Ukrainian Kharkiv Counter-Offensive - Russian Invasion DOCUMENTARY

Video Statistics and Information

Video
Captions Word Cloud
Reddit Comments
Captions
We finished our video dedicated to the events of the Russo-Ukrainian war in August with reports about the start of the long-awaited Ukrainian counter-offensive in Kherson oblast. In the first half of September, Ukraine maintained a slow, but steady progress there. But as it turned out, this would not be the most important process in this period. Ukraine launched a surprising and highly successful counter-offensive in the eastern part of Kharkiv oblast. In this video, we will describe both Ukrainian counter-offensives and provide you with updates on other notable developments from the war in Ukraine in the first half of September. The ebb and flow of fortunes in war can very much affect the flow of more material fortunes, causing the average stock and bond-based portfolio to be down twenty percent this year. To avoid such a fate, try investing with our sponsor Masterworks. Even for those far from the war, its economic impact can still be felt. In fact the average stock and bond-based portfolio is down twenty percent this year, leading some to look for more stable ways to invest their money. This is leading to increased interest in the art market, which is opening to more people than ever due to the revolutionary approach of our sponsor, Masterworks. They organise the buying and selling of shares in art, which is a particularly stable field especially in the current climate - Deloitte reports that eight-five percent of wealth managers recommend art to their clients, and Morgan Stanely note, “Investment-grade art has a low correlation to other major asset classes, and often experiences lower price volatility”. Masterworks makes getting into these markets easy by dividing works into shares, allowing people to buy in without the usual massive entry costs. Their world-class art experts collect pieces from the likes of Picasso, Basquiat, and Banksy, analyze their unique database of decades of art auction results, and then sell pieces at opportune moments to provide a return to those who bought shares. That’s how they’ve delivered an average net return of 29% to their investors to date. Masterworks has over 500,000 members, and an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau. Demand is surging as more investors reallocate their assets, so there is a wait list, But you can click our link in the description to skip the wait list right now. Our previous video described the start of the Ukrainian counter-offensive in Kherson. After several months of targeting Russian ammunition depots and critical supply lines in and around Kherson oblast, Ukraine launched its counter-offensive in three main axes. It was reported that Ukrainian forces broke through the first line of the Russian defense, which was mainly defended by the separatist DPR units. Even though the Ukrainian command maintained a strict silence policy in connection with its Kherson offensive, information about the liberation of several villages and towns was reported by the media. The message of the Ukrainian command and officials was not to be euphoric, as the Kherson offensive was planned to be the slow and methodical destruction of the Russian military assets in the area. In the first half of September, Ukraine continued putting pressure on the Russian forces in Kherson oblast to advance slowly, while further degrading Russian supplies and attacking Russian pontoon bridges and barges to minimize supplies coming to the Russian contingent of around 20k-30k troops in this area. Losing Kherson would threaten the Russian control over Crimea and another key logistical hub of Melitopol in Zaporizhia. Hence, since late August, Russia has ramped up efforts to bolster its numbers in the area. The British Ministry of Defense reported that elements of the elite 1st Guards Tank Army were deployed from the Kharkiv-Izium front to Kherson. Furthermore, RFE/RL provided footage of Russian convoys moving into Southern Ukraine via the Kerch Strait Bridge. But Ukraine did not intend to allow Russia to strengthen its positions in the Kherson oblast and continued targeting Russian military infrastructure. On September 1, a Ukrainian air strike destroyed a Russian military base in Snihurivka. On September 2, a Russian pontoon crossing in Nova Kakhovka met the same fate. On September 3, the Russian 45th Guards Spetsnaz Brigade, which was reportedly either encircled or enveloped in the Vysokopillia area by the 60th Motorized Brigade and the 108th Territorial Defense Brigade, and the 60th Mechanized Brigade, managed to break through towards the South to link up with the 98th Guards Airborne Division troops. Nevertheless, this led to the liberation of Vysokopillia, Olhyne, and Potiomkyne, which have been contested for months. On the same axis, the Ukrainian army reportedly made an advance towards Khreshchenivka. On September 4, it was reported that the Ukrainian 28th Mechanized Brigade, the 59th Motorized Brigade drove the 20th Guards Motor Rifle Division and the elements of the 7th Guards Mountain Air Assault Division away from Liubomyrivka near the M14 highway leading directly to Kherson. The Ukrainian army also liberated Blahodativka to expand its Andriivka-Lozove bridgehead across the Inhulets. Ukraine managing to protect and expand this bridgehead poses a threat of taking the T2207 highway under control to advance on Berislav and Nova Kakhovka, which would mean dissection of the Russian army in Kherson oblast into two. According to Russian sources, Putin’s just doesn’t have enough infantry to get rid of this bridgehead. Another interesting development in early September was the resurfacing of videos of Bayraktar TB2 drone strikes on Russian military equipment and positions for the first time in a while. After having some success at the initial stage of the war, the Russian air defenses and radar systems, presumably managed to minimize the impact of these strike drones. It is argued that the AGM-88 HARM missiles supplied by the United States to Ukraine, which have been essentially designed to target radar systems, have drastically decreased the electronic warfare capabilities of Russia in Kherson and other fronts, allowing Ukraine to send TB2s back to the air and cause some damage. On September 6, Ukraine destroyed another Russian ammunition depot in Tomyna Balka, about 20 km west of Kherson. On the following day, the advance of the Ukrainian army in the Northeastern axis of Kherson continued. It was reported that the village of Novovoznesenske was liberated. On September 8, an unconfirmed report claimed by Russian Telegram channels stated that either the elements of the units defending Kyselivka abandoned their positions under intense pressure, allowing Ukraine to take it. On September 10, Ukraine struck the Alkoresurs enterprise in Kherson, which hosted a Russian military base. On the same day, it was also reported that the Ukrainian 28th Mechanized Brigade drove the elements of the 20th Guards Motor Rifle Division from Oleksandrivka on the T1501 highway leading to Kherson. On September 12, the Ukrainian command stated without too many details that Ukraine has been able to liberate 500 square kilometers in Kherson since the start of the offensive. Spokesperson of the Ukrainian Southern Operational Command, Natalya Humenyuk noted a couple of newly liberated settlements - Bilohirka near the Andriivka-Lozove bridgehead and Myrolyubivka in the Northeastern axis. The liberation of Bilohirka means the further expansion of the strategically important bridgehead. Humenyuk also claimed that Russian forces deployed in Kherson oblast have offered to surrender. We cannot be sure whether that is true or not, and whether Humenyuk was talking about specific units or the Russian force in the western bank of Dnipro in general. At the time of writing of the script for this video, there were no further updates on this claim. On September 13, several social media accounts claimed that Ukraine further expanded its bridgehead in Kherson by liberating Novohrednjeve and Mala Seidemynukha. There have been additional claims of Ukrainian advances in Kherson oblast, namely a considerable progress south of Vysokopillia reaching Novohryhorivka, which would mean a 40-kilometer progress on this axis since the start of the offensive, but we cannot confirm this at this point. The last major event with a direct impact on the battle of Kherson was the Russian strike on Karachunivske dam in Krivyi Rih, which had substantially increased the water levels of the river Inhulets. Right now, it is difficult to fully understand how it will affect the resupply of the Ukrainian forces fighting in the Andriivka-Lozove bridgehead. We will see very soon, if Ukraine manages to solve this issue and how it is going to impact the situation in Kherson. The slow and methodic Ukrainian advance continues in the region and it is clear that the Russian supply situation is worsening. Most of Russian artillery moved back across the river in order to improve its ammunition situation. Regardless, the danger for the Russian troops is very real in the area, as they don’t have any bridges left across the Dnipro making a fighting retreat impossible. Now, let’s take a look at the events on the Kharkiv front. In our previous videos and above we talked about a small Ukrainian advance west of Izium in August and deprioritization of this front by the Russians, as they redeployed some of its units from this direction to Kherson expecting the Ukrainian offensive to start there and probably hoping to counter-attack against the forming Ukrainian bridgeheads. For weeks, Russian Telegram channels warned about Ukrainians deploying more troops to the area, but somehow the Russian command ignored these signs of impending activity on this axis. Their main focus was on the ongoing Ukrainian counter-offensive in Kherson and their continued attempts to progress in Donbas. This paved the way to another Ukrainian counter-offensive, which shocked the world and might have turned the tide of the war in favor of Ukraine. On September 6, the 92nd, the 93rd Mechanized Brigades, the 25th, the 90th, and 95th Airborne Brigades, and the 3rd Tank Brigade launched an offensive in and around Balakliya defended by the elite 1st Guards Tank Army, SOBR quick response units of the Russian National Guard, and several other units deployed in this area. Balakliya was an important transport hub for the Russian war effort in this area, which also hosted a major ammunition depot called the 65th Arsenal - one of the largest during the Soviet period. It is reported that the Ukrainian pace of the offensive was very quick. Instead of massing around and sieging settlements, Ukrainians moved very quickly to bypass them and wreak havoc in the Russian rear. Footages from battles in the area and comments of Russian military bloggers indicate that Ukrainian reconnaissance units moved very fast ahead of the main group of Ukrainian forces and created a sense of an all out attack by basically firing at will at everything on the horizon and breaking the resolve of the Russian troops suffering from low morale and poor supplies to resist. Within hours, Verbivka, a village north of Balakliya was liberated. Very soon other villages like Volokhiv Yar, Kunie and Vesele on the roads leading to Balakliya were taken under control, putting Russian SOBR under threat of encirclement. SOBR managed to flee the town, but had to leave the vast majority of its equipment to the advancing Ukrainians. At this point, the Russian front in the area basically collapsed, allowing further progress of the Ukrainian army. It moved towards another important road junction at the town of Shevchenkove, opening the road for liberation of Kupiansk, an extremely important railroad hub, which played a key role for supply of the Russian campaign in North Donbas. Liberating Kupiansk and other settlements on the western bank of the river Oskil would mean encirclement of the remaining Russian units in the area, including Izium, another strategically important city in this area. Nevertheless, it seems like the Russian units understood the threat posed to them very quickly and most of them managed to flee to the East of the river Oskil, while leaving most of their equipment to the Ukrainian army. By September 8, the Ukrainian units liberated Senkove on the eastern bank of the Oskil river, south of Kupiansk. On September 9 advanced on Kupiansk and liberated at least part of the city East to the river Oskil. At this point, even late Russian reinforcements sent to the area could not turn the tide, as the panic engulfed the Russian lines. On September 10, Russians fled from Izium, in order to avoid being encircled, but they had to leave a massive stash of weapons and equipment to the advancing Ukrainian forces. The Russian units west of Oskil and pro-Russian collaborators in this region fled to Russia and the Russian occupied areas of Ukraine. The collapse of the Russian army in this area, forced Russia to withdraw from the occupied areas of Kharkiv oblast, as Ukrainians within days retook control of towns like Vovchansk, which had been occupied in the beginning of the invasion. For days, the Russian command remained silent about the Ukrainian progress, while the Russian Telegram channels and social media followed and informed on it with astonishment and anger. Only on September 10, the Russian Ministry of Defense officially stated about regrouping actions the Russian units in the Izium-Kupiansk area conducted in order to focus on their mission in Donbas. The Russian public did not really buy this explanation, even though some of the most ardent loyalist admins of Russian Telegram channels continuously claimed that the Russian forces withdrew intentionally in order to draw Ukrainian forces into a trap. But you do not regroup or conduct strategic withdrawals while losing most of your equipment to the enemy. Ukraine liberated almost 6k square kilometers of its land in a matter of days, a massive area, which required Russians almost 4 months of highly costly operations to occupy. Very poor Russian command and coordination between its forces, low morale, problems with supplies, lack of manpower in this direction, and astonishing indifference to indications of an impending Ukrainian counter-attack led to this collapse. Russian occupation administration claimed that Ukraine had an 8:1 numerical advantage against Russians on this axis. One of the key factors for the success of this brilliant counter-attack was the inability of the Russian airforce to impose its will. German-supplied Gepard self-propelled anti-aircraft guns moved alongside the Ukrainian infantry defending it against the aerial threat. Liberation of this area allowed Ukraine to take control of several important supply lines and logistical hubs, relieve Sloviansk and Kramatorsk from a threat coming from the North and seize a huge number of Russian military supplies. Most importantly, any danger for the second biggest city in Ukraine - Kharkiv completely dissipated. According to Oryx, during the counter-offensive, Ukraine captured 388 pieces of Russian equipment, 200 of them in good condition. This included 49 tanks, 24 armored personnel carriers, 32 artillery vehicles and MLRS, and 2 planes. More importantly many Russian ammunition depots were captured intact and that would allow Ukraine to supply its largely Soviet-made artillery. It is difficult to say how many Russian soldiers were killed or captured, but the number is in the 1000s, with some units stopping to exist as a fighting force. But perhaps the biggest benefit of this highly successful counter-offensive operation by Ukraine is an incredible boost of morale for the Ukrainian army and the Ukrainian people. This victory, which is perhaps the biggest success of the Ukrainian army in the war on par with its victory in the battle of Kyiv, is yet another indicator that the Ukrainian army is not only capable of defending valiantly, but of conducting daring offensives as well. On the contrary, the already poor morale of the Russian army deteriorated even further. Unfortunately, after the Russian retreat, it became clear their troops have commited atrocities in the Izium area. Hundreds of corpses were found buried, many of them belonging to the civilians who were executed. Ukraine once again asked the international community to recognize Russia as a terrorist stated and invited the UN to conduct an investigation in the area. This defeat increased the discontent in Russia regarding the situation in Ukraine. For instance, the head of the Chechen Republic Kadyrov criticized the Russian command for its “mistakes” and threatened “to contact the leadership of the Defense Ministry and the leadership of the country to explain the real situation on the ground”, if the situation did not change. This was followed by a surprising petition of 65 municipal deputies in Russia to strip Putin of the presidency for “treason”. Along with that, several Russian MPs, including the chairman of the Communist Party, Gennady Zyuganov called for full mobilization. Military setbacks on the ground might push the Kremlin to announce mobilization in the foreseeable future, but the effectiveness of its conduct and whether it is going to change the situation remains highly debatable. The Russian government continued its efforts to restore the Russian manpower in Ukraine by creating new Wagner units. The owner of the Wagner group Yevgeny Prigozhin, who is known for his close ties to Putin, was seen making a recruitment speech in a Russian prison on September 14. In his speech, he offered amnesty to inmates, who would fight in Ukraine for 6 months and stated that refusing to fight and withdrawing after agreeing to fight in Ukraine would not be an option for them. Along with that, RFE/RL reported that Russia was redeploying its troops in Central Asia to Ukraine. Also, Kadyrov called upon federal subjects of the Russian Federation to launch self-mobilization campaigns, which is extremely problematic in terms of the unity of Russia. Amidst Kremlin’s unwillingness to declare a politically risky mobilization, the Russian elite is clearly worried about the situation in Ukraine and understands that the lack of manpower is one of the factors behind it. Russia has also been attempting to bolster its military resources by purchasing arms from other countries. On September 5, New York Times reported that Russia was purchasing artillery shells and rockets from North Korea. On September 13, after months of speculation, the first physical evidence of the Russian use of Iranian drones emerged. Debris of Iranian kamikaze Shahed-136 drone was found in Kupiansk and later in Nikopol. But the quality of weapons purchased by Russia continues to be overshadowed by foreign military aid given to Ukraine. In early September, the White House asked Congress to approve the provision of a further 13.7 billion dollars of military and economic aid to Ukraine, while on September 8, Biden approved a new 675-million-dollar package, which included more ammunition, more artillery, more grenade launchers and so on. Russia also suffered setbacks on the diplomatic front. Against the background of weakening of the Russian international standing, hostilities renewed between Azerbaijan and Armenia despite the presence of Russian peacekeepers. Armenia requested military support from the Russian-led military alliance - CSTO, but only received diplomatic support, which damaged the Russian reputation even more. As a result, two other CSTO members - Tajikistan and Kirgizstan began clashing along their borders. The occurrence of these ongoing conflicts show that Russia is quickly losing its leading position among the former Soviet states. The Ukrainian command stated on September 13 that the Russian command has suspended the deployment of new units to Ukraine, but this has not been confirmed yet. It seems like Ukraine was content with consolidating its gains west of Oskil, since it did not want to endanger its success by going deep into Luhansk oblast and risking its overstretched lines. Still, Ukraine gained ground towards Lyman and liberated Sviatohirsk. Ironically, Ukrainian forces were able to cross the Siverski Donets river near Bilohirovka, the location where Russia infamously lost a few BTGs in May, and advanced towards Kreminna. Success in this area will negate costly gains made by Russia around Sieverodonetsk and Lysychansk in a grinding battle that lasted for months, as Ukrainian officials are already reporting engagements in the vicinity of Lysychansk. There are reports that Ukrainians have already crossed the Oskil river near Borova and east Kupiansk, which means that Russia still hasn’t managed to form a good defensive line, creating a threat to Putin’s control over the Luhansk region. Another important factor is the disarray in the Russian supply lines. Kupiansk was essential for the supply of the Russian troops in Luhansk and Donetsk and without it, the nearest usable railway is in Valuyki in Belgorod and Ukraine can interdict that supply line with ease with its artillery and MLRS. Either to avenge its clear defeat or to calm down the military press, Russia shelled a number of Ukrainian power plants in the northeast of Ukraine leaving that area without electricity for some time. Striking civilian installations, that have no military utility, is a war crime. In response, Ukraine shelled the army base in Valuyki and a few other military installations within Russia. It is important to mention that both sides shelled each other’s territory along the northeast border for months. The situation in the rest of Donbas remained stable. Russia continued its attempts to break through around Avdiivka, Pisky, Mariinka, Bakhmut, and Soledar without much to show for it. Putin’s deadline of capturing Donbas by September 15 obviously failed, and the Ukrainian advance will likely further hinder the Russian attempts there. A stalemate in the Zaporizhian front which has been continuing for several months persisted, but there have been reports of deployment of additional units to this area by both sides. Russian military reports cautioned the Russian command that this may be the next axis of the Ukrainian counter-offensive, which would put the Russian control over strategically important Tokmak, Melitopol, and Mariupol under threat. The Zaporizhian Nuclear Power Plant crisis continued. On September 1, the Russian Ministry of Defense made an unfounded claim that Ukrainian saboteurs landed near the power plant to seize it, but most probably this was just another propaganda effort of Russia. Also in early September, the International Atomic Energy Agency delegation inspected the power plant. On September 6, the IAEA released its report, which did not explicitly blame Russia, but noted the placement of military equipment near essential facilities of the power plant and called for demilitarization of the power plant. But later the board of the IAEA adopted a more directly worded resolution, which called on Russia to “immediately cease all actions against, and at, the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant and any other nuclear facility in Ukraine”. But the risk of a nuclear disaster still exists, as Russia does not intend to withdraw from the power plant. Intensification of fighting in Zaporizhia may exacerbate these risks. It is important to understand why the Ukrainian approach to the counter-offensives in Kharkiv and Kherson are so different. On one hand, there is the matter of different terrain - the Kharkiv area is more forested and has elevations, both of which allow the infantry to have concealment, while the Kherson oblast is the open steppe with little chance to hide, making mass advances costly. On another hand, Kherson was taken by Russia with relative ease and is not nearly as damaged as Izium or Mariupol, or Volnovakha, which means that Ukraine would prefer to liberate it with the least amount of destruction. Still, the fact that Ukraine has a decisive numerical advantage, while Russia can’t generate manpower, means that the Ukrainian troops can create mismatches on any portion of the front and break through once again. With neither side willing to negotiate, the Russian government intends to continue its occupation of Ukrainian territories hoping that winter is going to weaken the resolve of European governments and create cracks in the Western alliance. On September 3, Gazprom maintained its shutdown of the Nord Stream 1 gas pipeline in an attempt to prevent European countries from filling up their gas depots. But according to experts, Europe is well positioned to brace for this winter in terms of its energy security situation, but it is unclear what would happen in the following winter, if the war in Ukraine continues. Still, the Russian government seems to gamble on destabilizing the EU member states through increased gas prices and inflation. For Ukraine, September has arguably been the most successful month of the war. They have almost fully liberated Kharkiv oblast in an unexpected and rapid counter-offensive, while also gaining ground in Kherson. The Ukrainian government will be hoping for more Western military aid to continue its de-occupation efforts. There have been some discussions regarding supplying Ukraine with ATACMS precision missiles with a range of 300 kilometers, which may be absolutely devastating for the Russian Army. But the losses of the Russian army continue mounting even without ATACMS. There have been no recent updates from foreign or reputable local sources regarding manpower losses, but Oryx blog continued reporting about visually confirmed losses of military equipment on both sides. By September 16, Russia had lost 1128 tanks, 2374 vehicles, 142 command posts and communication stations, 18 heavy mortars, 351 artillery pieces and vehicles, 109 multiple rocket launchers, 56 aircraft, 48 helicopters, and 127 drones. On the Ukrainian side, the visually confirmed equipment losses are the following: 263 tanks, 639 vehicles, 7 command posts and communication stations, 117 artillery pieces and vehicles, 22 multiple rocket launchers, 46 aircraft, 14 helicopters, and 34 drones. We will continue covering Putin’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine in the coming weeks, so make sure you are subscribed and have pressed the bell button to see them. Please, consider liking, commenting, and sharing - it helps immensely. Our videos would be impossible without our kind patrons and youtube channel members, whose ranks you can join via the links in the description to know our schedule, get early access to our videos, access our discord, and much more. This is the Kings and Generals channel, and we will catch you on the next one.
Info
Channel: Kings and Generals
Views: 1,252,735
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: izium, balakliya, oskil, lyman, svatove, kherson, counter-offensive, kharkiv, offensive, counter, himars, changed, MLRS, battle, war, of, attrition, Russian, invasion, ukraine, Putin, how, won, first, phase, oryx, donbas, zelensky, world war, Pacific War, 3d, animated, historical, documentary, kings and generals, king and general, modern warfare, decisive battles, military history, animated historical documentary, world history, history channel, animated documentary, history documentary, full documentary, kyiv
Id: gJRjKuss_Co
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 27min 5sec (1625 seconds)
Published: Thu Sep 29 2022
Related Videos
Note
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.