCLEX, health, disease, biology, medicine, nurse education, medical education, pathophysiology, campbell, human biology, human body
Id: H7inaTiDKaU
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 41min 51sec (2511 seconds)
Published: Thu Oct 21 2021
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Then question must be asked, is it a wonder that even those medical professionals who want to make entries into it give up, and that VAERS figures are 10 - 100 times underreported?
How many medical professionals would have all the requirements at hand to make the entries, let alone sit through a crash prone process and make the entries successfully assuming they had the time on hand?
Just like the VAERS system is both:
. . .The UK Yellow Card Scheme is named SCHEME for a reason. It's a trick, pretending to be a program meant to protect you.
Then they offer no better alternative to find adverse event data. And then say itβs safe and effective .
The NIH commissioned a study a few years back and it concluded less than 1% of adverse events are reported in VAERS.
Study: Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine death reports from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) Database
"Clinically trained reviewers have undertaken a detailed analysis of a sample of the early deaths reported in VAERS (250 out of the 1644 deaths recorded up to April 2021). The focus is on the extent to which the reports enable us to understand whether the vaccine genuinely caused or contributed to the deaths. Contrary to claims that most of these reports are made by lay-people and are hence clinically unreliable, we identified health service employees as the reporter in at least 67% ... while pharmaceutical employees were identified as the reporter in a further 5%. Lay people were identifiable as the reporter in only 28% of the reports." "The sample contains only people vaccinated early in the programme, and hence is made up primarily of those who are elderly or with significant health conditions. Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death." In spite of the fact that only 11 (4%) present with a test-confirmed and current COVID-19 infection, all 250 people in this interim collection were reported as COVID-19 deaths. This means that all, even those who received one or more negative test results, are erroneously counted in the officially reported national COVID-19 death tally.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis
Here we goπ. But of course, why would anyone NOT report? Let me guess, 45 minutes? Lol I wonder if every doctor is going to take the time to report a rash, body aches, palpitations, etc when they can easily attribute it to anything else and give someone a pill, a cream or requests more test.
More importantly just how useful is the data? Apparently not very much.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00880-9