Hey everyone, Rodney here at Kleebz Tech.
Today, we're going to be going over a few styles for stable diffusion. Since
there are tons of styles out there, I'm just going to talk about a few in this
video. I do plan on more videos to cover more styles in the future. I will be using
Fooocus today, since that is my primary tool, but most of these are not specific to Fooocus,
and even the ones that are can be added to others. Now, if you're not familiar with styles, I
do have a video that goes into more depth on styles with Fooocus and how they work.
In this video, I'll be discussing specific styles and their effects. To give you a basic
overview, styles are really just more words that are added to your prompt. You could accomplish
the same thing by just using those same words, but styles make it easier. However, it
is important to know what the styles are doing because if you use multiple styles,
they could be fighting against each other, and you're not going to get the results
you're looking for. This is the reason I usually suggest applying one style at a time if
you're not sure how they might impact the image. Today, I'm going to be looking at a few of the
photographic styles. The list of styles I'm using are included with Fooocus and can be found in the
style tab at the top. You can use a search bar to find any specific styles you may be looking for.
In Fooocus, they do give a small thumbnail preview of each style, but that really doesn't show much
of what it does. I will probably have an upcoming video on a better way to view what styles do,
but I'm still experimenting with that tool. One thing I want to mention to anyone who uses
Fooocus: the Fooocus V2 style is different from all the other styles. Where the other styles
always add the same words to the prompt, the V2 uses GPT-2 for a dynamic prompt expansion, and
it's supposed to improve the results. I usually recommend turning it off when experimenting
because what happens is, when you generate, if we go into the log here where I generated
these images, if you look at the prompt, this is what it changed it to. This was my
original prompt, and that's different than this one and that's different than this one. So
for each generation, it's changing that section of the prompt expansion. This can really make
the images look better, and it's one of the reasons Fooocus generates good images out of the
box, but it also introduces unpredictability. So, best not to use it when experimenting,
and I'm not going to be using it today. So, today we're going to be looking
at mostly the photographic styles, not every single photographic style because there
are quite a bit, but these are the most popular, some of the default ones in Fooocus.
I'm going to cover those now. The S MRE, those are just the abbreviations for who
came up with the styles, like Stability AI, and for Fooocus users, Fooocus sharp and enhance
is usually the default one that's enabled, so I do want to cover those as well
and how they impact the images. Now, I'm not going to go into every single
keyword that's used in the prompts because most of them I think are pretty obvious, especially
if you're familiar with photography at all. I'm not an expert on photography, I'm more of an
amateur, but I don't want to dive into every single term and what exactly they mean,
and that would probably be pretty boring. Let's just jump right into some of the images
that I've generated and start looking at the comparisons. The SAI photographic is one
of the ones I think does very well. It's a very simple one, it doesn't add a ton of
keywords. You can see where the prompt, your prompt, will be added in
this style where it's highlighted. Let's look at some of the comparison images
that I did. On these, I did the same two seeds. I ran these two images first, then I did
it with the style applied, the same seed on the same model I used, the Juggernaut and the
Hello World, more towards realistic models, so their default are going to look more like
photos at the top. Those will still look like photos, but it won't have some of those extra the
extra look and style applied to it. On this one, you can definitely see the difference. It does
make the pictures look a little bit better, look like they were taken more by
a professional than the other ones. Now, if we go into the scenic view of a pond, these you can definitely see a big
difference between the no style applied and the photographic style applied. I
don't think there's any doubt on these , the difference. Now, for the Fooocus photograph style, this
one I'm a little bit, I'm not as big of a fan. This one's geared towards making a more
traditional photo, I find. Now, obviously, whoever created this doesn't like Brad Pitt
or something, I'm not sure, because that's the first thing in the negative prompt. There's a
lot of things in this negative prompt that I don't really think need to be added, in most cases.
So, I'm not a huge fan of this style myself. Let's look at the results of this one. And
if you compare the Fooocus photograph ones at the top and the SI photographic ones
at the bottom, you can definitely see the difference between the two. The one at the
top looks like more traditional, older photos, in my view, whereas the ones at the bottom
look like more digital, modern photography. If we look at the scenic view of a pond in the
early morning, I feel we get the same results from those as well. And on these, I actually
found, I feel that the Juggernaut did a better job with this, but a lot of that can also do with
the settings and the seeds and everything else. Our next one is going to be Fooocus sharp. This
one is specific to Fooocus but could be used in other tools as well. Now this one does give it
a little bit more of a cinematic look with the cinematic still and then your prompt, and
it does add some other keywords in there, differently than the other ones, but it's
definitely going more towards sharpness. You can notice in the negative it's removing
and wanting to remove anything blurry, so if you're trying to get those things, you'll
want to remember not to use Fooocus sharp. And if we look at the results from that,
between no style and the Fooocus sharp style, you get that little bit of a cinematic feel to it,
I feel, and the images are a little bit sharper, not drastically, but as with most styles,
they don't necessarily severely alter the images. Same thing on these, you get a little
bit sharper results, a little bit better looking, but that's always going to be the case in almost
every circumstance if you have no style with a very simple prompt, a lot of times, you're
not going to get a really good looking image. Now onto our next one would be Fooocus enhanced.
Now this one doesn't add anything to the regular prompt, it only adds to the negative, and this
one, actually, I was surprised at how much of a difference it can make in pictures.
If we look in here at the first ones, no style and then just with the Fooocus
enhanced on the negative, you can see a definite improvement in the quality of the images,
the color, the vibrancy, and everything else. Now, the same idea if we go over into the pond, I feel these are even more drastic
on the difference that it can make. Now, when we look at the Fooocus photograph
with the Fooocus photograph and Fooocus enhanced applied together, we can see a little
bit of improvement in the images. We do notice that these are, you know, everything looks
a little bit better in each of these images, so it's taken that style and it's
actually improved it a little bit more. And same idea, the top ones here
are the SEI photographic ones, and then the bottom ones are with the SII
photographic and Fooocus enhanced style added, and it definitely makes a big difference on
those images as well. So, combining multiple styles can make a big difference as long
as they're not fighting against each other. Now, onto a couple of the more interesting
ones here. Now, the photo iPhone photograph iic one is geared towards making it look
like it was taken with an iPhone. That's basically all that's to that. What does that
show for results? Well, I don't own an iPhone, so I'm assuming the idea is it's more of like a
cell phone thing like that. So, these are the sort of results you're going to get. That definitely
improves the picture. It is different than how the other ones, because it's not necessarily
going more for that professional look. The same idea with the iPhone
photographic compared to the no style with the scenic pond definitely
makes a huge difference on those. When we look at the iPhone photographic with the
iPhone photographic and Fooocus enhanced, we can see the same idea. It takes those same
images and theoretically improves upon them. But then again, that really goes, depends
on what you're going for, for the look. You may not be going for that specific look
that you're getting with the enhanced. Now, the one thing I have noticed when I
was doing a lot of these images when it came to people is one thing to note between
these two models, which is not specific, but I did notice that the Hello World
model seems to pull back further when it 's doing these images. That's one thing I noticed
when I was doing these prompts of just a person, whereas like the Juggernaut would zoom in
more. The Hello World one is further out. The Hello World one would be a lot easier to get
full body shots, probably, than Juggernaut is. Now, onto our next one is the
MRE spontaneous picture one, and I actually like this one because it can make
your images, I find, look more natural, like not, well, not posed. You'll get less of a posed look.
This is, you know, which makes sense, looking the keywords, taken by a talented amateur, uh, magical
moment, simple but good looking, um, natural look. Now, if we look at the results on this between
the style, no style, and the spontaneous picture, I think it's pretty evident that the bottom ones,
for the most part, to me, look less posed. It's not as evident in these pictures as much, but
usually that is the case with these, so it's not going to drastically, the spontaneous picture
doesn't necessarily drastically change it overall. Like I said, it just gives it that more natural,
spontaneous picture look is what it's going for. Now, if we compare, I did a different one
here, a beautiful woman in at the park, and I used the photographic style and then
used the spontaneous picture style. You know, the ones at the top definitely look like they're
being posed for a photo and everything else, whereas the ones at the bottom look like they were
just taken just out at the park on an everyday walk. So, I find this is the one I recommend when
I get a lot of people who ask me about, you know, how can I make my pictures look more natural
and not professional, posed, and all this sort of stuff, and the spontaneous picture one, I
do find, works well for that sort of thing. You can also add other keywords into the, your
prompts as well for that, like candid, casual. Now, when we look at using it with
the iPhone photographic and the iPhone photographic spontaneous picture
and not as much of a difference there, in all honesty. A little bit different,
but not drastically different. I will leave you with one last style
that you may not be aware of, noing Photography. This one creates nice images
like these with everything laid out. Now, that should give you some ideas on what
some of the photographic styles you can use with stable diffusion and how they
affect the images that you generate. In future episodes on styles, I do plan
on diving more into the creative styles, since those are what I use more often than the
photographic ones, and those are a lot more fun. If you found this video helpful, please do
consider hitting the like button, and, of course, I do accept donations and would like to thank
those who have donated since it does make a huge difference. I did just recently set up a Patreon
account as well that I'll be using to help support the channel, and we'll offering some things
like free images with metadata from Fooocus. Thanks for watching, and have fun creating
