Why Warren Buffett Said No to Lehman and AIG in 2008
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Wall Street Journal
Views: 2,477,984
Rating: 4.8815365 out of 5
Keywords: warren buffett, Thomas Di Fonzo, drew evans, LEHMAN BROTHERS WARREN BUFFETT, AIG, Political Appointments, Terminations, Political, General News, Domestic Politics, Regional Politics, United States, North America
Id: 1QeUcfqkUzc
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 5min 2sec (302 seconds)
Published: Fri Sep 07 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
This is an unexpectedly hilarious video
I love that WSJ apparently has to define what a 10K is. I remember this video... I think it was before Robinhood, right?
Anyway, do any of you think there’s an implication here that Buffett would have loved to take a piece of AIG if he had the money? He doesn’t trash them (although foolish is a pretty big slam from Buffett, he’s pretty clear it applies to their FP division). He was clearly (and wisely) wary of being diluted out by the lender of last resort if he allowed himself to be the lender of second to last resort. He was also pretty clear that the timeline for the cash was an issue, not just the flat out quantity.
But I wonder what is true thoughts on bailing out AIG today with brk’s cash on hand. I think he would have done it. Unless he thought the only thing that could save AIG was the government’s “reputation” and not just cash, how many of you think he really wanted a piece of AIG?
And how many of you think this is one of the reasons he keeps so much cash now?