Why isn't Tesla broke?
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The Rest Of Us
Views: 1,787,086
Rating: 4.8042946 out of 5
Keywords: Tesla, Elon Musk, Cars, Finance, Cash, Cashflow, Profit, Balance Sheet
Id: BHS0H5AwGjU
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 9min 43sec (583 seconds)
Published: Sat Mar 17 2018
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Definitely stuff that fewer people understand/know than should be the case!
The big difference between net loss from operations and the net cash from ops is the consideration of depreciation and amortization which was $1.6b in 2017.
I do find it concerning that the net loss from ops exceeds the R&D costs though. Edit: in 2017
Very informative: TIL
Great vid. Learned quite a lot actually.
An interesting video from one of the people i'm subscribed to that looks at Tesla's funding model, how it's supported, and how it will look in the future. Along with some potential dangers about its model.
I don't think the author covered the equity capital raises and the future need for cash that well.
Tesla is certainly going to need more cash in future, sometime in the next 2-3 quarters and certainly by 2019 (if things remain the same and they don't suddenly figured out a cheap way to produce and then actually make 100,000 Model 3s over the next few months).
It seems that the narrator suggested Tesla is raising capital often through equity, which is slightly incorrect. Recently, Tesla has favored issuing debt over equity. Musk himself last year said they weren't really considering issuing new equity, but instead thinking about debt.
In February, they raised $546M in debt.
They issued $250M in new shares in 2017 (in which Musk bought 10% of it), but $750M in convertible notes (debt that can be converted to equity).
In 2016 they did issue a nice size of equity ($1.15B).
Tencent bought $1.8B in equity in 2017, but it's unclear if they bought the shares on the open market (which isn't a capital raise) or gave Tesla $1.8B directly (a capital raise).
If they are going to raise more cash soon, they are probably going to favor debt over equity. The problem being of course that every dollar of new debt is more expensive than the previous dollar. Tesla already is at junk grade level, a very sensitive rate where more debt added has a larger impact on borrowing costs. This is going to make it harder for them to payback debt.
Their debt to equity ratio has been rising due to all this new issuance:
2013 0.90
2014 2.06
2015 1.91
2016 1.26
2017 2.22
It's now gone up ~150% since 2013 and they still haven't turned profit positive. In fact, they have lost more money than ever their operating margin went from -9% to -13% from 2016 to 2017.
They need to probably suck it up and offer new equity (their shares trade at 4.5x price to sales - industry average is 0.6), and as the narrator mentioned, it's free capital (they don't have to pay anything back). I think though that they've been hesitant to disrupt the share price (issuing more shares in theory would hurt the price - more shares equals a smaller earnings per share).
This avoidance of equity disruption may be fine for now, but adding on debt impacts it in the long term potentially. Yes, it's nice as a shareholder to own X% in a company that's worth $50B in equity, but if their debt gets too out of hand and they struggle to operate, owning X% in a $0B company is less fun.
Here is a good snippet from BofA Merrill Lynch:
As an investor who reads way too much FUD news this was a good balance to the other side. The only real uncertainty I had about Teslaβs long term massive success was cash drying up in the next year or two. Now I have a different perspective on that. Thanks for that ford ! Lol
The ? at 7:07 is Deepak (CFO)
Gawd Ford really has a debt problem. π
Awesome vid!