The Terrifying Cost of "Freeβ Websites | Adam Ruins Everything
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: CollegeHumor
Views: 6,953,888
Rating: 4.8940253 out of 5
Keywords: Collegehumor, CH originals, comedy, sketch comedy, internet, humor, funny, sketch, facebook, google, surveillance, ARE, adam ruins everything
Id: 5pFX2P7JLwA
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 6min 20sec (380 seconds)
Published: Wed Dec 07 2016
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
If something's free then you are the product, is that not common knowledge?
People don't give a shit about privacy. How many here will delete their facebook account after watching this video?
Very funny video, thank you. I'd like to add something though which I think is most often missed in these privacy discussions. People tend to have a very binary view of either being private or not private which I don't think is very practical at all. If you allow me to get a bit weird for a moment...
I prefer to adopt a philosophy of anything that enters my consciousness having at that moment begun the process of being leaked. From then on out the focus in on mitigating the risk and damages. How secrecy in my observation works in reality is not so much as an absolute but rather just functional. You know and thus the other knows is of course not true but it is a good gedankenexperiment to do to figure out what is it that really would need to happen for the other to make it known to you that the other knows.
This is the illusionary playing field of practical secrecy, the other knows your secret already but knowledge is completely meaningless if no actionability arises from the knowledge. What risks and damages does the other incur in acting on the knowledge? If we start at the extreme beginning of knowledge just having entered your consciousness then I think you can already see the extreme costs on the other were the other to reveal itself as being in the position of access to your most fundamentally private thoughts. Then you can start expanding the exposure of the information and thinking of the kind of reverse Occam's razor on how many unlikely assumptions need to become a reality for not the leak to occur but the leak to be used against you. This needs to be coupled with some rudimentary threat modelling and profiling of the would be attacker, the motivations, capabilities, sociopolitical context and points of weakness that you in turn could be able to exploit. Finally rather than aiming for that absolute secrecy your final goal is a stable equilibrium of mutually assured destruction.
Now to get a little less weird again, I'm just trying to say that even if we start from a nightmare scenario of no privacy we do not in practice lose anything just due to that alone. But as we do try to limit, regulate and remove the threat of WMDs we should just as well try to limit, regulate and remove the threat of spying.
Adam ruins everything is just what I needed since John Oliver has taken a break
I would rather be advertised to than spend "just 12 dollars" for every site I want to use plus deal with the annoyance of not being able to access sites I haven't paid for.
Great video.
Ayy, its DC Pierson!
I personally give Facebook a fake name... They don't allow it but as long as you don't make it completely obvious you can get away with it