We talked about crane failures in a previousÂ
video, but you might be surprised to learn that  things can and still go wrong with heavy liftsÂ
even when the crane is perfectly safe and sound.  All cranes use a hook as a connection to theÂ
load, and yet, few things we need to lift have  an attachment that fits nicely over a giganticÂ
steel hook. “Rigging” is the term used to describe  all the steps we go through to attach a loadÂ
to a crane so it can be suspended and moved.  And, like all human endeavors, rigging is proneÂ
to error. Some of the most serious crane failures  in history had nothing to do with the craneÂ
itself but were actually a result of poor  rigging. One of the worst construction accidentsÂ
in U.S. history happened in New York in 2008Â Â when a large metal component of a crane wasÂ
improperly rigged. The overloaded slings failed,  dropping the collar directly onto its attachmentÂ
points to the building under construction,  causing it to detach and collapse. Six workersÂ
and one civilian were killed in the incident,  and many more were seriously injured. There’sÂ
a lot that can go wrong below the hook,  so in this video, we’re going to take a look at aÂ
few of the fundamentals in attaching and securing  a load and some of the hidden hazards that canÂ
pop up if not done properly and carefully. I’m  Grady, and this is Practical Engineering. InÂ
today’s episode, we’re talking about rigging. You’ve probably heard the phrase that if yourÂ
only tool is a hammer, every problem starts to  look like a nail. It’s a lighthearted way toÂ
warn about over-reliance on a familiar tool.  But, if you’re a rigger whose job isÂ
to secure loads to cranes for lifting,  you really do have just one tool. You don’tÂ
use a piece of old rope out of your pickup bed.  You don’t use a ratchet strap fromÂ
the big box store down the road.  And you definitely never use the crane’s hoistÂ
line to wrap around a load. You have one option:Â Â a sling. Of course, slings come in a wideÂ
variety of sizes and types and materials,  and you also have hardware like hooks and eyesÂ
and shackles and pulleys but, yeah, one main tool.  And here’s why. Slings have a rated capacity. ThatÂ
rating is a guarantee from the manufacturer. More  importantly, it’s a big responsibility taken offÂ
the shoulders of a rigger to know and trust that  each connection to a crane or hoist can carry theÂ
right amount of load. So what do these tags mean? It’s actually pretty straightforward. The tagÂ
shows how much weight you can put on the sling  using the three basic hitches. If your load has aÂ
hook or a shackle, you can use the vertical hitch:Â Â one eye over the load and one eye over the hook ofÂ
the crane or hoist. It’s the most straightforward  configuration for a sling and takes full advantageÂ
of its load capacity. If there is no attachment  point on your load, you might instead useÂ
a basket hitch. In this configuration, the  load is cradled by the sling, and both eyes are onÂ
the hook. One benefit of the basket hitch is that  it doubles the sling’s load capacity since youÂ
have two legs holding instead of just one. But,  it only works if the load is balanced and easy toÂ
control since it’s only cradled from the bottom.  If you need a snug grasp on the load,Â
you might use the third basic option:Â Â a choker hitch, where the sling passesÂ
through one eye and attaches to the  crane hook on the other. The choke point hasÂ
extra stress when used in this configuration,  so the load rating for a choker hitch is lessÂ
than that of the vertical or basket hitch. If you’re using a sling to lift somethingÂ
heavy and don’t see a load rating tag,  just stop. Every sling rated for riggingÂ
has to have a tag, whether it’s a synthetic  sling like this, a wire rope, or a chain.Â
Even so, the vast majority of rigging failures  happen because a sling was overloaded. YouÂ
might be wondering why that’s the case when  the load rating is spelled out right there onÂ
the tag. But those three numbers hide quite a  bit of complexity involved in rigging, and IÂ
have a few examples set up here in my garage  to give you a glimpse into those intricacies. EvenÂ
if you aren’t planning to connect a 20-ton beam to  a crawler crane any time soon, this informationÂ
applies to lifting just about anything. The first rigging pitfall is center-of-gravity.Â
Not all loads are evenly distributed or equally  balanced, and that can cause some serious issuesÂ
if the rigging doesn’t take it into account.  For example, if you’re using multiple slings toÂ
lift something, your first inclination might be  to simply divide the total weight by the number ofÂ
slings to estimate the load each one will carry.  But if the slings aren’t all attached at the sameÂ
horizontal distance from the load’s center of  gravity, the total weight won’t be distributedÂ
evenly between them. That may seem obvious,  but many many loads have been dropped becauseÂ
of misunderstandings with center-of-gravity. For just one example, loads often showÂ
up to a site in a crate where it’s not  quite so easy to see how the weight isÂ
distributed. In a worst-case scenario,  incorrectly estimating the force on each sling mayÂ
cause one or more to overload and fail. But even  if the sling doesn’t give out completely, it mightÂ
stretch just enough to cause a load to shift.  And if it shifts such that the center of gravityÂ
moves to the wrong side of the attachment points,  there’s a chance it will tip and fall. YouÂ
can’t push a rope, after all, so slings  only provide resistance in one direction. So whenÂ
lifting a load that isn’t equally balanced between  attachment locations (and especially for the bigÂ
lifts that use more than one crane), you have to  calculate the load share between the slings andÂ
make sure each one can handle its portion. The  formula is super simple as long as you know theÂ
center of gravity. And, if there’s a chance a load  could slide if one sling stretches more than theÂ
others, it’s got to be secured before the lift. The next potential rigging pitfall is theÂ
sling angle. Let me show you an example:Â Â Say you have a balanced load, and youÂ
need two slings to attach it to a crane,  but your slings are kind of short. So, when youÂ
get everything hooked up, the connections make a  30-degree angle from the horizontal. Is each slingÂ
carrying half the weight of the load? Would I even  be asking if the answer was yes? In fact, at aÂ
30-degree angle, each sling is subject to double  the force that it would otherwise feel if it wereÂ
perfectly vertical from the load. Why is this? Slings can only pull in one direction. ForÂ
simplicity, we sometimes divide the force  in the sling into its vertical and horizontalÂ
components. If the sling is perfectly vertical,  it has no horizontal part. But as the angleÂ
of the sling changes, the horizontal component  becomes a greater and greater proportion ofÂ
its total load. This may not need to be said,  but we don’t need a horizontal force to liftÂ
something. We need a vertical one. In fact,  the horizontal force isn’t just unnecessary,Â
but it also has to be canceled out by an equal  and opposite force in the other sling.Â
So, the shallower the angle of the sling,  the harder you’ll have to pull on it toÂ
get enough vertical force to lift the load. Watch the spring scale as I change the angle ofÂ
the slings holding this steel bar. It’s a little  hard to read on camera, but it’s still clearÂ
what’s happening. When the slings are vertical,  each one holds half the weight (in this case,Â
about 800 grams each). But as I bring the tops  of the slings toward the center (like theyÂ
would be if attached to a single crane hook),  you can see the plunger of the scale descending.Â
When the tops of the slings touch, the scale reads  about 1200 grams, an increase of about 50 percent.Â
I’m sure you can imagine what would happen if you  incorrectly divided the weight of the load by twoÂ
and assumed that to be the force in the slings.  You’d be underestimating by quite a lot.Â
So, when using slings that aren’t vertical,  you have to apply a reductionÂ
in capacity based on the angle.  Again, the formula is simple, but youÂ
have to know how and when to use it. Shallow horizontal angles aren’t just an issueÂ
with sling tension, though. Those horizontal  components of force that I mentioned have anotherÂ
disadvantage related to the third and final  rigging pitfall I want to discuss: abrasion. AsÂ
I said, slings can be made froma few materials,  including chain and wire rope, but one of theÂ
most common materials is woven synthetic fibers  like nylon and polyester. These synthetic slingsÂ
have a lot of advantages. They’re lightweight  and easy to move around. They don’t create sparksÂ
that can be dangerous in industrial environments.  And, they’re soft, so they won’t scrapeÂ
or damage whatever they’re connected to.  But, they have disadvantages too - mainly thatÂ
synthetic slings are more susceptible to abrasion. Those horizontal forces I mentioned earlierÂ
don’t just increase the sling tension beyond the  weight of the load. They can also cause a sling toÂ
slide. Obviously, that’s an issue if they slide so  far that the load falls. But even if they don’t,Â
the friction with the load can lead to abrasion  and even failure of the sling. Synthetic materialsÂ
are much easier to cut than wire rope or chain,  so they have to be protected from sharpÂ
edges, corners, and burrs. Synthetic fibers  can also melt. You might not think that aÂ
little sliding would generate much heat,  but consider that friction is a function ofÂ
the contact pressure between the two surfaces.  These slings are pretty small compared to theÂ
weight they carry, meaning the pressure they  exert can be enormous. Watch what happens on theÂ
thermal camera when I pull down on this loop as  it slides along the pipe. Even a small amountÂ
of sliding under so much pressure can create  enough heat to melt the fibers. One way to avoidÂ
the possibility of sliding is to use a spreader  bar - a device that helps distribute the singularÂ
lifting force of the hook among attachment points  that can be further apart. This kind of deviceÂ
lets you reduce the angle of your slings,  giving them more capacity and reducing theÂ
possibility of them sliding and abrading. I’ve been referring to “you” a lot inÂ
this video, putting you in the shoes  of a rigger learning the ropes. But I just wantÂ
to clarify that this video is not for training.  If this is your first exposure to the topic, IÂ
hope you’ll agree that you’re not ready. Rigging  is a vital but dangerous job, so if you’reÂ
going to be involved in any heavy lifts,  there is a lot more to learn than my examplesÂ
in this video. Finally, if you enjoyed this one,  check out the companion video about craneÂ
failures and what can go wrong above the hook. Hey, the fact that you stuck around to theÂ
end of this video means that you’re pretty  thoughtful about the kind of content youÂ
spend your time enjoying. In other words,  you probably prefer learning new thingsÂ
about the world more than run-of-the-mill  television programming. You probably also don’tÂ
enjoy watching ads like this one, which is great,  because Nebula doesn’t have any. Nebula is aÂ
streaming service built by and for independent  creators like MinutePhysics, Real Engineering,Â
Wendover Productions, and a bunch of others  (including me). It’s a way for us to try newÂ
ideas that might not work on advertiser-supported  platforms like YouTube. My videos go liveÂ
there the day before they publish here,  with no ads or sponsorships. And, we’re superÂ
excited to be partnered with CuriosityStream,  a service with thousands of documentaries andÂ
non-fiction titles on pretty much every subject  you can imagine. CuriosityStream lovesÂ
independent creators and wants to help  us grow our platform, so they’re offeringÂ
free access to Nebula when you sign up at  CuriosityStream.com/practicalengineering. I knowÂ
there are a lot of streaming services right now,  and all those monthly subscriptions can be toughÂ
to keep track of. That’s why this bundle is such  an awesome deal. CuriosityStream is takingÂ
26% off an annual plan - that makes it only  $15 for an entire year of access to thousands ofÂ
thought-provoking documentaries on CuriosityStream  AND everything on Nebula as well. You can watchÂ
awesome big-budget content on CuriosityStream.  I love nature documentaries, and this specialÂ
called Wild Galapagos narrated by Mike Rowe  is one of my favorites. Or, watch Tom ScottÂ
pit other YouTubers against each other in his  Nebula-exclusive gameshow, Money. It’s a greatÂ
way to support my channel and a whole host of  your other favorite educational creators. PlusÂ
it’s just a great deal. Do us both a favor and  click that link in the description. Thank youÂ
for watching, and let me know what you think!
I love Grady's videos - he boils down some complicated things in easy to understand bites, and his demos that he builds are fun to watch.
Nice video, thanks for posting