SHOCK MOMENT: FBI Official Admits Doc Alleging Biden Took $5 Million In Bribes Exists To Hawley

thank you Mr chair Senator Hawley thank you Mr chairman Mr body let me just stay with you you just started to answer Senator Blackburn's question that not releasing the 1023 or talking about it as a matter of life and death question of life and death you said explain it is potentially a question of life and death for whom with regard to the source of the information so okay so now we've confirmed that the document exists that's progress because the FBI director initially denied that it exists why did he do that we we have already and previously acknowledged the existence of the documents yeah after you first denied it now when a member of this committee read it right the FBI let's just get the record straight the FBI director initially said it doesn't exist then Senator Grassley said I've read it then he said oh okay well gotchas I guess it does exist now you're going back and forth with members of this committee what's in it why don't you just release it is it classified the document is not classified okay will you commit to releasing it Senator will take that back and we will work with you in this committee uh how about just say yes or no will you commit to releasing this unclassified document that alleges that the president of the United States the president of the United States has taken 5 million dollars or more in bribes from a foreign Nation the document has already been released pursuant to a subpoena to the house oversight committee has it been released to this committee work with this committee within the parameters that are established will you release the document to the public it's unclassified don't you think the American people have a right to see it Senator the document as you know contains sensitive information that has bearing on the life of the source of the information potentially you can redact the source's name we do this all the time in some instances Senator and I know you know this that is not sufficient to protect people and that's what we strive and work to do each and every day and I hope you would take that seriously too oh I take it very seriously but I also take seriously the fact that your institution has repeatedly abused its Authority has repeatedly targeted political opponents your institution is the one that went to the door of pro-life protesters with SWAT teams to try and intimidate people because of their speech your institution is the one that treated parents as domestic terrorists because of their speech your institution is the one that according to the court the fisa court ran 278 000 unwarranted probably illegal queries on Americans right that was your institution correct there with respect to the compliance incidents yes some of the other things you cited we can take them one by one they're not compliance you you would characterize the unlawful querying 278 000 times of American citizens as compliance issues we've said before I've said that that totally unacceptable who's been fired for it individuals involved are handled through the disciplinary process who's been fired for it we have their in the in the case of the unintentional instance where something similar happened we have fired people in the past well I'm sorry what what does that word salad mean the unintentional instance where some what does that mean who's been fired for the 278 000 times that you improperly or illegally query the database for American citizens anybody when we find intentional incidents well you're saying that the 278 000 queries were unintentional I believe that's correct wow 278 000 times American citizens information was queried by your agency unintentionally that's your testimony I would want to go back and check that Senator uh well that's what you just told me my understanding is that the vast majority oh wait that's different you just said it was you just said it was unintentional now it's the vast majority which is it do you know I would want to go back and check it so you don't know my understanding is that likely all are were unintentional likely all so first it was all of them then it was vast majority now it's likely so you don't know is the answer to the question I don't know the answer as we sit here today but I will start with that probably who was fired for the lies to the fisa court for the Carter page Warren who who was fired for that anybody has anybody been held accountable for your institution deliberately lying to a fisa court to get a wiretap on an ongoing presidential campaign there is an ongoing disciplinary process with respect to individuals involved in that here's the deal you're back in front of us asking for the reauthorization of extraordinary authorities multiple courts have uncovered extraordinary abuses perpetrated by your agency you are at the same time concealing information about serious allegations made against the president of the United States even as your institution also targets his chief political opponent in an unprecedented way why would we ever give you the blank check that you want to continue surveilling American citizens in an improper manner why would we ever do that Senator we're here to talk about reforms today I did get confirmation that the query no we're not we're here to talk about the reauthorization of section 702 why would we reauthorize it given your track record of abuse and illegal and proper surveillance and political targeting why would we do that why would it be appropriate for this body to do that we've made significant reforms and implemented corrective measures we've seen significant progress as a result of that Senator the uh so worries that you mentioned earlier were in fact unintentional that's what I was just told by my counterpart so your testimony is the 280 000 queries of American citizens was unintentional that's your final answer that's how they were assessed by that team that did the review I'm not satisfied with that that's why I don't believe that implemented further measures as I announced earlier today yeah I I don't believe that at all and frankly we've heard from your agency a thousand times that you're going to do better we'll do better you've promised after the abuses of Title One you do better and then we find out that in the meantime your illegal queer illegally querying 280 000 American citizens data it's just it's unbelievable frankly everything you say is unbelievable Senator Tillis

Channel: Forbes Breaking News

Views: 3,106,086

Keywords:

Id: H5N7s0vRQk0

Length: 6min 42sec (402 seconds)

Published: Tue Jun 13 2023

Reddit Comments

[u/keypuncher]

...and the video also shows the FBI stating that the life of the source is at risk if the document is released.

I ask again: from whom? Who would kill a source to prevent them from testifying that the US President took bribes?