Prisoner Re-entry: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Video Statistics and Information
Channel: LastWeekTonight
Views: 8,825,905
Rating: undefined out of 5
Keywords: HBO (TV Network), Last Week Tonight With John Oliver (TV Program), John Oliver (TV Writer)
Id: gJtYRxH5G2k
Channel Id: undefined
Length: 18min 44sec (1124 seconds)
Published: Sun Nov 08 2015
Please note that this website is currently a work in progress! Lots of interesting data and statistics to come.
The Tomato Grower Everyone!
I can't imagine having been in a jail in the middle of nowhere for 30 years, and then get thrown out with no ride and a $20 gift card in hand. Yes shows portrait the re-entry as a positive turnaround, but there are also characters like Brooks in Shawshank Redemption who went nowhere after being released and ended up hanging himself. (And who knows if Red would have done the same after 50 years if it hadn't been Andy)
It might be silly to suggest it, but there should be a government or a nonprofit organization that hooks these ex-con up and manages their lives, being the liaison between them and the criminal system. Otherwise it's no surprise that 60% of the ex-cons get rearrested in 3 years.
Ah man this show is back on track! No "I TOLD YOU SUZY, BUT YA KEEP DOING IT! YOU'RE THE WORST, SUZY!" jokes and little "It's like when..." jokes. Plus an interview, which I hope becomes a regular thing.
I am not smart and technologically limited. If someone wouldn't mind providing a mirror for non-Americans, I would be very grateful.
My grandpa grows tomatoes. I think I have some questions about his past.
Loved that ending. Glad he went through with the interview, gave it a very good finish. What a great person, and tomato grower.
I agree with most everything Oliver said in his segment and on a basic level believe that after a person has done there time in jail that should be the end of it. However, as someone who has been on the employer side of a job, maybe I can shed some light on their plight in this debate as well. Two major areas are probably the most important.
First, parole. It is insanely easy to violate parole. And it's hard to justify taking a chance on someone that you may have to replace again in a week. Though I think that says more about our parole laws then employers, it something that has to be taken into account.
Second is liability. Thankfully, I never had to deal with this one, but I have seen business sued and lose in court because they hired a felon who then committed a crime against one of their clients. i don't say this as a blanket "all criminals will keep committing crimes" statement, but it does highlight another increased area of risk that has to be considered. As an employer you basically have to ask yourself how much you trust this person you barely know anything about other than a few basic things and the fact they have a criminal record to not commit another crime and screw you over.
There are no easy answers to either of these questions.
Disqualifying someone for a felony conviction before they've demonstrated their competence directly effects recidivism rates ... and it's also absurd & makes no sense
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)