The Biggest Cheater In Goldeneye 007 Speedrunning History
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: Karl Jobst
Views: 1,144,879
Rating: 4.8980074 out of 5
Keywords: speedrunning, speedruns, speedrun, speedrunning cheater, speedrun cheat, biggest cheater, biggest cheater in speedrunning, n64, nintendo 64, speedrunning cringe, speedrunning fail, goldeneye 007, 007, james bond, karl jobst, cheated speedrun, speedrun history, speedlore, cheater caught, games done quick, gdq, billy mitchell, spliced speedrun, gaming history, video game cheaters caught, apollo legend
Id: 2S0lH6RLnEg
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 14min 29sec (869 seconds)
Published: Sat Feb 16 2019
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
Interesting video, and I particularly appreciated the heartfelt appeal at the end.
Thought it was going to be gooses faked runs lmao
Why mercy is ever shown to cheaters, even to this day, is beyond me.
If you do it once, you should be out for good.EDIT: I rescind this opinion.
TBH I feel like this just shows the need for stronger verification more than anything. If a cheater gets caught, instead of going "okay you're banned," they need to remove the offending runs and then up the rigor of proof so if that person tries again they can only do so through the new rules.
I said it elsewhere but you can't just simply 100% ban speedrunners who cheat, because several of them are incredibly good regardless and you can't literally ban them from speedrunning, just block their times from being "recognized" by... whoever. It's not like speedrunning is a "league" and you have to join in order to compete. Someone in their house with zero recording software at all could, in theory, blast apart records, it's just a matter of recognition.
The reason this is an issue is that let's say you get some cheater who's incredibly good but can't get a WR, so they splice a video or whatever. Now they're banned. A year later they put a video on YouTube that's irrefutably a WR, live feed of the controller inputs and maybe some witnesses, etc etc. Whatever you want to say.
What you've got now is a "leaderboard" that doesn't have that record on it, so someone has the "world record" of that category, but everyone's gonna know the banned dude is actually the record holder. Every video of the "official" record will be slammed with comments about how this other dude is the real best. What'll probably happen is that person on the leaderboard will want to "settle the debate" and get a better score than the banned person, meaning the banned person is effectively still on the leaderboards because their time is being treated like a barrier to overcome.
Like I said, this isn't boxing or baseball where banning someone removes them from competition entirely, it just removes them from having their scores posted on a website.