THIS Is How We Build On Mars
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The B1M
Views: 819,354
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: B1M, TheB1M, Construction, architecture, engineering, The B1M, Fred Mills, building, mars, nasa, spacex, european space agency, building on mars, living on mars, mars habitat, space, colonising mars, robots, robotics, hassell, eckersley o' callaghan, design museum, 3D printing, design, xavier de kestelier, moving to mars, science, epic games, unreal engine, lightfield london, space exploration, space travel, elon musk, unity, architectural visualization, CGI, CGI software, future
Id: mqyREFE_bWs
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 9min 40sec (580 seconds)
Published: Wed Mar 18 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I personally donβt see this plan being feasible in the near future. I feel like developing the technology involved for an autonomous swarm of modular foundry drones would be far more difficult than developing the a 10k starship fleet
This tends to be the result when you ask artists to design Mars/space structures: innovative, striking ideas that put form over function. Oftentimes, the most effective solution is invisible or mundane. A buried cylinder doesn't make for a sexy 3d render.
Egregious example from this video: "The ideal thing would be going into a cave. So what we're doing is we're creating our own cave."Or, instead of wheeling a hab into a structure built by numerous robots 3d-printing regolith, just wheel the hab into an already-existing cave (lava tube) on Mars. But that way you don't need the robots or the 3d-printed 'cave', so then all you have to show is the hab. The sliding shelves idea seems neat, until you realize it's even more mass- and space-efficient to ditch the redundant shelving and put most of that stuff in bins.
I'll give them the 3d-printed chairs made from recycled plastic, though, that's the kind of thing that will actually be needed. How about a ballute that's reusable as an inflatable hab, instead of parachute pants?
I'm sorry, but do you really need to send robots to build a pre-made regolith structure over a future mars habitat? You could just as easily send humans in habitats and then thave them fill up empty bags with mars regolith and place that over the habs for additional radiation "sheilding" (if that even works). Besides, that whole structure could fall right on top of the habs, I don't think it's actually very safe, or worth approaching.
Interesting related interview with Dr Aleksandra Radlinska, an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Penn State (College of Engineering), who developed the Marscrete mix used for the Penn State entry into NASA's 3d print challenge. And a video focusing on the winning entrant and their prototype printer (with related links in the description).
Regardless of whether people feel this autonomous collective approach is the best route [and with a cursory search, anyone can find numerous examples of development, prototypes, and commercial solutions of the various related tech that would enable such an idea], there are groups working on Marscrete and Marscrete 3d printers, specifically for structures like that envisioned above, and other solutions to many of the other challenges that SpaceX will face heading to Mars.
It's not like we can't take the best ideas of this proposal, and of other developments, and iterate into the best Mars solution possible. It's quite disappointing to see people here who subscribe to the idea that SpaceX will overcome a number of significant technical challenges to create Starship, refuel it, and land it on Mars, mine ice, and generate propellant, and then fly the crewed version back; yet turn around and be dismissive of any other idea that is demonstratively achievable within the next 5-10 year horizon [that is already pretty ambitious for putting first boots on Mars]. And not just in 5 years time, but even with just a couple of years of focused refinement/iteration.
And with relying on Crewed Starship as a primary hab, it's not like we couldn't send such a printer as a secondary objective (prove Marscrete structures viable). If Mars is a serious long term destination, this is a core tech that needs to be developed/proven, sooner rather than later.
One working prototype is worth more than billions of concept videos, especially those videos with smiling people drawing things together.
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:
Decronym is a community product of r/SpaceX, implemented by request
2 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 14 acronyms.
[Thread #4880 for this sub, first seen 18th Mar 2020, 21:39] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]