Game Theory: The Frozen Level You Will NEVER Play! (Kingdom Hearts 3)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The Game Theorists
Views: 3,186,191
Rating: 4.922956 out of 5
Keywords: kingdom hearts 3, frozen, kingdom hearts, disney, kh3, elsa, frozen 2, kingdom hearts 3 arendelle, kh3 arendelle, kingdom hearts 3 frozen, frozen world, kingdom hearts 3 frozen boss, frozen keyblade, arendelle, kingdom hearts 3 lucky emblems, face my fears, face my fears kingdom hearts 3, kh3 lucky emblems, frozen theory, kingdom hearts theory, secret level, hidden level, secret boss, game theory, game theorists, lost level, matpat
Id: Neau6ttz6Bk
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 19min 20sec (1160 seconds)
Published: Sun Mar 17 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
TLDW?
On the one hand, it's pretty clear that his theory holds true based on what we've seen in the game. I too expected Elsa as the boss in the game, so I found the outcome of Arandelle disappointing.
On the other hand, I am surprised that a rule as specific as 'stay true to the movie' was not brought up until the near end of development and forced the KH team to slap parts together, especially because Square Enix planned to have Frozen included since the day of the movie release.
Reading some articles about Disney/Pixar supervising their levels, the KH team's main focus was to prove they can animate scenes resembling the movie as close as possible (as seen with the shot-for-shot reanimation of the two musical scenes). I wonder if development chose to focus on the animation first, experimented with some level designs and then working story elements around it. At least that could explain why they didn't have enough time to plan out how to present a story to what Disney wanted, or have realized that Disney didn't want their proposed Arandelle.
Or higher ups jumped in last minute and interfered with what both the Frozen creators and KH team cooked up together.
Either way, I feel it isn't fair to solely blame Disney on that part. Nomura is not a great storyteller himself, and knowing how chaotic workplaces are behind the scenes, it's clear that Frozen fell victim to a not-so-ideal development progress.
One more thing I noticed, if I’m remembering correctly, someone mentions later in the game that Anna and Elsa are both princesses of heart.
This makes no sense for a few reasons, the first being Larxene’s statement about how she could use her powers for light or darkness. If she’s a princess of heart, that would not at all be possible since her heart literally has no darkness in it. The more damning fact however, is that we have no evidence of two princesses of heart from the same world.
In fact, it makes more sense that they would be from separate worlds. Marluxia mentioned that now that rapunzel is a new princess of heart, she is meant to guard the world’s light. This makes sense, and while the “new princesses of heart” was almost definitely added in after this frozen debacle as a means of tying the three we see into the main story, however it makes sense in the long run as well. The door to darkness opens when the 7 princesses of light, or maybe a better term guardians of light are united. And therefore they should NOT be anywhere near each other in preserving the order of the World.
The reason this is important to the theory, is that Elsa is (in matpat’s idea of the original story of Arendelle) struggling between darkness and light. Therefore she was never meant to be a princess of light. ONLY Anna is. Which makes a whole lot of sense in the movie as well. Elsa was, as matpat said, an antihero of sorts, while Anna was happy-go-lucky, overly trusting, selfless and very loving. Also SHE IS A PRINCESS. ELSA IS NOT (I realize that the fact that they’re not a “princess” means very little for princess of heart like Kairi and Alice, but I mean. Come on)
In conclusion, in support of the theory, Anna was originally supposed to be the only princess of heart in Arendelle, while Elsa’s struggle between her own darkness and light was the driving force of the story
So sorry for the messiness of this, as I started writing, I began to make more connections, resulting in a random train of thought
TL;DR
Matpat is right, supported by Anna and Elsa both being princesses of heart from the same world, which makes no sense
Unless I missed it, there was something obvious missing in this theory.
Elsa was supposed to be the villain in Frozen, but Disney decided to change it in the end
Not sure how that works out in the timeline, but it could even be possible Elsa was still the villain when this level started development.
Yeah, this one seems pretty plausible, and would be a lot more along the lines of what I was hoping would happen after Larxene's speech. It's not like the movie didn't show that Elsa had a lot of fears about her powers anyway, right? Even if she didn't fall entirely to Darkness, they could've at least shown it was a possibility so there was something in the level to catch a players interest. Oh well, nothing to be done for it now, and I really doubt the people at Disney will learn a lesson about why that ended up being the least liked level.
Anyway, on a somewhat separate topic, what also might have been nice to see, if not something they actually planned, would have been if Larxene had been ordered to make sure that Elsa stayed on the side of Light so she could be one of the backup Princesses. That would have put Sora in the awkward position of... trying to foil a evil plan about helping somebody be a better person. And put Larxene in the hilariously awkward position of having to try and be all positivity and friendship and what not despite being a sadistic psychopath.