The Full Story of THE NAZGUL! (RINGWRAITHS!) | Middle Earth Lore
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: The Broken Sword
Views: 823,109
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: The Broken Sword, The Lord of the Rings, Lord of the Rings, Lord of the Rings Lore, Middle Earth Lore, The Hobbit, The Silmarillion, Tolkien Lore, the nazgul, full story of the nazgul, journeys of the nazgul, ringwraiths, what happened to the nazgul, origins of the nazgul, origins of the ringwraiths, why is the witch king more powerful, how strong are the nazgul, nazgul scream, nazgul theme, nazgul chase, witch king vs gandalf, nazgul before the lord of the rings, wraith
Id: eMtg5-dnstg
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 31min 42sec (1902 seconds)
Published: Mon Jan 17 2022
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
We may not get all of them, but I would suspect that the origin of at least a few of them, particularly the Witch-King, will be a prominent part of the narrative. At least three were Numenorians, so I can't see Amazon passing on that.
I know it wouldn't be accurate to the canon timeline, but if I was betting, my bet would be that they make Ar-Pharazon or someone in his inner circle the eventual Witch-King.
We could.
However, just because we can get something doesn't mean we will - or even should.
Let me explain:
One reason that the books and existing films (I'm referring to the LOTR films here) work so well is that they don't explain everything. So much is left unexplored or merely hinted at. I don't recall the films, for example, ever explaining what "Forth Eorlingas" means, or the narrative of the books giving insight into the Cats of Queen Beruthiel (the narrative, not the appendices).
Those gaps and casual references to things the reader does not know yet the characters are aware of, helps to build and maintain the illusion of depth.
And then, even when the professor gives explanations in his other material, he usually frames it as "it is said" or "some believe" which inserts ambiguity into the story he is presenting. Is this the truth of the matter? Or is this merely what some believe or want to believe?
I hope this upcoming production doesn't attempt to answer everything.
For example, even though we are rumored to see the creation of the orcs, I would much prefer to leave that question unanswered. Are orcs slime and stone given life by the dark powers? Are they beasts corrupted and enhanced by the hatred of the same? Are orcs descendents of elves who have been warped and corrupted beyond the ability of their kind to rehabilitate? Have they been crossbred with humans - or even dwarves?
Depending on who you ask in the world, they may provide any of these answers. An elf, for example, may prefer to believe they have nothing in common with orcs and find a concept unthinkable and even offensive, whereas a dwarf or man may have no trouble with the elvish origin of orcs, preferring this origin over alternatives.
Leave some mystery and ambiguity in the world. Don't let the audience know significantly more than the characters within do.
Hoping we get one or two but not all
The last time we got origin stories for them was in the Shadow of War game and that was atrocious. So no, I hope that we don't get them again in the Amazon show.