Tainted Grail Review - An "Epic" Disappointment
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: No Pun Included
Views: 117,607
Rating: 4.4581809 out of 5
Keywords: no pun included, board game, review, npi, boardgames, boardgamegeeks, brettspiel, brettspiele, jeuxdesociete, tabletop, games, juego de mesa, gamenight, 2019, tainted grail, awaken realms, the fall of avalon, open world, game, kickstarter, overview, preview
Id: CvP-Oui_duQ
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 26min 17sec (1577 seconds)
Published: Tue Feb 04 2020
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
I don't know if their review has saved me from the upcoming pledge manager opening up or not, but I was really hyped to get this game and now i've simmered down a bit. I think i can easily get through the 10 hour mark, but if it becomes a slog of frustration and thumbing through rule books, I don't know if I'm interested.
I am surprised how often I disagree with their reviews. Shows though that even if a game is ranked high or low you could still try it out for yourself.
Full disclosure, I backed the kickstarter and have played 7 chapters solo (so somewhere around 10 hours). I personally really liked Tainted Grail, enough that it is the only game I've played multiple solo sessions. I really like the combat and diplomacy and the initial exploration.
I'm around the threshold NPI mention (10 hour mark) of when they criticize the survival mechanics. I actually disagree that it's the "survival" aspects that gets tedious, but instead I found the tedium coming from the "maze" type backtracking that occurs due to the menhirs. Since you have to light up menhirs to be able to open up certain paths, there were a few moments where I was traveling to a location just to light a menhir, in order to get to a menhir to light, in order to actually go to the place I wanted to go. I'm really glad I took notes and made little minimap for myself. Not sure if that's "against the spirit of the game", but I personally found it not just helpful, but part of the experience of discovering new locations and people.
Overall my experience (and maybe that will change once I get to the end) has been positive. I enjoyed the combat enough that I liked doing it over and over (especially since I rather like the upgrades). I found the narrative more engrossing compared to Gloomhaven (whether or not this is true, for now it does feel like the narrative divergences in Tainted Grail are greater than in Gloomhaven, so it makes me feel more inclined to start a new campaign just to experience "alternate paths").
To a certain extent, I agree with NPI's comment that this is basically the 2nd of two games in its "genre" (the other being 7th Continent), and thus it's not too hard to "stand out". I'm not sure I agree that this is the only thing going for it though, and something said in the review makes me wonder if it has more to do with how one views open-world games. Playing through games like Dark Souls, Code Vein, or grinding in Diablo, Torchlight, Monster Hunter, etc... repetition was only "padding" to me if the progression wasn't interesting. In the case of Tainted Grail, so far it seems that the "grind" works for me because I like the combat and leveling up the character continues to enhance the combat (although I wish there were character specific unique upgrade cards to help make character upgrading more unique in future playthroughs once more characters are released in expansions). However, if you "just want to get to point B", I totally understand feeling annoyed with constantly having "stuff in the way".
I have to agree with them. Backed it all in and couldnโt wait. Got 10 hours in and sold it. Really enjoyed the combat but the exploration I found boring/frustrating. Iโve also never been into survival video games either so it was likely my own fault for thinking Iโd like this one. Iโm glad itโs doing so well and Iโm hoping itโs tweaked and refined for the upcoming Etherfields.
It's weird, I agree with all of their points except one...I love this game. Granted we're only on chapter three but we are having a blast.
They highlighted quite well what would have put me off this: It just all seems a bit much for what you get out.
I'll stick to my 7th Continent (which I know they didn't like either, but which at least is a mechanically simple game where you get to focus on just a few things).
the dog was the real star of this video
I have this game coming in the โsingle waveโ shipment later this year. In a lot of ways I sort of wish I hadnโt backed it. Iโm not sold on the mechanics and the grimdark setting is not my favorite.
But: I already knew where this review was heading when Efka spent so much time on the miniatures at the beginning. I like NPI quite a bit but I definitely take their reviews with a grain of salt. Like SUSD, they have a very idiosyncratic set of tastes that donโt translate 100% to reviews.
This truly isnโt a knock of them, just an acknowledgement of different strokes.
While I usually love negative reviews of something I like (or may like) because they are often much more informative than gushing reviews which gloss over potential issues, I feel that NPI often have a habit of misrepresenting a game they didn't like to the point of spreading actual misinformation.
I first noticed this with AH LCG. I didn't agree with their review, but I put it aside because of the fact that they, after all, reviewed a single core experience, which is pretty much a barebones demo of what the actual game is and as such understandably a bit flawed. Then they reviewed 7th continent and convinced me NOT to buy that game... only for me to get it as a gift a year later and realize it was a great game and half of what NPI stated in their review is extremely misleading and sometimes objectively wrong (even in this video what Efka says at 11:07 is absolute nonsense). Now they crap all over Tainted Grail and I really don't know whether to take it at face value or just write it off as yet another game that got an unfair treatment merely for being what it is and not what NPI would want it to be.
I still like them and will continue watching, but I definitely think their opinions should be taken with a grain of salt (or a bag of salt for that matter), especially if your tastes differ from theirs.