Anyone who’s ever visited a jail knows that
it’s not exactly the most comfortable place in the world. That’s why the American judicial system
has the institution of bail -- a deposit to the court made in either cash or collateral
that allows a person to purchase their freedom while preparing for and undergoing trial. Around 40 percent of criminal defendants are
ultimately released on bail. For defendants who can’t afford to post
their own bail, there is a person called a bail bondsman. Bail bondsmen work for private LLC’s and
front these people a portion of the money for their bail -- which are called ‘surety
bonds’ -- and typically charge a fee for doing so. Though the amount of the fee varies from bondsman
to bondsman, the standard fee is 10 percent. Under this system, if a defendant agrees to
the terms set forth by the bail bondsman in order to win their freedom, they are essentially
handing over power of attorney for themselves over to the bail bondsman. This means that if they fail to appear in
court on the scheduled date or try to skip town, the bail bondsman has the right to track
them down and haul them in. But the bail bondsmen don’t undertake this
task themselves: they often hire bounty hunters -- also known as bail enforcement agents,
or recovery agents -- to track the defendant down on their behalf. But what is it like being a bounty hunter? What are the rules and laws that typically
govern bounty hunters? And is it as badass of a job as their job
title suggests? Bounty hunting is a vestige of British common
law of the Middle Ages. As we discussed in a previous video, “What
is Bail Money Actually For?”, England was the place in which the rule of law replaced
what we now consider to be more archaic forms of dispensing justice, like determining if
your neighbor stole your garden rake by seeing if their head resembled a pumpkin that everyone
knew was haunted. Instead of cash or collateral goods, bail
often took the form of an actual person, which meant that a friend or family member would
put themselves forward as vouching for the person accused of the crime. Thirteenth-century courts often required the
person doing the vouching to serve the punishment of the defendant if that person skipped town,
which could sometimes mean a death sentence. Fast forward to the modern era, and bounty
hunters primarily draw their legal imprimatur from an 1872 Supreme Court decision, Taylor
v. Taintor, which stated that bounty hunters “may pursue [a fugitive] to another State;
arrest him on the Sabbath; and, if necessary, break and enter his house for that purpose.” Bounty hunters are typically paid a commission
of the total bail amount that is owed by the fugitive. So, for example, if a person can’t afford
bail that’s set at $10,000, they would typically pay a portion of that amount in cash or collateral,
plus a fee, to the bail bondsman. Then, the bail bondsman pays the rest of the
amount, which is backed by insurance. However, the bail bondsman only gets their
money back if the person who was released on bail actually shows up to court: if that
person skips their court date or leaves town, it’s the bail bondsman who is on the hook
for the full bail amount. If the bail bondsman winds up having to pay
the full amount because the defendant hasn’t appeared in court, that’s called a forfeiture;
if the bail bondsman can produce the person who skipped out -- a person referred to as
a ‘skip’ -- then the bail bondsman is given the entire bail amount, plus the initial
fee that they charged to the skip for providing the bail money in the first place. In other words, if the skip is successfully
apprehended and brought back to court, the skip loses the amount that they initially
put up in cash or collateral. In those cases in which a person has skipped
town, the bondsman hires a bounty hunter to track the person down and even apprehend them. But since bounty hunters are independent contractors
and work on commission, they only get paid if they are able to find the skip and bring
them in. There isn’t a verifiable way to count the
number of bounty hunters in the United States. No central database exists and state laws
vary widely as to the legality of the practice. Multiple states -- such as Oregon, Kentucky,
and Illinois -- have banned the practice of bounty hunting altogether; other states -- such
as Wyoming -- are on the other end of the spectrum, with few if any rules governing
the practice at all. However, according to an estimate by an industry
organization called the Professional Bail Agents of the United States, the total number
of bounty hunters in the US numbers around 15,000. That’s a lot of bounty hunting going on. But what kinds of rules and regulations do
bounty hunters have to follow? One rule of all bounty hunting is that they
are not allowed to cross country lines. Bounty hunters who attempt to apprehend fugitives
in another country face dangerous consequences, as even a trip over the border to Canada to
snatch a fugitive would violate international law. When it comes to the tactics bounty hunters
employ to catch fugitives, it turns out that they can get away with quite a lot. Bounty hunters operate outside of the traditional
legal constraints that govern police officers and other agents of the state. This is because a bail agreement between a
defendant and a bail bondsman is essentially a civil contract that it is incumbent upon
the bondsman to enforce. As a result, bounty hunters hired by bail
bondsmen enjoy significant legal privileges that everyday police officers do not. For example, when bounty hunters are making
an arrest, they are not required to read a defendant their Miranda rights. Bounty hunters also may enter a defendant’s
home without probable cause or a search warrant, but only if they’ve established that the
fugitive is actually living there. In other words, bounty hunters don’t have
the right to enter the homes of the fugitive’s friends or family to look for the person. Depending on the state, bounty hunters may
also not be required to obtain a license or undergo training. All bounty hunters really need in order to
make an arrest is a copy of the ‘bail piece’, which is a copy of the paperwork proving that
the person that they’re hunting is indeed a fugitive; some states also require that
bounty hunters possess a copy of the actual bond. And because bounty hunters may carry firearms
and handcuffs, and may even use deadly force when attempting to apprehend fugitives, there
is a great potential for things to go arigh. That’s what happened in 2003, when a Virginia
bounty hunter named James Howard Dickerson entered the wrong house and shot dead a man
named Roberto Martinez after Martinez tried to escape. The unfortunate case led Virginia to introduce
a rush of new regulations on bounty hunters. The potential for disaster has led many states
to adopt stricter requirements for those who wish to become bounty hunters. For starters, many states require that applicants
be above a certain age -- say, between 18 to 25 -- and complete a course or set of courses
within 90 days of receiving their license. Another common requirement is for applicants
to have had no misdemeanor or felony convictions within the past 5-10 years. And this makes sense -- if you’re going
to hire someone who enjoys extra-legal privileges and likely carries a gun, you probably don’t
want someone with a history of committing serious or violent crimes. When drilling down into state regulations
around the bounty hunting industry, some are more stringent than others. Some, like North Dakota, look to protect against
potential conflicts of interest: According to the state regulations, those looking to
become bounty hunters “must not hold a position as a jailer, police officer, magistrate court
judge, sheriff, sheriff’s deputy or any other individual having arresting authority.” This makes sense, too -- you could see confusion
arising from someone justifying illegal search and seizure as a cop by saying that they were
acting in their capacity as a bounty hunter, and it would be difficult to prove that they
were acting illegally. Mississippi has similar requirements: State
law indicates that those seeking licensure as a bail enforcement agent “may not be
employed as an attorney, law enforcement agent, or judicial official,” and “may not be
employed as a correctional officer in a facility where inmates are bailable.” Some state laws around the industry pay particular
attention to applicants’ personal behavior. In Iowa, for example, people looking to become
bounty hunters must have no history of domestic violence or drug and alcohol abuse. And in Georgia, in addition to its requirements
around age, felony convictions, and US citizenship, the state also requires that prospective bounty
hunters be eligible to carry a firearm. Then there is the issue of temperament. Media depictions like the popular reality
TV show ‘Dog the Bounty Hunter’ portray an industry full of cowboy-type bounty hunters
who shoot from the hip, are regularly shot at, and engage in high-speed chases to apprehend
their fugitives. In reality, bail-bond agencies are far more
likely to hire individuals who are low-key and understated for the role of a bounty hunter. It is, after all, a private company: If they’re
known for employing people who regularly shoot people or engage in cavalier behavior, it
makes it less likely that people would want to solicit that company’s services -- in
this case, people who are already in a stressful situation because they’re facing a court
hearing. It’s also an insurance issue -- any of the
bounty hunters who injure someone or put lives at risk could potentially be costing the company
a great deal of money. And perhaps most importantly, one of the most
distinct advantages that a bounty hunter has in his or her pursuit of a fugitive is the
element of surprise. If a bounty hunter is constantly being loud
and drawing attention to himself, he is likely to miss out on opportunities to apprehend
his skip, which would make the bail-bond agencies that much less inclined to hire him. The issue of liability makes clear that while
there are some privileges that bounty hunters are allowed to exploit, there are still many
things that bounty hunters are unequivocally not allowed to do. First and foremost, bounty hunters are not
police officers, and any attempt by a bounty hunter to pass themselves off as a police
officer is illegal. This appears to be a non-uncommon occurrence:
A man in the Bronx was recently arrested for being reportedly decked out in “a bulletproof
vest, pepper spray, two radios, an expandable baton, a folding knife, and a B.B. gun holstered
in his nylon gun belt.” Establishing a clear delineation between who
is a cop and who is a bounty hunter is important: When an everyday citizen is approached by
a bounty hunter, they are not required to answer his or her questions and are not allowed
to be detained. As a result, many bounty hunters refer to
themselves as ‘agents’ -- as in, Bail Enforcement Agents or Fugitive Recovery Agents. Yet even with these boundaries in place, bounty
hunters may still engage in practices that are considered questionable or even legally
troublesome by law enforcement officials. For example, one Idaho bounty hunter was met
with angry responses from law enforcement after livestreaming his capturing of a fugitive,
and for a separate incident in which he asked the public for tips regarding a murder case. While not technically illegal, these practices
arguably infringe upon the civil liberties of the fugitives and could endanger lives
if things went wrong. While all of this may sound frightening and
make civil libertarians angry, there are reasons why the system exists. For starters, it’s effective: According
to a book by two economists that compares public and private law enforcement practices,
the surety-bonds system has lower rates of people skipping out on their court dates than
all the other forms of pretrial release. On top of that, bounty hunters have an astonishingly-high
capture rate, which sits anywhere from 85-99 percent. While the reasons for this rate of success
may vary, it probably comes down to bounty hunters enjoying significantly more legal
leeway than regular cops, and the fact that bounty hunters have a financial incentive
to capture their man. Another reason why the bounty-hunter model
continues is because it makes people money: The fact that around 15,000 people benefit
financially from being bounty hunters gives them an incentive to keep the system in place,
regardless of whether it’s fair. That’s not to say that there hasn’t been
significant pushback on the part of activists and concerned citizens who say that the cash-bail
system is morally and legally repugnant, and that while bounty hunters may be effective
in rounding up the tiny percentage of the population who have skipped out on their financial
obligations, they represent a far greater threat to the safety and liberty of everyday
citizens.. Now we’ve got a job for you. Two of our videos have gotten loose and it’s
up to you to track them down. Bring them to justice by clicking on them
now before they slip away again! Hurry you’re running out of time so grab
the one over here or the one over here. Don’t wait, get them now!
