Woman accusing a man of 'mansplaining' gets as good as she gives

you my lovely man's flaming I'm enjoying it you're loving what the mansplaining that's going on what's we're just talking me through how how what about it but I'm not answering the question what is repeating processes which are not related to the question that I've asked what's mansplaining said of it it's the slightly patronizing and condescending way that you're responding to my questions well I would suggest senator but if you're putting the word man in front of some description of what I'm doing you are doing that which I'm sure you're very much against is making a sexist implication about how I'm conducting my roles well then the easiest way to do it is it well say well what I'm saying is that the way you've been responding to me has been patronizing and condescending and I have responded to that so the easiest way to do mates not owning a man is not metal edge incentive not to imagine of isolating place you imagine the reaction senator if I said you were woman splaining you're saying that I meant well it is a term that's used is we whom my words and it seems I rude doesn't doesn't make my rude senses by senators who are seeking to make gender an issue no I'm not you want to reconsider what you said sooner I don't know what it not you don't want it no I mean I just might an extraordinary senator I just find it extraordinary that you or any senator at this at this table would seek to invoke gender in impugning how a senator is responding times the man squally haven't let the radio let the record show Ryan that Senator Gallagher thinks it's appropriate to refer to a senator as man splaining take a good look at yourself I mean sitting here and saying do I totally know senator your mansplaining if I said to a female senator you are woman splaining there would be uproar stop being a hypocrite yourself appropriately for this place I'm sorry you're so offended by these two words it is it is a word that's used it's it's a surprise that you're so shocked by the use of the word no I'm just hypocrisy from the policy there is labor thy name is Senator Gallagher now I think you need to settle down actually senator welcome to welcome to federal parliament up administer order to be paid Minister order

Channel: Greg Graham

Views: 11,704,022

Rating: 4.9013042 out of 5

Keywords: mansplaining, sexism, reverse sexism, femonazi, hypocrisy, feminist, feminism, misandry

Id: TJyQpRfaGnw

Length: 2min 27sec (147 seconds)

Published: Wed Feb 10 2016

Reddit Comments

[u/Jman-laowai]

"I'm going to condescendingly explain to you how you were condescendingly mansplaining to me. You should listen to me because I'm a woman and therfore my opinion is more valid; also you are a man who is unable to understand simple concepts unless a woman explains them to you in a patronising manner. Therefore I am right and you are wrong. Debate over, the end."

[u/callmecrazy234]

Someone give this guy a medal! What a fucking legend!

[u/sleepy_tech]

What a low balling biatch.

[u/mgarcia_org]

she's in twitter la la land in her head..

[u/wildboat]

FUCKING BUUUUURRNNNNN!!!

[u/skgody]

Listen to the cunts condescending and patronizing tone , fucking sexist cunt.

[u/SeriouslyPunked]

Well technically she is right by saying it is a term that’s used quite widely enough that it’s in the dictionary. It’s also strange that he hasnt heard it before (although I highly doubt he hasn’t and I think he’s just saying that to bait her).

However he is also right in saying that it’s not really appropriate for her to accuse someone of doing that in a place like parliament. It’s definitely hypocritical if a man were to say that she was ‘woman-splaining’ something (which she was by telling him what mansplaining was, although he did ask for it) he would be reamed for it.

So really, without knowing the context, I can see both sides.

[u/medwezys]

Bercaw’s “order” compared to the one at the end of the video is 3 orders of magnitude more powerful