Heal Quickness Herald PVE Build Guide - Guild Wars 2
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: ConnorConCarne
Views: 11,156
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords:
Id: ztY3JMMm3nM
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 21min 20sec (1280 seconds)
Published: Wed May 31 2023
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Heal Herald is good at what it does, but its biggest weakest is ironically that it's well-designed.
Heal Herald needs to make tradeoffs in exchange for things that it does well. Want to bring big group healing? Sure, but you can't have any stability then. Want stability? Sure, but you lose your big group healing. Unlike most other healers, Herald lacks any way to access Aegis, and condition cleansing is a huge weakness of the spec, especially without Ventari.
Now, this is a great design, actually. Herald has some strong strengths and some huge weaknesses. This actually follows the "holes in roles" design that Anet was talking about before.
But here's the problem. Some other healers don't actually have any "holes". Firebrand being a great example. It brings everything a healer could possibly ever want. Big healing, tons of cleanses, on demand stability and aegis, nearly every boon in the game. It's just the complete package.
Next to these "hole-less" healers like Firebrand, Herald just doesn't quite stack up to the same degree. It's good, but it's not Firebrand.
Both scrapper and herald suffers if you compare them to hfb. Why? Because of the utility. Yes you also have nice utility on herald but the way you need to use it isn't as good as fb's way to use it. Take stab for exemple, as herald you need to be on dwarf (wich has 9sec cd if you switched stance before) while fb can just use it anytime.
The only advantage herald has over fb is the ventari bubble wich is easier to maintain for a long period ( + occasional superspeed). It doesn't heal more, doesn't provide more utility, doesn't do more dps. So hfb is overall better.
Scrapper only has superspeed and possible invis, a bit more damage reduction than other healers above (bulwark gyro) but a small amount of utility besides that (bad bubble, worse boons, almost no stab). That's the worst of the 3 by far.
All of them can clear the end game content. But if I want to bring a qheal in my group it's gonna be an hfb 99% of the time (the 1% being random speedkills in low man setup).
I still prefer healbrand over heal herald. They lack access to stability (you have to either swap glint or ventari stance to get stability from dwarf, which either way make them cant access to boon or healing) and one important thing is that healbrand can swap utilities depend on the encounter (reflect, aoe heal, …)
So yeah you can play heal herald but the fact is healbrand still better overall
Strong, viable, balanced and fun build. If someone prefers to play it over Firebrand in my group, I'm cool with that.
But a lot of it's utility is locked behind different legends and 1 of your legends is mandatory for quickness. It doesn't feel great having to make trade-offs, especially when other classes - Firebrand do not.
If you want the utility that Herald brings in your party, then I don't see the benefit of bringing Heal Quick Herald over a DPS Quick Herald currently.
Heal Herald is good and better than most people give it credit for, but at the end of the day, you don't have aegis and stability comes at a much greater tradeoff than it does for HB/Mech. Personally, I don't think the Jalis tradeoff is as bad as most people make it out to be, but some groups use the Aegis for specific mechanics and not being able to provide that will keep this out of meta for the really hardcore groups even when nothing else will.
Just look at the boons in the thumbnail and you will know how it compares to Healbrand.
Healbrand would have eaten into the space where the character is posing with the boons and other unique utility they have.
But don't let this discourage you: Heal Herald is still pretty good. It's Healbrand that's overtuned af.
It's a flavorful, but slightly worse version of HB, best used for niche comps where its unique utility would be needed anyway. It can't do as many things as once, can't as easily build a massive quickness buffer, can't do its unique utility and give quickness at the same time, doesn't have nearly as good of a hybrid build for low-pressure scenarios where more damage is useful, and is still miles better than heal scrapper.
TBH, though, most groups would benefit more from running either an HB (in fractals and most strikes for maximum role compression), or a Druid (since there's not much a heal herald can do that a power quick also can't, and the DPS alacs don't have nearly the same utility or CC).
I don't do Fractals, so I primarily see Heal Herald on the following fights:
Outside of that, I see HB on KC CM, SH, River, Q1 CM, Deimos CM, and 50/50 on wing 7 (ham is also common here, and druid can do it well enough while being able to range CC and rez while tanking).
I tank raids on heal herald and I love it. It's so effortless, especially with the trait that gives you 1500 barrier every 3 seconds for achieving the difficult task of having boons.
Also tablet 10k heals go brrrr
It is my favorite build in the game. Yes you have to make tradeoffs to provide certain utility, but I think that is a strong design choice that something like heal firebrand lacks, for better or worse. You can swap out a traitline and/or hero to adapt to any encounter you wish, and you hold the privilege of running condi or power. The Ventari tablet is also just a really fun concept for a healer.